{"id":2578,"date":"2020-11-19T21:35:01","date_gmt":"2020-11-19T20:35:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/predication.net\/?p=2578"},"modified":"2020-11-19T21:35:03","modified_gmt":"2020-11-19T20:35:03","slug":"old-testament-scenario-of-the-origin-and-the-universe-6","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/predication.net\/?p=2578","title":{"rendered":"Old Testament scenario of the origin and the universe 6"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
The sixth day is the day of the birth of terrestrial game and man. Here again, problems arise that require a more detailed analysis. Above all, the most debated problem arises here, whether the man in all its complexity is also the product of development, or it is necessary to presuppose direct divine intervention. A text from the Bible could testify favoring the second view: “Then God said,” Let us make man in our image, like us. ” j. on the ability to think and make free decisions. If we supplement the austere quotation with another text from the source, we are offered an interpretation that is much closer to the scientific opinion. We cannot doubt that man also has a long development and that it did not arise all at once in its current form.<\/h2>\n
Elsewhere in the Bible, we read, “Then God made man out of the clay of the earth, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life.” originated. In order for this creature to get “mentally”, it was necessary for God to “breathe life” into it. Science cannot competently comment on this problem because it has not yet found any bridge between biological systems and systems characterized by self-reflection and thinking. And so, it is quite possible that in the process of evolution, God intervened creatively when he breathed into man’s soul. Despite these as yet unresolved problems, we can rightly state that there is an excellent correlation between religious and scientific opinion even on the sixth day.<\/h2>\n
There is another, not uninteresting, idea of \u200b\u200bthe sixth day of creation. If man were a phenomenon that had absolutely nothing to do with the rest of the living world, especially animals, one would certainly devote a separate day to it in the biblical script. In fact, it is claimed there that man was created practically together with animals, which apparently meant to demonstrate that the “bodily” basis has the same. This is in line with what modern science has arrived at – over 90 percent of genes are common to the entire animal kingdom. We thus come to the surprising conclusion that Darwin’s principle is actually implicitly present in the biblical text on creation.<\/h2>\n
Thus, we can state that the rapid development of science in modern times does not deepen the contradiction between science and faith. Still, on the contrary, information from these two sources essentially converges to the same truths, only formulated differently depending on the specificity of the languages \u200b\u200bthey use. As if Paul Davies’s statement was being fulfilled: “It may seem bizarre, but science provides a safer path to God than religion.”<\/h2>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"