Discussion-How to build a living church?

With priests Jozef Vadkerti from Podunajské Biskupice, Dušan Pardel from Ružomberok and Martina Šipošová from the Diocesan Catechetical Office of the Bratislava Archdiocese, we also talked about how to bring missionary zeal to Slovak parishes.

Help us protect the church from attacks?

The church is caught between the pressures of progressivism, stagnant traditionalism, and misinformation. In this challenging environment, the World of Christianity plays a crucial role, and our responsibility to it has never been more pressing.

The Christian world consistently stands by the church, openly addressing challenges and misconceptions, while also critiquing the internal church environment when necessary.

After the festivals Lumen in Trnava and  Camfest in Kráľová Lehota, the newspaper Postoj visited Dudiniec for the Hontfest festival with its discussion.

We bring you a shortened transcript of the most important and interesting things that were said during the debate.

When did you first realize in your life that the church is really a living community?

Martina Šipošová: I experienced it very intensely in the 1990s in my native parish Pezinok, especially in our youth community. Joint Holy Masses, adorations, spiritual renewals, service to children and young people were a wonderful time, from which many of us still draw today.

Jozef Vadkert:I grew up in a traditional village where faith was practiced in a uniform way for centuries. However, in the 1980s, I became involved with a youth community in Nové Zámky through a cousin, and after the fall of communism, I joined the Children’s Christian Communities Movement as an animator. As a university student, I met key figures such as the verbist Milan Bubák and the Jesuit Ladislav Csontos, who introduced me to spiritual renewals, ultimately revealing a new side of the church that I hadn’t known before.

Dušan Pardel: I grew up on Orava in the village of Liesek, and my family was a living church for me from the beginning. I also experienced the environment of the underground church, as my mother was going through the forbidden religious literature that the pastor Štefan Koma brought to her. Despite his age, he created an environment in which ministers, youth, and older active believers could get involved.

A common narrative outside the church suggests it is in decline, being mainly attended by older women, yet this contrasts with your positive experiences. What drives this perception?

Jozef Vadkerti: A big problem is wrong ideas about God. When we begin to prepare the Burmese to receive the Sacrament of Confirmation, we must also devote several months to breaking these false images. They actually reject something they don’t even know, they reject God even before they really and truly meet him, which is often the result of wrongly experienced or imposed traditional forms of faith.

Whose responsibility is it? Parents? Priests? Catechists?

Jozef Vadkerti: Without judging anyone, it is true that I cannot give what I do not have. If I have not experienced a personal encounter with God, then, of course, I cannot convey it to others either.

My parents instilled in me a traditional faith, for which I am grateful. They laid the groundwork that allowed me to build upon it. Although I had to challenge and overcome misconceptions, this foundation remained intact. As I matured, however, I came to realize that community plays a vital role in fostering growth, providing a spiritual framework that goes beyond one’s initial upbringing.

Martina Šipošová:Cardinal Basil Hume described parishes as a sleeping giant, existing globally yet remaining largely unchanged by the Holy Spirit. Though dormant, no parish is lifeless, for Jesus Christ is present in each and the sacraments are celebrated there, awaiting the spark of transformation to awaken them.

The basic territorial administrative unit in which an individual comes into personal contact with the church community are the just mentioned parishes. Try to describe the parish in which you currently live or work in the form of something interesting.

Martina Šipošová: In the parish of Pezinok, there are more than two hundred believers involved in various forms of services, and our vision is for the Kingdom of God to reach every family in our city. Just by the fact that one of us brings a food package to a poorer family and with it love and a smile, he also brings God’s kingdom there. Without perhaps speaking directly about God.

But the same is true of those who feel that their calling is to kneel before the shrine and pray for others. Without directly entering their homes, they invoke God’s blessings upon them.

Dušan Pardel: Ružomberok parish is specific in that the whole town is one parish, which is quite rare nowadays. We have all types of church schools in one square – from kindergarten to university. There are six of us priests in the parish, each one of us is different, but together we try – if I use Martina’s words and play with the name of our town – to wake up the sleeping Sleeping Beauty.

Jozef Vadkerti: Podunajské Biskupice is a place that is ethnically mixed and where many new settlers also live. This is also why the pastorate there is very specific. However, our intention is to build one parish, one community, because Christ is also only one. But we have to overcome many obstacles, barriers and prejudices. It’s not easy, but it can be done. I would even say that it was the complexity of the situation that forced me to be innovative and look for new ways.

Father Jozef, you’ve already touched on my next question, but I’ll expand on it. Where do your parishes have room for growth, and what’s their weak point?

Dušan Pardel: I recently spent time at a lively parish in Madrid, which has a program for the spiritual guidance of young people that caught my attention. In Slovakia, we’ve combined spiritual guidance with reconciliation, but they’re not the same. Given the number of pupils and students in our parish, I’d like to strengthen spiritual guidance as a distinct dimension.

Martina Šipošová highlights the need for improved communication, citing internal disunity as a persistent issue. Jozef Vadkerti, meanwhile, identifies cultivating a culture of hospitality in parishes as a significant challenge. He encourages individuals to break out of their cliques after Mass and welcome newcomers, fostering new relationships and making everyone feel at home.

Now let’s try to look at Slovak parishes in a slightly broader context, since you come from different regions and have experience with different types of parishes. First, one short quote: “The parish is a blessed place where one feels loved.” Arethese words of Pope Francis really true ? Aren’t our parishes sometimes just a place to fulfill religious obligations without deeper personal involvement? 

Jozef Vadkerti: In the church in Slovakia, we operate with a system of supply and demand. Since there is still a great demand for sacramental service in the parishes, we put almost all of our energy into administering the sacraments, and then we have no time left for the rest. This is what people want from us, so we give it to them, and since man is a lazy creature from his wounded nature, we have no motivation to invent something new.

Of course, I do not want to question the meaning of the sacraments, but the problem is that we have made them the only way of experiencing the spiritual life. In the spirit of the first church commandment, we have made participation in the Eucharist the absolute pinnacle, but we do not teach people how to climb to that pinnacle. We do not lead them to grow even through reading the Holy Scriptures, through adoration, charity, building fraternal relationships… At the same time, these activities help us in the ascent. Simply, we show them the top, but not the way.

It is also related to the fact that we live our faith too individualistically – I and God, and not we and God. We lack the relational dimension of sacramental life. Because if a person wants to grow in faith, he needs to grow in five areas at the same time: knowledge of God, glorification of God, community building, charity and preaching. However, we focus only on the first part and neglect the others.

Martina Šipošová: Right here, I see a lot of space for passionate lay people, who have access to places and situations that a priest cannot reach. In every parish live people who have a heart set on fire for Christ and want to pass it on, who have a missionary mentality. The Holy Father Francis also calls us to do this, to use the missionary key everywhere, to transform our parishes into missionary parishes. So that we are not afraid to reach out to others, invite them, involve them… Because who feels loved? One who is accepted.

Isn’t the reality often the opposite, though? Pope Francis warned of this in Evangelii Gaudium, cautioning that parishes should not become “dysfunctional structures” isolated from the people or elitist groups focused on themselves. Are some parishes devolving into exclusive clubs, and if so, how can we prevent it?

Dušan Pardel: The parish is a community of communities, everyone should be able to find their space there. Someone can be more active and find themselves in a kind of nucleus, someone else can proceed at a slower pace, but it is always true that we are always on the road together, never individually and no one is more than the other.

Another thing is when the community is not built on Christ, but only on the personal need not to be alone or on one’s own self-realization. Then it can gradually develop into some form of closure, when, for example, the priest no longer lives for the parish, but from the parish.

Someone could say – but Christ also chose the Twelve. Yes, he devoted himself to them more than the others, he formed them, but not so that they would stay together like this forever, but so that one day they would go out into the whole world, teach and baptize.

The concept of a “missionary parish” has been explored by Verbist Milan Toman in a recent Postoj newspaper interview, as well as in James Mallon’s book “The Transformation of the Parish” and a Vatican Congregation for Clergy instruction on the parish community’s evangelizing mission. How can this concept be applied, and can a missionary focus help revitalize stagnant parishes?

Jozef Vadkerti: A mission is a mission, and the basis of the mission is the knowledge that I have something to offer. It is true that every single person is a gift and can enrich the other person. But at the same time, each of us also needs to receive. So being in a mission does not only mean giving, but also being open to receiving.

We Christians should free ourselves from the mentality that only non-believers need us, because we also need them – otherwise we would not be giving Christ to anyone. Each one of us is dependent on the other, we must learn to accept this dependence. Can we humbly say “come, help me, you are important to me” and thereby acknowledge the value of the other person, admit that he is a gift to us?

Dušan Pardel: We used to understand the word mission as the proclamation of Christ somewhere in Africa or Asia. Today, however, the missions begin outside the walls of our house. How to do it, that is the eternal question. Devote yourself to small groups or generously sow and sow, although many seeds will fall even on barren soil? I think that neither of these strategies is bad, on the contrary, they complement each other.

I am fascinated by the idea of ​​Pope John XXIII, who said that the parish should be a well in the city or village from which everyone can drink. We should approach this ideal, in no case must we close ourselves off.

Martina Šipošová: Pope Francis invites each of us to be a missionary disciple, he invites us to daily conversion, which consists in a personal encounter with Jesus Christ. It is his spirit that awakens in us the desire to proclaim, as we can also see in Mary Magdalene, who, after meeting the risen Jesus, did not withdraw into herself, but ran to the apostles to announce it to them.

However, how to implement this announcement in everyday practice, so that it does not have an imposing, violent, annoying effect on our neighbors, colleagues, acquaintances and we do not achieve the exact opposite?

Jozef Vadkerti: Personally, I was very impressed by the method of parish evangelization cells, within which people are trained to be missionaries directly in the places where they live.

The first step is to realize what kind of people live around me and think about them. Are they baptized but not practicing? Are they seekers? Are they militant atheists? Or are they troubled, wounded persons?

Praying for others, specifically for their life situations, is the second step, allowing God to touch their hearts.

The third step involves engaging with them through acts of service, offering encouragement, and providing specific help when needed.

Only after establishing a natural human connection can personal testimony follow. This should be a genuine, relatable sharing of experiences, acknowledging common struggles and how one’s faith provides support, rather than portraying an overly simplistic conversion story. This approach allows for discreetly sharing the Gospel message and Christian values.

I find that genuine evangelization begins when someone shows interest in a topic and asks specific questions. At that point, I can share my faith directly and invite them to fellowship. From experience, I’ve seen this approach be effective, as people are often deeply hungry for God’s presence in their lives. Simply showing interest and giving them space can be incredibly impactful.

Dušan Pardel: I think that a very good recipe for proclaiming the Gospel was offered to us by St. Francis of Assisi, who sent out his brothers with the words: “Go and proclaim Christ. And if necessary, use words too.” Let us bear witness to Jesus especially with our life, our actions, and our concern for others.

For me, such an example is our churchman, who worked in education and discovered a vocation to the church after retirement. He is a true role model for me in his piety and unobtrusive service. He doesn’t say much, but his actions speak even more. For example, he goes to the homeless, whom he accompanies spiritually, he has already prepared several to receive the sacraments. He found his place where he serves and thus proclaims Jesus Christ with his deeds.

Father Milan Toman suggested that a functioning pastoral council is a key indicator of a thriving parish. How do our parishes measure up in this regard?

Dušan Pardel: Pastoral councils are very important because they represent a functional link between the pastor and other believers. That’s why I had it in my former parish and we also have it in the current one. Even in our Diocese of Spiš, there is also an all-diocesan pastoral council, which has 15 members from different areas.

Martina Šipošová: The pastoral council should help the priest create a vision for the parish and, subsequently, strategies for its fulfillment. Because even in the Holy Scriptures it is written that the people who do not have a vision perish. At the same time, the members of the pastoral council provide the priest with feedback from the faithful, thanks to which he knows what people live by and what their expectations are.

Jozef Vadkerti: I will only add that the creation of a parish vision, which should reflect God’s will for a given place, should take place within the pastoral council in a spirit of prayer and in an atmosphere of spiritual discernment.

I also consider it important that the pastor publicly delegates the persons responsible for individual areas in front of the entire community, so that no one can question them, but they are aware – to paraphrase the words of Jesus – that whoever listens to them, listens to me.

If we sum it all up at the end, what criteria do you think an ideal parish should meet?

Jozef Vadkerti: I have been a great idealist all my life, which is why my spiritual guide constantly emphasizes to me: “Joža, you must never start from what should be, but from what is.” So, in my opinion, an ideal parish does not exist, but existing parishes can strive to be ideal by making God’s love present.

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

What does the blessing express? What is its core?

What does the blessing express? What is its core?

In its essence, every blessing is a request to God himself to send his goodness or protection to a specific person, group, place, or even an object – and thus a prayer in which I entrust the person, place, or thing in question to God’s goodness and protection. In a figurative sense, it is any wish for good. It can occur using gestures, words, or perhaps by sprinkling holy water.

Is the blessing reserved only for priests, or can anyone bless?

Anyone can entrust someone to God’s goodness and ask for God’s protection. Blessing, in this sense, also belongs to the laity. We can mention, for example, parental blessings to children. At the same time, the most important thing is always the intention of the lesser – and if it is good and accompanied by a desire for God, it is more than a correctly pronounced blessing prayer, as we find it in the “benediction” – Blessing Rites. In contrast, the priestly blessing has a liturgical and sacramental dimension, resulting from the sacrament of consecration. So anyone can bless another, but everyone in the way that belongs to them.

In addition to people, we also encounter the blessing of cars, ships, banners, or briefcases. What can be blessed?

The palette is extensive: from people to buildings, means of transport, work tools to animals, fields, food, and much more. We always proceed from the fact that a blessing is a wish that the given thing or place serves the reasonable purpose for which it is intended. Conversely, blessing objects or activities that serve evil is impossible. This can be weapons, instruments of torture, occult objects, drugs, gambling, or blessing a person to do something evil.

What does a blessed motorcycle or a rosary gain by blessing? Are they becoming “safer” or “more powerful”?

The blessing does not cause change in the sense of magical understanding, the essence of the object does not change. But the blessing expresses that the given thing belongs to God and is intended for good. At the same time, some blessings make a person grateful – for example, by blessing food, the food does not change, but we are led to realize that we have everything from God, and with this awareness, food also connects us with God. Blessing is meant to serve the relationship between man and God.

“Blessed be you, Lord, God of the whole world…“, we pray at the Mass of St. How can a person bless the Lord?

As I mentioned before, a blessing is a wish for good. So, to bless God is to wish him well and rejoice in his being. If I rejoice in God’s existence and presence, I receive a great gift from God. Therefore, blessing God ultimately means bestowing a person, because I rejoice in the existence of the One who gave me life, and thus also in my life itself.

What place does blessing have in the life of a believer?

There are many things in life that we cannot determine. Parents do not influence which path their children choose, and a doctor does not guarantee that his patient will recover. Often, we can’t do much. But when we bless, we entrust the person in question to the care and protection of the Lord God, that is, to the best hands. It is an act of trust, faith, and goodwill that we show in this way.

Posted in Nezaradené | 1 Comment

22 Sunday in ordinary Time ,Year B Luke 4,16-30

Criticism – an expression of love. We all dislike criticism, as it often targets areas we think we’re handling well or consider off-limits to others.. After all, who is comfortable when someone tells them: you are a bad husband, you are a bad mother, you raise your children badly, you are lazy, you are dishonest and various other criticisms. Criticism of religious life is also a sensitive area. Even then, we usually get upset when someone has reservations about the style of our religious life. Jesus Christ shows us that criticism is sometimes necessary. In the Gospels, he is typically presented to us as a critic of the religious life of some Jewish elite groups, especially the Pharisees and scribes.

A central point of tension between Jesus and his opponents was the fundamental nature of religion. The Pharisees and scribes saw the essence in the observance of external religious regulations. Evangelist Mark reminds us of some of them today. They are regulations regarding ritual purity. Washing hands up to the wrist. Swimming. Washing cups, jugs, basins, and beds. They saw in this a connection with the tradition of their ancestors and the most appropriate expression of their relationship with God. That is why they boast to Jesus about the apostles that they do not do the same and despise the old traditions, ceremonies, regulations, and customs. Jesus’ idea of ​​what is important in religion is different. He does not consider the preservation of the tradition of the fathers to be the main thing, but the preservation of God’s commands. And it especially emphasizes the quality of the human heart. All things are good. Only man can be evil and impure. The heart decides what is pure and what is impure. As the heart is, so is the whole person, his life and the whole world. Everything around us is colored by the color of our heart. Everything that happens in the world was born in the heart of man. Man and the world are the image of the human heart.

Jesus doesn’t reject Jewish regulations and traditions, but rather subordinates them to a greater priority: a transformed heart.. What does Jesus’ criticism of the Pharisees and scribes tell us at this moment? Does it concern us too, or is it just an old problem of Jesus and the Jews? Is our religion a religion of the heart, or just the outward manifestations that we too have inherited? In the history of the Church, we see the human effort to enrich individual religious acts. What Jesus gave in a simple way and expression, man tried to enrich with his abilities. Jesus laid the foundation and man strives to build on it. We know, for example, that the essence of the Last Supper and today’s Holy Mass is the same. But if the ceremony of the Last Supper was very simple, the Church has enriched this ceremony in the course of history. Churches began to be built, mass prayers and songs were created. Each era has created such a liturgy to suit the conditions of the environment and time. And that concerns the administration of all the sacraments.

Or Jesus didn’t tell us what body position we should have when praying. People figured out that it’s good for a person to kneel, or stand, or sit on their heels, or have their arms folded or crossed. Jesus did not tell us how, for example, he imagines Marian devotion. Church, people, saints, created Marian prayers, litanies, rosary, statues, chapels and pilgrimages. We have inherited all this and many other things, and we are also enriching them. But we certainly have to ask: what is the relationship of Jesus to this magnificent work that man and the Church have created throughout history and will continue to create in order to enrich their religious life? It is certainly sympathetic to Jesus. After all, everything that helps a better religion, Jesus also blesses. However, even at this moment he is saying to us: It is nice what you have done, but show me your heart.

Jesus is interested in how the sacraments, prayers, pilgrimages and other religious manifestations helped us to improve our heart. If he sees in our heart evil thoughts, fornication, theft, adultery, greed, sensuality, unchastity, envy, slander, pride and stupidity, so do we. he must say: “This people honors me with their lips, but their heart is far from me. You forsake the commandments of God and hold to the traditions of men.” Although we do not like criticism, yet in one case we accept it more easily. It is when we feel that he who criticizes us also likes us. Jesus likes us and he cares about the quality of our religious life. If we are touched by his criticism, let us humbly accept it and obey his advice.

Posted in sermons | Leave a comment

The Parable of the Ten Girls.

The kingdom of heaven can be likened to ten virgins who went out to meet the bridegroom. Five were foolish, while five were wise. This parable reflects our earthly journey towards the kingdom of God. On this path, we are called to behave wisely, not unwisely. All ten virgins represent Christians who know their destination and possess the grace of baptism and a Christian lifestyle. However, they differ in their ability to sustain this lifestyle, symbolized by the length of time their lamps remain lit. Let’s remember our responsibility to behave wisely on this journey.

Some Christians’ light fades quickly, while others maintain it for extended periods. Wise Christians shine throughout their lives because they continually try to cooperate with God’s grace and multiply it within themselves. They nurture the strength and courage to serve as a good Christian witness, persevering in doing good and enduring evil.

According to the Gospel, being wise means consciously and persistently focusing one’s life on Jesus Christ. When the bridegroom didn’t come, all the virgins fell asleep due to natural fatigue. Falling asleep with a clear conscience is different from succumbing to sleep unprepared. Belief requires using the strength and values we have acquired in times of “light” to navigate life’s “darkness.”

The wise virgins refused to share their oil, seeming “unchristian.” However, specific values that require sacrifice, prayer, or sacraments unique to each person cannot be shared. When the virgins went to buy more oil, they missed their opportunity as the door closed.

Seizing the present moment is essential to our spiritual growth. A future-oriented mindset should motivate us to make the most of the present, while reflecting on experiences should inform and enhance our current reality. May we be inspired to live our Christian lives to the fullest, utilizing the graces available in each moment.

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

Herod and John the Baptist.

The king was saddened, but for the sake of the oath and for the sake of his fellow-constables, he did not want to disappoint her. Immediately, he sent an executioner and ordered John’s head to be brought. He went away, beheaded him in prison, brought his head on a platter, gave it to the girl, and the girl gave it to her mother” (Mk 6:17-29).
John did not accuse Herod of rejecting his first wife or of being polygamous, as these were situations permitted in the Bible, but of taking his brother’s wife, which is condemned in the Book of Leviticus (Lev. 18:16). Herodias was the daughter of Aristobulus, the brother/half-brother of Philip and Herod Antipas. Thus, the tetrarch has a concubine as his wife who is also his sister-in-law and niece: he could not have done worse. The very ambitious woman then brings about the ruin of Herod Antipas, and together with him, Caligula kills her.

According to Josephus Flavius, the death of the Baptist had a political motive; Herod feared that the popularity the Baptist had among the people would cause a revolt that would threaten his position. The evangelist wants to make a point about the Baptist’s actions: it is not a moralistic condemnation, but a connection between power and religion that keeps people in subjection. It is unlikely that the daughter of Herodias, the princess, would dance in public. Prostitute dancers were called in for these occasions. This expresses a humiliating flattery of power. In a story where everyone has a name, only the daughter is nameless. We know from Josephus Flavius that her name is “Salome,” but the Gospels are silent on this because she is a representative figure. She is a characterless figure, without personality, she has no will of her own and has to ask her mother what she wants. Through the anonymity of the daughter, the Evangelist presents us with the situation of a people who are ready to prostitute themselves just to remain attached to the representatives of power. The author of the text thus recalls the theme of prostitution of the people of God through the dance, a typical role of prostitutes.
From a certain point on, the plot of the story shifts to a representational plane. Proper names disappear: the daughter will remain nameless, Herod will be ‘king’, Herodias ‘mother’. The evangelist brings a figurative sense to the story. The title “king” makes Herod the enemy of God, the true king of Israel. Herod is presented as the bearer of a power that, in order to maintain itself, feeds on death and violence. Between his own prestige and the life of an innocent, he chooses the former. A foreign king who is not of David’s line represents an illegitimate power that is contrary to God’s promises. In order to retain power, Herodias allies himself with an illegitimate king at the expense of the people. He thus represents a Jewish ruling class that is unfaithful to God. The Jewish aristocracy is more ruthless than the ruling political power, has less reverence for God, and does not hesitate to prostitute the people it cares about just so it can take advantage of them. The nameless daughter without personality and will represents the people, subjugated and manipulated by the ruling class. The image of the daughter represents a people whose efforts are aimed at supporting the powerful, even at the cost of renouncing their own dignity.
At the feast, the only course, the only food, is the decapitated head of John the Baptist; a ghostly menu. Power serves as a dish, on a “platter,” to the girl and her mother, the head of a dead man. In the world of the dead, they feed on corpses. The condemnation of the illegitimate union of Herod and Herodias serves as a backdrop that shows the unfaithfulness to God on the part of the Jewish leaders; John condemned not only Herod’s personal immorality, but also the connection between the Jewish leaders and Roman power. The death of the Baptist was the result of the incitement of Jewish, It has nothing to offer. The only instrument it wielded was political power. The connection between political power and religious power does not allow the people to have an intimate relationship with God, but manipulated by this connection, the people prostitute themselves. This is the charge that cost the Baptist his life, and the same fate would befall Jesus.

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

The Passion of Saint John the Baptist, Mr 6,17-29

With Holy Baptism we became God’s children. If we follow the doctrine that our Savior brought us, we will meet the opposition of the world in which sin reigns. Jesus Christ says: “If they persecuted me, they will also persecute you” (Jn 15, 20). Sin is afraid of the truth, because it exposes it, tears off its mask. For a sinner who finds himself in the vicinity of a pious Christian, there are only two options: either he acknowledges his sin and repents, or he hardens his heart and begins to persecute this witness of the truth. You will surely agree with me that we often experience the second alternative. How should we behave in such moments? First of all, we must be sure that we are innocent. Because we often consider as wrong even what we have earned by our actions or by using the wrong words. If the offense was caused by our sin, let us accept the painful consequences as repentance. But if we are innocent, let’s not resist! Let us be guided by the words of Jesus Christ: “Love “Love your enemies, do good, lend, and expect nothing in return! Your reward will be great, and you will be sons of the Most High, for He is good to the ungrateful and the wicked” (Lk 6:35). Such an attitude towards wrongdoing testifies to the truth and promotes personal growth. In the biography of St. John Vianney, the parish priest of Ars, there is a story about an unmarried woman who gave birth to a child, with the father’s identity unknown. Living near the vicarage, she became the subject of malicious rumors that the parish priest was the father. John Vianney, knowing the truth, chose not to defend himself against this unjust slander, trusting fully in God’s justice. The rumors persisted for years. However, during a mission in Ars, the true father finally confessed to the priest, admitting his long-held shame over the impact on the priest’s honor. Afterward, he publicly acknowledged the truth, putting an end to the false accusations against Saint John Vianney. Through this ordeal, the priest achieved greater perfection and earned many merits in heaven.

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

Works of St.Augustinus.

Confessions, Tract revisions.

2. Philosophical works (Dialogues):
Against Academics, On a Happy Life, On Order, , Conversations with the Soul, Immortality of the Soul, Greatness of the Soul, Free Decision, Music, Master

3. Apologetic Works:
State of God, True Religion, Utility of Faith, Faith and Symbol, Faith in Invisible Things.

4. Dogmatic works:
The Trinity, Eighty-three different points of contention, Various problems for Simplician, Eight points of contention of Dulcitius, Manual of Faith Hope and Love, Magical Power of Demons, Faith and Works.

5. Moral – pastoral works:
Rule, Dignity of marriage, Dignity of widowhood, Holy virginity, Chastity, Marriage and lust, Lying, Against lying, Work of monks, Care of the dead, Christian struggle, Catechesis for beginners, Patience, Coexistence of adulterers.

6. Exegetical works (see also tracts, all of an exegetical nature):
Christian Doctrine, Questions on the Hexateuch, Commentary on the Letter to the Galatians, Genesis against the Manichaeans, Questions on the Gospels, Questions on the Letter to the Romans, Beginning of the Commentary on the Letter to the Romans, Notes on the Book of Job, 17 questions about the Gospel of St. Matthew, The Unfinished Book of Genesis, Genesis according to the letter, The Unity of the Evangelists, The Lord’s Speech on the Mount, Eight Questions to the Old Testament, The Mirror of Moral Commandments from St. Fonts.

7. Polemical works:
The essence of goodness, Controversy with Fortunato, Customs of the Catholic Church and customs of the Manichaeans, Spirit and letter, Nature and grace, Christ’s grace and original sin, The soul and its origin, Grace and free distribution, The gift of perseverance, Correction and grace, The Predestination of the Saints, Polemic with Julian.

8. Tracts:
Commentary on the Gospel of John, Commentary on the letter of St. John, Commentary on the Psalms, Homilies (around 400).

9. Letters:
We have preserved more than 300 letters.

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

St.Monica.

Mother’s upbringing and example

What is hidden behind the word mother?

The man says that she is his life guide, the one who takes care of his household children, cleans laundry, helps him raise children, and the like.

The children will say: She is the one who gave me life, who takes care of me both spiritually and materially, who loves me more than herself, and so on.

Society will say that the mother is the legal representative of the child and the first person close to the child.

The Church says about the mother that she is the one who gives not only physical life but also spiritual life. He takes care of both earthly and eternal education.

Today, on the feast of St. Monica, the mother of St. Augustine, we read about a widowed mother from the town of Naim whose only Son, who was already dead, was resurrected by Jesus.

What the Naima woman felt when she accompanied her dead Son, only a mother who has already experienced this pain from the death of a child knows best. When Jesus met her, his heart trembled and moved with compassion, and he said: “Don’t cry!” (Lk 7:13). This event is described by the evangelist Luke, who is the only one to explain things, and it is assumed that he got them from the Virgin Mary. Mary also knew pain as she stood under the cross at the death of her Son.

Don’t cry! These words are relevant many times, even today, not in the physical death of the mothers’ sons, but even more so in the mental death. Who will count the number of tears of mothers when their sons are physically healthy, but their souls are not healthy?! When sin made their soul’s dead souls. The mother sees her Son healthy, and his soul is dead for eternity. The mother who brought him into the world and wants him to be with her in eternity when she sees how her Son rejects eternal life is the most unhappy Catholic mother. This pain is much greater than the pain of a mother’s Son dying physically. She knows that he died reconciled to God and has hope of meeting him with God. But what about the death of the soul? We had the holiday of St. Ludovic. His mother, Saint Blanca, often told him: – I would rather see you physically dead than with one grave sin. – How sad it is to meet mothers indifferent to their sons’ souls. How painful it is when a mother still advises her child to sin when she encourages him to sin, when she defends his sin, and so on.

This does not match Saint Monica’s behavior. Someone will say that he knows everything about her:

  • How she endured wrongs from her mother-in-law.

  • She also talks about how she helped her husband find peace of mind.

  • How she prayed for her Son Augustín for sixteen years.

It’s a shame they know it but don’t follow her example. They would know what a wonderful feeling it is to wait for death. She died in Ostia, near Rome, far from her native Carthage. However, she died in the arms of her Son, no longer an errant Manichean, but the Son of a priest and a bishop.

Today’s world needs new Monicas. We need women, mothers, and brides who look not only with the eyes of the body at the people around them but also with the eyes of faith. It is beautiful when a woman, mother, and daughter-in-law knows how to take her place in the house, family, and society. It is valuable when such a woman knows how to defend her place even before the community of believers – the Church, especially before her conscience and God. St. Monica today teaches modern women an old but still modern Christian principle: Let us live so that none of us will be separated on the last day. Today, it is appropriate for women, mothers, and brides to pray to St. Monica for the virtues and graces with which she excelled. Today, sons, husbands, and parents-in-law should pray for their mothers, wives, and daughters-in-law that God bless them with the virtues that Saint Monica abounded in. And then today’s holiday will fulfill its role.

Saint Monica, mother, wife, and daughter-in-law, pray for us!

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

The Victory of Virtue.

Traditional moralists, who believe in the wisdom of nothingness, appear to their opponents as dull, monotonous, stern, and cursing damners. Well, believe them, they are not. They are rebels because it remains in the age of relativism orthodoxy as the only possible form of rebellion; these rebels also sing during the fight. They constantly keep hope in themselves until the end, even when they condemn our civilization. All the prophetsoffer hope. The patient has not died yet.

Patient, Western Civilization, maybe really soon he will die, perhaps a little later, but once for sure, because everything human is mortal. However, it is not necessary that she died immediately. On the slippery slope, along which they plunge into the abyss, “someone” has carved handles, which, if we catch it in time, we can still go back. As long as our single will is not just some kind of illusion, we are free to return, regret, turn around, and turn back the hands of the clock, which shows the wrong time. Unless we are victims of ourselves and our tools, like Dr. Frankenstein, as long as we are not slaves to time and masters of moralizing, we can still go back. No one with a flaming sword will close the way to paradise, which has long been settled. The history of the Israeli nation, our ancient history of the archetype, are interwoven with countless examples of the nation’s repentance and its return to God’s favor despite many, almost irreversible failures.

And God, like the loving father of the prodigal son, constantly waiting for our return. For this reason, we traditional and old-fashioned seafarers can smile because we are rebels and we have hope. However, relativists have no reason to smile. In his work The Fall, Camus briefly summarized: “Sometimes I think about what future historians will say about us. A simple sentence will suffice: they were fornicators, and they read newspapers.” We traditionalists “do not read The Times; we read eternity”, as Thoreau advises. And it is in her that we read the most wonderful news for us: God decided that we will make his bride.
A prevailing opinion is slowly disappearing: that traditional Virtue is uninteresting. It’s the opposite but the truth. Virtue will prevail. Virtue conquers the world.

What God planned, we will not change, and therefore will never change human nature. A person will starve from ordinary food repeatedly, and the stones will never be replaced with bread. It is the same with food for our spirit. A skeptic has the same digestion as a believer, only he does a different diet. He is not consciously looking for the right food to feed him, and he may find her only by chance. It can, for example, despise Mother Teresa’s faith, but he can no longer despise her when he once met her in person. These people do not know what Virtue is. They think it is something like a dried plum: old, wrinkled, and disgusting. By doing so, they essentially contrast Virtue and happiness however, it contradicts the comparisons of the oldest and the wisest philosophers and the discovery of the great moralists Plato and Aristo of the body and, last but not least, the content of Scripture.

They do not see Virtue’s winning campaign. However, the defenders of the virtues, who let themselves go, also made mistakes in part involve in a false dispute of concepts between Virtue and happiness, between Virtue and joy, Virtue and vigor; and who, somewhere along the way, lost the key to the victory of Virtue – to the pursuit of Virtue.
Medieval people knew how to be passionate about Virtue.
Today, however, it only seems bizarre, eccentric, and idiosyncratic. In the sixteenth century, Spencer could still portray Virtue as a beautiful lady. However, in Milton’s time, in the seventeenth century, divine virtues already appear cold, unpleasant, and unsympathetic, while vices, which were offered by the devil, enjoy more and more popularity and interest. Nietzsche generalized this contrast to the contrast between “Apollonian” cold reasoning, reason and truth and “Dionysian” explosiveness, passion, evil – and attraction. Well, Hannah Arendt he is right when he writes about the “emptiness of evil” (in the work Eichmann in Jerusalem), and members of the literary discussion group at Oxford University (among others, Lewis, Tolkien and Williams) point out that goodness is much more burdensome than evil, although others write otherwise. Liberals have a hard time getting fired up for Virtue because they have always tended to identify with general things like social justice, which is correct, but very distant. Conservatives rather identify with loyalty to a smaller whole – family, neighbors, and marriage, in short, to what we feel an irrational passion for. For ages, we have been created equally for emotional passion and reasonableness. And since liberalism gives us no room for zeal in virtues, only in vices, and conservatism shows zeal for Virtue, it is clear. If the world became what it was twenty years ago, when heroic virtues fascinated it, we can say he won.

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

St.Bartholomew Apostle.

Dies enthält ein Bild von: Thought for the Day – 24 August – The Feast of St Bartholomew, Apostle of Christ – Today’s Gospel: John 1:45–51

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment