-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
He taught them as one who has power. Realize the power of your word as a Christian.
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment
Testimony. To witness Jesus.
What experiences do we have with the testimony of faith? Haven’t you noticed that even “Christians” are ashamed to confess their faith? The man was talking about his co-worker. One day, this co-worker visited me. As I spoke, I asked him, “Have you ever heard the Gospel?” “No,” he answered, “but I have seen it.” I know a man who was the terror of the whole neighborhood. He was an alcoholic and a drug addict; he was as dangerous as a wild beast. But he was utterly changed by the influence of the gospel. Now he is kind and good and has given up alcohol altogether.”
In today’s Gospel, Jesus was not accepted by his natives because the words came out of his mouth: “You will remind me of the words: Physician, heal yourself!” We have heard all that happened in Capernaum; do the same here, in your homeland” (Lk 4:23). The Lord Jesus comes to his people, and they know him: Joseph’s son. They recognize him as their countryman, of course – and as such, he is not attractive to them, and they show him no recognition. They know him as their countryman – but not as the Messiah. As such, he wants to introduce himself to them when he reads the Messianic passage from the prophet Isaiah; the prophet points to him, but they do not accept it in mind or heart. When we look at the example of those Nazarenes, we can understand what it means to know Christ. It means to come out of darkness, from the darkness of error, deception, and insincerity. To know Christ means to free oneself from egoism, avarice, pride, sensuality, and comfort; allowing yourself to tell the truth – above all, the truth about yourself; it means accepting the truth – even if it’s unpleasant, complex, or inconvenient. Lord Jesus will not spare us such facts, even though we are his own for him – precisely because we are his own.
When he became man, Christ found his homeland among us; let him be a rare prophet in this country, even if he reveals brutal truths to us; for these truths, for our liberation from darkness, he sacrificed his life. No one is a prophet in his own country. The proverb can be misused. Jesus asks us to bear witness to the truth in this world, in the environment where we live and work. That is, to resist the false currents of the present, showing in one’s life that it is possible to live in a different, more beautiful, and perfect way. This will make many around us question the meaning of life.
Our testimonies with preaching about faith can be different. It is necessary that we first look carefully at our life. We do not want others to do what we do not do. The father says: The son drank, he also hit me… I once shouted at him: “Did they teach you that in religion and church?” He answered me: “Shut up! I never saw you as a Christian.” That day, I entered my conscience and changed my life.” From each other and for each other, I need to live the testimony of faith.
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment
Faith in a changing world .
How modern society has affected the self-understanding of the church?
Suppose we avoid the two extremes of uncritical acceptance of “the world” or outright rejection. In that case, we can embark on a path of differentiation and integration that can be mutually beneficial.
1. Our editorial office delivers quality journalism that helps hundreds of thousands of people not to be swayed by emotions and populism
and to make better decisions in elections.
2. We are independent of political pressure; we have no millionaires or financial groups behind us, and our editors have
the freedom to write openly and stand on the side of truth.
3. Above all, when you support us, you enable us to keep the Attitude open even for those who cannot afford it.
Occasionally, questions arise in the public debate about whether faith and morals are wholly inviolable and not subject to some development.
Some ask whether the dominant Christian church should adapt its opinion on some anthropological questions according to the general idea, which is supposedly based on a scientific worldview.
Behind this reasoning is the belief that the interpretation of basic Christian themes is subject to specific developments and should be adapted to life in the modern world.
It is a serious and legitimate question based on the observation that the Christian faith, with its content and interpretations, is constantly confronted with the worldly way of life and somehow reacts to it.
When I talk about the secular way of life, I do not mean it pejoratively, but I understand by it any human activity that is not explicitly sacred.
At this moment, it is optional to develop a view on topics that are lively debates in the public space.
The relationship of the church with the world
In general, the gospel is not a doctrine for the elect. In Scripture, we find a clear message that God wants everyone to be saved. The Gospel was not announced to keep it in a narrow group of experts as some philosophical theory. Still, by the commission of Jesus, the disciples were to spread it wherever possible.
With this task and the dispersion of the apostles to different countries, the question arose of how to interpret the message of Jesus delivered in a specific language, in a particular time and space, to people of different nationalities and cultures.
Entering a different cultural environment with any thesis means knowing it well and choosing the means of communication to bridge the already known and new content with the potential to integrate all of this.
From a human point of view, the apostles could not rely only on the realities of the Palestinian environment and the Law of Moses when testifying about the resurrected Christ because it was largely unknown to the majority of the inhabitants of the Roman Empire and adjacent territories.
From the beginning, Christianity appeared as a reasonable faith, the primary stimulus of which is God’s revelation, but it does not contradict the requirements of human thinking.
In principle, there are only two options in such a situation. Either you will convince the listener to discard their previous way of life and culture and start from scratch, or you will come to the conviction that there is a difference in every lifestyle, which means accepting the good, building on it, and rejecting the bad.
It is true that in some cases, missionaries in past centuries resorted to the first solution, causing cultural damage and human suffering to the inhabitants. Fortunately, most have gone about it the other way from the start.
It seems that the church, as not only a divine but also a human institution, was prone to distinguish more in a situation where it was in a minority position in society.
Ancient times are filled with the writings of many experts in the word of God called church fathers. These theologians had lengthy polemics with the humanists of their time. Greek philosophy influenced the formation of Christian theology. Church fathers reacted to the stimuli that appeared as counter-arguments for the acceptance of Christianity.
Thanks to these apologies and polemics, we can state two things. From the beginning, Christianity appeared as a reasonable faith, the primary stimulus of which is God’s revelation, but it does not contradict the requirements of human thinking.
The Church and the world influence each other.
At the same time, it became clear that Christianity and the world influence each other. In this case, modern philosophy speaks of the hermeneutic circle.
This influence results from the essential experience of the presence of Christianity in the world, which, as a universal interpretation for understanding the origin, meaning, and ultimate goal of man, is permanently embedded in the person of the individual in a concrete life situation, where it is to be realized and proven in cooperation with man and God’s grace.
The renewed interest in spirituality cannot be understood as an interest in religion as a system. Instead, a kind of fluid spirituality is on the agenda.
The mutual interaction between the Christian faith and the world carries a particular debate. On the one hand, it is necessary because a Christian lives in this world; he cannot isolate himself or force others to accept the Christian faith. Therefore, we expose the reflection of dedication to constant confrontation and questioning, which someone can understand as confusion and threat.
On the other hand, there is a risk that the wrong integration of the Christian message with contemporary thinking can distort interpretations of the Christian faith.
Some believers believe that the threat of the distortion of the faith is such a significant risk that it is not appropriate to expose the faith to confrontation with ideas that appear fundamentally flawed or toxic. The inclination towards such an attitude may be more widespread in an environment where Christians are in the majority.
However, a look into the past, especially the first centuries, bears witness to the courage for polemics and confrontations. This approach carries certain risks but ultimately makes understanding the Christian faith more mature.
Suppose we avoid the two extremes of uncritical acceptance of “the world” or outright rejection. In that case, we can embark on a path of differentiation and integration that can be mutually beneficial.
The meaning of the topic “church.”
The Catholic Church has undergone some development in this direction. From ancient times, when it was in the minority and more open and adept at polemics, through the Middle Ages, where it became dominant and self-confident, to the Enlightenment, which confirmed and strengthened secularization trends and became a catalyst for reevaluating attitudes towards the modern world.
Interestingly, when Christianity ceased to be a unifying element of society, the importance of churches began to grow because these communities were the de facto face of Christianity in front of secular society. Therefore, it does not matter what image the church gives of itself and how it understands itself.
For this reason, debates about the church and its meaning are increasingly coming to the fore. The Church became the central theme of the First and Second Vatican Councils. At the same time, a debate is taking place in various forms in the church environment, in which the site of the church in society, its approach to this topic so far, and possible starting points for further thinking are being critically re-evaluated.
This discussion is of crucial importance because the ability of the church to fulfill its mission, i.e., its missionary character, depends on the answers to these fundamental questions because God wants all people to be saved.
The church should not only be the one that sanctions but also the one that communicates. She can be a strict “mother” and a loving “sister.”
There were several attempts to find a new perspective. From authors who asked themselves questions, sometimes offered cautious, occasionally extreme solutions, and scared the leadership of the Catholic Church so much that it called them modernists and sometimes unnecessarily cracked down on them, through gifted individuals like Cardinal Newman or Pierre Rousellot to the Dominican and Jesuit schools, whose main protagonists, especially from the French environment, tend to be referred to by the term “new theology.”
We are once again witnessing a paradox. The environment of France, which was a natural laboratory of secularization within Europe, with formally the strictest approach to the Catholic Church, generated several theologians and scholars who significantly contributed to the renewal of Catholic theology and the formation of a new line for defining the relationship between the Christian faith and society in the aforementioned hermeneutic circle.
This whole renewal is marked by a return to the sources, which in practice means new translations of the Holy Scriptures from the original languages and a rereading of the works of the church fathers, which will prove to be crucial.
Thus, the issue of dialogue, which Pope Paul VI raised for the first time in modern times, comes to the fore in the middle of the Second Vatican Council in the famous encyclical Ecclesiam Suam. Its revolutionary nature lies not only in raising the topic and establishing dialogue as the primary pastoral tool but in defining the circles where it should be applied: Christian churches, other religions, secular culture, and within the Catholic Church.
The Holy Spirit will teach us everything.
If we ask whether the church does not go too far in reflecting on the mentioned topics and risks losing a correct understanding of the true faith, the history of the first millennium testifies that dialogue with confrontation is possible and that the benefits outweigh the losses. It is not only this practical experience of the past but also God’s word that provides reason for courage.
The Son of God himself says that he remains with us until the end of the world in the Holy Spirit, who is supposed to teach and remind us of everything that Jesus gave us. The Church is a divine institution, so the Holy Spirit is the guarantor of preserving the true faith.
From his presence is derived the pneumatological principle “sensus fidei,” which says that the church as a whole cannot err in its faith precisely because of the presence of God’s Spirit, which gives believers, through the universal priesthood received in the sacrament of baptism, the ability to distinguish true from false faith.
All these considerations lead to the conclusion that the thesis “modern society has affected the church’s self-understanding” is not an admission to the liberalization of the Christian faith or an argument for rejecting the Second Vatican Council due to the subsequent decline of confidence in the Euro-Atlantic area, but a fact that follows from the very message of Jesus and his requirements for future disciples.
Instead, this thesis affirms that the mutual interaction between the Christian faith and the world has made the Christian faith more intelligible thanks to the church’s renewed self-understanding.
Mosaic of images of the church
The essential self-understanding of the church is based on the Holy Scriptures and Tradition, especially from the New Testament. When reading the Old Testament texts, the church fathers find foreshadows of this community founded by Jesus.
God’s revelation in Scripture and Tradition offers many images of the church, which together help to understand what the church is. Throughout history, depending on their social interaction, some have become more important than others. However, none of them are exclusive.
Instead, it seems their diversity is advantageous because it makes it possible to highlight those characteristics of the church community that appear to be the most important at the given historical moment. It is common for one model to be outdone by another. It is not his denial; instead, the church’s image comes to the fore, making it more understandable about its historical tasks and especially conveying the gospel message to each individual.
The ability of the church to create a community of people as a network of informal personal relationships is a substantial benefit for the contemporary person, for which he gets into a closer relationship with the church.
In modern ecclesiology, it is possible to see the development from the so-called pyramidal model after the Council of Trent to the emphasis on the church as Christ’s mysterious body to the model of the People of God preferred by the Second Vatican Council to the current dominant ecclesiology of communion.
The tendency to emphasize communion as a community in the church’s self-understanding today is not accidental. Instead, it is an intuitive response to the individual’s current requirements.
Postmodern philosophers often characterize our epoch as individualistic and see a person who lacks roots in the form of a stable family or other community in which he would feel secure. As social creatures, excessive individualization does not suit us, and we are looking for a network of informal, more personal relationships.
That is why today the church is often referred to as a community of communities, and the ability of the church to create a community of people as a network of informal personal relationships is a substantial benefit for contemporary people, for which they come into closer contact and a relationship with the church.
We live in a modern society. My modern way of life, which includes everything possible, affects the experience of my faith. The reverse is also true. The power of my faith corrects and regulates my life in modern society so that it does not prevent me from growing in confidence and, simultaneously, does not isolate me from contemporary life. This applies to the individual as well as to the church.
Modern society has influenced the church, not by reformatting its core or goals, but by helping it teach itself in every environment to proclaim the gospel while remaining faithful to its Founder effectively.
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment
Loyalty and responsibility. We will give an account to God for everything in our life.
Let us be responsible for everything that God has entrusted to us.
Jesus reminds us of this in the parable of the talents: “For to everyone who has, more will be added and he will have more. And from him who has not, even what he has will be taken” (Mt 25:29). Our task in life is to fulfill the will of God and thus gain a share in the kingdom of God. they received. Jesus compared the gifts from God to talents so that the listeners would better understand the magnitude of the facilities. Talent was the most significant financial unit in Asia Minor. To create a correct picture of the value of the talent, let’s remember that the Jewish talent was divided into 30 minas or 3000 shekels. One mina weighed about 436 g of silver, the shekel 8.4 g. It took about 15 years of work to earn one million. A talent was equal to 26 kg of silver, which meant that for the average Jew, wealth was practically unattainable. In today’s situation, one talent would be worth 70 thousand US dollars. This means that whoever receives more will rightly be asked for more; if expectations are not met, a harsher punishment comes. The parable of the talents does not exclude anyone from God’s love. Everyone gets talents. As humans, we were given health, beauty, family, various smartness, skills, talents, and how have we dealt with them so far?
When Edison was asked what he owed to his discoveries and inventions, he answered: “One percent talent and ninety percent hard work.” Louis Pasteur, the inventor of the cure for rabies and the discoverer of pasteurization, spoke similarly. As Christians, we received gifts in the sacraments – baptism, confirmation, reconciliation, the Eucharist, marriage, and the priesthood. We must not only turn our attention to him regarding rights, but we also have obligations. The world admires Blessed John XXIII, who amazed those around him with his moral, human, and theological principles. Those who read his “Diary Soul” know that he worked on the values he possessed gradually and slowly, from his student years until he died Pope; he worked on himself again and cooperated with graces from God.
Talent is not only a gift but also a task, an obligation. Sv. Augustine realized the principle: “God, who created you without you, will not save you without you, without your cooperation.” Talent does not only require natural, physical work but also spiritual and mental engagement. In the parable, Jesus is concerned with our cooperation. We do not want to be like the servant who buried the talent and returned it as it was received. It is not enough to produce; when God wants more, we are obliged to fulfill the task with which we have been entrusted. The righteous, dishonest servant deserved the statement and the follow-up: “Throw away servant out into the darkness; there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth” (Mt 25:30). Man need not fear God the Judge when he lives as God expects him to.
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment
Wise and foolish virgins.
Symbol of oil▪ The lamp does not burn without oil. So, it is a symbol of death. When does death occur? Even doctors distinguish between so-called clinical death and the natural end of life. There are sure signs that life in the body is ending. Is it over? But with death, we don’t even know the beginning. According to a Spanish song, one begins to die at birth. But this is about natural bodily life. We Christians believe in eternal life but also the eternal death of sinners. When do they start? Life here is equated with grace, symbolized by the lamp’s oil. So when does a person die? He loses energy in the truest sense the moment he loses sanctifying dignity. That is why grave sins are also called “mortal sins.” Although the sinner continues to live on earth, it is only like the flickering of the last remaining oil. Bodily death will reveal what was inside. So there is a big difference between people. Wolves are all wolves; sheep are sheep, writes Pseudo-Makarius. They look the same and are the same. However, people only look the same on the outside. There are sheep or wolves inside; they carry life or death.
Arrival in the middle of the night▪ The oil is stored in the lamp but lit when it gets dark. That is why all lamps look the same during the day, whether they have oil or not. When does it get dark? In the complete sense, only at physical death. But already in this life, there are many moments in which it seems to us that it is getting late, that we are in a fog, that we have lost our way. In these moments, one already recognizes that someone has or does not have the light of grace. It is a light that does not burn brightly but still enough so we do not lose the right direction. Even great saints sometimes experience periods of anxiety. It seemed to them that heaven was closed to them. Theresa of Lisieux also had such an impression before her death. But she had one certainty, and all believers have it: the certainty of faith, of trust. We cannot see ahead, but we still feel that our path is the right one and that we cannot leave it. Pseudo-Macarius, who we just quoted, explains these states by using the example of someone walking with a lamp against the wind. The fire blazes in all directions, but it does not go out. That’s why we value it all the more and are sure it will flare up thoroughly when the wind dies down and there is calm.
I expect a groom. ▪ Faith is like a leap into the dark. At least, that’s how it seems to the great converts when they finally decide to accept the faith. But why does he finally leap? One of them explained it nicely. We don’t understand anything at that point. The darkness is complete. But we feel that it is not empty. Someone is standing there, and we know that they will catch us, that we will not fall or hit each other. Oil is a symbol of eternal light. But what would be the use of lighting the house if it was empty and no one was waiting for us there? The comparison to the virgins and the bridegroom is appropriate in the biblical tradition. Scripture is the message of the living God. His life is not in time, not in place. However, there is an eternal meeting of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, three persons in unity, in an inaccessible light. Nevertheless, we have been given access to this. Therefore, we await the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ in blessed hope.
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment
What does it mean to worship God?
As James Pitre says, to worship something as a god is to bring to it sacrifices. “And Jacob made a vow: ‘If God is with me, if he will protect me on this journey, by which I now walk if he will give me bread to eat and raiment to put on, and if I return happily to my father’s house, then Yahweh will be my God, and this stone I have set up as a monument will be God’s house. And, of all things, I will give you tithes” (Gen 28:20-22).
This is the first and primary form of sacrifice. Where is your tithe going? Because that’s where your God is. That is who you worship. “Mortify therefore your earthly members: fornication, uncleanness, passion, evil lust, and covetousness, which is idolatry!” (Col 3:5) “Their end is destruction, their god is the belly, and shame is the glory of those who the earthly-minded.” (Phil 3:19)
***
Faith, hope, and love…
Do you believe that to be like Jesus in Heaven, you must be like Him
like Him on earth because He is the same Jesus and the exact likeness and unity? Do you have the sure hope that in the power of God’s grace, you really can? And especially love – do you want it? Do you like Jesus and desire to be like Him? Not just in His abilities (power, immortality – who wouldn’t desire that?), but also in His qualities such as love, mercy, and goodness, because one without the other does not exist.
***
The more we immerse ourselves in Christ, the more our inner man.
***
In the Church, you will encounter two kinds of people: the native and the stranger. Strangers attend the Church but do not live or work in it, for it is foreign. Domestics live and work in it, for it is theirs. By this, you will know them from one another.
***
There are two ways to approach Scripture. The first is to take Scripture as a foundation and, on that basis, as some detectives, start deducing and looking for the Messiah and all that and everything that goes with it. That’s what the scribes and rabbis did at the turn of the century. But the result was that they had Jesus crucified, and Bar Kochab declared Messiah… The second is that the foundation and starting point is Christ – and in His light, we approach the Scriptures, and they are revealed to us because they are illuminated to Christ. So it was that the Emausite disciples first experienced this when Jesus “opened to them the Scriptures” and “beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, expounded to them the things concerning Him in all the Scriptures” (Luke 24:27). Since then, the Church has done just that
and continues to do so to this day. There is no sola scriptura, but only one truth: Jesus Christ. He is the Alpha and Omega, no one else, nothing else. After all, even Scripture testifies that “no one can lay any other foundation, but then that which is already laid is Jesus Christ” (1 Cor. 3:11).
***
Be like a child. To be born again. To be a new creation. Scripture describes the depths to which we must go, leaving behind the ideas and patterns of our thought to accommodate the reality of Christianity, God, and the real world. To see things in a whole new way. Truly. As they are, not twisted by the illusions of the world. Also, one must leave, or rather, legally leave the human family of the world when he chooses to live that way. This, too, the Scriptures call our attention to as the price of the new life, including the hatred of the world, which is terrified of what is taken from it that differs from it, that it does not understand, that it cannot control, and that which transcends it. Sometimes, we call it mysticism and think it is unique
for the few. The opposite is true. What else is Heaven but mysticism?
***
To pray is to dwell in God’s world. That is why prayer is so important
(though not only for this reason): to get used to God and the things of God and God’s world can only be done by dwelling on it as much and as intensely as possible. The community in which this world materializes has a similar function, and we also learn to live it and live in it by unlearning each other, by inspiration, and by example.
***
Not only the Eucharist as such, but also the liturgy of the Eucharist itself is Heaven at Earth – precisely because it is not anything but liturgy. Whoever loves Heaven loves the Liturgy of the Eucharist because, in it, he experiences it. He who loves the Liturgy of the Eucharist loves Heaven because he already knows what it tastes like.
***
When one sees all the barrenness to which many separated brothers
grow up, one understands better why Jesus did not leave us here with the book of Scripture in our hands but chose to stay with us on earth, clothed in the Body of the Church, which He created for this purpose.
***
We prefer to flow with reality rather than flow with ideas.
***
Rejection of God and His actions – whether atheists or separated brethren – is similar to conspiracy theories. As a friend wrote to me atheist on Lourdes, “The commission was investigating whether a kind of healing was a miracle – I’m not going to discuss that; I don’t believe in miracles; the whole idea is absurd.” You don’t need to know anything. You don’t need to know anything at all to use reason. Just repeat the magic words “demagoguery” over and over again, “absurd,” “I don’t believe,” “bullshit,” “the Church is a criminal organization,” “Religion has caused all the wars,” etc. The problem, then, is that while knowing the facts and drawing logical conclusions require courage, some effort, and even the art of correct thinking, The latter involves nothing – and yet it is also convenient because we are confirmed in our ideas, which gives us a sense of importance (I’m the one who knows how it is, not those stupid sheep) and comfort (I don’t have to change anything about myself or undergo no effort of thought). Therefore, in the end, attempts to show similar people the reality essentially ring hollow – because their problem is not ignorance; it’s just a consequence of their laziness and their feeling of superiority over the rest of the filthy “plebs.”
***
Adulthood is about self-actualization – I know who I am! – and transcendence – I know who I serve! Both are autonomic.
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment
The history of the world becomes similar again and again.
Jesus often comes into contact with the scribes and Pharisees. We hear that even today, he addresses them: “Woe” (Mt 23 27). The Pharisees demanded the observance of many rules derived from tradition and unreasonably limited personal freedom. By interpreting certain parts of the law, they imposed on the people such obligations that they secretly overlooked and even deliberately avoided. They saw their primary mission as ostentatious piety. Nothing was too holy not to serve this purpose. God told Moses about His commandments. These words have a deep meaning. If a person thinks about God’s word and lives according to it, he is exalted by nature. God’s law’s principles will manifest in just and compassionate action. Man will not succumb to bribes and various other seductive temptations.
Thus, you testify against yourselves that you are the sons of those who killed the prophets(cf. Mat 23,29-31). The Jews were very eager to decorate the tombs of the prophets to show their respect for them. However, they did not heed their messages and words of warning. In the time of Christ, superstitious attention was paid to the graves of the dead, and their decoration required considerable expense. It was idolatry before God. By their indecent worship of the dead, people showed that they did not love God above all, nor their neighbors as themselves. Much of the same idolatry can be observed today. They widen their prayer straps and enlarge the fringes on their robes. They like to have the leading places at banquets and the first seats in synagogues, greetings in the squares, and even when people call them Master! Jesus says: But do not let yourselves be called Master, for one is your teacher, and you are all brothers. Do not call anyone on earth father, for one is your heavenly Father. Do not even be called leaders, because one is your Leader, Christ (cf. Mat 23,5-10). Here, the Savior revealed their selfish ambition, striving for a position of power, and exposed their false humility, under which a heart full of avarice and envy was hidden.
Jesus warns when, on festive occasions, the guests were seated according to rank, and those given the most prominent places were the center of attention and unique favor. The Pharisees still sought this honor. Jesus condemned these customs. He also reprimanded the vain desire to be addressed as rabbi and master. What is it like to be the guest of honor at a lavish banquet? You enter the banquet hall door, and your host gives you a big smile and leads you to the place of honor behind the top table. When is a person proud? How to distinguish pride from pride in the work done, which is only a natural reaction? A person should know his gifts and strengths and be healthy and proud of his accomplishments. There is only a tiny step between healthy pride and pride. It is in the view of others.
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment
Salome.
Who are you, Salome? Young, beautiful, talented, and somewhat inexperienced. Sometimes, it is more visible, less. Salome had an excellent opportunity to show herself. Perhaps she thought that her potential husband was among the diners. So she wanted to establish herself in her best beauty. And she succeeded. They noticed her. The king, who was her stepfather, tried to repay her. After all, she became his stepdaughter, so he saw an opportunity to gift her. And he was truly generous. Half a kingdom is not enough. Someone will say that he has gone crazy – for one dance. Herodias was worse off. She wasted a great deal. She also impoverished her somewhat naive daughter with her egoistic act. And it was great, after all. Beautiful “tinsel” for unwrapped and showed emptiness.
It would be easy to judge us… Salome is in each of us. We are young (80 years to eternity), beautiful, talented, and inexperienced. Sometimes more, sometimes less. We like to show off because profit is helpful for us. And we can enjoy generosity. And there are always kings who jump on our “honey.” They want to get us. And so they promise us something. They are successful in this – they call us drunk with dry bread. Then, we will also waste more significant offers than “half the kingdom.” The problem is not only in the menu but also in the fact that we are willing to sacrifice anything for the “dry roll.” We are so glad that we even offer the heads of our neighbors. This is the emptiness that convicts us. It would be easy to judge us… but God does not judge us… He wants to forgive us… Do we want His mercy?
Come to the deep: How do I react to the various offers of the world? How long will I be here on Earth, and how long in eternity? Am I paying adequate attention to this fact? Am I thinking about God’s offers?
Tip for you: Let’s try to do something for those worse off than us. But let’s not do it because they are miserable, but because they are people like us. We are equal.
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment
Woe.
It is surprising and astonishing that such words could come from the mouth of Him, who was meek and lowly in heart. Couldn’t the Lord Jesus have spoken more gently to these people? Couldn’t he win the Pharisees by meekness? He couldn’t if he wanted to move these cocky and self-righteous people. Unpleasant things should be discussed without embellishments and called by name. Lord Jesus strongly reproaches the scribes and Pharisees for closing the kingdom of heaven from people. How do they approach it? Because they represent this kingdom in a false light, as a kingdom of strict formalists, hypocritical sacrileges, or some consecrated elect who think that only they are given to know the secrets of the kingdom of heaven.
They close their hearts to them; when they consider less pious people as stupid, evil, unworthy, and incapable of God’s kingdom – they complete the kingdom to others. Just as the door to the domain can be closed to someone when we close our heart to him – so we open this door when we show love to the sad, tired, longing, and thirsty for justice and also to lost and fallen people – opening to them a compassionate, understanding, forgiving heart. In this way, through his heart, opened by a spear, Jesus Christ introduces us to God and the Kingdom of Heaven.
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment
