A question about God.

It is an ongoing question throughout human history. Simple nations knew the world’s mystery so vividly that they saw it everywhere and looked at everything with respect. When we disassemble the car on wheels and cylinders, did we say everything? Isn’t it necessary to see the minds of the designer and the car mechanics behind the vehicle? You will say that primitive people also attributed phenomena and processes to supernatural forces, which we explain by natural laws. But have we removed the secret by describing these laws? Whether we have already explained the astonishing fact by describing chemical reactions that a tree with branches, leaves, and fruits develops from a small grain.
Where did this ability in atoms of matter come from? When a simple man saw only secrets everywhere, he was perhaps closer to the truth about the world of life and himself than we, who deny the secret and are content to repeat the law’s formulas as spells. If a simple person saw a secret everywhere, it was an extreme. However, we have gone to the opposite extreme, as if there were no secrets anywhere. And we pretend to understand everything, although we cannot explain the origin of the grain of grain or the mystery of the human mind. We know that the individual beings of the world and the world as a whole are more than what we see and can touch. The world is immersed in a mystery that transcends it.
Do you find it strange? But is there no more car than we see on it? If you want to understand and explain the existence of a vehicle, you have to register what you do not see directly, but what is authentic, that behind it all the designer’s mind. Think about the designer and admit that the car depends on him, belongs to the reality of the vehicle. The vehicle could not have come into being on its own. Think of God amid the world, beyond the world, and above the world is no luxury. God necessarily belongs to the world, and the world cannot be separated from it. When we talk about God, it is not impersonal theoretical reasoning. This is something most important for our lives. It is not a matter of someone in whom everything is explained and acquires its meaning. We can have an opinion on something. However, we accept God with respect and love. We believe in Him. To believe is to complete the personality from a human point of view. To consider means not to be something incomplete and empty, and not to live in a vacuum.
To believe means to be involved in the whole, to be connected with people through God, and thus to be fully human with the world. Faith in God has encountered many pitfalls, especially since the 19th century. Some opposed it for science. However, the wave of this scientific enthusiasm has subsided. We look at the results and possibilities of the sciences today with respect, but also materially and soberly. Science cannot solve those problems and interfere in those areas of human life where the overriding need for faith, the need for God, arise. Today, the most excellent naturalists are either much more restrained in their belief in God than their predecessors or talk about the need for God and his necessary existence.

This entry was posted in Nezaradené. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to A question about God.

  1. zortilo nrel says:

    Hi there, I found your website via Google while looking for a related topic, your website came up, it looks good. I have bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.

  2. Peter Prochac says:

    Your comment encouraged me. Thank you.

  3. Please let me know if you’re looking for a article writer for your weblog. You have some really good articles and I feel I would be a good asset. If you ever want to take some of the load off, I’d really like to write some content for your blog in exchange for a link back to mine. Please blast me an email if interested. Thanks!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *