Old Testament scenario of the origin and of the universe 1-2

Before examining the “Old Testament scenario” of the universe’s formation and evolution, several serious caveats statements should be considered. The first is the Papal Commission’s conclusion for the Interpretation of the Bible in the Church of 1993. It says, “… The literal interpretation of the book Genesis about the creation of the world is unscientific fundamentalism.” Next: in the regular reading of the book Physics, the reader can get the impression that the text binds only to our Earth, partly to the Sun and moon, at most to our solar system. The author (or authors) was probably to provide necessary information about the emergence and development of the real world at all. The fact that the information provided is associated with and happening on Earth is related to the fact that in those times, the entire universe was reduced to Earth as its center; everything else consisted only of objects of secondary importance. If we wanted to understand the book Genres’ text by attaching it exclusively to the globe and not to the entire universe, we would be in serious conflict with scientific facts. There is no doubt that the Sun was here more like planet Earth, therefore under the name “earth” in the statement: “In the beginning, God created heaven and earth,” it is not possible to understand our planet, but the basis of all the real world and from such a point of view we will try to some confrontation of the statements of the “biblical scenario” with the testimonies of the “scientific scenario.” For a long time, it was quite strange, and it was often seen as evidence of the mythical nature of the Bible, that the author of the book Physics placed the creation of the Sun until the fourth day, but the birth of light already by the first day. Where did the light come from without the Sun?

Whatever the reason, we now know that this is the only way to do it. We have already stated that the first phenomenon generated by matter in the Big Bang was light, more precisely severe electromagnetic radiation. We also know that soft forms part of a wide range of electromagnetic radiations, so the use of the word ‘light’ is justified here and, given the information our ancient ancestors had, in fact, only possible. This “light” in the form of relict radiation has been preserved until now. And so we see that when it comes to the first “day” of creation, the consistency between the information from the book of Physics and the conclusions of contemporary natural science is admirable. According to the scientific scenario, the only difference is that the “first day” of creation lasted approximately 300 thousand years. The divine activity of the second “day” of creation, according to the book Physics, focuses on “water separation.” According to the scientific scenario, there could not have been any talk of water yet, because the oxygen, which formed an essential part of the water, did not exist at all  the time. But the division was still there. Not water, but hydrogen (more precisely its nuclei) separated from 88 Faith versus Science radiation as a separate phenomenon after the process of generating “light” was completed. This department corresponds with the biblical division of waters and has, as we have already stated, the scientific name ‘space recombination.’ Thus, even with the second day of creation, there are no problems in scientific scenarios if we interpret the symbols used appropriately in Genesis’ book.