Cardinal Müller writes to Cardinal Duka.

During the Synod’s first week, Cardinal Gerhard Müller, a direct participant and strong critic of the Synodal process (calling it “a hostile takeover of the Church of Jesus Christ”), caused a stir.

Also, during the second week, the name of the former Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith came into the spotlight, although his activity this time was not a direct part of the session in Rome.

Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller wrote a letter to Cardinal Dominic Duke in which he commented on the response of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith to the dubia sent to the Vatican by the Archbishop Emeritus of Prague. The Prefect of the Dicastery, Víctor Manuel Fernández drafted the response.

Cardinal Müller’s letter was published on his blog Settimo cielo by Vatican scholar Sandro Magister.

Burke and Sarah ask about blessing of gay couples, Duka on divorcees
Cardinals write to the Pope/ Burke and Sarah ask about blessing gay couples, Duka on divorcees
The German cardinal, in a letter in which he teases Cardinal Duke and calls him “brother,” questions Fernandez’s claim that the interpretation of Amoris Laetitia from the Diocese of Buenos Aires is in continuity with the teachings of previous popes.

According to Prefect Fernández, Pope Francis insists on the total continence (continenza) proposal. First, therefore, they divorced and remarried in a new union. Still, he admits that difficulties may arise in its practice. Thus, in some instances, after appropriate discernment, he allows the Sacrament of Reconciliation to be conferred even when a person is incapable of the continence required by the Church.

According to Cardinal Müller, “even when one is incapable of the continence required by the Church” can be interpreted in two ways.

The first is that these divorcees try to live in continence, but because of difficulties and human weakness, they cannot do so. In this case, the “answer” could be in continuity with the teachings of St. John Paul II, Müller says.

The second is that because of their difficulties, these divorcees do not accept to live abstinent or attempt to do so (i.e., they have no intention of changing). “In this case, it would be a break with the previous magisterium,” says the former Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

According to Müller, Fernández’s answer seems to refer to the second possibility, as is supposedly indicated by the text of the Bishops of Buenos Aires themselves, who admit that there are cases of divorcees who do not try to abstain.

Cardinal Müller states that the continuity in the teaching of the Popes does not lie in the fact that someone may have already been admitted to Communion but in the criterion of that admission.

“John Paul II and Benedict XVI allow divorced people who, for serious reasons, live together without sexual intercourse to receive Holy Communion. However, they do not allow it when these persons habitually have sexual intercourse because here there is an objectively grave sin in which the person wants to persist and which, insofar as it touches the sacrament of marriage, takes on a public character,” Müller says.

In the “dubia,” the Czech cardinal also wondered who would decide on access to the sacraments for this group of people – a confessor, a local parish priest, an episcopal vicar, or a prison.

“The solution in the ‘Answer’ must have surprised you, which you could not have imagined. According to the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, the final decision must be made by each believer according to his conscience. It follows that the confessor merely submits to this decision of conscience,” Müller writes to Cardinal Duke.

“The faithful decide whether they will receive absolution, and the priest can only accept this decision! If this applies universally to all sins, then the sacrament of reconciliation loses its Catholic meaning,” the German cardinal continues.

According to him, in such a case, it is a matter of absolution of oneself after examining one’s own life. “This is far from the Protestant view condemned by Trident, which insists on the role of the priest as judge in confession,” he added.

At the same time, Cardinal Müller accused the dicastery he has led in the past of selectively picking and choosing from John Paul II’s statements what suited him when responding to Duke’s Dubai (alluding to the encyclical Ecclesia de Eucharistia).

The German cardinal finds it astonishing that the dicastery could present a text “with such a theological error for the Pope’s signature, thus endangering the authority of the Holy Father.”

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

Without fear of Christ. Jesus teaches us that whoever believes in him and lives does not need to be afraid.

Let’s continue yesterday’s reflection. A well-known European institute conducted a psychological survey. To the question: “What is the most powerful driving force in a person’s life today?” 98% of the respondents answered that it is fear. Jesus tells us: “Do not be afraid” (Lk 12:4), and today, “Everyone who confesses me… even the Son of Man will confess…”(Lk 12:8).

Whoever believes in Christ and acts in the spirit of Christ should broadcast from the “rooftops” what he heard “into the ear” so that the words of Jesus become known to the whole world and nothing prevents everyone from becoming aware of them. Indeed, the one who will fulfill the will of the Teacher Jesus and proclaim his words will encounter many difficulties and dangers. He will find himself like a sheep among wolves and must reckon that his action may bring him martyrdom, if not bloody, then at least bloodless. Even in such a case, the witness need not be afraid because the murderer can kill the body, but he cannot kill the soul. If we faithfully stand by Christ, He will take care of us.

It is up to us what attitude we realize in life, whether festive or every day. We noticed in Jesus’ words how he emphasizes that we confess to him clearly and comprehensibly in our lives. Jesus demands that we defend his teachings clearly and effectively. There is enough opportunity around us not to be afraid to profess our faith. There are many people around who spread lies half-truths, who deliberately lie, and who are not interested in the truth. A Christian has someone to lean on. Christ also asks us to live in truth, love, and justice. Otherwise, it would be true of us that it would be better if we were not baptized. St. Bernardino says: “I saw blackmailers, prostitutes, cruel soldiers converted… They became brave people. But I haven’t seen a single lukewarm convert.” They are considered good. I didn’t steal, I didn’t hurt…

Jesus is with us even in the most challenging moments. Jesus does not disappoint. An example from life says it well: A boy in a hospital was to be operated on. His father brought him to the hospital and tried to give him courage. “Daddy,” said the boy, “if you stay with me, I won’t be afraid.” The father said, “Okay, I’ll stay with you.” The doctor allowed it, so the father sat beside his child, lying on the operating table. When the boy was about to be put to sleep, he looked at the father again and said, “Dad, are you here? ” Then the anesthesia started to work. “You can leave now,” said the doctor when the little one fell asleep, and the operation was about to begin. “No,” replied the father. “I promised my son I would stay with him and would like to stay.” “Okay, then stay.” The operation was successful. When the boy woke up, his father was still holding his hand. The boy smiled and softly whispered, “Daddy, are you here?” and fell asleep again. He knew that his father was with him.

Thank God that quite a few among us do not want to disappoint Christ by sin. “Fear not!”

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

Mission Sunday Mt 28,16-20

Since 1926, the Church worldwide has been celebrating the so-called “Mission Sunday.” Pope Pius XI declared it a day of prayer and help for missions, particularly this year, or better, this year, when Pope Francis specifically emphasized the missionary mission of the Church; we should not pass it by without noticing.

What exactly are missions? The answer can differ, depending on the  .” Still, we, we look at them. Theology will tell us that “mission is the free proclamation of the Gospel, as intelligible truth and concrete love among all peoples and in all historical situations.” Still, we are usually not very wise from mere definitions.

In essence, it is the fulfillment of the words of Jesus Christ, given to the church at His Ascension: “Go into the whole world and preach the gospel to all creation!” He who believes and is baptized will be saved, but he who does not believe will be rejected.” In the name of the fulfillment of these words of Christ, for 2000 years, the heralds of Christ’s glad tidings have been going out to those who have not yet heard of Christ and testifying to them with their lives and words about their faith and impart to them the teachings of the Church about salvation for all people.

Historically, the first missionaries were the apostles themselves, then their disciples, and after them, others and others. However, we talk about real missionaries much later, in the 16th century. When, with the development of seafaring and the conquest of new territories, religious men most often came to teach the indigenous population the truths of faith in the newly discovered and – unfortunately repeatedly also bloodily conquered – territories and, what was especially important to them, to mediate their salvation through baptism. After all, according to the teachings of the faith valid at the time, “a heathen cannot be saved.” The intentions of the missionaries were .” good and selfless. Still, they undoubtedly. They were soon abused by the powerful and wealthy of their time, and they often turned happy, free pagans into unhappy, unfree, enslaved Christians. This is one negative aspect of breaking into new, hitherto unexplored territories. Another is the one often brandished by anthropologists. The imposition of a more developed Christian culture at the expense of the local cultures of primitive peoples resulted in the loss of their roots and traditions and the non-acceptance of the new Christianity. Many baptized, educated, and Europeanized natives lost a common language with their fellow citizens and did not find a common language with an advanced Christian culture. We would undoubtedly find more reprehensible phenomena of missionary activity in history. Still, the goodwill and commitment of missionaries to the salvation of indigenous souls cannot be dismissed because of a negative experience. Can it be said that the spread of Christianity was something terrible? Exactly opposite!

However, let’s move through the past centuries to the present. Even today, when there are no more white spots on the world map, and the globe is woven with millions of communication networks, there are still missionaries, and missions are needed. However, the form and content of the missions have changed.

The missions are centrally organized and subordinate to Rome—specifically, the Congregation for the Evangelization of Nations. The Papal Missionary Work has a worldwide scope. This has its own National Centers headed by the National Director in the individual states. They no longer ensure the sending of missionaries to the missions, but they create material and prayer facilities to help the missions. And here is a field in which every Christian can participate.

The main task of the missions is to spread faith in Jesus Christ and to create and support local church communities, through which the people in the missions will be able to participate in the sacraments in their language and according to their, often adapted, rite. Here, I see the most significant shift compared to traditional missions in past centuries. No longer to come and bring alien teachings into the local cultural environment and, in its name, suppress and destroy what is one’s own. But to go and in a way proper to the mentality of the local people, with the help of their tradition and language and preferably their people, is to teach them the truths of faith. That is why the giant sums from the treasury of the Papal Mission Work go to the building of local seminaries and the education of their priests, who will be understandable and authentic for them. This, in my opinion, is the meaning of missionary work: to create a spiritual background from “own resources,” and through them, hand in hand, material, social, medical, and charitable help will also come. In short, to pass on faith in Christ, to strengthen and spread the actual values ​​for their life, to ensure broad education, social and health care, and to leave everything inherent to the given culture and mentality.

Our so-called advanced, cultural world often does the exact opposite: it gives them money for weapons instead of tractors, will build Coca-Cola billboards instead of hospitals, installs economists and managers, plunders the natural wealth, and makes residents poor, not only materially, but also spiritually. And because as the pockets of the monopolies are filled, the country is poorer and poorer, he will offer them condoms as a medicine to control the birth rate. At least, this is how the operation of the so-called “International Monetary Fund” appears. The already mentioned “Pope Missionary Work” offers a better and more effective weapon of the most potent caliber and reach: Love, selfless help, and prayer. After all, today’s collection also serves this help, and the Sunday of prayers for missions also encourages us to do this help.

Posted in sermons | Leave a comment

The right attitude to fear.

The right attitude to fear. A Christian finds an answer to fear in his faith. Is there anyone among us who has not encountered fear in his life? How many reassurances do we receive during our life? And yet the assurance of Jesus – until the end of time, is still temporal: “Do not be afraid” (Lk 12:4). We do not need to be afraid of what we do with the intentions of Christ. Whoever believes in Christ and acts in the spirit of Christ should broadcast from the ” roof” what he heard “in his ear” so that the words of Jesus become known to the whole world and nothing will prevent everyone from realizing them. Indeed, the one who will fulfill the will of the Teacher – Jesus, and proclaim his words will encounter many difficulties and dangers. He finds himself like a sheep among wolves, and he has to reckon that his action may also bring him martyrdom, if not bloody, then at least bloodless.
Even in such a case, the witness need not be afraid because the murderer can kill the body, but the soul he cannot kill. We must fear the One “who can destroy both soul and body in hell” (Mt 10:28). The Creator cares for all His creation. If a sparrow does not perish without his will, no hair will be lost on the head of a man dear to God. Throughout the text, one can see God’s great concern for man. Fear is in a person’s blood from birth to death due to original sin, which is all a motive of fear. Why is there so much fear when we believe in God? How many words express this state of ours: fear, timidity, apprehension, horror, alarm, dread, panic, terror, uncertainty, restlessness, threat, dismay, trembling, shaking, and how many other names are there for the state of mind and body when we approach the wrong to your God.
“Do not be afraid!” these words of Christ are to be realized by all of us who have believed in Christ. We must not be intimidated so quickly because fear makes our lives unpleasant and difficult. It destroys and enslaves us to fear when we base ourselves on what people think about us, what they say about us, what they write about us, and how they treat us. We must not be ashamed of our Christianity. When we faithfully stand by Christ, He will take care of us. To be faithful to Christ even in difficulties and unpleasant things, to confess Christ, even in front of those who do not have the best relationship with God, faith, the Church, Christianity, the Pope, quickly brings peace, joy, satisfaction… When we put God first, it is beautiful, functional, and suitable for us. What God from us asks. When we make God happy with our behavior. Our faithfulness to God’s word is the guarantee of our eternity. We must not hide our Christianity from someone who has power, position, education, etc. and does not believe in God. It is suitable when someone says, and possibly according to whom he lives, that he is a Christian in his soul, but outwardly, in his behavior, he behaves in such a way that he does not show it. The Pope is not afraid! He accepted the words of Jesus and lived in their intentions. Jesus commanded us all: “Do not be afraid” (Luke 12:4). Let us pray: “Lord, we do not want to be afraid anymore. Lord, we are not afraid anymore. Lord, you are our security.”

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

Who are the most prominent representatives of the individual camps and what do they bring to the synod?

Some talk about Pandora's box, others demand radical inclusion

However, it is not enough to distinguish it only academically.

One example on which Pope Benedict XVI wanted. to explain the subjective dimension of sin, was widely publicized. It was when he was talking about a homosexual prostitute who is infected with HIV. The Pope said that when the person starts using a condom, it is a moral step forward for him. Here we are talking about a morally perverted act on all levels. For that person to choose to protect their “client” is a moral step forward.

It seems to me that these positions of Pope Francis – drawing attention to the subjective side of sin – have been consistent for a long time in his pontificate. He also speaks very similarly about the giving of the Eucharist for the divorced and remarried. Is that so?

Yes. And it is not only consistent with his previous statements, it is also consistent with the teachings of the Catechism of the Catholic Church signed by Pope John Paul II. and was developed under the leadership of Cardinal Ratzinger.

However, we cannot categorically say that something is not a sin. A specific person may be in a situation where he is so conditioned by external factors that objectively he acts disorderly, but subjectively he is not blamed. He may have weakened free will, for example due to psychological or sociological factors.

I also understand the bishops who are worried about this. Because the priests themselves often cannot distinguish much simpler things.

That’s right, this is another huge problem. Priests and bishops ask who and how should distinguish the situation of the given people, whether there should be any minimum written rules and the like. A bishop in Poland looks at some practice in Germany, and even if, of course, he cannot know all the specifics of individual cases, he says to himself that he would not sin in his life.

The solution is not to be defensive in order to be comfortable that “we defined what it objectively is”. It is also very comfortable for a priest to say that this is how it is and done, these are the rules and I don’t care that you poor people are in real life with all the conditions. This is not an evangelical attitude.

So what is the solution?

Go deep. Formation. The Pope said that it would be a big mistake if each episcopal conference set a standard. We have to accompany each individual in his unrepeatable, unique situations.

At most, I can create such a norm that the bishop would say that there are quite specific moral questions that ordinary priests cannot distinguish properly, so he will form priests whom he will trust, and people who struggle with those difficult situations will be sent to trained priests. to accompany them. That’s what’s happening.

Ultimately, and this is the teaching of the Second Vatican Council, there is freedom of conscience. We must remember that my conscience has the last word in assessing my situation and guilt. The conscience is supposed to be formed, and that is why the accompaniment is important there, but it should not be the priest who says what kind of guilt the given person has.

The priest should be wise, educated, well formed in moral questions and principles, as well as in objective truth, and he should help the conscience to judge it correctly.

But in the end, the priest gives or gives absolution, right?

This was the last media-interesting question of the cardinals towards the Pope. Pope Francis says that absolution must always be granted. So the doubt was that for the absolution to be valid, repentance should be present. Don’t need it now?

The Pope answers that, of course, repentance is needed. But in judging what repentance is, we must be careful that we do not have the standards by which we have become accustomed to judging repentance, and that we are not asking too much of a person at a given moment. The Pope asks if going to confession is not an act of repentance. He even says that even the ability to anticipate that the fall will come again does not destroy a person’s ability to repent at that moment.

It happens to me that in confession, where there is a threat of its invalidity or even sacrilege, I will explain moral principles to people and ask them if they want me to give them absolution. I have already encountered that they will say that they understand that it is not yet ripe for this. We pray together, I give them a blessing – not because they are committing a sin, but because they are seeking God – and it often happens to me that after a while it matures in them.

We have to ask ourselves what is troubling the Pope: how hard it is to fight sin with God’s grace. And we want people to struggle with sin without God’s grace and then come? Is confession a help to the sinner or is it, like Holy Communion, a reward for a good life? This is no longer evangelical.

I ask with a little smile. Doesn’t Francis complicate everything? Does he really want to leave the assessment of guilt up to each person? Won’t it be a terrible mess? Shouldn’t the church have order and clear rules?

Does the church run by clever rules or by the Holy Spirit? Do we still have faith that God works in the church and also works in people’s consciences?

We got to the bottom line. This also applies to synodality. People wonder what will come of it, confusion will arise. Do we believe that the church is governed by the Holy Spirit? Do we believe in the pastoral office and in the fact that the synod is also under the authority of Peter and ultimately it is also his charisma and his office that recognizes God’s will in the various promptings of the Holy Spirit?

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

A pretender. It’s not an accusation like an accusation

One and the same thing can serve us well, but it can also be harmful. What matters is whether we need it and whether we accept it. Medicine can harm, but it can also help. An admonition, which is carried out with feeling and tact, can also be a remedy. An accusation can also bring harm if a person does not accept it as it should. Let’s notice the admonition of the Pharisees by Jesus: “Woe to you, Pharisees, because you tithe mint, rue and every herb, but you bypass justice and God’s love!” This was to be done and that not to be neglected” (Lk 11:42). These were the harsh words of the Lord Jesus addressed to pious and educated theologians, experts in the Law. However, they are true and justified words, because they touch on pretense. We know about this group of the Jewish people , that they considered themselves perfect, and they showed this by their behavior. They sat in the first places in the synagogues, liked to receive greetings on the street, allowed themselves to be addressed as: teacher. That is why Jesus addresses these words to them: “Woe to you, for you are like unmarked graves and people do not even know what they are walking for” (Luke 11:44).

Piety – it is not just giving tithes when they have something, when it is from a surplus, when it costs them nothing, so to speak. Piety is a matter of love, which must come from within a person, from his conviction, and this must serve to glorify God, and not glorify the giver. Where there is love, there is no talk of egoism, self-love, or pride. Love does not offend, but encourages. Pride works evil. Love knows no boundaries. It is selfless, as Paul says in the Letter to the Corinthians: “Love is patient, love is kind; it does not envy, it does not shut itself off, it does not boast, it is not shameless, it is not selfish, it does not get angry, it does not think about evil, it does not rejoice in iniquity, but it rejoices in the truth” (1 Cor 13:4-6). This confession of Paul about love does not have and it can have nothing to do with the behavior of the Pharisees. And just by listening we feel where the truth is, where the value is hidden…. So love knows no bounds, but the behavior of the Pharisees does not indicate that.

The text of the Gospel is a lesson for us to let love affect each other, although it is sometimes difficult and requires effort and sacrifice, but it is also an enrichment. On the other hand, the pride and arrogance of the Pharisees kills. Christ, who is our teacher, clearly teaches us that we must not cultivate a pretense in ourselves, that is, we must not have a different behavior on the outside and a different behavior on the inside. When we feel that this applies to us as well, it is a sign to start a sincere change in the attitudes of our life. We realize that even if we outwardly speak and act however well, nicely, deservedly, and it does not match the love that springs from conviction, it would all be just like tinkling metal and a ringing bell.

It is beautiful when love is expressed not only in words, but in deeds. After all, the Lord Jesus said: “Not everyone who says to me: Lord, Lord, will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven” (Mt 7:21). Let’s be careful.

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

To paint Mary’s spiritual image in your heart.

Let them glorify you, Lord, all your works, and your saints praise you. Let them talk about the glory of your kingdom, and let them talk about your power…» Psalm 145, 10-11.

How did today’s saint glorify God with his life, St. Luke?

St. Luke, the evangelist (+ around 80 AD), was probably born in the Syrian pagan city of Antioch in a wealthy family. Lukáš became a doctor and traveled a lot in Greece and Egypt. He was perhaps touched by preaching the Gospel from the mouth of St. Apostle Paul in Antioch. Luke then accompanied him on his apostolic journeys. In the year 51, he went with him and with other disciples, Timothy and Silas, to Philippi, Thessaloniki, Macedonia, and subsequently also to Greece, Asia Minor, Palestine, Syria, and Italy. He was the only one who stayed with him in prison in Rome and was with Paul even before his death, as Paul himself writes: “…only Luke is with me.” Apparently, at Paul’s instigation, Luke wrote a description of the life and activities of the Lord Jesus, that is, the Gospel

. St. told him about many events. Paul, but the fathers write that he was a close friend of the apostle St. John and the Virgin Mary and knew other apostles. So, he had enough sources to capture the performance of Jesus Christ reliably. He dedicated his gospel to the noble Theophilus. He probably wrote it after the fall of Jerusalem, between 80 and 90 in Greek. He addressed it to Christians who had converted from paganism. This is also evidenced by the fact that he always tries to explain Jewish customs in detail in the Gospel. In his gospel, he is the only one of the evangelists to provide a detailed description of the birth of the Messiah. He writes very beautifully about God’s mercy (the parable of the prodigal son, the good shepherd, the good Samaritan, Mary Magdalene, the penitent later). He begins his gospel with Zechariah’s sacrifice in the temple, which is why the bull became his symbol.

The Acts of the Apostles also come from the pen of St. Luke. He also dedicates them to Theophilus, for whom he wrote the Gospel. This second book aimed for him to witness a living Church that did not perish despite the heathen world raging around. It describes the ascension of the Lord and the sending of the Holy Spirit, and the book deals mainly with the work of St. apostles Peter and Paul. According to tradition, after Paul’s death (67), Luke preached the gospel in Dalmatia, Italy and Gaul. There are several reports about his death. One of them claims that he died a martyr’s death in Patras, Greece, at eighty-four. But others say he died of natural causes.

It is common among Christians that he was also a painter and painted a picture of the Virgin Mary. Some paintings in the East are even attributed to him. However, it is not likely. He certainly painted a spiritual picture of the Virgin Mary in his Gospel since he wrote about her the most of all the Evangelists. Although many places claim ownership, it is also uncertain where his grave is located. Scientific research from 1998 says that the place of his grave could be the Basilica of St. Justin in Padua (Italy).

How should we glorify God with our lives? Well, by painting a spiritual image of the Virgin Mary in our hearts by reading and thinking about the Gospel, just like Mary, who kept all these things in her heart and thought about them.

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

Jesus’ admonition.

Jesus said: “Woe to you, Pharisees because you tithe mint, rue, and every vegetable, but you bypass justice and God’s love!” This had to be done and addressed there! Woe to you, Pharisees, because you love the first chair in the synagogues and greetings in the streets! Woe to you, for you, are like unmarked graves, and people do not even know what they are walking on!” Then, a scribe told him, “Teacher, when you speak like this, you also insult us.” He said to him: “Woe to you, scribes too! For you burden the people with burdens that cannot be borne, but you do not touch those burdens with a single finger.”

How did you react to the harsh reprimand? Did you not recognize your half-brother? Did you attack, too, or did you take it as a gift? Jesus says “woe” to the Pharisees three times, and they reply: “Teacher, when you speak like that, you also insult us” (Lk 11:45). The social class of the Pharisees did not die out. They don’t seem to do anything wrong. They pay tithes to the temple; what they consider good is enough for them. Jesus wants more – they do all this with their hearts directed to God and not themselves. We are tempted to pretend to be better but worse. It is appropriate to remind ourselves that we have to fight against pretense and especially not to be offended when reminded of it. Whoever wants to stand before God is not a friend of pretense. I am thinking about a note from a friend, a confessor, a professor…?

To love God means also to love everything that God created, especially what he endowed with his divine form, what he loves, and for which he gave his human life to an inhuman death. Such love excludes contempt for people who are less religiously aware. When we look at such people, even less morally familiar, perhaps disgusted with the world, we lose faith in man and his possibilities. And yet many people around us, even non-believers, strive with the most significant effort for something better, for some ideals / and everywhere life is entirely of heroism. It must be seen, recognized, and appreciated, and recommend these minds and hearts that sit in darkness and the shadow of death to God’s mercy.

Let’s think about ourselves: Am I satisfied? Am I happy with myself? What does that mean?

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

Margareta Mary Alacoque.

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

Margarete-Mary Alacocoque.

* 22 July 1647 Lhautecour, Burgundy, France
† 17 October 1690 Paray-le-Monial, FranceMeaning of the name Margita: pearl (Greek-Latin)Attribute: palm tree

St. Margita Mary Alacoque was born on July 22, 1647, in France in the village of Lauthecour near Verosvres. Her father was the royal notary in the village. Margita was the fifth of seven children. She was given the name Mary during confirmation. Parents lead their children to faith from an early age. When she was eight years old, her father died. Her mother sent her to the monastery of St. Clary in Charolles. Margita was very religious; she prayed a lot. When she was nine years old, she had a severe illness. She couldn’t move at all. She lost weight to the bone and skin. No one could help her. She said that she would recover only when her relatives and friends put her under the protection of the Virgin Mary. She promised herself that when she recovered, she would enter a monastery. She spent two years in bed in a monastery and another two years at home. After she recovered, she began to lead an austere life. She fasted, meditated, wore penitential robes, and slept on the ground. In addition, she had to suffer from her relatives – grandmother, aunt, and maid who ran the household as her mother was weak and sick. They mistreated her. They humiliated her and did not give her food or clothes. They didn’t even want to take care of her mother. Margita endured it all without pride and cared for her mother as best as possible. She even started whipping herself. Her mother cried because of this, forbade her to live in a separate room, and forced her to get married. In the end, however, she gave her freedom, and Margita, at the age of twenty-four, entered the monastery of the Order of the Visitation of the Virgin Mary, founded by St. Francis of Sales, in the town of Paray-le-Monial in the Burgundy region. In 1672, she took her first vows. She lived strictly and knelt before the Sacrament of the Altar whenever possible.

On December 27, 1673, the Divine Heart appeared to her in dazzling brilliance. It was then that she knelt before the Sacrament of the Altar. The heart was surrounded by thorns and decorated with a cross. According to her own words, she was filled with unspeakable love. She had her second apparition on Friday in the octave of the Body of God. Then, she saw the five wounds of Christ. At the same time, she heard a voice: “You cannot show me a greater love than to do what I asked of you, to increase your respect for my loving Heart. You can only become perfectly worthy of this grace through humiliation and suffering.” Then the Savior showed her His Divine Heart and continued: “Look, this Heart that loved people so much, spared nothing, even spent itself, just to show its love. However, he receives in return ingratitude instead of gratitude. Therefore, I ask you that the first Friday after the octave of the feast of my Divine Body be established as a special feast, that on that day, my Heart be worshiped with solemn supplications, and that on that day, people approach St. communion intending to make amends for the innumerable indignities it had received during the time it had been exposed on the altar.’

After this apparition, Margita fell seriously ill. She felt an immense pain in her heart, which did not leave her until her death. No doctor knew what kind of disease it was. Margita dutifully told the superior what was needed. However, the special and the other sisters did not want to believe her and persecuted her for making things up. Margita tried to endure everything in silence and humility. On Sunday, June 16, 1675, the Savior appeared to her for the third time. Again, he spoke of how men belittle his love and the sacraments. He asked Margita to attend the first Friday of every month to St. communion so that, according to her strength, she would correct the insults that befall the Most Holy Sacrament in that month. Since then, every night from Thursday to Friday, Margaret experienced the deathly anguish that Jesus had before his Passion in the Garden of Gethsemane. All this confused her; she could not understand that Jesus had chosen her for such an important task. However, God sent a wise and pious priest, Claudio de la Comboniér, a Jesuit, who became her spiritual leader, comforter, and adviser. With his help, she could carry out what the Savior had said and preached to spread further through the revelations.

In 1685, she became matron of novices for two years. Then, she became assistant to the matron of the house. In 1690, she started talking about death. She begged the matron to allow her to withdraw for forty days and prepare for death. The matron was surprised because Margita did not suffer from any illness. She got a cold in the fall, but the doctor said the disease was not dangerous. But the humiliated nun smiled and said they would not even notice when God would call her back. She often pressed the cross to her chest when sick and called on God. On the morning of October 17, 1690, she asked for a priest. The priest took care of her, and Margita died the same day. She was only forty-three years old. Her brain was found intact over a hundred years after her grave was opened. She was declared blessed in 1864 and a saint in 1920. Her remains rest under the main altar of the convent church in Paray-le-Monial. Devotion to the Sacred Heart of Jesus spread throughout the Church.

From the revelations of St. Margita, which she described in her notes, established over time the twelve promises of the Divine Heart for those who will worship the Divine Heart:

I will give them all the graces necessary for their condition.

I will bring peace to their families and comfort them in their troubles.

I will become their haven in life, especially in the hour of death.

I will shower abundant blessings on all their events.

Sinners will find a source of grace and an endless sea of ​​mercy in my heart. Indifferent souls become zealous.

Ardent souls will attain great perfection.

I will also bless the houses where the image of my Sacred Heart will be displayed and venerated.

I will give priests the gift that they will convert even the most hardened hearts.

The names of those who will spread this respect will be written in my Heart and will never be erased from it.

To all who approach St. Communion on the first Friday for nine consecutive months,

I promise the grace of repentance when dying – they will not die in grace nor without the sacraments. My Heart will be a haven for them in the last moments of their lives.

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment