Jesus knows the Father. Let’s live in such a way that we too get to know God the Father.

Lent is a serious time. We meditate on the suffering and death of the Lord Jesus. It is right that we accept Jesus as God the Son. Jesus did a lot for us to believe in his mission, and yet we see that many cannot make up their minds. That is why he said the words to them: “You know me, and you know where I am from.” And I did not come of myself, but he who sent me is true, and you do not know him. I know him because I am from him and he sent me” (John 7:28-29).

They heard his sermons and saw the life of Jesus many. Accepting his teachings means radically changing your life. On the other hand, they saw their indifference, and convenience, and did not have the strength to get rid of these weaknesses. They felt fear, so they preferred to settle for a neutral position. Yes, a lot is said and thought about God, faith, and Jesus Christ today. We see both negative and positive attitudes around us. Each side and decision has its reasons. We come to Holy Mass to be strengthened by Jesus’ word and Body in the Eucharist. This reminds us of the death on the cross, that is, our redemption, our liberation from sin. We come to strengthen our relationship with Jesus, which our Church teaches us about. We often realize in our lives that we must not be Christians only in church, or when we pray privately at home. Before the shrine, let’s draw strength and resolve to persevere on the way to Jesus. Yes, we sometimes feel that it is very difficult, and it hurts when we want to follow Jesus whole and whole.

We know from our own lives that even though this decision was painful and difficult, it was still the right and beautiful decision. As a priest, I can say from my own life that I have never regretted my decision to become a priest. After all, Jesus said: “And everyone who leaves houses or brothers and sisters or father and mother or children or fields for my name will receive a hundred times more and will inherit eternal life” (Mt 19:29). Today, after several years of priesthood I know that the profession of a priest is difficult, but I can say that if I had to decide about my profession again, I would not hesitate for a minute. However, I also know from your life’s journeys that more than one of you had and must make difficult decisions in your faith and Many of you have also become convinced that when you put Jesus’ words into practice in your practical life: “Whoever wants to come after me, let him deny himself, take up his cross daily and follow me” (Luke 9:23), that Jesus will not owe anything to his faithful.

If we have once decided on Jesus, we must not think that it only hurts once in our life. We certainly don’t want Jesus’ words from the Gospel to apply to us: “You know me, and you know where I come from. And I did not come of myself, but he who sent me is true…” (John 7:28). We believe that Jesus is our God, eternal Love, who loves us above all. We do not want to be among those about whom John wrote that they wanted to seize him and kill him when Jesus told them who he was and why he had come.

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

Fifth Sunday of Lent, Year A John 11,1-45

Jesus is not only one who conquered death, but also teaches us how to properly accept the death of the body. Can

Do you remember who you love? Yes? Name them all. Do you know what you would do to make them happy now? When was the last time you told them you love them? You enjoy and suffer with them. You like to meet them, visit them, feel good with them…

Imagine that someone you love comes to you and says: “How can I believe that God knows about me?! After all, there are five billion people in the world. Is it even possible for the poor human worm to know about me?” When a young man came to a priest with such a question, he invited him to open his hand in front of him: “Look at the fingers. Take a good look at the skin on the ends of your fingers. You will not find a person in the world who has the same finger grooves as you. So you are a creature quite different from others. God paid special attention to the fingertips.”
The young man’s face lit up and peace filled his soul: “Thank you. I will no longer allow doubts to multiply in me. Just looking at the finger is a reminder that God is interested in me.”

Question for us: Can we see to the end of our finger? This is because we want to understand death correctly in the light of the teachings of the Lord Jesus, who loves us and proved it with his death.

Jesus reminds each of us: “I am the resurrection and the life.” He who believes in me will live even if he dies (John 11:24).

The miracle of the resurrection of Lazarus in Bethany, who has been in the grave for four days, St. John describes in detail several reasons. It is the greatest miracle of Jesus, and he did it to show that he is really the promised Messiah and to give the high priests and Pharisees an impetus to their plan: to put Jesus to death and thus finish the mission for which Jesus came into the world as a man out of love for us. Bethany was not far from Jerusalem, and therefore the information reached the addressees in Jerusalem quickly. The message about the resurrection of Lazarus is undoubtedly joyful news, because Jesus himself says it: “I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in me will live even if he dies (John 11:24). The resurrection of Lazarus is all the more joyful, because the Jews did not believe in the afterlife. However, they believed that the soul of a person, good and bad, goes to the underworld, which they called “Sheol”. The Sadducees and their class – which mostly included priests – together with the Samaritans, did not believe in the resurrection, in the immortality of the soul, spirits and even angels. When Martha says to Jesus: “I know that he will rise on the last day in the resurrection” (Jn 11:24), she gives testimony, like the Pharisees, that she believes in the resurrection of the human body. When Jesus says: “He who believes in me will live, even if he dies” (Jn 11:24), he is not thinking about the physical life of the body. The truth is that whoever believes in him will physically die, will experience physical death. Jesus speaks of the death of sin. If a person is dead to sin, Jesus will make him alive again. Death is not the end of life, although it is a mystery. Jesus says the joyful message: “I am the resurrection and the life” (Jn 11:24). At that time, they buried the dead facing the west, because death ends everything and Jesus bears witness to the east. Our life through death leads not to extinction, to nothingness, but to life, which faith tells us will be quite different than what we can and can imagine today. Why do unbelievers laugh at Christ’s teaching even today? They lack faith, so they have not done everything to believe. This is their punishment, that they could accept Jesus, but did not. In order for someone to believe and accept Jesus as his God and Lord, he does not need special studies. It is necessary to have before the eyes the event of Good Friday, the death of Christ on the cross, and to accept the event of Easter Sunday morning, Christ’s resurrection. Then we can learn that true and eternal life comes after death. Jesus raised Lazarus from the dead on the fourth day, but not to eternal life, so he had to pass through the gate of death once more. We know he died later. therefore they did not do everything to believe. This is their punishment, that they could accept Jesus, but did not. In order for someone to believe and accept Jesus as his God and Lord, he does not need special studies. It is necessary to have before the eyes the event of Good Friday, the death of Christ on the cross, and to accept the event of Easter Sunday morning, Christ’s resurrection. Then we can learn that true and eternal life comes after death. Jesus raised Lazarus from the dead on the fourth day, but not to eternal life, so he had to pass through the gate of death once more. We know he died later. therefore they did not do everything to believe. This is their punishment, that they could accept Jesus, but did not. In order for someone to believe and accept Jesus as his God and Lord, he does not need special studies. It is necessary to have before the eyes the event of Good Friday, the death of Christ on the cross, and to accept the event of Easter Sunday morning, Christ’s resurrection. Then we can learn that true and eternal life comes after death. Jesus raised Lazarus from the dead on the fourth day, but not to eternal life, so he had to pass through the gate of death once more. We know he died later. the death of Christ on the cross and to accept the event of Easter Sunday morning, Christ’s resurrection. Then we can learn that true and eternal life comes after death. Jesus raised Lazarus from the dead on the fourth day, but not to eternal life, so he had to pass through the gate of death once more. We know he died later. the death of Christ on the cross and to accept the event of Easter Sunday morning, Christ’s resurrection. Then we can learn that true and eternal life comes after death. Jesus raised Lazarus from the dead on the fourth day, but not to eternal life, so he had to pass through the gate of death once more. We know he died later.

In life, we encounter many questions and uncertainties. However, two things touch every person: life and death. The world is a huge cradle, but also the biggest grave. Only a person from animate and inanimate nature who is gifted with reason and free will knows that he will die. The animal can sense its end, but nothing more. A person can know that his existence does not end with death. The place where they put the remains, the body, or the dust from the body will remain empty, but that is not the end of a person’s existence. After all, the eternal God created man in his image and likeness. The human soul is eternal. No end. The human body will be glorified once more. All this is guaranteed by Jesus before he died and rose from the dead. “I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in me will live even if he dies (John 11:24). Today, it is a challenge: to accept and believe in the words of Jesus. Life is relatively short compared to the distances of the star galaxies, but it is long enough to prove itself freely and voluntarily for eternal life either as a punishment or a reward. It is not the length of life that matters, but how we fill our life. When we see different-minded people around the grave, it is a challenge for us to adopt the most advantageous way of life for us for life on earth and once for eternal life.

We, believers, accept death as a consequence of sin. We take a responsible approach to death because it is just like a bridge over which we cross into a new life, but life does not end with death. In science, it is said that matter turns into energy. Our mortal certainty is transformed into immortal energy, into eternal life in love. That is why Martha and I confess: Yes, Lord, I have believed that you are the Messiah, the Son of God, who was to come into the world.
Sometimes we say that a mother is a friend of a son or daughter, and by this, we want to emphasize that between them there is an amazing understanding, trust, and certainty of soul mates. There is something much more between Jesus and us. His teaching, example of life… We have become brothers and sisters, and Jesus is our assurance of eternal life. A friend is faithful. Jesus indicated this to his friend Lazarus when he received the message: “Lord, the one you love is sick” (Jn 11:3). Judas Iscariot was not a friend of Jesus. Sin destroys friendship. It is necessary to strengthen your friendship, even by a real return in the Easter Holy Confession.

Leo Nikolayevich Tolstoy, in his memories of childhood, mentions a story that stuck in his memory. He saw a drunk woman. She was lying on the side of the road, where dirty water was flowing from the yard. She tried to get up, but she couldn’t. I wanted to help her, but she disgusted me because she was dirty and I told myself that my hands would stink in a month. A little boy was sitting on the curb, tears streaming down his face, crying hopelessly: “Mommy, Mommy! Get up, please!’

The peak of Lent is upon us. What did sin do to us? Can it be expressed in words when we have the treasure, our soul, on our minds? However, Jesus died precisely so that we could rise, could receive the forgiveness of our sins. Change life on earth and earn eternal life after your resurrection. Let’s remember the words of the little boy: “Mommy, Mommy! Get up, please!” What do we want more from Christ than what he offers us, what he leads us to, and what he teaches us?

God loves even the most ungrateful person. God has not forgotten any of us. Let’s look at our hands and look at our fingertips. Each of us is original in God’s work. Today is the time that we want to take a responsible and faithful approach to the suffering, death, and resurrection of Christ.

Posted in sermons | 14 Comments

Egoism, Scandal, Perdition.

There are three kinds of egoism. The first is personal, which is condemned; the second is familial, which is justified; and the third is national, which is celebrated. Among the apostles, egoism was between the family, (collective and national/. Envy is the daughter of egoism and the mother of superiority.

Love of God and neighbor is the pinnacle of perfection, the foundation of all virtues. It is therefore easy to say that the opposite, love of self, is the source of all evil. So at least the French authors of the 17th and 18th centuries, including Bossuet, were fond of saying. La Rochefoucauld argues that all virtues dissolve in self-love like salt in water. Love is only true if it is selfless. And yet Aristotle already points out that reality never corresponds to the lofty talk of disinterested love. Would that be correct? What’s wrong with having to love ourselves? After all, we wouldn’t live any other way! What use would others benefit if we meant ourselves ill? The great philosopher of antiquity even dared to say that there is no but that we love ourselves. A mother loves her children because she considers them part of her person. We love a friend because he is our “second self.” This doctrine, to be sure, seems a little noble. Life does is not corrected by denying reality for the sake of some ideal motives. Aristotle’s doctrine needs to be supplemented, namely not by preaching and false encouragement, but by pointing out new facts, and new realities. The only way out of egoism, Aristotle, sees in true friendship. With a friend, we share interests, ideas, and a part of life. Those who do not have a friend are ultimately harming themselves. Christianity this fellowship between people has been strengthened in a strange supernatural way. In Christ, we are all one, as limbs of one body (cf. 1 Cor 12:12 .). To love our neighbor. Him, then, means to love oneself. On the contrary, even true love for oneself is for the benefit of others. The Gospel does not say that we are to love our neighbor and not ourselves. We are to love him as ourselves (cf. Mt 19:19).

Why, then, is selfishness the source of evil? “Selfishness” we usually refer to a love of self that is disordered, unreasonable, that does not reckon with the fact that neighbors belong to us. According to St. Paul’s simile, this is probably the case, as if the eye said to the hand, “I don’t need that one! Or as if the head said to the feet: I don’t need it. you!” (1 Cor. 12:21).
Egoism, then, harms itself. It thinks it likes itself, and yet it destroys itself. It deprives itself of everything that makes it beautiful, great, and strong: the union of grace with all men and with God. In that sense, of course, he is right St. Maximilian the Confessor, declared that the source of all virtues is the love of God, while the source of all vices is “self-love.” The egoist artificially isolates himself. Hell is then eternal loneliness.

Who belongs to the Church? Those who have been baptized. Many of them have left the Church, but they have no part in the life of the Church, but they belong to it. Children, always remain daughters or sons of their parents, even if they quarrel with them or leave home. However, those who have not been baptized but live according to conscience, doing good, also belong to the Church. Jesus said by their fruits, you will know them. Of course, by lasting fruit.

What does scandal mean? Becoming a stumbling block to someone’s faith, a stumbling block. Someone is following Christ, and we stumble at his feet. Either by bad example or bad counsel. We stop him in his tracks. Something may be a stumbling block to someone that is not a stumbling block to another. How do we find that measure of when something is an offense? When the apostles were asked. Does the master not pay your taxes? Jesus said to Peter. Go catch a fish, take the money out of it, and pay for yourself and for me so that, we are not a stumbling block to them. The principle applies here. Be careful.  Even if something doesn’t offend me, the other person is sensitive so I’d rather not say something, even though there may be nothing wrong with it. But some people want to be offended by everything. They see offense in everything, We are not to blame for such offense.
Who and when can be damned? The state of hell. The Bible has 6 or 7 different degrees. St. Thomas Aquinas takes them up. They are different states and not cauldron, fire devils. Jesus was talking about Gehenna. Gehenna was specifically a place outside the walls of Jerusalem, in the valley of the brook Gijón, where there was a so-called dung gate where garbage was taken out of the city as well as sacrificed animals, and it all burned there. We can imagine what the smell was like. Figuratively, it brings out the state of the soul. This image of fire is used by the prophet Isaiah in chapter 64. Those. who oppose God will be burned with unquenchable fire.

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

Testimonies about Jesus.

Do we have experience in giving testimony? The principle applies that the more credible a witness is, the more important and necessary his testimony becomes. John the apostle describes the testimony of Christ, which we should know in our faith and should not bypass. Jesus said to the Jews: “If I testify about myself, my testimony is not true. But there is someone else who testifies about me, and I know that the testimony he gives about me is true” (Jn 5:31-32).

Jesus acts as the Messiah, and according to the laws of the time, rightly so. That is, in Jewish law, it was valid that the sentence could become valid only when the facts of the act were witnessed by two witnesses. The Jews knew this regulation from the book of Moses, which we call Deuteronomy. There it is written: “One witness shall be of no avail in any guilt or crime which any man hath committed; the decision will depend on the testimony of two or three witnesses” (Deuteronomy 19:15). Jesus knows these regulations. He is sent by God, and he is approved by several testimonies: the testimony of John the Baptist, his deeds and miracles, the laws of Moses, or the books of the Holy Scriptures and by God the Father himself, who is his crown witness to him. The deeds that Jesus does are the deeds of God, and the voice of the Father calls to faith in Jesus Christ, as every unbiased person knows. Jesus Christ is the ambassador of God. We realize that whoever rejects such testimony is outside the law, his trial is false and invalid.

Centuries, and now millennia, have not changed anything for some. There are people in our environment who try to include Jesus in some group they have created, just so they don’t have to recognize Jesus Christ as their God and Lord. This is how they say about Christ that he did not exist at all, which is denied by Joseph Flavius ​​- Jewish historian, Pliny, and others, who accurately captured in their works the time when even we believers say that Christ lived among us. Others want to assign Jesus to the philosophers, others to the reformers. Some regard Jesus as a politician and generally as a person similar to us, but with a higher intellect for his time. But we know that Jesus cannot be included anywhere. He is not a social rioter, nor a dreamy thinker. He is God’s messenger, he is the mediator of salvation, therefore his words also apply to us, so that we believe, and we will be saved.

For us, the teaching of Christ is the teaching that shows us the way to eternal bliss. Let us repeat with St. Paul even today: “I know whom I have believed and I am sure” (2 Tim 1:12). Amazing confidence that can bear everything for Christ, that can move mountains, and that is the testimony for us that about itself says Jesus in the Gospel.  The testimony of Christ is unshakable when we have surrendered ourselves completely to Him.

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

The Sin.

1. If God loves us, why do we as individuals live full of insecurity, fear, and hatred? Why are we discontent, and emotionally unstable, fall into anxiety, grief, and self-limitations, and do not feel his love at all?
2. If God loves us, why are families breaking up at the societal level, children rebelling against parents, generations being pitted against each other, and rivalries and hatred reigning everywhere?
3. If God loves us, why are there wars, hunger, poverty, injustice, discrimination, oppression, and lack of freedom? Why don’t we as a society live a wonderful plan of love, justice, and peace?
4. And deep down, a discontented question gnaws: If God loves us, why don’t we try? Why isn’t our world a paradise where we live in harmony, peace, and justice?
A. The Problem
Before we would like to solve a problem, we must know the problem. If the problem is not formulated, the solution will never, we will never find it. If our car breaks down, we go to the mechanic to tell us what’s wrong. If our watch breaks down, we ask the watchmaker to fix it for us. But if it’s a broken life, who do we go to? If the world doesn’t go in the right direction, we’re supposed to ask the Creator of the world what’s going on. For all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God. (Rom 3:23). That which does not allow God’s glory to be manifested in the world’s love and the realization of his plan of happiness, peace, and unity, is called sin. Sin is the cause of all the evils that afflict humanity.
God has poured out a flood of love upon us. But we are under an unbreakable glass that allows us to watch the rain of love fall, yet we don’t even get wet in the water of life. It is sin that keeps us from experiencing God’s love. Ever since Satan deceived our grandparents in paradise, who believed that by their strength they could gain happiness and human fulfillment, all the unhappiness in which we live began: Man has drifted away from God, the source of life, separated from his wife and blamed her, and made friends with the creature who rebelled against him. Since then, hatred, hostility, and vindictiveness have reigned. Immediately afterward, the stronger (Cain) killed the weaker (Abel). Wars, injustices, the pursuit of wealth, and all the evil that exists in the world began. Our problem is that we are sinners, and therefore we are distant from God’s love. The worst thing is that we cannot avoid it because sin is not something we can prevent from coming into us, but something that is born out of the nature of our being. Why does the lemon tree always give bitter and sour fruit and not sweet and tasty? The reason is simple: it has the roots of the lemon tree and cannot give any fruit other than lemons. And so we also bear the fruit of sin because our roots, our hearts, are sinful. We need someone to change our hearts…

We are sinners, and that is why we sin. Because our roots are the roots of sin, it stands to reason that they bear the fruit of sin. When King David recognized his sins and confessed them, he said that he was a sinner from conception, that he was born a sinner. Indeed, I was born in iniquity and my mother conceived me sinful. (Ž 51, 7). Sin is like our shadow. It cannot be separated from us. They are only two ways to be free from the shadow: Remain in total darkness – which is even worse, to be light, because light has no shadow – which, however, is for human powers impossible. To want to save one’s life with one’s strength means, falling further into hopelessness and helplessness. When the first space satellites began to be sent to the moon, the fundamental problem that humans faced was that they didn’t have enough energy to get there -they were falling to earth. And the higher they got, the harder the fall and the worse the consequences. The same thing happens to us when we want to achieve happiness through our strength and means and realization of our life: When we seek false paths: materialism, humanism without God, communism, and capitalism…, when we believe in false idols: Satanism, divinity, greed, mind control, transcendental meditation, predicting the future…, when we depend only on ourselves: the fulfillment of one law, our righteousness, our good works…

We are blind, unable to find the way. And no one else can help us, because others are – like us – blind. We need power from above, which we do not have. Two drunken men boarded a boat to sail to the other side of the river. It was already dark. They rowed all night without it, to reach the other side. At dawn, after partially sobering up, they discovered that they had not advanced a meter because the boat was tied up. We, too, are bound by the rope of sin, which does not allow us, to try as we may, to attain the salvation that is on the other shore. Neither our good intentions nor our good deeds, nor our righteousness, is not able to secure our salvation. And it matters not at all what the rope is. The little bird cannot fly whether it is tied with a steel chain or a thin thread. Either way, it cannot fly. We need someone to cut the rope of sin… Sin is not believing in God, not trusting in God and trusting more yourself, preferring yourself and negating him, rejecting his will, to arrange our life according to ourselves. This means worshiping an idol.

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

The relationship of God the Father to God the Son.

The mystery of the Holy Trinity is the greatest. Jesus tells the Jews about this secret of authority and love: “Verily, verily, I say unto you, The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do. What the Father does, the Son also does” (John 5:19).

Jesus explains to the Jews his relationship with God – the Father. He emphasizes that God did not cease to be active even after the work of creation, as the Jews thought, but constantly maintains and manages the world. His son is his equal in nature, power and right, and majesty. This relationship is explained in theology in dogmatic by the doctrine of God in three persons – “De Deo Trino”. In the Gospel, John presents a serious idea: God has entrusted everything that he owns to his Son, namely: power, life, and judgment. From the Gospel, we see that Jesus does not make demands for people to believe in him, he does not rely on human authority, but on the authority of God. Jesus heals on the Sabbath, which offends the Jews. What God can do: raise the dead, and judge human deeds, he gave that to Jesus, his Son. From this, Jesus deduces for them that whoever does not honor him does not honor God – the Father either, but whoever believes his words gains eternal life.

Why can the Lord Jesus do what his Father does?
This he explains by saying that whatever his loving Father shows him, he also does. Whoever sees the Lord Jesus sees God. He who can listen to him listens to the Father, but also he who ignores him rejects the Father. Without him, we have no life, no salvation, and no way to God. And yet we accept the words of the Lord Jesus: “I am the way, the truth, and the life” (Jn 14:6). That’s why we look at Jesus as a landmark not only of history but also of humanity.

This means for us that indifference to Christ does not exist. Each of us must make a decision – either to accept Jesus or to reject him. We want to accept it. That is why Jesus is close to us, we see in him our Judge, who in the hour of our death will be a landmark of bliss or damnation. He earned this rank by his love for God the Father and us, his brothers and sisters when out of love he came among us to redeem and save us.

We believe that Jesus is “Truth”. We believe that the judgment upon us will be what we deserve and that it will be just because he will not punish for himself, but for the Father, whom he propitiated. Therefore, it is our effort to be fully lived through life and be respected by is authority. Whoever does not respect authority on earth offends and deserves punishment. Whoever does not respect authority for eternal life despises the love of Christ and therefore prepares himself for eternal damnation. Even when preparing for the Sacrament of Reconciliation, we should realize, that this may be the last opportunity to apologize to God for our sins.

The thought of meeting Jesus as a Judge will lead us to a responsible approach to eternal values. Therefore, when questioning the conscience, or during various discussions about the fulfillment of the Ten Commandments and other commandments, let’s not say and convince what my opinion is, how I like it, or how it suits me, but let’s look at Jesus. 

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

The church also has a relationship of faith with objects.

For example, do I expect my salvation and healing from a miraculous medal, scapular or holy water?

Jesus says to a sick man who has been lying at the Sheep Gate in Jerusalem for thirty-eight years, near the pond: “Get up, take up your bed and walk!” (Jn 5:8). The Holy Scriptures speak of healing water. Ezekiel writes about the healing power of water in Betsata Pond. This was not the natural power of water. We could compare it to the effects of water in today’s Lourdes, where many inexplicable healings took place – based on the immersion of a sick person in this water. The book Lourdes Lighthouse of the Atomic Age is written about these events not in a superficial sense, because each case is investigated by a committee of doctors and the doctors don’t have to be believers. When the Church gives evidence of unexplained healing, it is issued after a thorough investigation. So nothing, superficial, was invented.

The sick person lies in a colonnade by the pond where he came or could be brought to be healed in the water that restores health. However, he had no one to carry him into this water when it swirls, that is, when it acquires healing power for a while. It was something special. After the storm, the water in the pond healed only one, and that was the first person who entered it. This patient is therefore sad. Hope dawns on the sick man when Jesus asks him if he wants to be healthy. However, the sick person sees only a sick body, and Jesus wants to give him his salvation. The sick man thinks that Jesus wants to take him there, but Jesus does not want to become a nurse. He wants to heal with his word. The sick man was not healed with the help of miraculous water, nor with the help of some proven practices, but with the love of Jesus. This should lead him to seek Jesus and salvation. Jesus, who healed his body, can also heal his soul. That’s how we understand Jesus’ words, with which he admonishes him: “Behold, you are healed, sin no more, lest something worse befall you” (Jn 5:14).

Our faith is not based on the power of sacred objects. These objects, such as scapulars, agnostics, medallions, are only visible objects that are intended to awaken and maintain faith in the power and strength of the teachings of Jesus Christ. When we take such objects in our hands, let us not succumb to superstitions, and magical charms, because our devout respect for these objects is only meant to deepen our dependence on God. It is different if someone wears a cross around their neck or a rosary on their finger to call on God for help and protection, than someone who carries these objects with them as a talisman for luck or success. Let these objects remind us of the salvation of our souls. But let them help us grow spiritually and progress in fulfilling God’s and the church orders. Yes, we must not lightly provoke, but we must not passively resign when approaching, for example, the rosary and the like. Let us use these and similar things with discretion for the salvation of our immortal souls. In these matters, let us submit to the discipline of the Church while ensuring that it will only benefit the cause and our salvation. 

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

Saint Joseph.

Dies enthält ein Bild von:

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

Joseph, a righteous man and bridegroom of Mary.

With the birth of Jesus Christ, it was like this: His mother Mary was betrothed to Joseph. But before they started living together, it turned out that she had conceived from the Holy Spirit. Joseph, her husband, was a righteous man and did not want to expose her to shame, therefore he intended to release her secretly » Mt 1, 18-19.

We continue our reflections on the figure of St. Joseph. Today, I would like to take a deeper look at his designation of “righteous” and “betrothed to Mary”, and thus convey a message to all engaged couples and newlyweds. Many events associated with Joseph are told in the apocryphal gospels, i.e. non-canonical ones, which also influenced art and various places of worship. These writings, which are not in the Bible – they are stories that Christian piety created for themselves at that time – respond to the desire to fill the gaps in the narrative of the canonical gospels, that is, those that are in the Bible and that provide us with everything essential for Christian faith and life .

Evangelist Matthew. This is important: what does the Gospel say about Joseph? Not what these apocryphal gospels say, which are not bad or ugly; they are beautiful, but they are not the word of God. However, the gospels, which are part of the Bible, are the word of God. Among them is the evangelist Matthew, who calls Joseph a “righteous” man. Let’s listen to his story: «The birth of Jesus Christ was like this: His mother Mary was betrothed to Joseph. But before they started living together, it turned out that she had conceived from the Holy Spirit. Joseph, her husband, was a righteous man and did not want to expose her to shame, so he intended to release her secretly” (1:18-19). Because the fiancé, if the fiancée was unfaithful or if she became pregnant, was supposed to betray her! And in those days women were stoned to death. But Joseph was righteous. He says, “No, I won’t. I will be silent”.

To understand Joseph’s behavior toward Mary, it is helpful to recall the wedding customs of ancient Israel. Marriage was understood in two precisely defined phases. The first was the official betrothal, which already meant a new situation: especially the woman, although she still lived in her father’s house for a year, was actually considered the “wife” of the betrothed. They weren’t living together yet, but it was like she was his wife. The second act was the transfer of the bride from her father’s house to the groom’s house. This was done in a solemn procession that consummated the marriage. And the bride’s friends escorted her there.

Based on these customs, the fact that “before they started living together, it turned out that she had conceived”, exposed the Virgin Mary to the accusation of adultery. And this guilt was punished by stoning according to the ancient law (cf. Dt 22:20-21). Anyway, in later Jewish practice, a more moderate concept prevailed, which imposed only the act of repudiation with civil-law and criminal-law consequences for the woman, but not stoning.

The Gospel says that Joseph was “righteous” precisely because he obeyed the law like any pious Israelite. However, his love for Mary and his trust in her suggested to him a way to save the observance of the law and the honor of his bride: he decided to give her the deed of release secretly, without fuss, without exposing her to public humiliation. He chose the path of discretion, without judgment and compensation. How great is the holiness in Joseph! We, as soon as we hear some “colorful” or unflattering news about someone, we immediately go to gossip about it! Josef, on the other hand, is silent.

However, the evangelist Matthew immediately adds: “As he was thinking about this, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream and said: “Joseph, son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary as your wife, because what is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. She will give birth to a son, and you will name him Jesus; for he will deliver his people from their sins”” (1.20-21). God’s voice intervenes in Joseph’s discernment and through a dream reveals to him a meaning that is greater than his own righteousness.

And how important it is for each of us to cultivate the right life and at the same time feel that we still need God’s help! So that we can broaden our horizons and assess life’s circumstances from a different, broader, point of view. Many times we feel prisoners of what happened to us: “Well, look what happened to me!” – and we remain prisoners of something bad that happened to us; but it is precisely in front of some life circumstances that initially seem dramatic that Providence stands, which takes shape over time and sheds meaningful light on the pain that has struck us. The temptation is to close ourselves in this pain, in thoughts about the unpleasant things that happened to us. And that is not beneficial. It leads to sadness and bitterness. A bitter heart is so grumpy.

I would like us to stop and think about a detail of this Gospel story that we often overlook. Mária and Josef are two betrothed who probably cultivated dreams and expectations about their life and future. God seems to intervene as an unexpected event in their lives, and both, although with initial difficulties, open their hearts wide to the reality before them.

Dear brothers and sisters, our life is often not what we imagine it to be. Especially in relationships of love and feelings, it is difficult for us to move from the logic of falling in love to the logic of mature love. And it is necessary to move from infatuation to mature love. You newlyweds, think carefully about this. The first phase is always marked by a certain fascination that forces us to live immersed in an imaginary world that often does not correspond to reality. But just when falling in love with her expectations seems to end, true love can begin. To really love does not mean expecting the other person or life to conform to our ideas, but above all it means deciding in complete freedom to take responsibility for the life that is offered to us.

That is why Joseph gives us the important lesson that he chooses Mary “with open eyes”. And we can say that with all the risks. Consider that in the Gospel of John there is a rebuke that the scribes address to Jesus: “We are not sons who come from there”, alluding to prostitution. But because they knew how Mary became pregnant, they wanted to defame the mother of Jesus. To me, this is the dirtiest, most demonic passage in the Gospel. And Joseph’s risk gives us this lesson: take life as it comes. Did God intervene there? I take it. And Joseph did as the angel of the Lord commanded him: After all, the Gospel says: «When Joseph woke up, he did as the angel of the Lord commanded him and took his wife. But he did not know her until she gave birth to a son; and gave him the name Jesus” (Mt 1:24-25).

Christian couples are called to bear witness to the kind of love that has the courage to move from the logic of infatuation to mature love. And that is a difficult choice that, instead of imprisoning life, can strengthen love to withstand the tests of time. The couple’s love continues in life and matures every day. Betrothed love is – let me tell you – a bit romantic. You’ve already lived through it all, but then mature everyday love, work, and the children that will come begin. And sometimes the romance fades a little. Well, is there no more love? Yes, but mature love.

“But you know, father, sometimes we quarrel…” This has been happening since the time of Adam and Eve until today: husbands quarreling is our daily bread. “But shouldn’t there be arguments?” Yes, yes, there can be. “And father, but sometimes we raise our voices” – “It will happen”. “And also sometimes saucers fly” – “It happens”. But how to ensure that it does not damage the life of the marriage? Listen well: never end the day without reconciliation. We argued, I cursed you, my God, I said bad things to you. But now the day is ending: I must reconcile. Do you know why? Because the cold war of the next day is very dangerous. Don’t let the day after start with war. Therefore, reconcile before going to bed. Always remember: never end the day without making peace. And that will help you in your married life. This path from falling in love to mature love is difficult, but we must follow it.

Saint Joseph, you who loved Mary freely and decided to give up your ideas to make way for reality, help each of us to be surprised by God and to accept life not as something unpredictable to be protected from, but as a mystery, which hides the secret of true joy. Ask all Christian spouses for joy and radically, but always keeping in mind that only with mercy and forgiveness is love possible.

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

German synodal journey.

Both the blessing of same-sex unions and the sermons of the laity were given the green light. Rome is on the move

The raised finger from the Vatican only partially worked. The Church in Germany continues on its way.

Both the blessing of same-sex unions and the sermons of the laity were given the green light.  Rome is on the move

Chairman of the German Bishops’ Conference Georg Bätzing and head of the Central Committee of German Catholics Irme Stetterová-Karpová on March 9, 2023, in Frankfurt. 

Pope Francis received a “gift” from Germany on the tenth anniversary of his pontificate. Over the weekend, the local church finished the fifth and last session of the so-called German synodal journey (different from the worldwide synod on synodality), which has been causing controversy and controversy for the past three years.

Pope Francis also addressed the German Synod critically and ironically, saying that there is a very good evangelical church in Germany and we don’t need two.

The reform of the Catholic Church in Germany from Thursday to Saturday in Frankfurt am Main by 210 delegates, including German bishops and representatives of the Central Committee of German Catholics and other delegates appointed by these bodies. About 20 foreign observers were also present at the conference center.

The leaders of the process are the Bishop of Limburg and the Chairman of the German Bishops’ Conference, Georg Bätzing, and the Chairman of the Central Committee of German Catholics, Irme Stetter-Karp.

The assembly voted on several sensitive issues, and although it did not cross the “red line” that was clearly defined by the Vatican in the area of ​​approving the so-called synodal council, some other agreed steps are clear proof that the German Catholics did not back down. Vice versa.

As reported by the Austrian Catholic agency Kathpress, the synodal assembly in Frankfurt spoke in favor of the Pope re-examining the mandatory celibacy of priests. In other topics, the assembly decided on specific reforms for the area of ​​the German Bishops’ Conference.

For example, women and non-ordained men should be able to preach at Catholic services in the future. Blessing ceremonies for same-sex couples were given the green light, and in the church, the behavior of people who consider themselves transgender or who do not consider themselves male or female should be more respected.

It was also decided to further tighten the standards for dealing with perpetrators of sexual abuse and for the prevention of such crimes.

The last text adopted was a vote calling for the opening of the diaconate to women throughout the Catholic Church.

Blessing of homosexual unions: opposed by nine out of 58 bishops

Delegates in Frankfurt approved that the Catholic Church in Germany will officially bless the unions of same-sex couples from March 2026.

According to the DPA agency, out of 202 members of the synodal assembly, 176 voted for the proposal, 14 were against and 12 abstained. The necessary two-thirds majority was thus achieved, while according to the participants, a clear distinction must be made between blessing and marriage. The liturgical format of the ceremony with the participation of the bishops is to be worked out in three years from the time the change takes effect.

Only nine out of 58 bishops were against the proposal, while 11 bishops abstained. During the discussion, Bishop Stefan Oster of Passau, Bishop Gregor Maria Hanke of Eichstätt, and Bishop Rudolf Voderholzer of Regensburg, a close friend of the late Pope Benedict XVI, spoke.

Members of the KFD group, which represents Catholic women in Germany, protest before the start of the fifth synod session in Frankfurt am Main. They demand equal rights for women in the Catholic Church. 

Bishop Bonny and other bishops in Belgium introduced the blessing of same-sex couples as early as September 2022. The bishop of Antwerp told synod delegates in Frankfurt that during the Belgian bishops’ ad limina visit in November 2022, Pope Francis neither approved nor rejected the blessing, but said he was going for the pastoral domain of the Flemish bishops, as long as they are all united.

The Vatican Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith declared in 2021 that the blessing of homosexual partnerships is not permitted.

Five reasons why the church cannot bless a homosexual union

How to understand the latest position of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which once again caused stormy reactions in the world.

Transgender resolution: seven bishops against

The other approved text is titled Addressing Gender Diversity and was approved with the support of 96 percent of the 197 voting delegates. It was also supported by 38 bishops and only seven members of the episcopate were against it. Thirteen bishops abstained from voting.

The approved material calls for “specific improvements for intersex and transsexual believers,” including changing baptismal records to match a person’s self-determined gender, banning gender identity in pastoral roles, and mandatory training for priests and church staff to “deal with the topic of gender diversity’.

The text also prohibits “external sexual characteristics” from being used as a criterion for “accepting a man as a candidate for the priesthood,” which could open the door to attempts to ordain women.

Catholic News Agency (CNA) reports that during the debate, a minority of bishops spoke out against the measure, stressing that the church should improve its pastoral care for people who identify as transgender.

Auxiliary Bishop Stefan Zekorn of the Bistum Münster diocese said he could not support a text based on gender ideology, while Paso Bishop Stefen Oster said the document did not emphasize that a Christian’s primary identity should be rooted in Jesus Christ.

According to Julianna Eckstein, professor of theology at the Johannes Gutenberg University in Mainz, the book of Genesis is an insufficient basis for the questions of sexual anthropology.

And Viola Kohlberger, a young woman from Augsburg, told the audience that there is no “norm” for gender and that the tradition of the Catholic Church is holding back progress. “And I would like to break it today,” she said.

When the vote on the transgender resolution passed, delegates stood and applauded, while some hoisted rainbow flags, the German news agency CNA added.

Lay people can preach, celibacy is to be “reconsidered” by the Pope

Only ten of the 58 bishops voted against the measure, which calls on German bishops to promote the issue of women’s sacramental ordination at the continental and universal level of the church.

The proposal adopted by the assembly replaced the call to establish a “sacramental diaconate of women” with a call to “open the sacramental diaconate to women”. According to the CNA, the difference clearly shows that the German synodal path promotes the inclusion of women in already existing sacraments, an idea that the church has repeatedly affirmed as impossible.

People living in same-sex unions, as well as those who left the church, will be able to work for church organizations in Germany.

Delegates in Frankfurt also adopted another proposal that adjusted priorities regarding the all-male priesthood and called for the practice to simply be reviewed at the universal level of the church, rather than ended.

Munich Cardinal Reinhard Marx said the proposal was necessary to “reach consensus” for changes in the church’s dogmatic teaching on the priesthood.

Several female delegates were seen in tears after the vote, saddened that the text did not more explicitly require that priests be also women. “Discrimination against someone because of their gender must end in the Catholic Church,” CNA quoted delegate Susanne Schumacher-Godemann as saying.

In the adopted text entitled Proclaiming the Gospel to the Laity in Word and Sacrament, the Frankfurt Assembly states that bishops “entrust pastoral workers with preaching during the Eucharistic celebration” as part of their ecclesiastical mission “so that they can exercise their preaching ministry officially and in the name of the church”.

In the future, lay people – women and men – should be able to preach at Catholic services.

The “German Synod” also approved a measure asking Pope Francis to “reevaluate the connection between the granting of priestly ordinations and the obligation to observe celibacy.”

The measure was supported by 44 out of 60 bishops, eleven abstained and only five members of the episcopate voted against it.

The warning from the Vatican took effect. Partially

In addition to agreeing on the aforementioned controversial issues, the German assembly did not cross the “red line” defined by the Vatican.

It is about the establishment of the so-called synodal councils at the national, diocesan, and parishlevelsl. According to the Vatican, such a model of synodal councils, which includes the joint management of the church by bishops and lay people, is not by Catholic ecclesiology.

As NCR explains, in the German proposal the laity could even override the bishop, or the bishops at the national level, with a two-thirds majority.

Even before the synod meeting in Frankfurt, the church in Germany received a kind of warning. Apostolic Nuncio Nikola Eterović reminded German pastors at the plenary meeting of bishops in Dresden (which preceded the Frankfurt event) that they are not authorized to establish synodal councils.

Subsequently, the president of the bishops’ conference, Bishop Bätzing, wrote a letter to the three curial cardinals – Secretary of State Pietro Parolin, Prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith Luis Ladario, and Prefect of the Dicastery for Bishops Marc Ouellet. They wrote to Germany back in January, and Bätzing assures them in his reply that the German bishops take the “concerns” of the Holy See seriously.

At the same time, he states that as soon as possible after the synodal meeting in Frankfurt, he wants to go to Rome to talk about the dispute about the “German synodal road”. As reported by the Italian ACI Stampa, in a letter to the cardinals, the bishop of Limburg spoke about the project, which could last for another three years.

Chairman of the German Bishops’ Conference, Bishop of Limburg Georg Bätzing at the opening press conference in Frankfurt. 

Georg Bätzing thus takes his time on this controversial topic of the synodal council. The raised finger of the Vatican may have made sense since the delegates in Frankfurt did not approve the creation of synodal councils, but took another step towards an “unauthorized” body or bodies.

The so-called the synodal committee, which in the next three years is supposed to work on the preparation of the establishment of a permanent synodal council at the national level, elected twenty members – 19 laymen and one auxiliary bishop. They will join the 27 bishops and 27 members of the Central Committee of German Catholics who are already active in the synodal committee.

Bätzing is satisfied, but Stetter-Karp wanted more

The president of the bishops’ conference, Georg Bätzing, said at the final press conference in Frankfurt that the results give the bishops a mandate to make some changes in Germany now while pushing for broader reforms. “The church is visibly changing, and that’s important,” Bätzing said.

The president of the Central Committee of German Catholics, Irme Stetterová-Karpová, said that the results show that the synodal journey in Germany will continue.

“It doesn’t end here. It’s just the beginning,” she said, according to Kathpress, admitting that she wished for more. According to her, it was not possible to “really change the structure of the Catholic Church in Germany”. At the same time, however, she emphasized that this is a great success and that all-important decision-making issues are now on the table.

According to her, another success is the new culture of discussion. She also expressed the hope that further changes and reforms will take place.

The session was also accompanied by demonstrations in front of the hall. Some activists demanded equal rights for women in the church, and others warned with banners of “heresy and schism”, writes Kathpress.

According to the NCR,  none of the measures taken on the synodal road have a binding effect in German dioceses without being implemented by the local ordinary.

But observers believe the measures are likely to be introduced in most dioceses, in some cases because bishops support them, while in others because of intense pressure on bishops from church staff, Catholic media, or even other bishops.

In 2026, the next synodal assembly is to discuss whether and how the resolutions have been implemented.

This time a public vote.

The “German synodal journey” is criticized from various sides. For example, during the event in Frankfurt, the former personal secretary of Pope Benedict XVI gave an interview with the Augsburger Allgemeine. Archbishop Georg Gänswein.

“If the synodal path continues with the declared goals unchanged, the Roman Catholic Church in Germany will say goodbye to the unity of the universal church,” explained Gänswein.

He pointed to the ad limin visit of the German bishops in Rome last November, as well as to the mentioned letter of the three cardinals, which Pope Francis, according to him, “expressly approved”. According to Gänswein, this letter made it very clear what “it was about”. However, the majority of German bishops do not want to perceive this.

A different view of synodality, sexual morality or the consecration of women.  What about the Vatican?

Critics from among the bishops blocked changes to sexual morality, but subsequently, a text was adopted on the revision of the teaching on homosexuality.NCR and  CNA Deutsch, which belong to the same media house EWTN, also criticized the voting method. They point to the rejection of a secret ballot by the leadership of the bishops’ conference and the synodal presidency, as agreed in the statutes after the ballot failed for a blocking minority of bishops.

Namely, at the previous synodal assembly in September last year, the text on changes in sexual morality narrowly failed to pass, when 22 out of 55 bishops voted against it. IForthe text was to be accepted, not only two-thirds of the members present but also two-thirds of the bishops present would have to vote for it, according to the statutes of the synodal journey.

In response, the organizers changed the procedural rules to make voting public, which has continued even now in the fifth assembly.

On the website of the Catholic newspaper Die Tagespost, after the weekend, a comment with the headline ” Failed party conference ” appeared. In the text, the gathering in Frankfurt is referred to as an emotionally charged and not very argumentatively successful party conference, where the fight was fought partly by unfair means.

“The delegates staggered from compromise to compromise under great time pressure. Tears, accusations, and invocations replaced valid arguments. Some bishops felt blackmailed. The minority of bishops faithful to the Magisterium sometimes seemed to be outright resigned,” writes Die Tagespost in a comment.

Indeed, only a significant minority of bishops opposed the controversial material. In some votes, nine German shepherds were against it, in other times seven. There were only three German bishops who voted against all problematic proposals from last week’s so-called synodal journey.

We will see what Rome will say about these facts.

Posted in Nezaradené | 2 Comments