-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
When a shepherd’s work stinks
Actors, influencers and artists are also shepherds. They have a huge impact, too. Their words, attitudes, humour and values shape the thinking of generations.
We need pastors who are not afraid to say that just because something is legal, it doesn’t mean it’s good. Not everything that is modern is true. Not everything that is popular leads to life. We need people who are truly ‘in’ — not for the paycheque or for algorithms, but for the truth about humanity and God’s plan. The document Dignitas Infinita warns against digital violence and ideologies that break down a person’s identity. Publicly known personalities have enormous power in this area – they can either deepen or heal wounds. A good pastor does not seek applause. He seeks the truth. He has the courage to live by it publicly.
Posted in Nezaradené
1 Comment
St.Louis Grignion de Montfort Mt 28, 16-20
CURRICULUM VITAE
He was born in Montfort, a village in Brittany. He became a priest in Paris. He taught people about the path to holiness and to Jesus through Mary. Pope Clement XI appointed him as the Apostolic Missionary of France. He played a key role in establishing the Congregation of the Daughters of Wisdom and founded a male religious community that would later become known as the Montfort Society of Mary. Following a demanding ministry, he passed away at the age of 43.
His Marian writings contain prophecies about the end times of the Church.
CV FOR MEDITATION
ANNOUNCER OF THE SAFE PATH TO JESUS
He was born on January 31, 1673, in western France, where he was baptized in Montfort, 20 km east of Rennes. His father was a notary, temperamental and violent. After about two years, their family moved a few kilometers away to their farm, Bois-Marquer, belonging to the municipality of Iffendic. Louis was the second of 18 siblings, eight of whom died early.
From the age of 11, Louis was at the Jesuit college of St. Thomas Becket in Rennes, where 2,000 young men studied. There, he became friends with Claude Poullart, later founder of the Fathers of the Holy Spirit, and with Jean Baptiste Blain. In Rennes, Louis also had an uncle who was a priest, and he became his confidant. The Grignion family also moved to Rennes two years later.
Louis was intelligent, diligent, artistic, somewhat shy, and deeply religious. That was how his professors saw him. While praying in the church of Our Lady of Mount Carmel, he decided to become a priest. After eight years of study in Rennes, another eight years of theology awaited him in Paris.
He said goodbye to his family and saw the crossing of the Cesson bridge as a symbolic entry into a new life, which he wanted to live in complete dependence on God’s Providence. He expressed his conviction of a loving Father by giving his luggage to the first beggar, all his money to people experiencing poverty, and reportedly exchanging clothes with another beggar. These were his first joyful steps in a consistent life according to the Gospel. He experienced happiness in trusting in God’s Providence and begged for food and shelter along the way. He felt his freedom in complete surrender to God’s Love, Eternal and Incarnate Wisdom, Jesus Christ.
In Paris, he was housed with poor seminarians and attended lectures. He only entered the St. Sulpice Seminary after two years. The professors there recognized his talents and good qualities. His “weakness” was his love for people of low income and his desire to serve those on the fringes of society. He identified with the most neglected. He worked as a librarian at St. Sulpice and was an avid reader of books on Marian devotion. He greatly broadened his horizons by studying the spiritual writings of important figures, including the Church Fathers. He knew the Bible very well and used it a lot. He longed to be a missionary to the poor, whether in France or abroad. He decided to proclaim the good news of God’s love to the outcasts of human society, that Jesus loves them, and that Mary’s maternal care. His desire was for Jesus and his Mother to be loved by as many people as possible.
At the age of 27, he celebrated his primogeniture in the church of St. Sulpice on June 5, 1700. His further priestly ministry, like his studies, lasted only 16 years. He initially worked among missionary groups and served in the almshouse in Poitiers and in the General Hospital in Paris.
He wondered whether God was calling him to a mission elsewhere, and in 1706, he went to seek advice from Pope Clement XI. Noting the extraordinary gifts God had given Louis, the Pope rejected his offer of a distant mission. Instead, he appointed him an apostolic missionary and sent him back to his homeland, then overrun by Jansenism, to restore the Church there.
Louis de Montfort returned on foot to Poitiers and, in the power of the Spirit, preached the Gospel and taught about the baptismal consecration of the Eternal and Incarnate Wisdom, Jesus Christ, Son of the Virgin Mary. In Poitiers, he also began to found, with Marie Louise Trichet, the female religious congregation of the Daughters of Wisdom. He made the blind woman superior.
Although influenced by the Jesuits and the Sulpicians, he entered the Third Order of St. Dominic in 1710. He organized two hundred missions and retreats in the western region of France. Some admired him, others rejected him. His lifestyle was considered undignified. He carried a Bible, a breviary, and notebooks in a bag over his shoulder. In some dioceses, the episcopal consistories did not even allow him to preach. When it was said that Louis de Montfort had many enemies, he replied that he knew no one but those who flattered him and spoke well of him, and that his best friends were those who caused him great crosses. It was probably not an isolated incident that he gently picked up a dying, dirty, sick beggar on the street, as in Dinan, and carried him to the nearest religious house, calling to the doorman: “Open to Jesus Christ!”
His sermons were filled with his own experiences of God’s love and Mary’s maternal care, and they brought thousands of souls to faith. He recommended daily Holy Communion and Marian devotion. He taught the path he himself had taken: “Through Mary to Jesus”. He taught that the more our soul is devoted to Mary, the more it also surrenders itself to Jesus Christ. He pointed out that in such a form of piety, one can see the perfect renewal of baptismal promises and commitments. In it, the believer surrenders himself to the Virgin Mary, so that through her he may belong completely to Christ. To the Virgin Mary because she was the most suitable way that Jesus himself chose to unite himself to us, and for him to receive us into himself. And Jesus is our goal. Through him and with the cooperation of the Holy Spirit, who is called the Spouse of Mary, we encounter the Father. Mary thus introduces us to the Trinitarian mystery. As the Holy Father John Paul II, who belonged entirely to Mary, said: “No intervention of Mary in the renewal of Christians takes place in competition with Christ, but comes from him and is at his service. I understood that I could not exclude the Mother of the Lord from my life without disregarding the will of the Triune God. The entire Christocentric and Marian spirituality taught by L. Montfort comes from the Trinity and is directed towards it.”
With this teaching, Louis de Montfort successfully fought against Jansenism, which even the higher clergy had absorbed. His successes unleashed a storm of hell against him, and he overcame all adversities with patience, meekness, and humility, unafraid of public opinion. During the mission at Pontchateau, with the help of thousands of people, he built a hill and erected a Calvary on it to make it a place of pilgrimage. Before it was consecrated, the bishop ordered it to be demolished. Louis de Montfort replied to the thousands awaiting the consecration of Calvary: “We hoped to have a Calvary here, but let us build it in our hearts! There the Cross of Christ will stand better than in any other place.”
In 1713, he founded a second congregation, the “Missionaries of the Society of Mary”, a priestly society known as the Montfort Missionaries, which, after his death, became the “Montfort Society of Mary” (SMM). This society spread throughout the world. In 1715, he founded the “Teaching Order of the Brothers of St. Gabriel” to teach catechism to people with low incomes. Some mention is made of the care of the sick.
Posted in Nezaradené
1 Comment
St.Petrus Kanisius Joh 10,1-10
CURRICULUM VITAE
He came from the Dutch city of Nijmegen. He studied at the University of Cologne and, on May 15, 1543, entered the Jesuit order in Mainz. In 1546, he became a priest. He participated in the Council of Trent, worked in Messina, Sicily; took his vows in 1549, and obtained a doctorate in theology and was then sent to Germany, where for thirty years he worked to revive and strengthen the Catholic faith in the face of Protestantism. In 1556, he became provincial of the Jesuits and brought the brothers of the order to Prague. In addition to Germany and our homeland, he also worked in Austria and Switzerland, where he died at the age of 76.
CV FOR MEDITATION
IN PEACE, LOVE, AND PERSEVERANCE
He was born on May 8, 1521, in Nijmegen in the Duchy of Geldern (in present-day Holland), then part of the Holy Roman Empire of the German nation. His father was the local mayor. He lost his mother early on, and his father devotionremarried. He then had 8 more children, among them Theodoric, who later followed Peter into the order.
Peter is said to have longed for the priesthood since childhood, although his father’s plans were different. While studying at the University of Cologne, he visited the monks of the Charterhouse of St. Barbara and other religious men who combined Dutch humanism with German mysticism and devoted themselves to a spirituality called devotio moderna – modern piety, which was about spiritual renewal.
In 1540, Peter obtained the title of Master of Liberal Arts and then, while studying theology, he also devoted himself to scientific work, from which he published two volumes concerning the church fathers Cyril of Alexandria and Leo the Great. At that time, he met Peter Favre (d. 1 August) and held 30-day retreats under his devotion, and on 8 May 1543, he entered the Society of Jesus in Mainz.
When Archbishop Hermann began to lean towards Protestantism in Cologne, he became the spokesman for those who wanted to remain faithful to the church, and in 1545, he met Emperor Charles V three times and spoke to him about the seriousness of the situation.
He was ordained a priest on June 12, 1546, and by 1562 he had become known as a preacher in Germany, Switzerland, Austria, and Bohemia.
From February to June 1547, as theologian to the Bishop of Augsburg, Cardinal Otto Truchsess, he attended the Council of Trent, where he collaborated with Diego Lainez and Alfonso Salmerón. The cardinal selected him at the Diet of Worms, where they both met with Emperor Charles V.
Peter Canisius was then called to Rome by the founder of the order, Ignatius of Loyola (b. 31 July). There he completed his formation and in the spring of 1548 was sent to the seminarians in Messina, Sicily, to teach them rhetoric, Latin and Italian. From Messina he was recalled to Rome, where on 7 September 1549 he took solemn religious vows and received a blessing from Pope Paul III. Then on 4 October he received a doctorate in theology in Bologna and was sent to Germany, where he worked for thirty years to revive and restore the Catholic faith.
Canisius’ spirituality recalls his ascetic life and loving devotion not only to Jesus, with whom he experienced a deep personal friendship, but also to the Virgin Mary, with whose help he carried out his apostolic mission. At the very beginning of his life, already in Rome on September 4, three days before his vows, he had, according to his spiritual diary, a vision of the Divine Heart. He wrote: “Then it was as if your most sacred body opened its heart to me – it seemed to me that I was looking directly into it – and you commanded me to drink from this spring, because you, my Savior, never cease to invite me to draw from your springs the water of my salvation.” He also recounts a vision in which the Savior gave him a garment sewn from three parts, which are peace, love and perseverance—the virtues necessary for the apostolate that Peter was sent to carry out in Germany.
His activity in German territory began in the Duchy of Bavaria. In 1556 he was appointed provincial of the order, under whose jurisdiction Austria, Bohemia, Poland, and Switzerland also belonged. He founded Jesuit colleges that helped implement reforms according to the Council of Trent. He opened the Clementinum in Prague and brought 12 Jesuits to an abandoned monastery. Protestants showed their hatred towards him by throwing stones at his services and calling him a “dog”, after Kanijs (from the Latin “canisius”).
His successful work did the most to preserve Catholicism in southern Germany, and his most widely distributed work was the three Catechisms, which he wrote around 1556-57. In the first, he explained basic theological concepts to students, in the second, he presented the basics of religious education for young people, and in the third, he wrote for high school and university students. He used the question-and-answer format briefly and very clearly. With the Catechism, which was published 200 times during his lifetime and was published until the end of the 20th century, he shaped the faith of the people.
He also prepared the publication of prayer books in various languages, texts of homilies and biographies of Swiss saints. In Worms in 1557, he participated in discussions with Protestant representatives. He always faithfully adhered to every dogmatic truth and at the same time showed respect for every person. As he sent a message to Rome, he recognized that the majority of Germans had converted to Protestantism through no fault of their own and distinguished between conscious apostasy from the faith and its innocent loss. He wrote three volumes to refute Protestantism: On the Incarnate Word, On the Virgin Mary, and On the Papacy.
He was offered the rank of Bishop of Vienna three times and always refused it. In 1558 he served as papal nuncio to Poland. The following year, in 1565, he attended two provincial assemblies in Augsburg. At the final session of the Council of Trent in 1562, he spoke on the question of communion under both kinds and on the Index of Forbidden Books.
From 1580, he preached and wrote in Freiburg, Switzerland, where he also died at the age of 76.
He was beatified in 1864 by Pius IX and declared the second apostle of Germany by Pope Leo XIII in 1897. In 1925, Pope Pius XI canonized him and declared him a Doctor of the Church.
RESOLUTION, PRAYER
It is easy to make a long-term resolution, but difficult to persevere in it. For our relationship with all others to whom we are to communicate the faith, it is necessary to be full of peace, love, and perseverance. To clothe ourselves with these virtues means to become accustomed to and to come closer to the image of Christ, the second apostle of Germany.
O God, who strengthened Saint Peter Canisius to defend the Catholic faith with love and wisdom, through his intercession, grant to those who seek you the joy of finding you and to those who believe in you perseverance in faith. We ask this through your Son Jesus Christ our Lord, who lives and reigns with you in the unity of the Holy Spirit, world without end. Amen.
Posted in Nezaradené
1 Comment
A Gospel rich in detail
Saint Mark was a close collaborator of Saint Peter in Rome. In fact, he helped Peter so much that, in one of his letters, the Apostle refers to Mark as his son (cf. 1 Pet 5:13). Mark accompanied Peter on his preaching tours and, at the request of the Romans, wrote his Gospel based on Peter’s sermons. Peter himself, upon hearing it, authorized it to be read in the church.
In his Gospel, Mark omits some of Jesus’s great sayings. Instead, he vividly describes the moments he spent with the disciples. He pauses to describe the atmosphere of the places they visit, contemplates the Lord’s gestures and recounts the Apostles’ spontaneous reactions. In short, he enables us to appreciate the charm of Christ’s character, which attracted the Twelve and the first Christians.
During the early years of his priestly ministry, Saint Josemaría gave away copies of the Gospel as gifts. He explained that, like Saint Mark, we need to keep the life of Jesus “in our heads and hearts, so that at any moment, even without a book and with our eyes closed, we can contemplate his life as if in a film”. The first Gospel is written with such detail that it is easy for us to enter into Jesus’ earthly journey. With the help of our imagination, we can relive some of the scenes from his life and gradually develop the same feelings and thoughts as Christ (cf. Phil 2:5).
Mark, Paul’s friend…
Before he lived in Rome, Saint Mark was one of the earliest Christians in Jerusalem. He was the cousin of Barnabas, who invited him to preach the Gospel. They both set out with Paul on his first apostolic journey (cf. Acts 13:5–13), but not everything went as they had hoped. Upon arriving in Cyprus, Mark realised that he could not continue and returned to Jerusalem. This must have caused Paul to feel resentful; when they planned a second journey and Barnabas wanted Mark to accompany them again, Paul objected. The group therefore split up, with Paul and Barnabas going their separate ways.
Years later, when Mark found himself in Rome, he met Paul again, and we see them collaborating in the proclamation of the Gospel. realizedn. When he had to leave, Paul wrote to Timothy: ‘Take Mark with you, for he is useful to me in the ministry’ (2 Timothy 4:11). The problems they had experienced in Cyprus were forgotten. Paul and Mark were friends, working together on the most important thing: spreading the good news about Christ.
In our daily lives, it is normal to have certain conflicts with those around us, as Paul did with Mark and with his companions in bringing Christ to people. These conflicts may arise due to different approaches to a problem, certain difficult-to-understand character traits, or many other reasons. Fatigue itself can accentuate these frictions. However, what matters is not these differences, which will always exist, but our ability to recognize this diversity as a source of richness. In this way, we can value the people around us like Paul did, recognizing that what unites us is greater than what divides us. As Saint Josemaría said: ‘You must also constantly practice the fraternity that is above all natural sympathies or antipathies, loving one another as true brothers and sisters, with the care and understanding that are characteristic of those who form a well-united family.’
Leaving the safety of the shore…
Saint Mark concludes his narrative with Jesus’ call to the apostles to spread his word: ‘Go into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature’ (Mark 16:15). Not only did the evangelist accept this command, he also tried to put it into practice. recognizinget off on other adventures, leaving his homeland behind.
‘Life is strengthened by giving and weakened by isolation and comfort.’ Indeed, it is those who make the most of life’s possibilities who leave a certain shore and allow themselves to be inspired by the mission of communicating life to others”.⁴ Saint Mark had the same experience. Initially, he felt disoriented, moving away from the peace and reality he knew, but he was ultimately able to venture beyond the safety of the shore and share the joy of life with Jesus throughout the world. Through his gospel, he also helped later generations of Christians to know the Lord more closely.
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment
St.Fidelis of Sigmaringen
| April 24 reminder | |
| Position: | religious priest and martyr OFMCap |
| Death: | 1622 |
| Patron: | lawyers, assistants, in judicial matters and in spreading the faith |
| Attributes: | Capuchin, club or mace and sword |
CURRICULUM VITAE
He came from Sigmaringen in Swabia, which is now part of Germany. Studying law in Freiburg under the name Marek Roy, he then practiced law. In 1612, he became a priest and took the name Fidel when he joined the Capuchin order. Representing the newly formed Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith, he combatted the heresies spreading in southern Germany and Switzerland. He was eventually arrested and murdered by heretics because he refused to renounce the Catholic faith.
THE LOYALTY OF THE ADVOCATE OF THE POOR
He was born in early October 1578 in Sigmaringen on the Danube in southwest Germany. He was given the Christian name Mark. He had four siblings. His father, Jan Roy, was a mayor and judge, but apparently died when Marek was still young. His mother’s name was Jenovéfa, and she is said to have cared for the orphans with a guardian.
Mark, as the most gifted, was sent to Freiburg, where in 1601 he obtained a doctorate in philosophy. He then continued his studies of civil and ecclesiastical law, which he interrupted in 1604 and traveled with young German nobles through France, Spain, and Italy as their leader until about 1610. After returning, he completed his studies with a doctorate on May 16, 1611, and then served as a lawyer and court councilor in Ensisheimcombatedlsace. Unlike his colleagues, he uncompromisingly defended the rights of those who needed it, he stood up for the poor in the first place and was therefore called the lawyer of the poor. Once his fellow lawyer said to him, “Doctor, I beg you not to be too fair. Just deviate a little from your principles, and you will make a great profit from it.” Perhaps this was the last straw that caused a change of profession—embarking on a spiritual path.
He decided to enter the Capuchin order, but first, in the quadrant, he longed for priestly ordination. He had completed some of his studies earlier, completed the rest, and became a priest at the end of September 1612. A few days later, on October 4, he entered the Capuchin novitiate in Freiburg, Germany. There, with the religious habit, he also received the new name Fidel (Latin Fidelis), expressing fidelity to the faith, and on that occasion the quadrian reminded him of the words from the Book of Revelation: “Be faithful until death, and I will bestow upon you the crown of life” (Rev. 2:10). And those words became his motto.
After the novitiate, which ended in 1613, he received further theological education in Constance and Frauenfeld. In 1617, he preached in Altsdorf and then for about five years held the position of quadrian, superior in several Capuchin monasteries. He also raised the moral level of the faithful with his sermons. He was a sought-after confessor, counselor, and if necessary, even in his habit, he went to court to help the poor enforce their rights. He himself led a very simple life with frequent fasts and other self-denials. He lived faithfully to the Virgin Mary, because walking with her meant for him also the path of faithfulness to Christ, to whom she directs everyone. Spirituality on his spiritual life were published in print under the title Spiritual Exercises (Exercitia spirituality). In later editions, the title was changed to spirituality of Seraphim Piety.
In addition to Alsace, Fidel also worked in Switzerland and Vorarlberg. From the end of 1621 on, he worked in the Rhaetian mission, whose task was to prevent the spread of Calvinism and strengthen the Catholic faith in eastern Switzerland. The Roman commission (later congregation) for the propagation of the faith appointed him superior of the mission on 19 April 1622. However, this appointment was towards the end of his life. He signed his text as Brother Fidelis, soon to be buried.
His last assignment was in Seewies at a time when religious hostility, especially among the Calvinists, fueled by political disputes, often led to bloody riots. Fidelis was therefore offered an armed escort for his missionary journey to Seewies, which he refused. His brother John then asked him what they would do if they were attacked. He replied, “What else but martyrs of God? We would gladly undergo death for God.” In his sermon, he then emphasized and explained the words: “One God, one faith, one baptism.” At that, one of the Calvinists began to shoot at him. Fidelis was not hit and quickly went outside because he did not want the murderer to desecrate the church. He walked towards the neighboring village but was stopped by the Calvinists, who wanted him to convert to their faith. He replied to them, “Dear brothers, I have not come to you to accept a distorted faith but to preach to you the true faith.” After these words, they attacked him with swords and a spiked club and murdered him.
He became the first martyr of the Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith. He was declared a saint by Benedict XIV in 1746.
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment
Fourth Sunday of Easter, Year A: John 10.1-10
Asking for the gift of gratitude, love, ideals, and humility…
The fourth Sunday of Easter is traditionally called ‘Good Shepherd Sunday,’ so it is not surprising that the word ‘shepherd’ appears several times in biblical texts (in all cycles). So, let’s start by trying to understand who the Shepherd actually is, what his role is, and why he is important. After all, how many people in our society today are familiar with the hard work involved in being a shepherd? Our image is perhaps too idealized: a pipe, a blue sky, rolling grass, birds singing overhead, and sheep bells jingling.
In ancient times, particularly in the Near East, being a shepherd was a serious profession. It was a poor person’s profession; the sheep did not belong to them, yet they were responsible for them. They had to locate pastures, which was not easy in a dry, arid environment. Moreover, they had to move from winter to summer pastures twice a year, sometimes traveling hundreds of kilometers. They also often had to fight other shepherds for access to pastures and springs. During the day, the shepherd guarded the flock so that none of the sheep ran away and at night to prevent theft or attacks by wild animals. They were always awake and alert, providing the sheep with safety, protection, pastures and water, just as the psalmist sings in today’s Psalm 23. They also had to provide direction and constantly count the flock, calling to them — the sheep remember the voice of their shepherd well. The sheep depend on the shepherd for everything; they must trust him, and he must deserve their trust. If we transfer this image of the shepherd to Jesus, then only He can truly say: ‘I am the good shepherd; I know my sheep, and my sheep know my voice’. No one has ever cared more about us, the sheep of his flock, than he has. Being a sheep of Christ is not a degradation but a privilege: belonging to Christ. To have the Son of God as my shepherd, who knows me personally and knows my needs, my joys, my worries and even my sins, yet still loves me, and calls me by name! Knowing someone’s name is always an expression of a personal relationship, especially in the mentality of biblical people. He knows my name and knows me above all. As a good shepherd, he feels responsible for me, he loves me and he cares for me!
As I mentioned at the beginning, today is known as ‘Good Shepherd Sunday.’ Whenever we read the Gospel of John, Christ says of himself: ‘I am the good shepherd!’
In Biblical Hebrew, the verb ‘to be’ does not have the same tense as in English. This is reserved exclusively for God, who alone speaks about himself: ‘I am who I am!’ (Written in Hebrew script, which has no vowels, as YHVH.) This word, Yahweh or Jehovah (with vowels added depending on whether those from the names ADONAI or ELOHIM are used), is applied by Jesus Christ, the Son of God, to himself. This use of God’s name outraged the Sanhedrin, priests and Pharisees, who considered it blasphemous. From their perspective, it was blasphemy that deserved the death penalty.
Although we did not explicitly hear the aforementioned ‘I am the good shepherd,’ we initially heard rather unflattering things: ‘I am the door.’ However, these are not ordinary doors. Here, it is the entrance to the sheepfold, and only the shepherd is permitted to enter through it. If someone else enters the sheepfold—this place of safety—they do not enter as a shepherd but as a thief. The Pharisees and high priests treated the prophets, as well as Christians, as usurpers who broke into the souls of God’s people. Because they imposed only one interpretation of God’s law and one view of God, Christ calls them “thieves and robbers.” Jesus is the only just and good shepherd because he gives his followers freedom: ‘I am the door.’ Whoever enters through me will be saved. They will be able to come in and go out, and find pasture’ (an expression of freedom). ‘I have come that they may have life, and have it abundantly. ‘ The Son of God is the giver of life!)
We also heard the beautiful expression of the good shepherd in Psalm 23. As a priest, I know that most people at Holy Mass do not understand the psalm texts, the singing, or the drone from the pulpit. For many, the psalm merely serves as an addition to the table of God’s word, rendering its meaning elusive. However, I believe you would all be able to recall today’s psalm because the words “The Lord is my shepherd, I shall not want” are probably familiar to us all. This is probably because we have heard it before, either as listeners to Antonín Dvořák’s beautiful Biblical Songs or as attendees of funeral ceremonies, where this psalm is often recited.
So why not enjoy this beautiful psalm as a “dessert” to today’s biblical readings?
‘The Lord is my shepherd; I shall not want.’ And what about us? Do we really lack anything? Each of us could list several things we lack, and sometimes this is noticeable. I don’t know anyone who would answer: ‘I am happy and content; I have everything I need.’ Only the rare ‘simpletons of God’ in the tradition of St Francis and his followers would answer that way. And yet, the answer should actually be self-evident. Why don’t we reflect on our complaints and what we lack? If we are honest with ourselves, we will realise that, except for health — both physical and mental — everything else is important and essential but not actually necessary. How many things and needs can we easily do without? But can we live without love? Or without inner peace, joy, and balance? And, of course, can we live without bread and water?
(Just to emphasize how much happier we would be if we realized what is essential and non-essential in life, and what is necessary and what is not. If only we were aware that our happiness will be fulfilled only if those around us are happy thanks to us… Let us listen once again to the words of the psalmist: ‘The Lord is my shepherd, I shall not want. He makes me lie down in green pastures and leads me beside quiet waters; he restores my soul.” This image represents the satisfaction of all a person’s basic needs: the need for satiety, represented here by the ‘green pastures’. After all, if the Lord is the shepherd, then we are his flock, his beloved and lovingly cared-for sheep. This is not only in terms of physical and biological needs. The Lord is a shepherd who feeds and waters his sheep, gives them rest and security, and protects them. With him, we can rest and he will refresh us. He will restore freshness, strength, joy, and hope, especially to our souls. He does not leave us helpless and groping: ‘He leads us in the right paths,’ and most importantly, he watches over us, providing protection and security.
We could go on with Psalm 23, but you can do that sometimes alone at home, in peace, in contemplation. I will end with the last verse: “Surely goodness and mercy will follow me all the days of my life, and I will dwell in the house of the Lord for ever and ever.” Is there any need to add anything to these words of invitation? Perhaps just a request. To see ourselves through the eyes of Christ, the eyes of the shepherd, and to ask for the gift of gratitude, love, and humility. May the gifts of the Spirit accompany us with Christ “all the days of our life.”
Posted in sermons
Leave a comment
Where is the definitive life?
This is the will of the one who sent me: that I should not lose any of those he has given me but raise them all on the last day.’ Jesus remains in the Eucharist so that our hearts may be safe while we walk on earth, with our gaze fixed on heaven.
In this part of the Bread of Life story, Jesus encourages his listeners to take a leap of faith. Having fed them with earthly bread, he now wants them to long for heavenly bread. The Master wants to focus the crowd’s attention on the ultimate: eternal life. The people wanted Jesus to provide them with daily bread, but he wants them to understand that true security lies in placing our existence in his hands and allowing him to guide us towards eternity. ‘For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him shall have eternal life, and I will raise them on the last day.’
We strive so hard for earthly security! Yet we often find that it is fragile. Our hard-won gains can be lost through misfortune, but we can still be brought down when we see them disappear. Jesus does not want us to lose heart when faced with life’s setbacks. That is why he remains with us in the Eucharist, so that we may discover rest and safety in him, keeping our gaze fixed on heaven as we walk the earth.
The Church refers to the Eucharist as ‘a pledge of future glory’ (see Catechism of the Catholic Church, no. 1402). Jesus himself undertakes to open the gates of heaven to us if we receive the Eucharist devoutly throughout our lives. Ultimately, this is what has the greatest value; our successes or failures, changes of plans, etc., are relative. In contrast, the Eucharist offers a final, definitive life.
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment
St. Anselm
April 21, non-binding commemoration |
|
Position: |
church teacher |
Death: |
1109 |
Attributes: |
crutch, book, ship, monk, pen |
CURRICULUM VITAE
He hails from the northern Italian city of Aosta. While wandering through France in his youth, he learned that the world’s vanities cannot make a person happy. He arrived at Bec, where the monk Lanfranc helped him rediscover his love for piety and a virtuous life. He entered the Bec monastery and became Lanfranc’s successor, later becoming abbot himself. In 1093, he was appointed Archbishop of Canterbury in England, a position from which he was exiled twice. He wrote numerous philosophical, theological, and mystical texts, earning him the title of the “father of scholasticism.” Through his actions, he finally secured the church’s freedom.
CV FOR MEDITATION
WITH GOD’S GRACE HE ACHIEVED THE FREEDOM OF THE CHURCH
Anselm was born in 1033 in Aosta, Piedmont, into a wealthy family. His mother, Ermenberg, raised him well, but she died young and he did not get along with his strict father, Gundulf. His father’s frequent criticism and anger hindered his upbringing, and, at the age of 16, he left home, crossing the mountains to France, where he wandered aimlessly for three years. Although he sought entertainment, he felt empty and despondent inside.
Reflecting on the purpose of his life, he decided to study at the Benedictine Abbey in Bec, Normandy, where the renowned monk Lanfranc taught. He studied diligently, mastering the basics that his devout mother had taught him and completing his conversion. Following his father’s death, he renounced the world’s vanities forever, using his inheritance for charitable purposes. At the age of 27, he accepted the monastic habit of St Benedict.
As a monk, he excelled in a pious and ascetic lifestyle, continuing his studies zealously. Three years later, when Lanfranc was appointed abbot of the monastery of St Stephen in Caen, Anselm succeeded him as prior in Bec. He led the monks with humility, patience, meekness, and kindness. He observed religious rules, fasted, taught at the monastery school during the day, and divided his nights between prayer, research, and writing learned books, devoting very little time to sleep. He often meditated before the crucifixion, feeling regret for his past offenses. He hated sin and had great respect for the Virgin Mary. He took a fatherly approach to caring for sick monks. People came to his school at Bec Abbey from various parts of France, Germany, the Netherlands, and England. Following the example of St. Augustine, Anselm supplemented Christian truths with rational arguments, showing their depth and organizing them scientifically, which made him famous.
He combined theology with the teachings of the ancient Greek philosophers, laying the foundation for the scholastic philosophical system. He believed that one must first have firm faith in God’s revelations and the Church’s teachings before embarking on a scientific journey. His guiding principle was ‘I believe in order to understand.’
His writings gained him such fame that even popes and rulers were interested in him, and many sought his advice. His writings were copied throughout Europe.
His simple lessons, drawn from everyday events, are also worth noting. For example, when an abbot complained to him about the disobedience of his young charges, Anselm pointed out that even wholesome food such as dry bread would harm a small child, who needs milk above all else. Similarly, young people need kindness and patience; without these, severity is harmful. Without love, distrust and hatred of all beneficial things flourish in young people. Just as a goldsmith must bend, shape and smooth gold to make a golden vessel, so an educator must have love as their main principle.
He once saw a young man playing with a tied-up bird, releasing it and then pulling it back again. He drew the lesson that the devil plays with souls in a similar way. Those accustomed to sin want freedom, but as soon as they make progress, they are dragged back into unrighteousness by the devil through the power of their passions. They can only be free when, with God’s grace, they break free from their evil habits.
Following the death of Abbot Herluin in 1078, Anselm was elected as his successor. Since the Bec Abbey also had estates in England, Anselm had to travel there several times to negotiate with King William I.
However, after William I’s death, his son William II, also known as William the Red, succeeded him. During this period, the Church in England experienced difficult times. William II assumed the right to appoint clergymen to the bishopric and abbey, from whom he made a profit by collecting pensions for his wars, and he ignored the Pope’s words. The Archbishopric of Canterbury was also abandoned, and its pensions were appropriated by the king. He summoned Anselm to his court and promised to rectify the wrongs if he recovered from his serious illness. Anselm was elected Archbishop of Canterbury, but he accepted the position very reluctantly, aware of the future tribulations. His fears that William II would continue to oppress the Church after his recovery were realised. Anselm was sorry that some bishops did not dare to resist the violent king. They even tried to persuade him to support them in their quest for peace. He is said to have replied to them: ‘I understand. If you wish, go to your master. I will stick to God!’ He strove to be a good shepherd, fighting against sacrilege in his archdiocese. He acted persistently, consistently, and deliberately, yet gently, against the king. Nevertheless, the king wanted to overthrow him, threatening that if he visited Rome, he would not be allowed to return to England. Nevertheless, after saying goodbye to his clergy, Anselm went to see the Pope in 1097. Urban II received him in Rome and promised to help him defend the Church’s rights in England.
While in Rome, Anselm fell ill. While convalescing in the countryside, he wrote the book Why God Became Incarnate. After negotiating with William II for some time, he became the Pope’s advisor and was invited to a church council in Bari, southern Italy, where the schism with the Greeks was discussed. There, Anselm defended the teaching that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son. The behaviour of William II, whom the bishops wanted to excommunicate, was also discussed there. However, Anselm begged for a postponement of such a step. The laws prohibiting the investiture, or confirmation, of church dignitaries by secular rulers were renewed..
In 1099, Anselm left Bari for a council in Rome, and from there he traveled on to Lyon, as negotiations with the English king were taking too long. In autumn 1100, William II was fatally wounded by an arrow while hunting, and Anselm wept for his unrepentant death. Henry I, the new king, was intimidated by the fate of his predecessor and summoned Anselm from exile. Anselm then exercised his pastoral office in peace for three years. However, Henry I did not want to relinquish his supposed right to appoint bishops and thus came into conflict with Archbishop Anselm. The king demanded that Anselm consecrate the bishops he had appointed or leave the country. So Anselm travelled to Rome again to meet Paschal II. Henry I also sent an embassy, but the Pope approved the archbishop’s actions. This angered Henry I, who banned Anselm from entering England again. He therefore took refuge with his friend, Bishop Hugh, in Lyon once more. There, he lived ascetically and did penance for the conversion of the king and his orphaned flock. Meanwhile, his sister tried to reconcile him with the king. Finally, in 1106, the king met with Anselm in Normandy. Henry I renounced his supposed right to investiture, wanting only an oath of loyalty from the bishops and abbots, which they were to take while tied to the altar.
The people rejoiced at Anselm’s return, and Queen Matilda venerated him as a saint. The king even appointed him temporary administrator of the empire in his absence. As long as his health permitted, Anselm remained very zealous. Towards the end of his life, however, he was no longer able to celebrate Holy Mass and would only have it carried to the church. During Holy Week, clad in a sackcloth robe sprinkled with ashes, he died at the age of 76.
RESOLUTION, PRAYER
I will offer tithes to the Church and make a vow for the same purpose.
O God, who granted the holy bishop Anselm the ability to comprehend the depths of your wisdom and to teach it to others, grant us the same grace, so that we may joyfully receive the truths that you reveal to us in our hearts and be guided by the light of faith. We ask this through your Son, Jesus Christ our Lord, who lives and reigns with you in the unity of the Holy Spirit, now and forevermore.
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment
Returning to the initial encounter with the Lord
The people who had been listening to Jesus all day received the grace of the multiplied loaves. Seeing Jesus’ power, they wanted to proclaim him king. They had first followed Jesus to hear him speak and had also asked him to heal the sick. They stayed all day, listening to Jesus without getting bored or tired. They were happy there. However, when Jesus gave them food, which they had not expected, they thought: ‘This would be a good ruler for us! He will surely free us from the Romans and make our country flourish.’ They were excited at the prospect of making Him king. But their intention changed after they saw it, and they said to themselves: ‘Indeed! Anyone who performs such a miracle, providing food for the people, could be a good ruler.’ But at that moment, they forgot the enthusiasm that Jesus’ words had aroused in their hearts. Jesus withdrew and went away to pray. The people stayed where they were, and the next day they looked for him. They thought he must still be there because they had noticed that there was only one boat, and that Jesus had not entered it with his disciples. They did not know that Jesus had overtaken the disciples by walking on water. They decided to go to the other side of the Sea of Tiberias to look for him. When they saw him, they asked: ‘Master, when did you get here?’ It was as if they were saying: ‘We don’t understand this. This is strange.’ Jesus took them back to the initial feeling they had experienced before the multiplication of the loaves, when they had listened to the word of God. ‘Amen, amen, I tell you, you are looking for me not because you saw the initial signs — the words and healings — but because you ate the loaves and were filled.’ Jesus reveals their intentions and says, ‘You have changed.’ They defend themselves: “No, Lord, no…” They were humble, and Jesus continued: ‘Do not work for the food that perishes, but for the food that endures to eternal life, which the Son of Man will give you. God the Father has set his seal on him”. They ask in good faith: ‘What must we do to do the works of God?’ ‘Believe in the Son of God’ (cf. Jn 6:28-29). Here, Jesus corrects the people because, halfway through, they have moved away from their initial spiritual consolation and set out on the wrong, worldly path.
It leads us to reflect on the fact that in life we often begin by following Jesus with evangelical values, but halfway through, something else comes to mind; we see another signal, we move away and adapt to something temporal, material, or mundane, and perhaps we forget our initial enthusiasm that we felt when we listened to Jesus. The Lord always returns to this first encounter, to the first moment when he looked at us, spoke to us, and aroused in us the desire to follow him. This is the grace that we should ask the Lord for, because in life we are always tempted to move away when we glimpse something else. “That would be good, that is a good idea…” We move away. [Ask for] the grace of constantly returning to the initial vocation, to the first moment: not to forget, not to forget my history, when Jesus looked at me with love and said to me: “This is your path”; when, through many people, he allowed me to understand the path of the Gospel, unlike those other paths, somewhat worldly, which have other values. Let’s go back to that first encounter.
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment
