-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
Voluntarism, sentimentalism.
Voluntarism. The human will is a tremendous force. It can do a lot. Without it, we would not save ourselves. “He who created you without you…,” writes St. Augustine, “will not save you without you.”But even this power must not be overestimated as if it alone is sufficient for everything (so-called Pelagianism) or if Christian perfection should be judged only by performance, especially external performance. At the end of the last century, some said that the time had come to replace passive virtues with active ones. We should worry less about humility, contemplation, adoration, and denial but instead put all our strength into doing something properly for the Church, social justice, and the law. These counsels were often well-intentioned, and there was a piece of truth. However, their one-sidedness quickly leads to consequences contrary to Christ’s life and the teaching of the Gospel. Related to voluntarism is so-called moralism. He who loves God keeps the commandments (Jn 14:21). People with a valid will are better able to keep the laws of morality and the rules of the Church and are faithful in their duties. Can it be said that they are genuinely holier, better than others? We are sure that keeping God’s laws sanctifies a man. The life struggle of Christ against the Pharisees shows how easily
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment
We have found the Messiah.
Andrew joyfully announces to his brother. In the Gospel, we hear how Andrew and John were interested in Jesus and how they came to know him. We who gather around the altar also want to know Jesus, for through him, we know the mysteries of life. Without Christ, we do not understand what life and death are. We are still determining who we are and what our destiny is. Someone has said that knowledge of God gives birth to pride, and knowledge of man gives birth to despair. The prideful are those who claim to know the ways of God and supposedly know what to expect from God. And those who know man’s misery and what he can do fall into despair. Jesus Christ came into the world to reveal God’s love and show us man’s greatness. For man’s salvation, God consented to the death of His Son. Happy are the first disciples who came to know Christ, but we see that the knowledge of Christ is not the goal but the starting point for them. They bring to Christ, other disciples, and then whole nations. Thus, our task is also to bring religiously indifferent people to Christ and open their eyes to heaven. It is a sad fact that the Messiah has already been born and is in our midst, and many have not yet come to know Him.
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment
Six tips for spending time with God
You know that feeling when you’re trying to steal a little time to devote to God, but your responsibilities won’t let you? And you fall asleep feeling guilty that you didn’t do enough for it every night. You struggle with remorse until you reach an impasse… What wins? Your pride, your fear, or your humility? In your pride, you say: “God will wait, but duty will not,” in fear you mumble to Our Father, “For what if…” and in humility, you say: “God, forgive me, for you are the Lord of time – here I am, I am listening.”
You are not alone in experiencing the struggle with time, but it is a little different. Our busy, duty-laden lives are not the only reason we don’t have time for God…
Why do we forget God?
We are used to giving out of our surplus. If we give something to people experiencing poverty, we provide not the most beautiful and precious things we have but what we no longer need. Piles of clothes that are no longer fashionable occupy the closet. Or the money we donate to people in need only at the end of the month because it has increased to us. So, we are used to giving God the leftovers of our time.
It is not an art to give in excess but to go out on a limb and trust God implicitly. To be frugal, to sacrifice a little of our comfort and give it to those who need it most. Those who love to sacrifice for others sacrifice most of their time for God. Don’t give him your leftovers – the time you have left before bedtime. If you never want to forget God again, start with Him when you wake up first thing in the morning.
Time with God is like a meal you must eat several times daily to fill you up. It is said that appetite grows with food, so why not speak to Him in the morning, at lunch, and at night before bed, but every time you have a moment – in the doctor’s waiting room, on the way to work, or while cooking? Make every opportunity to spend time with God your number one priority.
How can you spend time with God every day? Here are six tips
Start as soon as you wake up. Not all of us are early birds to get up, but what about sacrificing a few minutes of your sleep to God? Pray, give thanks, praise the Lord, or read a few scriptures. If you start talking to God, He will bless your day, fill you with the Holy Spirit, and multiply your time. Sacrifice your discomfort for the souls in purgatory or for your own sake.
Listen to God’s Word while you work.
Sitting down during the day and reading the Holy Scriptures or other spiritual literature is often challenging. However, audio versions can be downloaded to your cell phone and listened to anytime. You can download free Holy Scripture, Christian audiobooks, praise or sermons, and lectures by inspirational people. Listen to them on your way to and from work or home while doing chores that don’t need your full attention. Make the most of every moment and fill your mind with the Word – you will have a wonderful time with God, whom you will never forget.
Read the Holy Scriptures while you wait.
We try to make the most of every spare moment while waiting. It is unthinkable to wait and do nothing at all. We pass the time by surfing the internet on our mobiles or tablets and don’t even realize that we could have spent it more meaningfully. We must remember about good old tried and tested manual work or reading. How many people have you seen today doodling or reading a book in a doctor’s waiting room or while driving to work?
Shorten your wait by reading spiritual literature or Holy Scripture. Why is it important to read God’s Word daily? Reading the Holy Scriptures should guide how we live our lives so we can be saved. It is a source we can draw at any time – in a state of joy, sorrow, fear, or pain. Holy Scripture is a constant reassurance from God of His love for us.
Speak to God with your words.
How many of us wander our minds thinking about ourselves, our actions, our problems, or how others treat us? Our thoughts have great power. They make us proud as we constantly remind ourselves how wonderful we are. Who can praise you more than your ego? Or who can give you more credit for the fact that your neighbor or colleague hasn’t been fair to you than yourself?
Instead of looking at yourself and your neighbors, turn your attention to God, and you will not lose your value. You can only gain. How about talking to God in your own words? Just like with your best friend. Just speak; your God is the best listener. Don’t be afraid to ask him for help because he responds with deeds – undeserved gifts and infinite mercy.
Be receptive to the gifts of the Holy Spirit all day long.
Being close to God also means being receptive to the gifts of the Holy Spirit. God speaks to us through the Holy Spirit, from whom we have received in the Sacrament of Confirmation the gift of wisdom, discernment, counsel, strength, knowledge, piety, and the fear of God to walk in the Light in this world. God’s love and the Holy Spirit guide us through the obstacles in our path. If you do not feel the blowing of the Holy Spirit in your life, there is a mistake somewhere.
The problem is that we often need to remember to thank the Holy Spirit for help, not realizing that the Holy Spirit lives within us. The Holy Spirit can help you make small daily decisions by whispering. If you listen to Him and discern the “feelings” that the Holy Spirit is giving you, you will have fewer problems. How to listen to the Holy Spirit? In the Holy Scriptures, it says: “By their fruits, you will know them…” (cf. Mt 7:16). The fruit of the Holy Spirit is “love, joy, peace, long-suffering, gentleness, goodness, faithfulness, meekness, temperance” (Gal 5:22-23).
Would you be able to sleep? Start praying
No, this is not meant to sound funny. Even if someone says it’s good to start counting sheep to get to sleep quickly, sometimes it doesn’t work. What to do at that time? Have you found yourself yawning while praying? It’s strange, but it works. Can you think of a better and more beautiful way to fall asleep than with a prayer on your lips?
Now, we don’t mean that you should save evening prayer for the late hour of the night when you fall asleep to it. It is intended to be one way of devoting the last minutes of nothingness to God. After all, it is possible to fight insomnia by prayer.
When you give God your time, He will multiply and bless it with graces. God uses a mysterious equation: He does not divide the time you give Him but multiplies it so you will have time for many other duties.
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment
We read Georg Gänswein’s book
The book begins by telling how Joseph Ratzinger chose him as his secretary, then goes on to write about the challenges that the later Pope dealt with as prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. It also touches on several dimensions of the pontificate, such as the choice of the secretary of state and the betrayal of those closest to them – the Vatileaks case. It also details Benedikt’s decision to resign and the days when it happened.
Subsequently, the Francis-Benedict relationship is analyzed in the eighth chapter, The Relationship of the Two Popes, and partly in the ninth chapter (Busy Silence in the Monastery). From the 330-page book, passages on this sensitive topic make up less than 20 percent of the content.
At the beginning of chapter 8, Gänswein recalls that Benedict publicly promised “respect and obedience to the new pope” even before the election of Francis.
He added that when celebrating Masses in retirement – in Italian during the week and in Latin on Sundays (Gänswein pointed out that according to Paul VI’s missal) – Benedict always mentioned “Pope Francis” in the Eucharistic prayer.
He also returned to the conclave in 2013; according to his own words, he didn’t even have time to congratulate the newly elected Pope from Argentina when he overtook him by saying he wanted to call Benedict to help him with this. Then, the German monsignor details the story with the phone call to Castel Gandolfo.
Joseph Ratzinger’s secretary is trying to clarify Benedict’s public words that he did not count on the election of Cardinal Bergoglio. According to Gänswein, the outgoing pope may have mistakenly believed that the Argentine cardinal had already passed 80.
In retrospect, it seems to Gänswein that Benedict tipped someone from the favored trio: Archbishop Angelo Scola of Milan, prefect of the Canadian Congregation for Bishops Marc Ouellet, and Archbishop Odilo Pedro Scherer of Sao Paulo, Brazil.
He knew Jorge Bergoglio, but there were few opportunities for them to meet each other, because “the Argentinian archbishop did not like to travel to the Vatican”.

Ratzinger’s secretary shattered the idyllic idea that there was harmony between Francis and Benedict right after the funeral.
Gänswein marks the episode of 2007 as a significant, albeit indirect, contact between Ratzinger and Bergoglio. It was at the time when the Superior General of the Jesuits, Peter Hans Kolvenbach, offered his resignation to the Pope and, at the same time, was preparing the election of his successor.
At that time, Benedict formulated a letter through State Secretary Bertone with reservations regarding the theological and ecclesial training of young Jesuits and the observance of the fourth religious vow, which consists of obedience to the Pope for Jesuits.
The State Secretariat proposed to Father Kolvenbach to involve the Jesuit Cardinal Bergoglio in the preparations for the new elections, which would provide an opinion on the state of the order and the hypothetical establishment of commission supervision over the Jesuits.
According to Gänswein, the new Superior General, Father Adolfo Nicolás, after meeting with Pope Francis on March 17, 2013, heard from the new pontiff words of trust that were in opposition to the idea of supervision over the religious order, while the father was supposed to report to Benedict on the pope’s behalf “the inappropriateness of this problematic course and received a promise that it won’t happen.”
Gänswein does not comment further on the episode. He wanted to point out that Benedikt’s reservations were not taken into account by his successor, or instead, he stood up for “his.”
But what follows is a more positive passage about how Benedict was personally affected by the words of Pope Francis on March 15, 2013, when he praised Benedict in front of the cardinals, saying that “he lit a flame in our hearts that will continue to burn thanks to his prayer that will support the Church on his spiritual missionary journey.”
There is no difference in housing.
In the book, Monsignor Gänswein also returns to the subject of Benedict’s successor’s residence. He recalls how he showed Francis the rooms in the Apostolic Palace and how the pontiff told him some time later that “he normally sleeps like a log, but after seeing the room where he should stay, he slept badly.” And he asked Gänswein to find him smaller accommodation in the Vatican.
Let’s remind you that even after the resignation of Benedict, Francis kept Gänswein in the position of Prefect of the Papal House, which is a function connected, for example, to planning and accompanying foreign delegations to private audiences with the Pope or assisting in general audiences.
Benedict’s secretary was looking for solutions but interpreted to the new pontiff that they would need fixing with service and security. At the same time, he reminded Francis that many people passing by St. Peter’s Square in the evening looked up to the light in the windows of the Pope’s room in the Apostolic Palace as a point of reference. If the current Pope moved, people would perceive it with nostalgia.
Gänswein felt that the distance of thousands of kilometers from Rome made Francis insensitive to this dimension, and he described how he thought about this decision regarding his predecessor’s residence. “Even Benedikt was surprised by this, but his wise conclusion was that he can’t be forced if he doesn’t want to.”
In the next part, he writes that he must question the claims of critics who created a contradiction between the popes on the issue of housing. According to him, the personal quarters of the last popes were equivalent to the suite of Pope Francis in the House of Saint Martha; at the same time, the other spaces – from the kitchen and dining room to the chapel – are equally accessible, albeit as part of the hotel part of the house.
“Indeed, I can testify based on how we found the papal suit in 2005, John Paul II. certainly did not live in the comfort of a prince, and even the subsequent adjustments were not too lavish for the Holy See,” says Gänswein, adding that many non-Catholics also respect the office of the Pope.
According to Gänswein, this contrasting position between an incumbent and an emeritus pope always made Benedict sad, especially when it came from within the Vatican.
Msgr. Gänswein signed a document in Latin the day before the funeral, which was placed in Benedict’s coffin.
In the book, we also find moments where Archbishop Gänswein does not hide Benedict’s gratitude to his successor.
For example, when in June 2016, Benedict XVI. celebrated the 65th anniversary of his priestly ordination, he gave a kind of eulogy for Pope Francis when he also said that his “goodness is the place where I live, I feel protected.”
The publication also contains passages about the visits of Francis to the Mater Ecclesiae monastery, we read that the incumbent pope always brought wine and an Argentinean cream dessert to the visit. Benedict retaliated with limoncello made from lemons from the monastery garden and traditional Bavarian sweets.
However, we find less sweetness in the next part of the book.
After comments from Benedikt, Francis no longer asked for feedback
Half a year after his election, Pope Francis gave an extensive interview to the Jesuit magazine La Civiltà Cattolica, which was conducted by the editor-in-chief Antonio Spadaro.
The Italian publicist Massimo Franco later wrote in the book The Monastery that Pope Francis sent Benedict a printed interview with two blank pages, which meant a request for possible critical comments.
According to Gänswein, however, it was different. The Acting Pope handed him an envelope with a copy of the Jesuit Quarterly only after the interview was published on September 19, 2013, and asked him if Benedict could look at it and possibly comment on it. Benedict took it seriously, carefully read the 30 pages, and summarized the comments in a letter Gänswein handed to Pope Francis.
In the introduction, Benedikt said he read the text with pleasure and “with complete approval.” However, he needed to comment on two points. One was about abortion and contraception, and the other was about homosexuality.
In the letter, Benedict alluded to Francis’ words that he “did not talk much” about these topics and that “the pastoral mission is not obsessed with the disparate transmission of several doctrines.” In his own words, Benedict agrees with this. Still, he needs to add something to it. He recalls his 23 years during the pontificate of John Paul II, who, according to him, led the “fight for life” not as moralizing but as a fight for the Creator. Since the mentioned practices go directly against the Creator, they express “no” to God’s presence in human life.
According to Benedict, this perspective is often missing in pro-life movements. Hence, rebalancing is necessary, “but the public struggle against this concrete and practical negation of the living God certainly remains a necessity.”
Even on the topic of homosexuality, Benedict appreciates that in Francis’ words, he finds a balance that is also present in the catechism in the sense that, on the one hand, there is respect for the person, pastoral love, and then the doctrine of faith.
Nevertheless, Pope Emeritus wanted to add one aspect: a consequence of public propaganda in this area.
According to him, propaganda is not at all interested in the good of homosexual persons but only in the manipulation of being and the radical negation of the Creator. “I know that many gay people disagree with this manipulation and feel that their life issue is being used in an ideological war. Therefore, a strong and public resistance to this pressure is inevitable. We must realize this resistance without losing the balance in pastoral care between the shepherd’s love and the truth of the faith,” he wrote to Francis.
Gänswein did not stop teasing when he stated that he took the letter to Francis, who asked him to convey his thanks to Benedict, “but I do not know whether and how he adopted these considerations.”
Subsequently, Benedict’s secretary tells how Francis sent a copy of the apostolic exhortation Evangelii Gaudium to the Pope Emeritus in November of the same year, while he did the same for his other encyclicals and exhortations and always signed himself with the words “filially and brotherly Francis.”
“However, specific requests for comments on these texts no longer came,” comments Monsignor Gänswein.
In addition, he notes that some of Francis’ statements in the Evangelii Gaudium text sounded “foreign” to the emeritus pope, given Benedict’s theological sensibility. He enumerates three specific points, for example, 41: “For it happens that believers – accustomed to their speech, which they understand – when they listen to the flawless orthodox language, they take away something that does not correspond to the true gospel of Jesus Christ.”
To balance this, Gänswein adds that Benedict has also publicly expressed that Pope Francis governs the church with the best effort for the good of the current church with the responsibility of Peter’s successor.
According to Gänswein, a “misunderstanding” caused Pope Emeritus to be listed as a co-author of Sarah’s book, which he then asked the African cardinal to correct. The German monsignor quotes the entire letter in which Benedict explains everything to his successor (he said he did not reply, only confirmed the acceptance).
The African cardinal does not fare well at all in the description of the incident in Gänswein’s book; its author is very critical of him, which can also be explained by the fact that he associates his dismissal from the post of Prefect of the Papal House with this scandal.
Don Georg and František did not sit down.
We come to a passage that is more about Gänswein’s relationship with the incumbent pope than memories of Benedict.
The author openly writes that only a few months after the election of the Argentine pope, it appeared to him that an appropriate atmosphere of trust had not been created between them, while Francis had been leaving more and more responsibilities to the vice-prefect Leonardo Sapienza from the beginning.
He mentions an example from 2014 when he and Pope Francis were supposed to visit the Community of St. Aegis in the Roman quarter of Trastevere, but the Pope told him the day before – in front of the others – that he didn’t have to go with him, let him take time off.
The next day, the community’s founder, Andrea Riccardi, called Gänswein to ask what problem he or Benedikt had with them. Archbishop Gänswein then complained to Francis that it had humiliated him, to which the pontiff told him that he did not realize the problem and apologized, “but then added that humility is beneficial.”
According to Gänswein, this was repeated several times, especially when visiting Roman parishes.
Archbishop Georg Gänswein and Pope Francis accompanied by Mons. Leonardo Sapienza is separated after the funeral of Benedict XVI.
Then, Gänswein deals with his accommodation in the Vatican and describes how Francis forbade him to move into the Apostolic Palace, the original apartment of the prefect of the Papal House, which was undergoing renovation. Therefore, Gänswein lived temporarily in the monastery with Benedict.
When he came to Francis personally in January 2020 to explain the case with Sarah’s book, the Pope allegedly told him to stay in the monastery, where Benedict needs his care, and to make him a shield ( fascia scudo ).
“You will remain perfect, but from tomorrow, you will not return to work,” said the acting pope, according to Gänswein. “I was shocked and speechless,” he describes the decision to take away his executive powers as prefect of the Papal House.
When Gänswein reported this to Benedict, he is said to have remarked ironically: “It seems that Pope Francis no longer trusts me and wants you to be my guardian.” And Gänswein immediately asked the question with a laugh: “Should I be a guardian or a supervisor?” According to it was a protest against the case with Sarah’s book.
Benedict was said to be sorry for how this case developed, and at the end of his letter to Pope Francis dated February 13, 2020, he also dedicated a paragraph to his secretary, when he defended him by saying that he did the right thing in the Sarah case and that now he “feels under attack from of all parties and needs the father’s word.”
A few days later, the acting Pope confirmed to Gänswein that nothing would change, and he did not even respond to Benedict’s second appeal in a letter dated February 17.
When Gänswein returned from the hospital in September of that year, where he was diagnosed with renal syndrome, he met František, who told him that the de facto removal from the post of prefect was not a punishment. To Gänswein’s objection that everyone sees it that way, he is said to have said: “Many write against me or you and are not worth mentioning.”
Gänswein claims that, according to the doctor’s statement, his health problems may also have a psychosomatic origin.
Amoris laetitia and the pre-conciliar liturgy
How did Benedict perceive the apostolic exhortation of Pope Francis Amoris Laetitia, which includes in a footnote the possibility of access to the sacraments even for divorced and remarried people?
According to Gänswein’s account, after reading the text, the pontiff emeritus “became perplexed, and although he appreciated many passages, he wondered about the meaning of some which would ordinarily amount to a mere citation of a source, but in this case represented significant content.”
It is said that even in the following months, Benedikt still needed to understand the motive of why a certain ambiguity was left in the document. According to Gänswein, he did not agree with the strategy of keeping several interpretations in circulation and then cutting out one (meaning Francis’ letter to the Argentine bishops).
The Pope Emeritus was said to have been surprised by the absence of any hint of an answer to the four cardinals who wrote a letter (so-called Dubai) to Francis asking for an explanation of some doubts. The cardinals also demanded an audience with Francis, which did not happen. According to Gänswein, František was usually willing to meet and talk.
However, for completeness, he also noted in his memoirs that even Benedict did not personally receive any of the four critical cardinals.
The most direct criticism of Benedict towards Francis recorded in this book concerns the decision to tighten the rules for serving the pre-conciliar liturgy.
Benedict XVI is said to have carefully read Francis’ motu proprio Traditions custodes in L’Osservatore Romano, and when asked by Gänswein for his opinion, the pontiff emeritus noted that a sitting pontiff has responsibility for decisions like this and must do what he thinks is best for the church. “But from a personal point of view, he saw the decisive change of course and considered it a mistake because it jeopardized the attempt at peace that had been established fourteen years before.”
Benedict also considered it wrong to forbid the celebration of Mass in the old rite in parish churches “because it is always dangerous to drive a group of believers into a corner, to make them feel persecuted and to make them feel the need to protect their identity at all costs in the face of the enemy.”.
As Gänswein claims, this seemed inconsistent with Benedict’s intentions to allow an extraordinary form of the Mass. He also “remained a mystery” why the survey results among bishops, which Francis referred to and conducted by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, were not published.
Likewise, the German secretary notes that Benedict was also surprised why there was a transfer and dismemberment of competencies in this matter from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith to the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments and also the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life.
Benedict’s secretary during the general audience of Pope Francis on February 27, 2013.
The rest of the final chapter is devoted to Gänswein’s attitude to Benedict’s sexual abuse cases, returning to the events when the retired pope had to respond to allegations of insufficient handling of sex scandals while he was archbishop of Munich.
In this context, he recalls that Francis expressed personal closeness, full support, and prayer to Benedict at the beginning of 2022 and thanked him for the letter that Pope Emeritus published.
At the end of the book, he quotes Benedict’s homilies and describes life in the Vatican monastery as a daily regimen or diet. We learn, for example, that Sunday dinner was Bavarian-style with black bread, sausages, and beer. However, Benedict “continued to drink his usual lemonade, to which he added a little beer.”
Neither attack nor kindness
The book Nichlen Pravda does not attack Pope Francis but contains references that can unnecessarily inflame passions.
Archbishop Gänswein writes in one place how the contrast between the popes always saddened Benedict, but he contributes to this with some words in the book.
The inconsistency can also be seen in the passage when he mentions the writer Vittorio Messori, who publicly described how the communication with Gänswein and the meeting with Pope Emeritus occurred. In the book, Benedict’s secretary complains that Messori exaggerated some things and said Pope Ratzinger called him a friend through Gänswein.
At the same time, he published things that we cannot independently verify, for example, the words and gestures of Benedict, with which he allegedly reacted to the actions of his successor.
In the book, Monsignor Gänswein also analyzes the tensions caused by the coexistence of the two popes. According to him, it is more correct to say that the problem does not lie in the fact that there were an incumbent and an emeritus pope next to each other but that two camps of fans arose because, over time, it became clear that “there are two visions of the church. And these two camps caused tension, which then reflected on those who do not know church processes well”.
It’s a shame that Gänswein is contributing to the tension, if only by saying in an interview with the German weekly Die Tagespost that Francis’ decision to limit the Trident Mass broke Benedict’s heart. At the same time, this phrase is not found in the book at all.
Georg Gänswein’s book does not present Francis and Benedict as two rival figures, but it is also not a work of peace and unity.
Perhaps this book is like Benedict’s “radler” in some ways. It is not “hard alcohol” full of gossip and slander, but also innocent, non-alcoholic, refreshing lemonade of memories and memories. It is something in between, thanks to Fr. Georg also “poured” a certain amount of controversy and discretion between the two popes into the book.
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment
The Cathars.
The Cathars, a heretical movement of the Middle Ages, had one more feature besides its gnosticism: it divided people into the perfect and the imperfect. The perfect lived an impossible life, or at least very difficult, for an average person. Thus, so that even a normal, ordinary person might have some hope of salvation, there was a belief that if such a perfect one, a psychic, as they were called in Gnosticism (or a good person, as the Cathars called them), gave an average and therefore still human person, a special absolution, the so-called consolamentum to the dying, before death, then that person would also be saved as a result of it. The perfect one was saved because he was perfect, the others because they received this absolution from them, and based on it, God took pleasure in them and accepted them, even though they were still sinful and carnal.
Does that remind you of anything? It certainly does. Today, we call it clericalism, and this delusion is rampant among Catholics.
It, too, believes that there are men, clerics, or “parish priests and nuns,” as it is popularly called, whom God has chosen for a life of holiness and perfection. In this understanding, holiness and perfection mean that they only pray, read the Bible and the holy books, and do nothing but deal with the Lord God. Therefore, they have neither family nor any other occupation and live in a rectory or monastery, separated from the rest of the world. They are called to holiness, and they save themselves for their holiness.
And then there are the laity who live in the world, have families and jobs, and cannot live anything like that; it is not in their power or ability, and no one expects them to. They are weak and sinful, but they will save themselves because of God’s mercy when God has mercy on them, and despite their sins of worldliness, they will still receive into Heaven. And He will do this if they will at least somehow “support the institutions of the Church,” and if they will at least confess and receive absolution from the priest before they die so that, cleansed of all guilt, they may pass clean before the Judge. And, of course, it is best if such purification occurs regularly, say once a month, and if church attendance is added as insurance, ideally every Sunday, or at least occasionally, on major feasts. Then it should be a sure thing!
It’s similar, very similar.
There are a lot of misunderstandings and misconceptions in the background, from the idea of holiness as basically a superhuman burden or “just praying all the time” to the concept of Heaven as a place where God will let us in or out at will – and whether He will do so is up for debate, will be determined by whether He is still angry with us for our faults and sins and will pursue us with punishments for them, or whether we have managed to “wash” and cleanse ourselves of everything in confession beforehand and come before Him already clean. He is satisfied and graciously lets you go to Heaven. ..
Oh, it’s all been here before. As Ecclesiastes says, “What has been is what will be again. And what has already happened will happen again. Nothing is new under the sun. If there is anything that man would say: “See, this is something new!”, it was already there in the times that were before us.” (Eccl 1:9-10).
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment
The problem of complexity
Inner transformation requires us to undergo an unpleasant experience in the dark recesses of our souls. According to the opinions of many …this look is nothing more than an admission of a tendency to impatience or the expression of a particular critical spirit. Most Christians will admit quite readily that their sinfulness is more than just a manifestation of behavior that violates established norms. Of course. We struggle with deeper issues, selfish motives, and so on. But at the level of unconvincing generality, most of the time, it stays.
On the other hand, others resist looking at the ugly inside, preferring
to consider struggles rather than sinfulness. “I don’t have enough self-confidence. I’m just so insecure.” “Why am I such a perfectionist? I take everything too much; I’ll go crazy one day.” Such problems provoke sympathetic concern in others and an almost heroic sense of self-pity in ourselves. On the other hand, confessing our sinfulness is condemned by others. Those who speak of their struggles feel noble, while the sinners feel worthy of scorn.
In many churches, a sincere concern to repair the damage in human life has led to an understanding of man that quietly pushes aside sin
. The truth that suffering people need encouragement sometimes focuses our attention too much on people’s struggles and has weakened our ability to understand their sinfulness. In the efforts of some conservative Christians to emphasize the problem of sin again, we can see an inevitable swing of the pendulum away from an emphasis on “helping the suffering.” In the righteous indignation at modern efforts to mitigate the horror of sin by pointing to its psychological conditioning, these people want to point again to sin in its visible form (fornication, laziness, lying, etc.) to emphasize that people often struggle but also sin.
This observation of theirs is accurate. We certainly struggle as victims
of the unkindness of others. We are victims of someone else’s sin. But we cannot excuse our sinful reactions by saying that others have sinned against us. We are responsible for our actions. We are both strugglers and sinners, victims and perpetrators who suffer and hurt. But notice what has happened. If we look within ourselves, we tend to see ourselves as people struggling with our buried pain and psychological complexes. But when we decide it’s time to get serious about our responsibility to follow God, we return to the surface and try to do what we expected. Struggle tends to be associated with looking inward (“let’s see what your real trouble is”). At the same time, sin is typically handled by transforming our outward actions (“It’s time to stop all this introspection and get to work. How much time do you spend with your wife?”).
Committed Christians who want to change have two options: seek help in honestly exposing the pain in their own heart or accept the responsibility of correcting sin in their behavior. Pain in the heart and sin in behavior are two categories we must contend with. And yet neither of them will lead us to our souls’ dark, ugly, distorted corners. Neither of them will help us penetrate the sin in our hearts that we must touch to be inwardly transformed. Sin affects something more than our outward attitudes (sin in behavior), and we must confront much worse problems than deep-seated psychological problems (pain in the heart).
I do not want to deal with external sinfulness or internal struggles in this chapter. I want to expose the sin in our hearts. However, I want to
The Problem of Demanding to be stricter than those who regard inward sin as a tendency to impatience or the occasional expression of a critical spirit. The problem of our heart is much more severe than many think. When we look into the inside, we find more than just ugly memories and painful feelings. In any case, a candid look will reveal something ugly – demandingness. We are a demanding people. Because we stubbornly pass over God’s water sources and dig our wells, our survival depends on the water we dig. Our self-defense mechanisms don’t – work. If we take responsibility for putting our thirst into our own hands, our survival depends on the success of our quest.
We demand that our partners meet our needs; we demand that our children bear the fruit of our godly activity; we demand that our church be responsive to our needs by providing specific services; we demand that drivers who drive slowly leave the overtaking lane of the highway; we demand that we no longer no one to prepare us for the disappointments we have already experienced; we demand that we be given the legitimate joys that have long been denied us. How absurd! Can you imagine an army in which conscripts and societies whose policy is determined by messengers? And yet, here are mere men shouting their orders into space. Such folly is the inevitable consequence of taking responsibility for our happiness- a burden too heavy for our shoulders. When we accept responsibility for what we desperately desire but have no control over it, we irrationally demand
our efforts succeed. The ugly disease of demanding is deeply wedged in our thirsty souls. Inner transformation demands that we face our demanding problem and do something about it. The spirit of demandingness must be recognized to see it in all its horror and then to rid ourselves of it through repentance. Let’s think together about this problem from three different angles:1) how God sees it, 2) how it arises, and 3) what to do about it.
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment
Solemnity of Blessed Virgin Mary,Mother of God.Lk 2,16-21
Mary wants to bring us to Jesus (Lk 2:16-21)
Let’s decide on the first day of the year: let the Mother of God guide us to Jesus.
New Year’s Eve was short for many of us. We are not dreaming. What did we come to ask for on the first day of the new year? The Church reminds us today that we all have one Mother. What do we want to ask her?
Anyone who wants to accomplish something great needs a living role model, an ideal he would try his best to emulate and follow. This applies above all in moral perfection.
And that is why on the first day of the year, on the Feast of the Virgin Mary, let us remember how the Virgin Mary behaved, what she experienced when she stood by the manger of her Son and listened to the shepherds who came to worship their God, about whom the angels informed them.
Evangelist St. Luke writes: “Mary kept all these words in her heart and thought about them” (Luke 2:19).
The Virgin Mary seems to want to whisper or call to our hearts so that we don’t waste time already on the first day of the year and start acting and living the way Jesus expects us to. Jesus and Mary are a challenge and hope for the new year.
Sv. After his personal experience of meeting Jesus near Damascus, Paul advises that in the name of Jesus, “every knee in heaven, on earth, and under the earth should bow” (Phil 2, 10). This name has the same power in every age. It transforms human hearts into the highest acts of spirit and love. It gives strength to the persecuted, the suffering, and the imprisoned. One lives and dies in the name of Jesus. Sv. Anselm, Archbishop of Canterbury in England, bishop, and teacher of the Church, strove for Christian perfection throughout his life and meditated a lot. He is one of the most outstanding educators of humanity. He prayed like this every day:
“Jesus, be my strength in every suffering, in every behavior, in every temptation, in every weakness, in every danger.” Grant me until the hour when I stand before your face to live in faith, hope, and love, and lead me to eternal joy.” With such determination, entering the new year is more specific.
What does God want us to be in the new year?
KIND – “Be kind and compassionate to one another, forgiving one another, just as God in Christ forgave you” (Eph 4:32)!
ACTIVE – “And do what you say, do not be mere hearers who deceive yourselves” (James 1:22).
MERCIFUL – “Be merciful, as your Father is merciful” (Luke 6:36)!
THOSE WHO GIVE WITNESS – “Worship the holy Christ the Lord in your hearts, always ready to defend everyone who challenges you to give a reason for the hope in you” (1 Pt 3,15).
STRONG – “Finally be strong in the Lord and the strength of his might” (Eph 6:10).
BEARING FRUIT – “That you may live as befits the Lord and please him in everything, bearing fruit in all good works and growing in the knowledge of God” (Col 1:10).
RENEWED – “And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, so that you may discern the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect” (Romans 12:2).
EXEMPLARY – “But be an example of the believers in word, behavior, love, faith, purity” (1 Tim 4,12).
SAINTS – “Be holy in all your actions” (1 Pt 1,15).
ZEALOUS – “Be steadfast, steadfast, ever more zealous in the work of the Lord, for you know that your labor is not in vain in the Lord” (1 Cor 15:58).
THE WATCHFUL – “Therefore be ready, because the Son of Man is coming at an hour you do not know” (Mt 24:44).
These suggestions cannot harm anyone—Vice versa. A new year with Jesus and Mary is a new hope for every person. We can start writing a new letter of life that will bring success.
Jesus Christ came to save all people and is our example in everything. Only he could say: “Learn from me…” (Mt 11, 29).
Next to Jesus, the Virgin Mary is the Queen of all virtues. It teaches us how to practically fulfill the law of brotherly love given to us by Jesus Christ. “In her life, this Virgin was a model of that motherly love that should permeate all those who cooperate in the rebirth of people…” (Lumen Gentium, 65).
Of all those virtues, her motherly love should be noted. Let’s remember how anxiously and lovingly she searched for the lost 12-year-old Jesus for three days. What joy it was when she found him (cf. Lk 2:41-52). And what is her love for us, since she is our spiritual Mother?
Deprived of the throne, Napoleon was abandoned by his brothers and sisters, kings, most loyal generals, wives, and nations – only his mother did not abandon him. His mother’s heart floated over the ocean to him. “I’m still there for you if you’re looking for me,” she wrote to her son.
“If mothers judged at the last count, I believe,” says L. Perlaky, “hell would remain empty…”
St. Anton says about one sinner: “He once had a dream. It seemed to him that he was standing before God’s judgment seat, and the evil spirit was listing all his sins. He placed his written sins in the balance of God’s justice to add weight to his words. The bowl sank deep and outweighed the good deeds. He seemed lost. At that moment, the Mother of God stepped forward, placed her protective hand on the second bowl, and pressed down. Then the sinner woke up. He understood the admonition this dream gave him. He began sincere repentance.”
On the first day of the new year, we can be sure that the intercession of the Mother of God has enough power to stay the punishing hand of the righteous Judge and ask for our forgiveness. “The Virgin Mary united with Christ in pain and in will. That is how she deserved to become the distributor of blessings that Jesus won for us with his blood (St. Pius X).
Therefore, let’s start or continue the veneration of the heavenly Mother today. We believe that honoring our Mother is one of the hallmarks of a Christian and an essential sign of our righteousness. That is why those who need her help, comfort, and strength in hope constantly turn to her in prayers.
“Mother of infinite love, rejoice and save those who hope in you.”
“You are all beautiful, Mary; there is no spot in you…” The words of this well-known Marian song, taken from the Old Testament book of the Song of Songs, are often echoed in our temples to celebrate our heavenly Mother.
And indeed, nothing has diminished from her beauty. On the contrary, we continue to celebrate her; we sing her songs of gratitude to God for putting such a beautiful idea of virtues in the Virgin Mary. “It is the new heaven and the throne of God, the model of purity, which heralds joy to the whole world, the protector of our life…” (From the great vespers of the Feast of the Nativity of the Most Holy Theotokos).
In one family, the children are looking at the family album. They judge and find fault with everyone. The uncle has no hair, the grandmother has an old-fashioned hat, the father is strict… Then, they look at a new picture for a while – the picture of the mother. At once, everyone exclaims: Our mother is golden! The child’s mind fell silent at the sight of the mother. They weren’t looking for fault here. A child’s heart of love awoke and spoke.
This image from everyday life tells us a lot, and we can also apply it to our heavenly Mother. He talks about her beauty, purity, and goodness, which have no stains.
St. Bernadette, a visionary from Lourdes, was fortunate to see the Blessed Virgin more often. In connection with this, she said, “Once a person has seen her, he cannot love anything else on this earth.” He would like to die so that he could see her again.”
The Holy Scriptures say very little about the Virgin Mary. The Gospels are occasional messages. They say a lot, but they do not describe the life of Christ or his Mother in detail. Nevertheless, we know enough, and our imagination helps us to be able to imagine what is essential about the life of the Virgin Mary so that we can observe her in all her holiness, spiritual beauty, and greatness. “Why is she worshiped as the most excellent, unique member of the Church, as her prototype and most proven model in faith and love, and the Church, instructed by the Holy Spirit, shows her filial devotion and love as a beloved mother” (LG 53).
In this way, the Virgin Mary became the ideal of purity for us. She ascended to a moral height and approached God’s throne as the Mother of our God. She is the “lily,” the “unfading flower of loving fragrance,” with which she illuminates the Christian world.
The American poet and novelist HW Longfellow thanked God for the Virgin Mary as follows: “If our religion had given us nothing but you, model of motherhood and womanhood, noble heart, you good and powerful, endlessly patient and calm, faithful, kind and pure, it was enough it would, and it would be a proof for us that our faith is true and right…”
To love the Virgin Mary means to love and follow her virtues. There is always something in her life that we can follow and learn from. Above all, she taught us to despise sin and be virtuous according to her noble example.
“You are all beautiful without spot – original sin, guilt – ask the Son for us in sorrow – when the voice of an evil deed is heard in us.” The fact is confirmed a thousand times that people, small and great, uneducated and scientists, people of cold balances, and people with hot feelings, found and are still finding a way to God through the Virgin Mary.
It is up to us whether we step into the new year on time, correctly, and confidently. It only depends on us. Jesus and Mary love us and are waiting for ours: Yes!
Posted in sermons
Leave a comment
Sunday of the Holy Family B Lk 2,22-40
Does the Holy Family have something to say to our families? (Luke 2:22-40)
Let’s return to the veneration of the Holy Family.
Let’s imagine our apartments. What decorates the walls of flats? Why? Does the image of the Holy Family still have a place in our apartments?
Let’s imagine the image of the Holy Family: Joseph, who works as a carpenter. Mary, as a housewife and a child, imitates Jesus, who follows them and is also the center of the family, giving it meaning, purpose, and value.
Is the image of the Holy Family kitsch? Does the Holy Family have anything to say to today’s modern family?
Yes, times are changing. What has changed only in our family! Let’s remember what troubles and worries us in the family, but let’s also remember what we desire, what we would like for our family, what we would like to gift it with…
The evangelist notes about Joseph and Mary, the parents of Jesus Christ: “His father and mother were amazed at what was being said about him” (Luke 2:33).
Indeed, the Holy Family is not a model of a country house, an idyll. The family of Joseph, Mary and Jesus did not have it all laid out on roses.
Although we know Joseph was the “head of a famous family” and a man of faith, he was subjected to trials. The fiancee informed him that she had conceived a child. However, he behaves like a loving and believing man, which is what the Gospel says, thinking about how to help Mary, and therefore, he does not want to prevent her from fulfilling the word she gave to the angel. He settles for the explanation of the angel in the dream. He becomes before the world the husband of Mary and the father of Jesus, in fact he is the foster father of the Son of God. He travels with Maria to Ain Karim to visit his relative Elizabeth. He is seeking shelter, a place in Bethlehem for God, who decided to save and redeem humanity. In the Gospels, we do not find a single word that Joseph said. And yet, from the descriptions of events, especially from the Gospel of St., We know from Luke that Joseph was a just, pure, wise, obedient, and faithful man… He dies quietly. He fulfilled his mission that God expected of him. We know about the flight to Egypt from Herod, or the loss of the twelve-year-old Jesus when he got lost in the temple, so Joseph’s life was difficult, demanding, dangerous, but he managed his role before God.
Mária also had to act to be a woman of action, courage, loyalty, and bravery. The angel’s words with which he addressed her during the annunciation, she deserved with her life. She did not disappoint God; she lived for God, with God, among women, but also in the nation and abroad for thirty years by the side of Jesus and Joseph; she did not bow down when she met her son when he was carrying the cross. She persevered faithfully under the cross and confidently accepted the dead body of her son in her arms.
Anyone who wants to look for something not mentioned in the Gospels wastes their time. Jesus, like his mother and Joseph, did not differ in anything special from the women, men, and their sons with whom they lived in Nazareth, participating together as believers in prayers in Jerusalem. And yet.
The Nazarene family until the end of time is a sign that many families oppose. The Nazareth family is a model for families and their members in fulfilling the will of God. God assigned a mission to each person, each family. However, God leaves everyone with the freedom to make decisions and reason to act. However, God, in his love for us, gives us the Nazareth family as a model, a reinforcement in fulfilling the will of God.
We know that even the most beautiful star in the sky will stop shining—even the most beautiful flower withers. Even the mission of every man and woman must end death. When every star or flower has its mission before God, should we, our families, be left with only crosses on graves or memories? It would not be enough. It would be unfair. When God decided to live in a family, to have a mother and a father, He wants us all to receive a reward after fulfilling the will of God. That is why God’s Son lived in a family so our families would live forever after death. Jesus rightly demands from each of us, from each family, that we do and fulfill the will of God and that God may one day reward us.
When was it easier and harder for the family? Which family has it easier or harder today? An old proverb says that there is no family without a chimney. Even though many houses no longer have chimneys, the proverb wants to say that every family on earth has a place for joy and pain; every family and its individual members must go through trials. It pleases God that we are afraid to offend him by sin and try to do according to his will.
We are people. Every family is made up of ordinary people. Although marriages are made for love, they are only made by humans. What is it talking about?
The first time they argued was when deciding who would sign the marriage certificate first. Who counts disappointments? He forgot the wedding bouquet. How often did he raise his voice when she offered him a cold lunch? Who counts the exchanges of opinions, the raised voice for little things, that he didn’t want to go for a walk with her, that she stayed longer with the neighbor, that he was reading the newspaper, and she wanted something from him? They have become ordinary, no longer look each other in the eye, and terse commands, requests, and orders have replaced nice words. However, this must not destroy their love. Vice versa. She knows that her husband is also tired, and she knows how to stand up for him. He knows that no other woman would be so tolerant of his mistakes. He also knows how to get up when the child cries at night. She will also say sorry and forgive so that the fire of tension does not grow and destroy their love, family well-being, and happiness. He does not leave education to his wife alone, but the children know that the father always follows the mother’s orders. From the beginning, children see the commandment of love: “Honor your father and your mother,” because their father and mother love their grandfather and grandmother.
The child knows the order should be fulfilled, not on the second or third request. Everyone in the family has rights and obligations that must be respected and preserved. They are not ashamed to ask, thank, and apologize. Decency and respect come from mutual love. To humble yourself, to separate yourself, to have time for another. They should grow older, realizing that someone else lives next to them. They are knowing how to conduct a dialogue with each other. They are not afraid of others, knowing how to confess, listen, have time for others, confide, and criticize—knowing how to give up their plans in time and without long speeches regarding a common cause. Adequately help each other.
When a storm comes, a disagreement, a misunderstanding, voices start to rise, arguments sound like lightning, and thunder shakes the family’s peace; you need to know that after the storm, the sun rises again, and winter comes spring. Just so that the consequences are not painful.
Material things are often the cause of tension. Modesty should not be missing in any family. It must not be true that only I want but that others also want and perhaps need more.
Human bodies cannot be underestimated. Not only do they get old and sick, but also sex should not be underestimated. Mortification, self-discipline, self-control, prevention, and instruction should be known before damage to character, good name, and honor could occur.
This also applies to alcohol, drugs, or computer games. To care about each other. Prevention of love is a blessing for the family and the individual.
Even though an individual or the majority will do everything in their power and power, and one or more will become a black sheep, the cause of sadness, tears, and pain, God asks repeatedly to help, forget, and save.
The priest said to the newlyweds at the altar: “I believe that one common Lord’s Prayer can do more for your happiness than anything else in the world.” They pray to him from the first evening. How often have they realized the words “sanctify themselves,” especially when they wanted to bypass the moral law? How often did they look at each other at the words “forgive us our trespasses”? How many times have they put their faith, when illness, death of loved ones, failures… into the words “thy will be done”? Years pass, and they still pray, although they are already called grandfathers and grandmothers. And they pray the Lord’s Prayer together every day.
It is hard to imagine a society without a family. However, hearing voices about registering other types of marriages, such as between a man and a woman. Paying respect and attention to those who feel something different is necessary. However, we must not forget that God created man for woman and vice versa.
It is also necessary to avoid hastily resolving matters through divorce proceedings. The Church also talks about parting from the table or bed. Unbelief is a sin. How many sins did God forgive us? It is necessary to know your guilt. Do not judge and condemn the other person immediately.
With the word abortion, let’s imagine that, in our case, the father or mother would say: we don’t want him to live. And we wouldn’t be today. We would have ended up in the trash can. Today, we would not know what love and joy are, but also what it means to be able to carry the cross, what it means to forgive, and who God is.
The Holy Family has something to say even today. To know, to want to listen. Perhaps approach physical and spiritual duties more responsibly. Everything is in time. Both youth, and beauty, and health, and success, and fame, and… But when we know that God is eternal and wants to endow us with eternity, it is the duty of a person gifted with reason and free will to fulfill the will of God.
The Holy Family does not teach us to cry. This is what the world and sin teach us. The Holy Family teaches us to hope, love, and believe. The world and sin will take everything away from a person. Even the ones we love. God promises that life does not end with death.
There is a difference between a funeral and “at a funeral.” There is always pain and sadness with him… But who believes…! We have Saint Joseph as the patron saint of death. According to tradition, he died in the arms of Jesus and Mary. That is also why today, the Holy Family is an enrichment.
Let us stop today at the painting of the Holy Family. Although the painting is not of great value, it is not a work of art but has great moral value. Let’s look at the individual characters in the picture and consider their role in the family. Then and now, let hearts filled with faith, hope, and love speak. Let’s pray for ourselves, our dear ones, and our families… Let’s ask, thank, and pray for the Holy Family of Jesus, Mary, and Joseph.
Posted in sermons
Leave a comment
German disappointment with Fiducia supplicants .
The Vatican allows breathing, but with the condition that it must not be confused with singing.
The Catholic committee “LSBT + Komitee” complains that the blessing that will be possible from now on is a “light blessing” that can be compared to the blessing of the sick or pilgrims.

Same-sex couples attend a public blessing outside Cologne Cathedral on September 20, 2023, in Cologne, Germany.
A day after the Vatican’s Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith approved the possibility of a blessing for same-sex couples, as long as it does not resemble a wedding in any way and as long as the blessing is not given as part of a Catholic ceremony or during a civil marriage, the heavyweights of the German Church have already had time to react.
Since the German bishops and lay people on their “synodal journey” already have an agreed requirement for the church blessing of remarried couples and same-sex couples, it is now quite interesting how German Catholicism will react to the change that – for many unexpectedly – brings Monday’s document Fiducia supplicans.
Summarized in one sentence: The bishops appear cautiously enthusiastic, most lay organizations are slightly disappointed, and the vanguard of the fight for church gay marriage is a little disgusted.
Let’s note the news on the official website of the Catholic Church in Germany, katholisch.de. Introduction: This medium pushes such a progressive line that it may seem like a hacker hoax to a Slovak reader. On Tuesday, there was a comment where a Catholic priest accused the late Pope Benedict XVI of “in a way, caused a schism in the Catholic Church by responding to the challenges of postmodernity by retreating to premodern traditions.”
Another Catholic commentator defended German Muslims against the demands for their integration, as formulated by the new program of the Christian Democratic CDU: “A religious minority, which is already constantly insulted by the far more numerous German fascists, is effectively exposed to general suspicion and plundered.”
Of the voices that criticize the Vatican document from a conservative, orthodox, or traditionalist point of view, not a single one is cited by katholisch.de. That is why katholisch.de can be considered an authentic expression of mainstream German Catholicism. Such are the conditions there.
Pope Francis confirmed the document of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith.
In the editorial comments on katholisch.de, we find disappointment in particular.
To say something good, the editor Christoph Paul Hartmann calls the document “a masterpiece from the point of view of craftsmanship” but then continues with a sharp criticism: “In the many intricate pages, however, there is often a fear of too much openness and an iron insistence on the heteronormative biblical image of human beings relationships, which, with its focus on caring for women, simply cannot be applied to today’s relationships.”
The Catholic journalist Hartmann concludes his assessment with a “pale taste”: “In this respect, we must be glad that the Vatican was able to commit to at least this step – however small it is from the point of view of the West.”
Another video commentary is less diplomatic: “Imagine if the Vatican allowed breathing. But only because it cannot be confused with singing.” Commentator Thomas Halagan makes this comparison regarding the dicastery’s explanations of the blessing of homosexual couples since marriage is expressly prohibited therein. It is precisely this – same-sex marriage in the church – “however, people wish for it,” says the katholisch.de commentator.
The President of the Conference of German Bishops, Georg Bätzing, spoke with his typical cheerfulness: He praised the fact that the document tackles an important question “from a pastoral perspective and in a theologically moderate and non-agitating language.” He is “grateful for the pastoral perspective” that the papal letter offers, in the blessing, “God’s love is promised as reinforcement on the journey of life.”
Cardinal Reinhard Marx called Fiducia supplicants “friends,” which means “tottering like an egg.” It’s a German slang for a laborious writing style.
Bätzing’s predecessor, Munich Cardinal Reinhard Marx, is surprised. Marx, who until March of this year served as a member of the papal council of K9 cardinals, did not think “that it would happen so quickly that such a signal would come.” Marx revealed that in 2021 – after the Congregation for the Faith refused to bless gay couples – he told the Pope “that it doesn’t work that way.” According to his words, Francis was also not enthusiastic about the documentary then. Marx referred to Fiducia supplicans as “eiernd,” which means “tottering like an egg.” It’s a German slang for a laborious writing style.
The Bishop of Dresden, Heinrich Timmerevers, is enthusiastic: “This has never happened before in the history of the Church, this milestone that the Pope is making possible here.” For Timmerevers, the document “is not just a Christmas present; it is something more.” He admitted “a bit of guilt” on the part of the Church, “that through our moral teachings, we not only brought people together but also excluded them.” Timmerevers pointed out that the perception of the issue outside the Western world should be considered. According to him, some people in Africa are shaking their heads.
The highest-ranking German layperson, the president of the Central Committee of German Catholics ZdK, Irme Stetterová-Karpová, sees a positive in the fact that the new regulation “liberates the decision in favor of the blessing from the sacramental superstructure, which previously seemed inappropriate for the persons concerned.” With a warning undertone, she added: “Exclusive subjection by prohibition is not Catholic.” Her representative, Birgit Mock, praised Fiducia supplicans as “an important bridge that leads us to pastoral practice, as long as the foundations of sexual morality have not yet changed.”
How can Monday’s Vatican document be reasonably explained to the world?
Katholisch.de gave a broad scope to reactions from such groups within German Catholicism, which, with significant media influence, fought for the rights of homosexuals in the church.
The Out InChurch initiative responded with skepticism. Her spokesman, Rainer Teuber, said: “As long as there is still talk of irregular relationships and the blessing remains prohibited at church services, my joy is minimal. Ultimately, all existing blessing formats will be banned.”
Parish priest Bernd Mönkebüscher, fighting to change the teaching on homosexuality, is disappointed that now “there are a thousand restrictions again.”
The Catholic committee “LSBT+ Komitee” complains that the blessing that will be possible from now on is a “light blessing” that can be compared to the blessing of the sick or pilgrims: “The Roman approach disappoints and lags behind the resolutions of the synodal journey in Germany as well as well-founded and tried-and-tested guidelines.” Homosexual Catholics are said to be unable to enjoy this Christmas gift as they continue to be condemned in the Catechism.
Parish priest Bernd Mönkebüscher, fighting to change the teaching on homosexuality, is disappointed that now “there are a thousand restrictions again.” Mönkebüscher would consider it better “if it were said that we see people in all their shades and no longer make distinctions regarding the sacrament of marriage. But we are still far from that”.
To avoid giving the impression that German Catholics are only grumbling, katholisch.de ended its selection with the euphoric reaction of theologian Michael Seewald. The Münster dogmatist declares the document of the dicastery to be groundbreaking for the Church: “As far as the development of the doctrine of faith and morals is concerned, it is the most significant innovation since the end of the Second Vatican Council in 1965.”
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment
Two criteria of love.
There are two criteria in love that Jesus gave us.
– The first criterion is expressed in words: “Love your neighbor as yourself!” (Lv 19:18). If you do not love yourself, you cannot fully love your neighbor. That is why I have spoken to you about accepting yourself. If you reject yourself, condemn yourself, do not forgive yourself, pull yourself aside, do not recognize your charisma in yourself, and do not love yourself, you cannot love others. You can only love to the extent that you love yourself. If you do not accept yourself, you cannot accept others. If you cannot forgive yourself, you cannot forgive others.
– But then Jesus gives us a second criterion in the New Testament when he says: “The new commandment I give to you, that you love one another. That you also love one another, as I have loved you.” The novelty of this commandment is not in the injunction “Love one another”-we already find that in the Old Testament. The novelty is in the words-” as I have loved you.” The criterion of loving “as yourself” is no longer sufficient. The criterion has become “as I have loved you” (cf. Jn 13,34). And how did Jesus love us? Unconditionally. Next, we will try to explain the word “unconditionally.” This is newness in love.
The difference between secular and Christian love
It will be good to tell ourselves the difference between worldly and Christian love. Ordinary love is based on feelings, attraction, and sympathy. We see this on television or in reading love novels. The decision to forgive Christian love and forgiveness is based on a decision, not feelings. We must understand this. Often, people come to me and say: “I don’t know if I have forgiven that person or not.” It is impossible to doubt whether we have forgiven someone because forgiveness is a decision we have come to. It is a question of wanting or unwillingness. If you want to forgive a person, you have already forgiven him. If you don’t want to forgive someone, you haven’t forgiven them. Hence, the doubt whether we have forgiven or not doesn’t exist. If we have forgiven someone, it does not mean that we have immediately healed from all the wounds that we have in our hearts. If I have forgiven you, it does not mean that I will immediately start liking you, that I will immediately if I didn’t like you before. Sympathy has nothing to do with love or hatred. If I don’t like someone, that doesn’t mean I hate them. If I like someone, it doesn’t mean I love them. Sympathy or antipathy is an emotional affair that can lead to hate or love but does not necessarily end hate or love.
For example, I’m sure the Pharisees were not sympathetic to Jesus, but that doesn’t mean he hated them. But he certainly wasn’t emotionally attracted to them. It is often the case that we need to distinguish between love and sympathy. What does it mean to love someone and feel compassion for someone? Attraction to a person, positive or negative, has nothing to do with love or hate. And this is where we need to look at the difference between Christian and secular love.
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment