-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Peter Prochac on The Epihany of Lord MT 2.1-12
- Peter Prochac on St. Nicholas, bishop.
- Peter Prochac on Evidence of God
- Peter Prochac on Evidence of God
- Peter Prochac on IS THERE A GOD?
Archives
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
Obstacles on the way to God.
Agnostic Jean Rostand was forced to write. I really don’t see how it is possible to derive all the richness of man’s spirit and culture from matter and its atoms. How is it possible that people resist acknowledging spirituality and accepting God as the fundamental reality on which the world and man’s whole life rests? The narrow horizon of human consciousness is the most common cause of the disorder in knowing God. Not all newspaper readers read both sports and economic news. Music professors will probably be less interested in financial issues. We have strong mental attitudes. They are often obstacles to knowledge. The artist finds it difficult to understand the technical problem of the dam. This is obvious to the builder. Today’s man quickly becomes one-sided. He doesn’t see things outside his department. Even if he sees them, he sees them through the eyes of his union. This also applies to attitudes towards religion. Many bases all their knowledge on empirical knowledge, closing the way to God. They want to see everything in the laboratories under a microscope. What they don’t see there doesn’t exist for them. How many times it has already been shown how limited this requirement is. How do you prove that Aristotle lived? How can you prove many philosophical truths in this way? Another obstacle on the way to God is our way of thinking, which goes into more and more detail, but it escapes the whole. The specialization of our sciences betrays us. We are satisfied with the details. We must have the entire person in front of our eyes. who goes beyond what can be seen and touched by the hands—being human means constantly asking questions, not stopping at any artificial boundaries. If natural science suffices as an explanation of a lifetime, it is a sign of touching naivety. There are two ways of knowing: counting knowledge and intent knowledge.
This entry was posted in Nezaradené. Bookmark the permalink.