Where there was a blessing of homosexual couples, there was a division.

 

Where there was a blessing of homosexual couples, there was a division

Two Anglican parish priests at the blessing of their union.The blessing of same-sex couples does not cause passions and controversies only in the Catholic Church. What is happening with the Anglicans and the Methodists proves that wherever the churches did this, they were soon divided.

Anglicans. In the Anglican Church, they began to bless same sex couples only a day before the release of the Vatican document Fiducia supplicans , which Pope Francis allowed to bless irregular and homosexual couples. That is, December 17, 2023.

It is interesting that the General Synod of the Church of England used a similar argumentation as the Disaster for the Doctrine of the Faith in justifying this decision: marriage is only a union between a man and a woman, but the good that is found in the couple can be enhanced with a blessing.

Even the restrained attitude of the spiritual head of the Anglicans, Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby, who declared that he would not personally bless homosexual couples, did not prevent the bishops from Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Pacific, associated in the conservative network GAFCON (Global Anglican Future Conference), from declaring breaking away from the Church of England.

“What we have proposed as a way forward is not nearly enough for many, while for others it is already too much,” responded the Bishop of London Sarah Mullally for the AP.

Professor of political science at Eastern Illinois University Ryan Burge, who is also a pastor of the American Baptist Church, added that African bishops across Christian churches have powerful ammunition in their hands: “They are telling the West: We are the ones who grow.” You may have money, but we have numbers.”

Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby.

Methodists. Even more dramatic is the situation in the United Methodist Church, which with six million members is the third largest church in the USA (after the Catholic Church and the Southern Baptist Convention).

I mean, she was until recently. During the past five years, a quarter of the congregations left it (approximately 7,700 out of 30,500). The church has another seven million believers outside the USA, mainly in Africa, but many of them have already left and others are leaving. This also applies to the Evangelical Methodist Church in Slovakia, which left the United Methodist Church in 2022 and subsequently transferred to the newly founded conservative Global Methodist Church. We wrote more about it in this place .

A similar decision was made by many other Methodist churches, provinces, or congregations that no longer felt at home in the United Methodist Church.

The reason for this is that although the general conference of the church in 2019 rejected the liberalization of the Bible’s teaching on sexuality by a majority of 53 percent, many, especially American progressive churches, ignore this decision. An example is the consecration of the first lesbian bishop, although current norms do not allow it.

And what else. A similar division in the USA also occurred in the Episcopal, Presbyterian, and Evangelical Lutheran churches. On the contrary, the Southern Baptist Convention or the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormons) still adhere to traditional doctrine.

Of the three largest Christian denominations – Catholics, Orthodox, and Anglicans – currently, access to homosexual couples does not cause internal tension only among the Orthodox. On the contrary, when at the end of last year the Greek government announced its intention to promote same-sex marriages (registered partnerships have been valid there since 2015), the local Orthodox Church responded with a clear “no” .

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

Prayer is not measured by time, but by desire.

 

 
Prayer is not measured by time, but by desire

At sunrise, the believer remembers Christ’s resurrection, the rainbow reminds him of God’s covenant with Noah, the little bird reminds him of God’s care for everyone. Illustration image: www.istockphoto.com

In the last two reflections on spiritual renewal, we clarified some basics of Christian prayer. If prayer for a Christian is truly an expression of his relationship with God — a relationship that includes the whole being of a person — then even prayer cannot be limited to an oral form.

Unbelieving people sometimes mock the

supposed superstition of Christians who recite religious texts while vainly imagining that someone can hear them. Has God answered someone’s prayer? And yet: God answers, even intercedes himself. After all, prayer outside is not just a one-sided effort and is not limited to what happens in the temple. GOD SPEAKS TO US EVERYWHERE

We know that no one can personify faith and God’s grace. God gives out of His mercy according to His will—abundantly, in due time. However, the supernatural action of God’s Spirit does not close its possibilities. Saint Paul very eloquently points out this fact in his Letter to the Romans when he talks about the Gentiles: “It is evident to them what can be known about God; God revealed it to them. After all, what is invisible in him – his eternal power and divinity – can be known by reason from created things since the creation of the world; so they have no excuse” (Romans 1, 19-20).

Every created thing speaks of its Creator. The beauty of nature, the night sky, the harmony of natural laws and the entire creation can appeal to a simple person and a scientist. But the believer sees even more: at sunrise he remembers Christ’s resurrection, a rainbow reminds him of God’s covenant with Noah, a little bird reminds him of God’s care for everyone. God created the world for man, and our joy and gratitude for him makes him happy as well and is a constant opportunity to pray — to raise our hearts to God.

THE PRACTICE OF SPIRITUAL READING

If created things can elevate us to the heavenly, then much more God’s revelation itself — especially that which we have captured on the pages of the Holy Scriptures and served in the liturgy. We can already find the practice of spiritual reading among the first pioneers of monastic life. It is the desert fathers who are important witnesses in this regard, since in their case reading the Bible did not have the aim of expanding knowledge or theological science, but served prayer supremely.

In inspired texts, God speaks to us and prompts us to respond. Similarly, the texts of the Scriptures themselves can be the place where the Christian finds the answer to his questions or the direct expression of his own situation, as is often the case in the Psalms and other wisdom texts. From there, it is only a step to the next form of prayer — meditation. CONTEMPLATION IN GOD’S PRESENCE

Contemplation consists in reflecting on a certain selected text. It can be a text of the Holy Scriptures, the work of a saint, or you can help yourself with a book containing prepared meditations. In some currents of spirituality, meditation is directly connected to broader methods that include oral prayer or concrete practice of virtue. The modern method of lectio divina, which can also be practiced in the community, is very popular nowadays.

All these methods point to the fact that the goal of meditation is not only a kind of acquisition of the text, intellectual enrichment or awakening of religious feelings, but its goal is to use human abilities so that the soul remains in God’s presence and our love for God grows together with its practical realization in normal life.

St. John Cassian (ca. 360-435), a monk and author of important works of monastic literature, presents in his conversation with Abba Isaac a method of simple prayer that can be practiced in any circumstances.

“If you want to always remember God, constantly repeat the following call: God, come to my help; Lord, hurry to help me! This one saying was chosen from the treasure of Holy Scripture not without meaning, because it combines all the situations that arise in a person, and it can be well used in every state of the soul and in every temptation” (Conversations X, 10).

Abba Isaac then presents all sorts of cases from everyday life, in which this prayer can be used and has its own meaning. In principle, it is a short prayer that uses a simple, easy-to-remember, short text that is always at hand. In the monastic tradition, this way of prayer developed into the doctrine of the prayer of the heart — a simple prayer that should accompany the monk constantly. The goal of prayer cannot be one’s own spiritual performance, but God’s closeness and a relationship of love, which will one day find fulfillment in eternity.

This prayer has acquired various specific forms over time, and in our environment it is known mainly from Eastern Christian spirituality, in the form of the so-called Jesus prayer, using the formula “Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me”. In the Western tradition, there is a somewhat similar doctrine of the so-called gun prayer. Such a prayer can be repeated many times during the day and especially in situations where a longer prayer is not possible, such as situations of great mental tension, anxiety, and stress.

I give all these examples not because I want to point out the diversity of Christian spirituality, but rather to underline a very important fact: there is no one form or method of personal prayer that is suitable and effective for everyone and in every situation. Any convulsive adherence to some form of prayer regardless of external conditions, one’s calling, abilities or the fruit of the prayer itself leads to closing into certain schemes rather than to real communion with God.

If a person does not remain free in his relationship with God, begins to cling to external forms of religion or makes demands on God, he will not progress on the spiritual path

.CHERISH, TO GOD, NOT FORMS OF PRAYER The Holy Spirit is the spirit of freedom. If a person does not remain free in his relationship with God, begins to cling to external forms of religion or makes demands on God, he will not progress on the spiritual path. It is extremely important to leave God free to deal with man according to His purpose.

What does this mean in practice? First, it is important to know the calling that God gives me. If I am a monk, my prayer will also be a monk’s prayer, drawing on the long time spent in choral prayer, respecting the daily order of the monastery and other obligations resulting from the rule. If I am called to marriage, my relationship, and commitment to my husband or wife and everything that family life requires will be a priority for me.

Spouses cannot devote themselves to prayer as monks, but they can find a way of personal and communal prayer that corresponds to their state and vocation and respects the particularities of their vocation. Then when children enter life, it may seem that prayer suffers, but it is not so. Children are God’s gift, a sign of God’s will for spouses. Although there will be less time for prayer, and it may be necessary to look for new forms, but the relationship to prayer and God will not suffer as a result. On the contrary, it can deepen, develop in a new direction.

IT‘S NOT ABOUT PERFORMANCE, BUT ABOUT A RELATIONSHIP OF LOVE

Spiritual life is a journey that has its stages and lasts the entire time that God has allotted to us on earth. In some periods it will be more appropriate to pray in your own words, in others it will be necessary to help yourself with composed prayers. Sometimes contemplation will enrich the believer and lead him to good decisions and virtues. Other times it will be better to simply read, to let the inspired text work, but rational reasoning will not be necessary, or even possible.

 

 

 
 
Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

Third Sunday in Ordinary Time, Year B Mark 1,14-20

Posted in sermons | Leave a comment

Jesus calls by name

 
Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

Jesus told his disciples that they should prepare a boat for him so that the crowd would not press him › Mk 3, 9.

The news about the healings in Capernaum attracted a large crowd – so large that people threatened to trample Jesus. Without newspapers, e-mails, telephones or television, the news about Jesus spreads to Tire and Sidon, eighty kilometers away in the north, to Idumea, a hundred and twenty kilometers away in the south. How could the news about Jesus spread so quickly? Suppose one person told another, another person, another person, and so on. It was almost as simple as that. And so powerful. When God acts, one is amazed. Imagine that you are there too: you have heard of the healing of the sick, of the revival of paralyzed limbs, of the disappearance of despair and despondency. You have already heard about so many healings that you finally dare to think that a miracle could happen to you too. Hunger and hope are born in you. Hearing about “small miracles” – the easing of hardships, unexpected kindnesses, a good night’s sleep after many sleepless nights – could have the same effect. A simple spoken word is powerful, and you can share this good news with others. Tell someone about what God has already done in your life, how he manifests himself in prayer, how he speaks to you in the sacred readings at Holy Mass, and what from all this still resonates in your heart. Maybe thanks to that, you will ignite a spark of hope or faith in someone. You don’t have to dramatize anything or say it to the whole crowd; it is enough if you simply and truthfully tell at least one person how God works in your life. Then leave room for the Holy Spirit, who will deepen faith in the person in question. You don’t even have to convince anyone. God can do this because his words and actions have power in themselves. The world hungers for God, whether consciously or unconsciously, and it is you who can show him how and where you have seen him act. However, if you think you have nothing to talk about, ask him to give you the opportunity today. Always watch carefully how God acts – by word, encouragement, healing.

Posted in Nezaradené | 2 Comments

Memorial of Saint Anthony, Abbot, Mk 3,1-6

Saint Anton the Hermit, also called the Abbot, came from a rich Christian family. He was born around 251/52 in North African Coma, Egypt. When he was 20 years old, both his parents died. Anton took care of the family property and the younger sister.

But that didn’t last long. When Anton once heard the words of the Gospel while visiting a church service: “If you want to be perfect, sell everything you have and give to the poor…” (Mt 19:21), he decided to accept this challenge from Jesus. He gave some property to religious women with the request that they take care of his sister, and gave away everything else. He began to lead a strict ascetic life in prayer, self-denial, and physical labor. At first, he lived near his hometown. Later, the desire for greater solitude led him to a rock cave in the Libyan desert and finally to the desolate mountains between the Nile River and the Red Sea.

Anton’s contemporaries, especially simple people, did not know such comforts as are taken for granted in our times. They lived simply and hard. How must the hermit Anton live, when his way of life caused general admiration and respect? In addition to voluntary hunger, thirst, and a stone bed, Anton endured the harsh desert climate with admirable contentment, and in such conditions, he worked, prayed, and pondered over the words he read in the Holy Scriptures. But that was not enough. For many years he was tormented by severe temptations. Biographers mention that the devil appeared to him in various animal and human forms. Sometimes he tempted him with enticing seductions, other times he tortured him so much that Anton was often completely beaten up.

It is certain that many extraordinary events mentioned in Anton’s old biographies have too much fantasy in them and belong rather to legends. But even these, in their way, help to better realize the historical fact that Saint Anthony the Hermit chose a very difficult path of following Christ, from which he was not led away by any seductions or threats or debilitating suffering.

Anton sought solitude, but he did not always manage to keep it. His admirable way of life did not remain a secret. He was sought out by the curious and people who asked for advice and help. Not only ordinary people came to him, but also monks, priests, and bishops, even Emperor Constantine the Great and his sons addressed him by letter. Since Anton also had a reputation as a miracle worker, many sick people came to him to achieve healing with his help. Several of the visitors decided to stay close to him and follow his way of life. That is why Anton is sometimes referred to as the founder of monastic life. However, he did not organize any monastic communities; only his younger contemporary Pachomius did that.

Despite his great desire for solitude, Anton did not despise human company. When there was a serious reason, he was willing to leave his heritage and go to help those who needed him. Thus, in the persecution under Emperor Maxi minus Daza (around 310), he set off on a long journey to Alexandria to strengthen the persecuted and imprisoned Christians there. Towards the end of his long life, he left solitude once again, at the request of the Alexandrian bishop St. Athanasius. He asked Anton to help him defend his true faith against the error of Arianism. It was already a very arduous journey for Anton, over a century old, but he went. When he returned, he felt that he was about to die. He warned his disciples of his impending death and ordered them to bury him in such a way that no one would know about the place of his grave.

Anton died at the advanced age of about 105 years. Biographies give the date of his death as January 17, 356. His grave remained unknown for a long time. It was only discovered during the reign of Emperor Justinian I in 561. At that time, his remains were transferred to Alexandria. Well, not for long. When the Muslims conquered Egypt, the remains of Saint Anthony were transported (in 635) to Constantinople. From there, around the year 1000, a large part of the remains reached France, where they have been kept in the church of St. since 1491. Julien in Arles.

St. Anthony Abbot had a surprisingly strong influence on his generation and subsequent periods. Under the influence of his example, thousands of Christians left their homes and chose a strict ascetic life. Even in the West, hermit communities were formed according to his model (Rome, Milan, …). St. Anthony himself did not establish any monastic institution and did not write any rules for his disciples. He was their living rule, which they strove to realize in their lives. What was later referred to as the rules of St. Anthony, was only a summary of advice and instructions, mostly taken from the biography of St. Anthony, written around 370 by St. Athanasius. After the saint’s remains were transferred to France, his veneration spread greatly in this country as well. A special knightly order of St. Anton and several fraternities for caring for the sick.

Anthony’s institutions, especially hospitals, had a good name and great privileges in France. Among them was the permission to raise pigs where other residents were not allowed to do so. From there, some derive the custom of depicting St. Anton Pustovník with a pig. Perhaps the veneration of this saint as the protector of domestic animals is related to this. Others explain the depiction of St. Anton with the pig so that it is an allusion to his temptations, during which the devil appeared to him in the form of animals. There is also a legend, according to which the defeated devil had to accompany the holy hermit in the form of a bravo as punishment.

Although these are mostly folk and legendary ideas, these also help – especially simple people – to understand the great spiritual power with which the great holy hermit Anthony surpassed everything that was animal and diabolical.

 
Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

The contradiction between the spirit, the body.

From the moment we receive the Holy Spirit into our hearts, we can no longer live “after the flesh.”
Do you know the Holy Spirit? St. Paul still teaches, “Those who live as he wills the flesh, seek only the things of the flesh; but those who live as the flesh wills the Spirit, after spiritual things. The efforts of men of the flesh lead to death and the efforts of spiritual men to life and peace. Therefore, the strivings of carnal men stand at enmity with God, for they are not subject to the law of God, yea nor can they be. Those who live to their flesh cannot please, God. But you do not live after the flesh, but according to the Spirit, if indeed the Spirit dwells in you. God” (Am 8:5-9).
The habit of pitting the spirit against the flesh is an ancient one, though it is not always clear how this is to be understood. The origin of this language seems to be found in the Indian sages. In Greek Platonic philosophy, it was understood as a radical distinction between the material body and the immaterial soul, which was therefore considered spiritual. This implies the moral necessity to renounce material values, to reduce to the smallest degree the needs of the body, and to follow the path of asceticism. Exhortations (exhortations), taken from Greek literature, were often repeated by the Church Fathers. But we must be careful to understand their proper meaning in a Christian setting. The word “spirit” in the new meaning is reserved for the Holy Spirit, and only the person we can call “spiritual” in whom the Holy Spirit works Holy Spirit. Then the term “body” also takes on a new meaning. It does not only mean the material element of our person and therefore created by God as good.

 One spirit with the Lord’s “flesh” according to St. Paul refers to all centrifugal, sinful inclinations that oppose the work of the Holy Spirit both in the inner man and in the world. This resistance to the Spirit, a consequence of sin, is not only in the body but above all in the soul. Hence, we are not surprised at the statement of Origin, which says that the souls of sinners are “carnal” and that the first “carnal” is the devil himself, even though he has nobody. It is important to realize the meaning of this terminology to understand the texts of Scripture and the Fathers properly, and to avoid the misunderstanding that Christianity seems to be the enemy of the human body. On the contrary, even the body must participate in the ideal of “progressive virtualization” of the human person.

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

Invitation to get to know each other.

Many ask, “Teacher, where do you live?” they don’t ask because they don’t see the reason. But in every life, there will be situations with painful phenomena.

When I visited houses and apartments in the parish during the Christmas season to bless them, I had the opportunity, if only for a few minutes, to enter the personal zone of many parishioners. Few things give you such a picture of a person as their living situation.

It is not only a question of whether he is surrounded by expensive or inexpensive things, but what he surrounds himself with, whether he likes order, and how the various items in his home are arranged. This is how you get clues as to what is important to the person or family.

At the same time, you don’t just invite anyone into your home. We have many acquaintances and friends, but we meet them at work, at school, on the street or in the shop. At home, we welcome family and close friends. Inviting someone home is, in a sense, a marking out. As long as we “only” meet, we can claim anything about ourselves. In the abode, however, things and surroundings speak about us. It’s where others get to know who we are, what we like, or where our favorite corner is.

If I’m meeting someone and our communication or relationship shouldn’t be formal, I’ll invite them home or accept the invitation. Walking into a stranger’s home is an invitation to get to know each other better.

In a home environment where I feel comfortable, I don’t have to act macho, I can open up more and show who I am. We know this pattern well. Every marriage starts with dating together, then we get to know where the other person lives and their family, and at the end we decide to live our lives together under the same roof.

This rule, so well known in everyday life, is also present in the Gospel. At the beginning of his public appearances, Jesus is only just being recognized by many. So two potential disciples approach him and ask him a question: “Teacher, where do you live?” His direct answer is also an invitation: “Come and see.” Behind Jesus’ words is not a desire to satisfy their curiosity, but to bring them to know him. One can only desire what one knows, at least in part.

We are invited into his “dwelling place” to get to know him better.
When a person desires to know God, he is one of the lucky ones and is on the right path. Those who desire to know the Lord more and open their hearts to Him will be given opportunities for their desire to be gradually fulfilled. Our culture does not help people to mature into such a question, which is why many never even ask it.

To state that we are surrounded by a superficial commercial culture, overwhelmed by platitudes, is carrying wood into the forest. Many of us are aware of this. It’s so easy to drown in the endless entertainment of short videos, never-ending information, and notifications from our messengers.

Many wonder, “Teacher, where do you live?” they don’t ask because they don’t see the point. Inevitably, in every life, a situation will arise in which our existence is confronted with painful phenomena. We are not immune to setbacks, wrongs, frustrations, sickness, or death.

In such a moment, every human being seeks a clue. If he has even a germ of Christian faith in him, he intuitively seeks spirituality with its answers or God directly, to regather the shards of his own life in conversation with him.

It is good that this is so. Jesus’ redemptive mission is for all. God can find an original way for each person during his or her lifetime so that he or she cannot help but notice it. Only if everyone takes courage and has the goodwill to respond.

In any case, we are indeed called to a deeper touch with the transcendent, to open ourselves to the God who transcends us. We are invited into his “dwelling place” to get to know him better. He calls us because we are God’s children for whom he sacrificed himself, and he does not want us to trudge around the world like lonely runners with our limitations, but to find peace of mind and a fixed point, which for human beings is only him. The sooner we understand that, the better.

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

The journey to the land of faith.

Is God just a mirror image of our desire?

Critics claim that God did not create people in his image, but on the contrary – man creates a god in his image. Is it so?

Is God just a mirror image of our desire?

A thought once occurred to me: “Aren’t the images we create of God a mirror image of our dreams, desires, and anxieties?” Religious critics, such as philosopher Ludwig Feuerbach, that’s what they say. They are fundamentally suspicious of references to God. They say that God is just a figment of imagination, a wishful thinking of people.

To support this thesis, they argue as follows: because man cannot be good, he longs for God’s goodness. Because there is injustice here on earth, there arises a desire for heavenly justice, which will settle everything. Because we humans lack certainty, we dream of a saving “heavenly Father”.

Regarding this point, they claim: that God did not create people in his image, as it is written in the biblical account of creation, but on the contrary – man creates a god in his image. So to speak, he projects his desire for the heavens – like a projector projects an image on a wall. And then he prays to this projection and calls it “god”.

Reality versus illusion

Undeniably, all our images of God also contain projections. But is God himself an illusion? When you are hungry, your body sends a signal and you start thinking about food. Images of delicious food flash through your head. You dream about him. Your dream image is unrealistic. But is food, the food itself an illusion? After all, your hunger is clear evidence that there must be food somewhere.

There is a “hunger for God” all over the world. It is not possible to explain the phenomenon of religion otherwise. Where does the “hunger of people for God” come from in a thousand variants? Why have people of all eras, cultures, nations, and religions dreamed up to this day, in countless images and again and again, the dream of “God”?

You may have heard this phrase as a child: “Dreams are like foam.” A silly phrase that you should forget right away. Today, thanks to psychoanalysis, we know that dreams are the language of our soul. As a rule, what appears in dreams is what we suppress in the waking state or what we do not admit to ourselves at all. They often contain messages that we should listen to.

Food that satiates

God’s word is a signpost and a source of strength, healing, and critical commentary on what we do daily.

I read once about a woman who claimed to be an atheist and who turned to psychotherapists with the following question: “Can you please help me? I have been a convinced atheist for many years. I do not believe in god. My only problem is that I dream about him every night. Please explain it to me!”

I don’t know how the therapists responded. But could it not be that this woman’s recurring dream is related to her pushing God out of her life?

Could it not be that it is God himself who, in our longing for him, speaks to the word to remind us again?

Couldn’t the desire for God be the right impulse for the fact that God is here – an image of hunger for him?

God as a mirage?

What fills us up? What bread of life? The fact that we form false ideas about the Bread of Life is no reason to suspect it of being an illusion.

I would like to ask you not to prematurely suspect God of illusion. Because then something similar to those “modern people” who got lost in the desert can happen to you. Completely exhausted, they see an oasis in front of them. “Ah, a mirage,” they think, “a reflection of the air that wants to drive us crazy.” They are approaching the oasis. But she will not be lost.

They can see the date palms and the spring more and more clearly. “Of course, it’s a fantasy of hunger,” they say to themselves, “that shot our half-mad wits. Now we can even hear the water gurgling. An auditory hallucination!’

A little later, two Bedouins find them – but dead. “Do you understand it? Dates grow almost in front of their noses and they perished. They lay very close to the spring and died of thirst. How is that possible?” The other answer: “They were modern people.”

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

Meeting with a doctor.

It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick. The Lord Jesus enters the environment of sinners in the role of a physician. This healing role is to become our lot as well. The Christian is to go boldly into the world to transform it, to sanctify it by his prayer, his work, his example, and his life. This entry of the Christian into the world has been defined by Christians as consecration, or the sanctification of the world. As the priest takes ordinary bread in his hands at Mass and, with words of consecration, transforms it into the body of Christ, so we too are to transform, to direct to God, all the things of this world that our vocation in life encounters. In this way, we can heal many human ills if people feel the presence of Christ in our presence. But the problem of Christ as a physician has yet another aspect that should interest us. Perhaps we like to take on the role of physician of other people’s sins. But who do we consider ourselves to be? As righteous and perfectly healthy? We often encounter Christ at Mass, for example, where he offers himself for the sick. We encounter Jesus through his word and sacrament. Do we think of him as a physician in these encounters? Or rather as a reward for our righteousness? It might be better not to overdo it with our righteousness. It is certainly better to turn to Christ than to a doctor. Not a few sicknesses have hidden in our souls, various paralyzes, deformities. We may not be hurt by anything, but we are not hurting others. Perhaps one of us is a wound on the organism of the community. Either way, we always need some healing, because there are no people one hundred percent healthy. But the first condition of healing is to acknowledge that we are sick. As we see the Pharisees reject the Lord Jesus, but the humble tax collectors who consider themselves sinners are justified in his sight.

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment