Watch your pride. Do not judge your neighbor.

When was the last time you asked Jesus for something? Maybe when we committed some sin that gnawed at our conscience. Let us not despise the sinner, but let us not love his sin. “Because they thought they were righteous and despised others, he spoke this parable” (Luke 18:9).

This parable is intended precisely for the Pharisees. To each of us. The Pharisees belonged to the higher group of people who had a great influence on the social situation in the country, and thus had a certain position in society. And this could lead them to exalt themselves above others. They often abused this position to their advantage. There are two people in the parable. The first, which represents the Pharisee, thinks he is righteous. Let us notice his prayer. In it, he describes himself, what he will do, and what he can renounce. By doing so, he points out to himself how perfect he is. What he claims is true, but that truth is from his point of view. In the prayer, he begins to point out the publican and his bad qualities. Toll collectors are nowadays employees of the tax office. The parable also features a tax collector who is aware of his sinfulness and regrets what he has done in his heart.

Will you agree that even today there are such Pharisees and publicans among us?! They are. And it may even happen that I am a Pharisee. Let’s try now, each of us inside, to consider which category I would fit into, a tax collector or a Pharisee?! I pray daily, I go to church regularly, and I go to confession every first Friday, maybe even more often, when I go to confession, I say to myself “I don’t have such serious sins, I pray the rosary every day, maybe some devotions, I read the Holy Scriptures I didn’t hurt, I don’t steal, I don’t cheat, I try to get along with everyone on good terms”….etc., simply – I’m not that bad, I live a spiritual life. So I probably won’t be a Pharisee.

How many times do I catch myself talking about others, but not in the good, but in the bad, and especially about his bad qualities? I notice who goes to church, how he dresses, how he behaves, whether he goes to communion, how he lives in a family, whether he argues with his wife, maybe he gets drunk, overpays, cheats on his wife, or a man’s wife, can’t get a job,… ..etc. And right here can be the problem that Jesus points to and that problem is pride. The same as the Pharisees. “I tell you, this one went home justified and not that one.” That is, the publican was justified and not the Pharisee. St. Paul writes to the Corinthians: “Therefore let him who thinks he stands to take heed lest he fall. ” This means if I think that I am managing to lead a spiritual life anyway, and I do not commit as many sins as others, I should thank God for this grace that He gives me. St. Peter and James state in their letters: ” God resists the proud, but gives grace to the humble.” That means pride is an obstacle. 

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

Fourth Sunday of Lent.

Jesus returns his sight (Jn 9:1-4
Have you ever met someone very happy because he confessed years later? And have you ever encountered the indifference that the nearest didn’t care? And you certainly know people who distort morality, and Christian ethics and look at sin in the wrong way. Yes, it happens. It is right when we can find time and listen to a homily on such a topic, and not only listen but apply its words correctly and to our benefit and benefit in our lives.

We should not overlook the words of Jesus: “I came into this world to judge: that those who do not see may see, and those who see may become blind” (Jn 9, 39).

These words are spoken by Jesus at the end of a long passage about the healing of a man blind from birth, who not only gains sight but also faith in Christ. The Pharisees took a different attitude towards Jesus, to whom Jesus says: “If you were blind, you would not have sin. But you say: “We see.” And so your sin remains” (John 9:41). The man blind from birth whom Jesus meets does not ask for healing, nor does Jesus ask him if he wants to see. The blind man in the gospel is simply there to show the power of God on him. It is necessary to realize how gradually a seeing person turns into a believer. At first, he simply obeys Jesus, although he does not understand why Jesus tells him: “Go, wash in the pool of Siloam,” which translates as Sent. He went, washed, and returned seeing” (Jn 9:7). Then in its simplicity the spirit acts. He knows nothing about the man who healed him. When questioned by the Pharisees, he calls the one who healed him a prophet. And while his parents are afraid to confess the truth in front of the Pharisees, the healed man is not afraid to ask the Pharisees: “Do you also want to become his disciples” (Jn 9:27)? And because of his behavior, which does not suit the Pharisees, he is banished. Here he meets Jesus, who heals him. Jesus introduces himself to him, and subsequently, he is healed and bows down to Jesus.
The closer Jesus gets to his death on the cross, the more intense his relationship with his enemies, the Pharisees. So it is with this miracle, one of the seven that Jesus performed. The event happened on Saturday, that’s why there is so much opposition from the Pharisees towards the healed man. However, a courageous person is healed. He sees the hostile attitude of the Pharisees towards Jesus, and despite this, he takes the side of Jesus, although he has to leave the synagogue. Man is the type ofpepperswho believes in Jesus, even if they cannot justify their faith with rational evidence. The words of Pascal apply to them: “The heart has reasons that reason does not know.” The parents of the blind man cannot be said to be brave. Precisely because of the exclusion from the synagogue, that they may lose their property, they let their son speak for himself: “He has his years, let him speak for himself” (John 9:23). Jesus foretold to the disciples that times would come when when “they are expelled from the synagogue” (Jn 16:2). The behavior and attitude of the Pharisees towards Jesus is permeated with hatred. They close their eyes to the truth. Neither cursing, nor insulting the opponents, and finally not even their violence will help them to win their truth. A lie is always a lie.
In the event of the healing of the blind man, we find more truths: Jesus is always faithful to the person who remains faithful to him. Another truth is that faithfulness always brings enlightenment. It may also cause the persecution of bad people, but the reward of faithfulness is always an intimate friendship with Jesus and a deeper knowledge of his person and his love.
Every encounter with Jesus is connected with judgment, namely, our attitude towards Jesus is our judgment of ourselves. When we see nothing in Jesus that we should love, and admire, then we condemn ourselves. If we see in Jesus someone worthy of admiration and love, then we are on the way to God. We see our weaknesses, but we have eyes that we can open even more and penetrate deeper into the truth. If we are not aware of our weaknesses and shortcomings, we are truly blind. He who begins to realize his weaknesses can become strong. It follows that only the person who is aware of his sinfulness can receive forgiveness. It is necessary to live with the knowledge that we are responsible for the talents of God. The Pharisees were not brought up in ignorance, and therefore they are condemned. They knew about the Messiah, and yet they did not accept him. A reminder of responsibility for the privileges we have.
The event of the healing of the blind man and subsequent events point to the words: “Light came into the world, and people loved darkness more than light because their deeds were evil” (John 4:19). People live in darkness when their deeds are evil. Whoever turns his face away from Christ, chooses darkness, does what God does not like. Whoever wants to live in sin seeks darkness, and flees from the Light – Christ, “so that his deeds are not revealed” (John 2:20). Sin can so blind the eyes that a person loses the concept of beauty, goodness, hardens, becomes alienated from people and himself, and especially from God. He who loves the filth of his sins cannot love Christ. He flees from Christ because the Crucified One disturbs him and reminds him that man must be a child of God and not of the devil. Every sinner is blind because he does not see where good, and happiness is, and the smell of mud is more fragrant to him than the smell of a flower.
On the contrary, whoever turns his face to Christ, heals him from eventual blindness. That is why let us become apostles, Christians, brothers and sisters who are not indifferent to the soul of a brother or sister from the neighborhood, who are in sin and are blind. Our prayers, a personal example, but also conversations and tough, serious ones, must be used to help the blind soul to meet his Redeemer – Jesus.

They lived together for twenty-five years. They trusted each other. They were both attractive. She was sure that she was still his love. He had a position that made him lead a double life. When he was in his fifties, she got hold of evidence of her husband’s infidelity. She couldn’t handle it mentally. From treatment, he writes a letter to his cousin, who is a practicing Christian, asking for advice and help. In response, she read: “I see a solution. Stop limping on two sides. Make a decision for God once and for all, find a priest to whom you can open your heart and listen to what he tells you.” She followed the advice. She recovered, and the marriage was restored, but since then they no longer build their security on human foundations. She found Christ. Today she knows where she made mistakes and unhealthy compromises. She only cares about being with her man in eternity. She doesn’t blame him for infidelity, she started living again and differently.

Through us, as his instrument of love, Jesus calls us to lend a hand to those blinded by sin and help them find the right path. If the physically blind needs a helping hand, the one who has lost God in his heart through sin needs it even more. He who is in sin is blind because he does not see good. God will also allow the cross to fall upon us because then we become more receptive, ore and earlier we find time for God, for prayer. It is in the cross that many regain their sight. Let us receive those who return to Christ as the prodigal son with understanding and love as a father from the Gospel and not as an older brother.

If we are healthy, if our soul sight is not diseased, we still live in the awareness that we are threatened and should be vigilant. We must not expose ourselves to the loss of sanctifying grace, let us experience friendship with Jesus more and more with joy. When we do not underestimate prevention in the area of ​​bodily health, it is all the more right that we pay attention to the prevention of the soul from any sin.

Ján already knows today that he mustn’t tell himself that nothing bad can happen to him, that he doesn’t need God or anyone to advise him, help him, confess his transgressions to someone for a happy life, even more so he doesn’t need priests, confession, a church. He was, they say, a strong man. Admired. Flighted. This was the reason why he did not estimate as much as he can, what he can afford, what is the limit of possibility, and later also the limit of decency, etiquette, ethics, morals, and lity. Today he knows that he is not a friend as a friend. He was disappointed especially by those who tapped him on the shoulder, who ran up to him, who only saw his body, who mocked him, who took advantage of him, and when they gave him something, it was just another step into the mire of human indignity and betrayal of God’s sonship. Today he thanks God that those he called parasites of society, dark people, and sanctimonious people took care of him. Today he is one of us, and yet with rich experience,
We also have many similar experiences. That is why even today we feel in Jesus’ words: “I came into this world to judge: that those who do not see may see, and those who see may become blind” (Jn 9:39), the relevance of today’s society and us personally.

That is why we give thanks for every sacrament of reconciliation, where Christ – the doctor of our souls – gives us a healthy perspective on life. That’s why even today we don’t want to stay only with the words we heard, but already at mass we pray for the light of the Holy Spirit: what, where, and how to act in faith

Posted in sermons | Leave a comment

Let’s learn true love, let’s keep the love of Jesus.

All of us who have to fight for true love, because we know daily the attacks of the temptations of the flesh, the world, and the devil, long to be strengthened to resist and persevere in true love. Jesus’ words are clear: “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your mind, and with all your strength… You shall love your neighbor as yourself!” There is no other, greater commandment than these” (Mk 12:30-31).

The Synoptics (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) noted the importance and need for the commandment of love. Already in the Old Testament in the Book of Deuteronomy (cf. 6:4-5), this command was not understood as something restrictive, but as the greatest wisdom. Whoever knows this command of God, God’s advice, or guideline for life should accept it as the greatest wealth. The lawyer asks Jesus the question: “Which commandment is the first of all” (Mk 12:28), it cannot be understood as a provocation or a bad intention. The lawyer listens to how Jesus correctly answers the questions of the people from the crowd.

The Jews had 365 positive and 248 negative commandments. Such a number can confuse which order is the first, the most important, and the most essential. Jesus answers. Two commands that do not stand next to each other in the Old Testament, Jesus connects, so to speak. It is essential for us that Jesus not only combines these commands but also interprets them: “There is no other, greater commandment than these” (Mk 12:31). Jesus combined two commands, which no one had done before him. He teaches that one commandment without the other cannot be separated. One commandment without the other would be incomplete. To love God and not to love your neighbor is not true love. The truth is that God wants to be loved in a twofold way of love: indirectly through people and directly through devoted gratitude of faith.

The commandment of love leads us to follow God, who is love. The view of the world teaches us the love with which God loved a man before he created him. The whole world is a song about God’s love. Jesus expressed his love with words and confirmed it with his death. Could we have received more from God than we received in the Eucharist, the mystery of love, when we have the living and true God present among us in this sacrament?

The world does not want to hear about God’s love. We need it all the more. What can be expected from the world without love? Murder, not only in wars but also in unborn children, murder of conjugal love, sibling, neighborly, friendly love… Whoever does not love his brother or sister does not even love God. A Christian loves God in another person and himself. Whoever hates himself, his neighbor also hates God. Only man is capable, from created things, of true love. Let us renounce any part of the commandment of love and cease to observe it, we cannot speak of true love.

The fight for love reminds us of St. Paul in his letter to the Corinthians (cf. 1 Cor 13:1-13). And it would be beautiful if we used the words from 1 letter of St. John the Apostle (4.7-5.4), which begin with the words: “Let us love one another, for love is from God, and everyone who loves is born of God and knows God” (1 Jn 4.7).

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

The devil is not a fairy tale character. The devil is a representative of the power of evil.

Nowadays, we should not laugh at the word devil, the devil, and similar names. These are not fairy tale creatures. They say about Jesus: “With the help of Beelzebub, the prince of devils, he casts out devils” (Luke 11:14).

The Gospel tells about the collision of the Lord Jesus with his real opponents. These are turning his calcific teaching into the exact opposite. Their reproach is focused on the fact that Jesus is the devil, that he is possessed and works from the devil’s power. The reproach of the enemies against Jesus could not have been more terrible and terrible. Jesus’ answer is aimed at removing the absurdity of the accusation. In the parable of the house of the “strong man,” the answer is expressed in an understandable form. The power of Jesus is manifested by doing good and not evil. The power of Jesus is visible, especially in the healing of the possessed. By this, Jesus proves that his power is disproportionately greater than the power of Beelzebub, the lord of all evil spirits. It is unthinkable that Satan himself would invade his kingdom as a ravager. Jesus’ logic is convincing. Turning Jesus’ fight against Satan into its exact opposite, that is, declaring Jesus’ work as Satan’s work, when it happens despite better knowledge to the contrary, is blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. It is the ultimate human possibility.

Our times are indeed often mistaken. Although, Satanism is “legal” in the free world as long as it does not violate state laws. Let us remember that we are children of God. At baptism, we renounced evil. We are not alone in our fight against Satan. Jesus promised us: “And, behold, I am with you all the days until the end of the world” (Mt 28,20). Jesus’ word will protect us. Apostle James says: “Submit yourself to God, resist the devil, and he will flee from you.” Draw close to God, and he will draw close to you” (James 4:7-8). We realize that the devil is real, but Jesus Christ is our strength.

Satanism, as a religion, is as old as sinful human nature. However, no one formulated it into a set of ideas and rituals like LaVey in the sixties of the 20th century. The danger is that Satanism tends to be overrated and underrated. Both attitudes are harmful. Satanism is the opposite of Christianity. In Satanism, it is not only a weakness or a misstep, but a free decision to oppose God. The best weapon against Satanism is loyalty to the Christian community, frequent reception of the sacrament, prayer, and joy of faith. Let’s stand against everything related to Satanism. Apostle St. Peter teaches us: “Be sober and watch! Your adversary, the devil, goes around…” (1 Pt 5:8

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

The Cross

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

God’s laws are necessary for our salvation.

God does not change laws. Secular power, on the contrary – often. Which law is more perfect? Lord Jesus says in the Gospel: “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish them, but to fulfill them” (Mt 5:17).

Matthew teaches that the Law is an expression of God’s will. In this sense, the Law cannot be abolished, but only implemented. The Law and the Prophets mean that God’s commandments rest on the commandment of love for God and neighbor. Therefore, where love is taught, there the Law is correctly explained, and therefore St. Paul says that love is the fulfillment of the Law. We know from the Gospel that Jesus taught us that all commands and laws, as well as regulations in the field of religion, express only one command: To love God and neighbor. Those commands and regulations that lead to this are good and we cannot cancel them, but on the contrary, regulations that move away from love or make it more difficult must be abandoned.

After the Second Vatican Council, many regulations were canceled and changed, to make love a better way of life. Therefore, the traditionalists who reject the post-Council changes are not right, in other words, they do not want to give the Law a new spirit. Let’s remember Archbishop Lefebvre, who in Elkon ordained new bishops without the permission of Rome and the Pope, who, like him, are against the fact that everyone can celebrate the Holy Mass and the sacraments in their own language. He was of thought the Latin language should remain. After all, we see that the Holy Mass in comprehensible language helps us to love the Lord God more. On the other hand, the progressives, who want to change everything in the name of false freedom, and want to abolish the Law, are not right either.

During the Vatican Council, there was also talk of a church regulation that does not allow married priests to celebrate Holy Mass and administer the sacraments in our Roman Rite. That priests should not marry is not God’s law, but the church’s. These progressives want marriage for priests. For now, the law is that Roman priests do not marry. The law of love, because was established by the Church – not for property disputes, as the enemies of the Church teach and say, but so that the priest and own owned and family do not stand in the way of fulfilling his duties as a priest who is supposed to take care of spreading the teachings of Jesus Christ, teachings of love. So neither the strict traditionalists nor the innovators – progressives – are right.

In the Church, Jesus Christ is right, who is represented by the visible head of the Church – the Pope. When the church authority led by the Holy Spirit orders something, we accept it and believe that it will bring the appropriate blessing for us as well. Therefore, let’s all try to fulfill God’s and the church’s commandments so conscientiously and honestly, to spread the love of God in ourselves. We must not cancel even the smallest commandment, or bypass it out of the conviction that it is nothing, because the Lord Jesus tells us: “Whoever, therefore, breaks one of these commandments, even the smallest one, and thus teaches people, he will be the least in the kingdom of heaven.” (Lk 5:19). That is why we want to keep even the smallest commandment to obtain a higher degree of eternal bliss.

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

To forgive.

Many of you have surely heard or asked yourself the question: Will God forgive me of my sins? Or they uttered the sentence: God will not forgive me, my sins are great and terrible. In today’s Gospel, Lord Jesus talks about forgiveness, about the dependence between God’s forgiveness and human forgiveness. “So also my heavenly Father will do to you, if you do not forgive each one of his brothers from the heart” (Mt 18, 35). Today’s Gospel begins with the apostle Peter approaching Jesus and asking him: “How many times must I forgive my brother?” Perhaps seven times” (Mt 18:21)? Peter asks this question not because he doubts that it is necessary to forgive, but he wants to know from Jesus how many times he should forgive, what is the upper limit. He probably asked this question because the rabbinical schools of the time taught that it is possible to forgive only seven times. Peter receives the answer from Jesus: “Not seven times, but seventy-seven times” (Mt 18:22). If the Jews expressed with the number seven the same thing that we express with the word many, then Peter should have known that the number seventy-seven means that there is no limit, he must and must always forgive.

But why should we always forgive? Jesus answers this question of ours and certainly also of Peter with the parable of the unmerciful servant. The parable is about a big and a small debtor. Why about the big and small borrower? The great debtor was to return ten thousand talents to his Lord. One talent was about twenty-six kilograms of silver, then ten thousand talents was two hundred and sixty tons of silver. It was a huge amount. It is certain that such a debt could not be paid by the servant in question. The small debtor owed his fellow servant a hundred denarii, which was a little more than the average of three months’ earnings. Compared to the previous debt, it could not even be considered a debt. In this case, the promise to repay the debt was indeed real. The Lord took pity on the great debtor. He released him and forgave him all his debt, although it was very great. The big debtor behaved differently towards his small debtor: “He threw him into prison until he paid the debt” (Mt 18:30). But it didn’t help him. “When the Lord found out about it, he not only revoked the forgiveness of the debt, but “handed him over to torturers until he paid the whole debt” (Mt 18:34). In conclusion, Lord Jesus points out: “So will my heavenly Father do to you, if you do not forgive each one of his brothers from the heart” (Mt 18:35). 158 The Gospel parable is clear and impressive. We are great debtors to the Lord God, just like the servant in the parable is to his Lord. Our debt is our sins, which stem from disobedience to fulfill God’s will, to live according to God’s and church’s commandments. That is why we constantly need God’s forgiveness. Many people today are convinced that their sin is very great and God cannot forgive them. But this opinion is wrong. After all, we know from the Gospels that the Lord Jesus forgave even very serious sins. He forgave the public sinner, who committed sins of sexual immorality. He forgave the woman who was caught in adultery and wanted to stone her. He also forgave the criminal on the cross who committed robbery and murder. All these were great and grievous sins. It follows that the magnitude of the sin is not an obstacle to God’s forgiveness. That’s why we are asked, what is an obstacle to God’s forgiveness? The obstacle that prevents God from forgiving us is when we do not forgive our neighbors, when we do not forgive our small debtors. God’s mercy to us is strictly tied to our mercy to our neighbors. Whoever does not have mercy for his brother or sister will not receive God’s mercy, because sinful man has anger in him, and God does not like any anger. Since it is a very important requirement for our life, so that we do not forget it, Lord Jesus included the request in the daily Our Father prayer: Forgive us our trespasses as we forgive our trespassers. As we can see, forgiving our neighbor is vital for us, significant for our salvation. That is why the Lord Jesus gave us an example of his forgiveness while he lived here on earth. He lovingly forgave those who wronged him. He experienced the most severe and greatest harm during his crucifixion. He was mocked, spat on, beaten, scourged all over, crowned with thorns, and finally nailed to a cross. Although he suffered in terrible torment, hanging on the cross he prayed for his tormentors: “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do” (Luke 23:34). This great forgiveness shines like a great light before the eyes of all people. And indeed many people throughout history have forgiven their neighbors in the light of Jesus’ example. important for our salvation. That is why the Lord Jesus gave us an example of his forgiveness while he lived here on earth. He lovingly forgave those who wronged him. He experienced the most severe and greatest harm during his crucifixion. He was mocked, spat on, beaten, scourged all over, crowned with thorns, and finally nailed to a cross. Although he suffered in terrible torment, hanging on the cross he prayed for his tormentors: “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do” (Luke 23:34). This great forgiveness shines like a great light before the eyes of all people. And indeed, many people throughout history have forgiven their neighbors in the light of Jesus’ example. important for our salvation. That is why the Lord Jesus gave us an example of his forgiveness while he lived here on earth. He lovingly forgave those who wronged him. He experienced the most severe and greatest harm during his crucifixion. He was mocked, spat on, beaten, scourged all over, crowned with thorns, and finally nailed to a cross. Although he suffered in terrible torment, hanging on the cross he prayed for his tormentors: “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do” (Luke 23:34). This great forgiveness shines like a great light before the eyes of all people. And indeed, many people throughout history have forgiven their neighbors in the light of Jesus’ example. beaten, scourged all over, crowned with thorns and finally nailed to the cross. Although he suffered in terrible torment, hanging on the cross he prayed for his tormentors: “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do” (Luke 23:34). This great forgiveness shines like a great light before the eyes of all people. And indeed many people throughout history have forgiven their neighbors in the light of Jesus’ example. beaten, scourged all over, crowned with thorns and finally nailed to the cross. Although he suffered in terrible torment, hanging on the cross he prayed for his tormentors: “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do” (Luke 23:34). This great forgiveness shines like a great light before the eyes of all people. And indeed, many people throughout history have forgiven their neighbors in the light of Jesus’ example.

Yes, only love can forgive. Jesus forgave his tormentors based on his infinite love, love for us humans. He offers this love to us too, so that we too have the strength to forgive our culprits, our little debtors. We must remove all enmity from our lives and love everyone in God, because at the end of life we ​​will be judged by love. Today, the world will not change through various global programs, but through the conversion of hearts to love. We will achieve this conversion when we draw from the inexhaustible source of God’s love, from the Eucharist. Let’s look into our heart at this moment. Do we harbor forgiveness, anger towards relatives, neighbors, superiors, towards our neighbor? If so, let us realize that it is an obstacle placed in the way of God’s mercy towards us. Let us realize that the heavenly Father will not forgive us until we forgive. therefore now at this moment, let’s decide to forgive everyone with whom we are angry, so that we can pray the Our Father prayer before Holy Communion with full sincerity: Forgive us our trespasses, as we also forgive our trespassers.

Posted in Nezaradené | 17 Comments

The new attitude of the church toward the divorced.

Reception for divorced people does not endanger marriage, the bishop wants to look for the lost sheep

We found out what it will look like in the Pilsen diocese to accompany people whose marriages have failed and who are living in a new relationship.

Reception for divorced people does not endanger marriage, the bishop wants to look for the lost sheep

Plzeň Bishop Tomáš Holub opened a space for distinguishing the possibility of receiving the sacraments for spouses who live in a new irregular, i.e. civil, non-church union.

At the end of the discernment, the bishop decides whether he will allow them to receive the sacraments or invite them to receive the sacrament of reconciliation and the Eucharist.

Bishop Holub introduced this decision on the first Sunday of Lent. “I have decided to entrust the Missionaries of Mercy in our diocese to offer their spiritual accompaniment from this first Sunday of Lent, in the spirit of the urgent recommendation of Pope Francis, to the sisters and brothers of our communities who have experienced a painful separation in their life relationship and are now living in a new relationship,” wrote their diocesan bishop in a pastoral letter to the faithful in Western Bohemia.

Neither the bishop nor the priest questions the indissolubility of sacramental marriage

Bishop Holub entrusted the Missionaries of Mercy to accompany people who live after divorce in a new union. One of them is the parish priest in Karlovy Vary-Rybár Romuald Štěpán Rob.

The priest for the World of Christendom repeated what his bishop also emphasized, that this step and this decision is a reaction to the eighth chapter of Pope Francis’ exhortation Amoris Laetitia, where the Pope calls “to look for ways to help those whose lives have collapsed in some way “.

“Nobody gets married or married to get divorced. It is a call to go out to the periphery, as is characteristic of the Pope, and seek the lost and the lost. Leave ninety-nine righteous,” says the priest from Karlovy Vary.

Although the Bishop of Pilsen issued a directive according to which spouses who live in an irregular union and go through the path of discernment can be invited to the sacrament of reconciliation and the Eucharist at the end of the process, this in no way invalidates the doctrine of the indissolubility of marriage. Bishop Holub’s step is mainly an effort to find “lost and stray sheep”.

According to priest Rob, Bishop Holub is trying to make this form of search an institutional form.

“The goal is to distinguish whether the situation, which reduces the subjective culpability and immutability of an objective irregular situation, is such that it allows them to receive the sacraments,” says the Czech missionary of mercy.

In practice, this means that even if a person commits a grave sin, the circumstances may be different. It is about the so-called exculpation, i.e. release from guilt.

Read also

Bishop Holub opens the way to the sacraments for some divorced people in a new union

The bishop commissioned the Missionaries of Mercy to offer spiritual guidance to those who have experienced separation and are now living in a new relationship.

“This also applies to other commandments. The so-called exculpation also applies, for example, to people who steal because of hunger. Or they steal to feed their children in extreme conditions. Yes, they commit an objectively grave sin, but subjectively it cannot be attributed to them,” explains the Czech priest.

According to him, such cases can also occur among people who have a sacramental marriage, are divorced and today live in a union with another partner.

Discernment is about dialogue and prayer

“Imagine there is a case, which does not happen infrequently, that someone lives in a sacramental marriage where there is domestic violence – and it does not matter whether it is on the part of the man or the woman. One side has a judgment in hand that she was a victim of violence. This person leaves such a marriage and suddenly raises three children alone. Then some other partner appears there, with whom he also has another child, and helps manage this situation,” says the priest.

Or there may be a situation where one of the partners leaves the sacramental marriage through no fault of the other person, and this person cannot handle solitude.

And it is precisely people in similar situations who, following the path of discernment and accompaniment, want to allow access to the sacraments in certain cases.#”Discernment should be guided by the path of dialogue, common prayer,” says the missionary of mercy, who emphasizes that the Pope calls on priests to approach similar cases even in the confessional individually and not in a blanket manner.

“The couple meets with the priest and talks about their situation, and how it happened. And be careful, it is not said that such a distinction must necessarily end with permission to receive the sacraments. In the end, it has to be approved by the diocesan bishop. This is something that is extra and that even the Pope does not mention in the exhortation,” explained the clergyman.

He explains that the meetings of spouses who live in an unsacramental union should also be about the partners talking in front of each other about the situation that led to the collapse of their sacramental relationship. They are supposed to talk about the circumstances of the divorce and what happened.

“It is difficult and hurtful for people, but I think that people who want to receive the sacraments should talk about these things in front of themselves in some atmosphere of trust. It’s an analogy to preparing for marriage, but you’re talking to people more about what led to the failure of their relationship. There should be common prayer and dialogue during the meetings,” Rob explained how the meetings will look like.

After the journey of discernment, the bishop should receive these people with the missionary of mercy and they should talk about it together. Finally, the bishop is the one who has the final say on the possibility of receiving the Eucharist and the Sacrament of Reconciliation.

However, the goal of this journey should not only be to enable these people to receive the sacraments, but also so that they do not feel on the periphery in their difficult situation so that they are integrated into the life of the parish.

“It’s about finding out whether people living in a new irregular union with all that goes with it, which is an intimate life, can be in grace and receive the sacraments,” says Reverend Rob, quoting point 305 of the eighth chapter Amoris Laetitia.

Therefore, the shepherd cannot feel content merely to apply moral laws to those who live in “irregular” situations, as if the given laws were stones to throw at the lives of persons. This is the case of closed hearts, which are often covered by the teaching of the Church “to sit on the throne of Moses and judge, sometimes with arrogance and superficiality, difficult cases and wounded families”.

In the same vein, the International Theological Commission expressed itself: “Natural law cannot be presented as an already created set of rules that are imposed a priori on the moral subject, but is a source of objective inspiration for his extremely human decision-making process.” Due to conditions and mitigating factors, it is possible that within the objective situation of sin – which is not subjectively guilty or not fully guilty – it is possible to live in God’s grace, it is possible to love and it is possible to grow in a life of grace and love, receiving help from the Church for this purpose.

Discernment must help find ways to respond to God and grow despite limitations. When we believe that everything is black or white, we sometimes close the path of grace and growth and discourage paths of sanctification that glorify God. Let’s remember that “a small step amid human limitations can be more precious to God than the outwardly flawless life of a person who spends his days without having to face serious difficulties.”

The concrete pastoral care of clergy and communities cannot forget to accept this fact as their own. ( Amoris laetitia , point 305)

The Czech priest repeats that the introduction of this option in the Pilsen diocese is not the abolition of the indissolubility of marriage, but rather an effort to go and look for those who can be in grace.

“Sacraments are not candy for a reward. They are necessary means on the way to salvation, where we all walk, that is, to heaven. It is also a call for parishes to be inclusive. It’s often the case that spouses or families who experience this are simply excluded,” adds Rob.

When we wrote about Bishop Holub’s decision to accompany the divorced and in some cases to invite them to the Eucharistic table, comments appeared under the article that the bishop would allow adulterers and people living in grave sin to receive the sacraments.

Romuald Štěpán Rob responds by saying that just like every football club has ultras fans, it is the same in the church, which also has ultras fans. “And that on both the liberal and traditional sides, where there are voices of those who see it as a revolutionary exception or voices who consider it a revolutionary failure. Both views are wrong and result from a misunderstanding of the situation. This is not saying that objectively it is not a violation of the sixth commandment, it is only saying that there can be situations when, due to various circumstances, people have less subjective responsibility,” states the pastor.

The Czech missionary of mercy thinks that it is good that Bishop Tomáš Holub got involved. “It will help the bishops to take the exhortation of Pope Francis and his invitation to look for the lost sheep seriously, to communicate about it,” concludes the parish priest in Karlovy Vary.

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

Jesus was not accepted by his natives.

Jesus still sends prophets today. We do not want to position ourselves as natives of Jesus. Everyone has enemies. Today’s gospel warns us believers about this. Addressing his countrymen, who did not accept him as a prophet, Jesus says: “..not even a prophet is welcome in his own country” (Lk 4:24). Jesus is already acting as a prophet in the Nazareth synagogue. He provokes his countrymen with his behavior. When he says, that the words of the prophet Isaiah, which he had just read, were fulfilled in him, the natives will not accept. They will immediately remark, “isn’t this Joseph’s son” (Luke 4:22)? In other words, what new can he tell us?

Jesus answers them by pointing to the well-known event, how the prophet Elijah was not accepted by the nation, only by the Gentiles, the widow of Zarephath, and Naaman the Syrian. Jesus did the right thing. Shouldn’t he have first won his countrymen over with acceptable words and only then, later, gradually explain things to them? Wasn’t it Jesus’ fault that the natives were carried away by anger? We can observe that the preaching of the apostles is carried in the spirit of Jesus. It must be remembered that the people in Nazareth were no worse than elsewhere in the world. When Jesus quoted the prophet Isaiah to them, all his countrymen were happy to hear the glad tidings that answered their wish. Let’s be aware of the paradox, Jesus announces a “merciful year” and the natives react by wanting to kill their native who announced this news to them. Jesus God brings forgiveness and love and receives hatred, anger, and finally death from people.

The Church continues what Jesus taught and commanded the Church not only to teach, to baptize, but also to teach to observe all that He commanded. The mission of the Church was, is, and will be to speak the truth, to defend and uphold the rights that the world tramples on, silences in the entire breadth of life, from those who cannot be born, who no longer want them, or who hinder someone, to the old, infirm, or condemned to death. Do we not have a similar relationship with Christ and the Church? When they comply with us, we are satisfied, but when they enter our conscience when they draw our attention to something, and when they rightly demand something from us, we no longer have a kind heart, but a heart full of hatred, malice, and sin.

Jesus in Nazareth was led to “the slope of a mountain…and they wanted to throw him down from there” (Lk 4:29), but he did not change his attitude towards the truth, he did not retract what he said. Only on the slope of another mountain does Jesus allow, because he wanted it, he gives to crucify oneself so that until the end of time people will be aware of the truth of Jesus. Let us not condemn the people of Nazareth. On the contrary, let us learn to follow Christ and radically preserve the words of the Gospel. After all, we believed in Christ, who not only died for his conviction but as the God-man proved one and eternal truth. God pours his Spirit into the prophet and makes him an instrument of his activity. The perspective of such activity is difficult and most prophets, except when directly addressed by God himself, do not want to undertake this mission. The mission of the prophet hinders many sons and daughters of this world .

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

Sins of ignorance.

Moralists understandably excuse wrongdoing of ignorance. But they nevertheless recognize that ignorance itself is often caused by negligence, disinterest, and bad will. No wonder, such ignorance is judged by ascetic authors severely. It almost seems to St. Basil that ignorance of the principal duties is not even possible in a Christian who wants to live as a Christian. After all, the Gospel is easy to understand and is at hand! What would St. Basil say today, when everyone knows how to read, when there is enough and enough spiritual literature, and yet there are so many people who do not know even the most basic of religion?
In addition to this, there is also a kind of sin connected with ignorance. Socrates said that man sins only out of ignorance. The Greek Fathers reversed his sentence. Because man sins, he becomes more and more ignorant. The thought of God disappears more and more from his thinking, his conscience becomes clouded, and moral principles become obscure. Against this ignorance, we must of course
fight against it, as we fight against darkness on the path of light of the headlights. “The way to the knowledge of God,” writes Hesychius, “is to rid oneself of evil inclinations and to be humble; without these qualities, no one will see God.” To the sins of ignorance belong the so-called sins of forgetfulness. The legalistic Pharisaic conception sees perfection as a complete set of prescriptions. Do not transgress what God forbids, is a great thing. But that alone means little if we do not also do what God positively requires of us, namely to fill our lives with love, with work, with sacrifice. To the confession of guilt at the beginning of Mass were added recently words: I confess… that I have not done what I ought to do.” It is good not to lie, not to steal, and not to offend others. Nevertheless, let us not forget the curse of Jesus at the barren fig tree (Mk 11:13). Some say, that they have nothing to confess, they do not know that they have sinned. And yet, the good things they neglect much more seriously than obvious transgressions.
Sins of human weakness.
Modern psychology comes to the aid of those who are indulgent in human sins. How many components are at work in a single act, from heredity to the influences of climate? It almost seems as if a man could not even consider what he does. Even Christ in the Gospel is manifested very much from the faithful to sinners, in whom he sees only weakness and not wickedness. Some moral preachers, e.g., even St. John Chrysostom}, occasionally allow themselves to be carried away to direct judgment, which seems inhuman and Pharisaical. This is partly to be explained by the fervor of eloquence. But there is another reason. This severity stands out in those places where the Fathers wish to emphasize a fundamental Christian truth: the only real cause of sin is man’s free will. For it depends on us, whether we want the good, on anything else. Wrongly, of course, this principle was understood by some of the ancient sectarians who claimed that a perfect man needs no longer fear any environment or temptation. He is said to be strong enough to resist everything. Surely he didn’t want to go that far, as any true preacher would go. Therefore, they correct their first statement about the strength of the human will, they give it the correct value and measure by challenges of the opposite character. They recommend avoiding all as far as possible all temptations. For we are frail. For even the angel in heaven and Adam in paradise sinned, how much more have we humans on earth? We are therefore to know our weaknesses and not to expose ourselves to danger arbitrarily or through carelessness. The point here, moreover, is something similar to the sins of ignorance. Weakness justifies sin, but the reverse is the case, with voluntary sins being the cause of our weakness. It is not possible, therefore, to be completely excused.

Posted in Nezaradené | 16 Comments