Fourth Sunday of Advent, Year A, Mt 1, 1-18

Let us live open to God’s surprises…

Today, on the fourth and last Sunday of Advent, the liturgy presents to us the figure of Saint Joseph (cf. Mt 1:18-24). He is a just man about to be married. We can imagine what he dreams of for the future: a beautiful family with a loving wife and many worthy children and a decent job—simple and good dreams, dreams of simple and good people. But suddenly these dreams are met with a disturbing realization: Mary, his fiancée, is expecting a child, and the child is not his! What emotions must Joseph have experienced? Horror, pain, confusion, perhaps even irritation and disappointment… his world has collapsed! What can he do?

The law gives him two options. The first is to denounce Mary and make her pay for the supposed infidelity. The second option is to secretly annul their engagement, without exposing Mary to scandal or serious consequences, but at the cost of bearing the burden of shame. And Joseph chooses this second path, the path of mercy. And behold, in a time of crisis, just as he is reflecting and evaluating all this, God lights a new light in his heart: he announces to him in a dream that Mary’s motherhood is not the result of betrayal but is the work of the Holy Spirit, and that the child who will be born is the Savior (cf. vv. 20-21); Mary will be the mother of the Messiah, and he will be his guardian. Upon awakening, Joseph realizes that the greatest dream of every devout Israelite is unexpectedly being fulfilled: becoming the father of the Messiah.

To make this dream come true, it will not be enough for Joseph to belong to the descendants of David and to observe the law faithfully; he must also trust in God above all else to accept Mary and her son in a way entirely different from his initial expectations. In other words, Joseph will have to give up his comforting certainties, his perfect plans, and his justified expectations and open himself to a future that must be discovered. And in the face of a God who changes plans and asks for trust, Joseph answers yes. Joseph’s courage is heroic and is realized in silence: his courage lies in trust; he trusts, he accepts, he is available, and he does not ask for further guarantees.

Brothers and sisters, what does Joseph say to us today? We, too, have our dreams, and perhaps at Christmas, we think about them more and we talk about them. Maybe we feel remorse for some dreams that have come to naught, and we observe that even the most optimistic expectations frequently face unexpected, unsettling circumstances. And when this happens, Joseph shows us the way: we must not give in to negative feelings such as anger and closure; that is the wrong way! On the contrary, we must accept surprises, the pitfalls of life, and even crises, with the warning that when one finds oneself in a situation, one must not make hasty decisions based on instinct but let oneself be sifted like Joseph, “weigh everything” (cf. v. 20) and start from the fundamental criterion: God’s mercy. When we face a crisis without succumbing to our emotions, such as anger and fear, and instead allow God to step in, He can intervene. He is an expert in transforming crises into dreams: yes, God opens crises to new perspectives that we could not have imagined before, perhaps not in the way we expected, but in the way he knows how. Brothers and sisters, these are God’s horizons: surprising, yet infinitely wider and more beautiful than ours! May the Virgin Mary help us to live open to God’s surprises.

Posted in sermons | 1 Comment

Jesus will be born of Mary, betrothed to Joseph, son of David…

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

The Last Name of God—The Family Tree of Jesus Christ

A family from high society had their family tree drawn up. However, one ancestor stood out among the rest. A confident man, Uncle John murdered his wife under the influence of alcohol and was subsequently sentenced to death in the electric chair.

The family pointed the matter out to the family tree compiler and asked him to be very diplomatic. He then made an entry in the family tree: “Uncle John got an important position in the field of applied electronics in an important government institution. His death came as a real shock.” This technique is also a way to embellish your family tree.

This story comes up almost every time we get to the obligatory Christmas readings in our liturgical readings—the genealogy of Jesus Christ. Many struggle with the temptation to skip it and jump straight to the “more exciting” part: “Now, the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise…” (Matthew 1:18)

However, there are also opposing voices who claim that the genealogy of Jesus Christ hides the entire theology of the Old and New Testaments—an intriguing statement. In any case, the genealogy was critical to the Jews, as evidenced by their appearance in the Old Testament, where we locate about 50 of them. If someone wanted to embark on a spiritual or political career, they had to have a proper “purebred” genealogy.

Contradictions in the Bible?

It is common knowledge that the genealogy of Jesus Christ is a favorite weapon of critics as a “clear” example of inaccuracies and contradictions in the Bible. These are supposed to result from the very comparison of the two genealogies in the canonical gospels of Matthew and Luke. The reason? Although both looked at the same fact, each examined it from their perspective and placed their emphasis on it.

Saint Matthew begins with Abraham and ends with Jesus, while Luke begins with Jesus and continues all the way back to Adam and God. Matthew follows the line of Joseph, while Luke traces the line of the Mother of God. Luke emphasizes Jesus as a man, while Matthew seeks to prove that Jesus is a descendant of King David and therefore the legitimate Messiah.

Weak at math?

A common objection is that Matthew was apparently not very good at math. At the end of the genealogy, he says that there were 14 generations in three stages, but this does not fit. Since the author is a former tax official, counting was his passion. One explanation is that ancient writers took a specific literary liberty in rounding numbers to emphasize the intended point. What did the evangelist Matthew want to say?

The world-famous biblical scholar NT Wright sees the passage as a “play” with the number seven in the Bible. He assumes that the Jews observed a sabbatical year every seventh year, and every forty-ninth year, which is seven times seven years, they celebrated a jubilee year, a year of grace—this year marked the resolution of all unresolved issues: the release of slaves, the return of land, and the forgiveness of debts. According to Wright, the evangelist Matthew, by counting all the generations 3×14, i.e., 6×7, wants to arrive at a message that every Jew of that time could read: Jesus is the 7×7 generation, i.e., the living Year of Grace, when God puts everything in order in the most profound sense of the word.

Even women of questionable morals

Jesus’ genealogy is also surprising in its content. Five women are included in the list of male names: Tamar, Rehab, Ruth, Uriah’s wife, and the Virgin Mary. This instance was very unusual in a patriarchal society dominated by men. Why are other wives of the patriarchs not mentioned here—Sarah, Rachel, Rebekah, and Esther?

But Tamar? In the Book of Genesis, we read that Tamar was the bride of Judah. ​​She was married to two of his sons in succession, but both died. According to Jewish custom, another brother was supposed to marry her, but Judah, the father, did not want to allow that. So Tamar disguised herself as a “woman of ease,” seduced her father-in-law, and had twins. Shall we say that it was a one-time failure?

The same cannot be said of another woman in the genealogy. Rehab was an immoral woman by profession in Jericho. But at a crucial moment, she received the Israelite spies from Joshua and was saved.

The third wife, Ruth, was pious and self-sacrificing and accompanied her mother-in-law even after her husband’s death. She expressed this admirable feat in her own words: “For where you go, I will go, and where you lodge, I will lodge: your people shall be my people, and your God my God.” (Ruth 1:16) But she still had one flaw in her beauty: she was a Moabite and therefore an enemy of Israel.

The fourth woman is identified by the epithet “Uriah.” From Holy Scripture, we know that she is Bathsheba.

From a purely human perspective, we will say that none of these women had the necessary qualifications to be in the family tree of the King of kings, Jesus Christ. And yet they are there. Why? Perhaps they serve to emphasize the grace that God bestows upon us. What does this episode mean for us? It is not of primary importance what qualifications we have for God. What is much more important is what we become in God’s presence.

Are our ancestors to blame?

Not all the men in Jesus’ family tree are morally upright. Yes, there are some bright spots, like King David and Josiah. But there are also kings we could safely call disasters for Israel: Ahaz and Amon.

Another important lesson that the family tree teaches us is that evil is not always inherited. When children misbehave, we parents argue about which of us they probably got it from. However, in Israel’s history, we see that good kings alternated with wicked ones. The almost brutal Manasseh followed the noble King Hezekiah. The evil King Amon was followed by the beneficial King Josiah, of whom the Scriptures say that he turned to God with all his heart, soul, and strength.

The family tree, therefore, reminds us that we are responsible for our decisions. The acceptance of God’s grace varies for each individual, depending on how they choose to receive it. Excuses based on nature, ancestors, genes, or time are not always appropriate. Everyone freely decides for themselves.

God’s “timing.”

And finally, the genealogy of Jesus Christ shows us God’s perfect timing. The first epoch begins with a childless old man and ends with a mighty kingdom. However, the subsequent two epochs represent a significant decline. Israel was asking, “Has God forgotten his people?!” Between the last Old Testament prophet and the coming of Jesus Christ lie centuries of apparent silence from God. Where is he?

Christmas is a clear answer: “God is here! God is with us! He is Emmanuel.” He has not crossed out any name in his family tree; he does not retouch anything; he does not use euphemisms.

Pope Francis aptly named the reason when he said that we are the last name of God. He himself presents himself in the Bible as the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob…

In a “pre-Christmas” religion class, a student once told me, “I hate Christmas. I hate those masks of people who pretend to be better at Christmas and then forget about it very quickly.” The question surfaced in my mind: “What if it’s not a mask? What if it’s our desire?”

The genealogy of Jesus shows us the reason for Christmas: God’s desire to become our last name. The consequence of Christmas, in turn, can be the joy of adopting the name God as my last name. The result will not be just a worn-out cliché but a deep and clear identity: God’s daughter, God’s son, and God’s children.

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

The Good and the Bad.


If Jesus only wanted the wicked to change and become beneficial, then behaving honestly would win it.” And I feel that this is how we often act with the gospel and Jesus’ work of salvation—it is about sinners turning around, abandoning their sin, and thus changing their “no” to a “yes.” So why does he mention the second situation today, when “yes” ultimately becomes “no”? The answer is because he does not view the world in terms of “good” or “bad”! After all, He came so that everyone—good and evil (from our perspective)—”may have life and have it more abundantly.” He came so that we may have life. This is absolutely crucial because both good and evil individuals can choose to accept or reject life, close themselves off from hope, or become a person of hope.

One may do so for comfort, while the other may do so due to their sinfulness. There may be various reasons for this behavior, but the fact remains that resignation towards life and hope poses a danger for everyone. It’s not about how long we can be “sinless,” how strong we are, or how much good we can extract. It is about how often we have fallen into sin and neglected our resolutions. It is about never stopping, living, and desiring life. And we can and should do this—whether as “sinners” or as “righteous.” The Father has taken care of such issues for us through his Son, Jesus.

Come to the depths: How do I look at myself and the people around me—have I not put on “black and white” glasses of morality, through which I see very clearly “black and white,” good and bad people? When was the last time I glorified and praised God for His patience and generosity, for continually inviting me into the fullness of life, love, joy, and hope? Is it enough for me to be “good,” or do I want to live a life in the Spirit?

Tip for you: Today, I will not pass judgments—neither on myself nor on others.

Posted in Nezaradené | 1 Comment

If you want to judge, judge yourself.

 

 
Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

St. Lucia

Lucia, virgin and m.

December 13, commemoration
Position: virgin and martyr
Death: but 304-305

Patron:

Syracuse and Venice; the blind and those with eye diseases, glassmakers, glaziers, seamstresses; in some places she is also said to be the patroness of more than 15 professions, but the question of justification arises; she is also considered the patroness of fireflies in scout troops; she is invoked by the poor and can also be the patroness of those who spread the light of truth

Attributes:

cauldron, neck with stab wound, lamp, sword or dagger, bowl with eyes on it, palm branch, ox team

CURRICULUM VITAE

She came from Syracuse. Against her will, her parents promised her to a rich young pagan. Her mother, only after her recovery through the intercession of St. Agatha, reconciled with Lucia’s wish to live a celibate life dedicated to Christ. However, her fiancé disagreed. During Diocletian’s persecution, he denounced her as a Christian. She was sentenced to forced prostitution, and because she was saved from it by miraculous power, she was allegedly blinded and her throat was pierced.

Her veneration spread throughout the Church by the end of the 6th century, with her name included in the Roman canon of the Mass. Her tomb was discovered during the exploration of the catacombs in Syracuse.

CV FOR MEDITATION

“SVETLANA” FROM SICILY

She is one of the saints included in the first Eucharistic Prayer of the Holy Mass. Pope Gregory the Great included her in the canon around the end of the 6th century.

Biographies are based on traditional accounts, the oldest documents about her worship, archaeological finds in the catacombs of St. Lucy and St. John in Syracuse, and biographical records dating back to the 6th century. Today’s biographies of St. Lucy often incorporate elements from various legends, necessitating careful consideration.

She was born in Syracuse, Sicily, probably before 290 AD, into a better-off family. Perhaps as a child, as a Christian girl, she made a vow of virginal purity out of love for Christ, to which she remained faithful under all circumstances.

Her mother, Eutychia, either did not know about the promise or did not take it seriously. She wanted to marry her to a suitor from an equally noble family, and the problem she would rather not see was in the world. Lucy put everything into prayer, but her mother’s conversion in that direction did not come. Lucy probably hoped for the help of the revered martyr Agatha. She convinced her sick mother, suffering from a flow of blood, to make a pilgrimage to the tomb of this saint, from whom she expected help. According to tradition, their joint pilgrimage and the help from St. Agatha took place. Legends tell of a vision or dream of Lucy, in which Agatha let her know that both her mother’s recovery and her martyrdom would occur.

After the mother’s sudden recovery, the only problem left was the unwanted fiancé. He was understandably interested in why he was rejected, and the legends here are distorted. The true reason for the rejection ultimately resulted in Lucia being brought before a judge, perhaps because the fiancé could not bear the truth. The judge’s task was to break her loyalty to God and punish her according to the circumstances.

Legends state the topics of the judge Paschasius’s questions and Lucy’s answers, first leading to the matter of the dowry, which Lucy allegedly managed to distribute to the poor. She is also said to have convinced her mother to take a similar step, although she wanted to keep her property until her death. The decisive sentence is: “He who gives God only what he cannot take with him to eternity when he dies has no merit from it, but if you want to make a sacrifice pleasing to God, give (his poor) what you can enjoy now.” It is the topic of a catechetical teaching, similar to Lucy’s emphatic stance on the issue of obedience to imperial decrees. Here, Lucy declares that she is first and foremost obedient to God’s commandments. And she reminds the judge that he fears mortal rulers, while she fears (the insult) of the eternal God.

At the end of Lucy’s defense, she is partly asked to repeat the words of the Apostle Paul about the purity of the soul, the body in which the Holy Spirit dwells and is therefore the temple of God. (Cf. 1 Cor 6:19). All this is recalled to create an image of Lucy’s attitude that led to her torture. This determination is captured in the words with which she replied to her executioner: “You will not force me by anything to consent to the sin of impurity. I am ready for any suffering.” (see G. Pettinati, I Santi canonizzati, XII)

Lucy was sentenced to be forcibly deprived of her virginity by visitors to a brothel. However, her rape did not occur because all attempts to transport Lucy there failed. Even the oxen, which later became associated with her, did not provide any assistance. Subsequently, legends describe various tortures that she had to undergo. The reliability of these data is questionable; what is certain is that she suffered a martyr’s death, and it is believed that she was stabbed with a sword or dagger, according to tradition, in the neck.

Her eyes on a bowl are a distinctive attribute of St. Lucy, which is why we give them special attention here. Later legends may have influenced the inclusion of this personal attribute. However, they are inconsistent. They say that Lucy herself plucked them out and sent them to her fiancé. Here, the reasons for the implausible act differ: so that he would renounce her, after which the eyes were returned to her by the Mother of God; elsewhere, the plucking out of her eyes is listed just before Lucy’s death and their donation to her fiancé because he admired them on her, with thanks for helping her to heaven. Contrary to the claims of other scholars, Msgr. Prof. Dr. Jaroslav Němec, who studies saints, writes about Lucy in his work New Profiles of Saints (2005), stating that she was eventually blinded and pierced.

Her name is derived from the Latin word “lux—lucis,” meaning “light,” and is translated as “Svetlana.” It is also the name of the youngest members of scouting—fireflies, who see her as their patron saint and want to strive to be a light and role model for others like her.

Lucia’s remains were first moved to Constantinople in 1039 (due to fears of Muslim attacks) and then to the Church of St. Jeremiah and Lucia in Venice in 1204. Parts of them were transferred to Syracuse. The reliquary with her eyes is kept in Naples.

(*More information about St. Lucia’s Day in the note.)

RESOLUTION, PRAYER

Being a light to others should not be a task just for fireflies but for every Christian. The biography provides a clue on how to do it. And for my life, I will make a concrete decision today.

Hear, O God, our prayers, and through the intercession of the holy virgin and martyr Lucy, whose birth into heaven we celebrate today, grant that your glory may be revealed to us. Through your Son, Jesus Christ, our Lord, who lives and reigns with you in the unity of the Holy Spirit, forever and ever. Amen.

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

Evangelizer of the New World …

It is October 12, 1492, and Christopher Columbus discovers the New World, which will later be called America. This marks the beginning of the Spanish colonization of Mexico, which began in 1521. Mentalities, cultures, traditions, cults, and religions meet here. Religious symbols, statues representing Mexicans, and sacrifices are regarded as pagan idols, prompting the start of a Christian campaign that lasts for many years. Approximately 10 years after the conquest, the missionaries had only minor successes in evangelizing the new lands. The turning point came in 1531, when the Virgin Mary appeared to Juan Diego, an Indian, on Mount Tepeyac.

The Virgin Mary invited him to go to the bishop and tell him that he wanted to build a church, but the bishop did not believe him. On December 12, the Virgin Mary appeared again to Juan Diego, who was looking for a priest to help him with his seriously ill uncle. She asked him, “I am not here; who is your mother?” She assured him that his uncle would not die. Young Juan Diego asked Mary for a sign so that the bishop would believe him. She advised him to go to the mountain to pick flowers. He did so and returned to the Mother, who then took the flowers and put them in Juan Diego’s cloak. He immediately ran to the bishop and unbuttoned the cloak in front of him, on which appeared a “painted” image of the Virgin Mary. The bishop and those present knelt, moved, and asked for forgiveness for their lack of belief.

With this apparition, the Virgin Mary brought reconciliation between the natives and the Spaniards through the symbols on the cloak. Both cultures were able to accept the message that the Christian faith is not the property of anyone but a gift of love for all. The features of the Virgin Mary’s face are neither European nor Native American, but rather a mix. This tradition prefigures the future and original civilization, Native American Christianity, which was born from the racial integration between the Spaniards and the Indians.

As the final act of this long and captivating story, Mary is at the center of universal history and at the beginning of the history of the New World. She is always ready to offer all her love, compassion, help, and protection to the inhabitants of this land and to all who love her. Our Lady of Guadalupe appears as the one who wants to welcome everyone, both Indians and Spaniards, with the same maternal love.

To welcome the Mother of God, therefore, means to welcome the natives as well. The new temple will help restore dignity to the oppressed. Mary, a missionary of the Good News, transforms reality to create a new people and a new family. After a conquest that brought suffering, division, and resistance, the Virgin of Guadalupe on Tepeyac Hill became a sign of the meeting of two worlds that had been in dramatic opposition until then. Over seven years, eight million natives were converted after the apparitions, an average of about three thousand people a day, reminiscent of Peter’s preaching.

Pius X declared Our Lady of Guadalupe the Patroness of all Latin America. Pius XI of all America. Pius XII referred to her as the Empress of America, while John XXIII called her the Heavenly Missionary of the New World and the Mother of America. And we, Koinonia, address her as Mary, Star of Evangelization.

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

Third Sunday of Advent, Year A, Mt 11,2-11

The following Sunday of Advent invites us to journey to places where our minds and hearts become more open to spiritual strengthening and experiencing the presence of God. Last Sunday, that journey—following on from the concluding Jubilee Holy Year, called “Pilgrims of Hope”—took us to John the Baptist, to the Jordan, to open us to the truth about ourselves and to set us on the path of knowing Jesus—the Messiah. Spiritual journeying, above all through dedicating time to prayer, becomes in Advent a setting out on an adventure with God. When we prepare for the Nativity of the Lord, we focus on the Child Jesus, but the meaning is much richer. It extends to experiencing our lives with God beyond history and temporality, reaching into eternity. Pope Francis said beautifully years ago that in every Advent we rediscover that we are on a journey: the Church, with her vocation and mission, and all of humanity, nations, civilizations, and cultures—we are all on a trip; we travel along the paths of time. Just as each of us needs to start anew, rise, and gain a sense of the goal of our own existence, the eternal human family also requires the renewal of the typical horizon towards which we are heading. The horizon of hope! The time of Advent, which we are beginning again today, restores to us the horizon of hope, a hope that does not disappoint (Angelus, December 1, 2013). So let us also set out on this third Sunday of Advent on another journey—a pilgrimage. In this case, we will travel to the desert.

The prophet Isaiah presents the image of the desert to us, though it is a strange one. We are not accustomed to the idea of ​​a desert that blooms, where flowers appear, which is one of the driest places on earth, where, every few years, its ordinary barren sand is covered with white and purple flowers. But usually our thinking is the opposite: the desert is hot and dry, scorched land, desolate, waterless, bringing tribulation and fear. The prophet Isaiah creates this image to show the contrast between the situation in which man lives today and what will happen with the coming of the Messiah. The problem is entirely changing; a time will begin that will reveal the greatness and majesty of God. And the redeemed of the Lord will return; they will come to Zion with singing. Eternal joy will be on their heads; they will obtain joy and gladness; sorrow and sighing will flee away (Isaiah 35:10). When we read these words in a historical context, they were supposed to inspire in the listeners hope for the restoration of Israel, liberation, and authentic joy in returning to the land, but also to God. Then the eyes of the blind will be opened and the ears of the deaf unstopped. Then the lame will leap like a deer, and the tongue of the mute will sing for joy (Isaiah 35:5-6a). The image of a desert blooming, joyful, and bursting with consolation spoke volumes when compared to the sadness of slavery, contempt, infidelity, and the lack of perspective and hope for a change of fate. Say to the faint-hearted: Be strong, do not fear; behold, your God will come with vengeance, with God’s recompense; he will come and save you (Isaiah 35:4).

This biblical image of a blooming desert is crucial for us. This image primarily conveys a message of hope. When it seems all hope is lost and there are no opportunities to improve our circumstances, the desert intervenes, not in a depressing or barren way. The path of our pilgrimage should lead us to another desert, the one where great things can happen. That path was discovered by monks and hermits, who chose places far from people, often desolate and challenging to live in, to find spiritual values. Why not try to follow in their footsteps? We may not be hermits, but we can try to notice what we missed before. It can be prayer, silence, discovering the value of meekness and restraint, purity, detachment from the world, even for a moment. Although it seems complicated, it is possible for someone who is connected to God.

One of the most famous desert monks, Saint Evagrius, described his spiritual experiences in the desert, which remain valuable to us today, 16 centuries later. These are the words of advice: learn to discern thoughts, practice silence and solitude, work on imagination and memory, do not focus on fighting but long for love, and know God through prayer. These are the words of a man who spent his whole life struggling in the desert with himself and his weakness, yet the desert led him to God and to the peace of his heart.

A pilgrimage to such a desert teaches us that true happiness is somewhere else than we usually think. Pope Francis stated these words in the jubilee bull: What is happiness? What kind of happiness do we expect, and what type do we desire? Not a fleeting joy, but a satisfaction that, once it has achieved something, demands more and more, in a spiral of desire in which the human soul is never satisfied but increasingly empty. We need a happiness that is filled with what truly fulfills us, specifically love, allowing us to affirm: I am loved, and therefore I exist; I will always remain in the Love that does not disappoint and from which no one and nothing can ever separate me (SNC, 21). Choosing the desert path is about finding time for God and our souls. It is a journey to discover, experience, and share love.

Here, we must show the direction that leads to the discovery of love. Pope Francis speaks clearly and specifically about confession: Sacramental Reconciliation is not only a beautiful spiritual possibility but also a decisive, essential, and necessary step on the journey of faith for every person. There, we allow the Lord to destroy our sins, heal our hearts, lift us, and embrace us so that we may know his tender and compassionate face. There is no better way to know God than to allow him to reconcile us to himself (cf. 2 Cor 5:20), so that we may experience the joy of his forgiveness. Let us therefore not give up on confession, but let us rediscover the beauty of the sacrament of healing and joy— the beauty of the forgiveness of sins! (SNC, 23). There is no better way to know God than to allow him to forgive us. The sacrament of Reconciliation and mercy places us in the contrast spoken of by the prophet Isaiah. We come from the desert of our heart, dried up, burnt, barren, dark, and terrible, and we leave confession with a blooming and joyful heart. Previously unconscious, deaf, lame, and weak—now full of health and strength. The desert of the heart is transformed into a garden. That is why it is worth going to confession.

Here we must pay attention to one more important thing. It is evident in the scene from today’s Gospel. Jesus asks the crowds a question: What did you go out into the desert to see? (Mt 11:7). He says this in relation to John the Baptist, who was gaining more and more popularity and to whom many came to the Jordan. What did the crowds expect? What did they come out to see? People may have had different expectations and different ideas; they longed for something different. Jesus also says his words in his own context. Was John, who was now sitting in prison, presenting himself in a way that reflected all he wanted to achieve? Jesus’ question concerns our expectations and, perhaps a little, our ambitions. Do we have higher expectations than others, first of ourselves, to live a life of faith for Christ? Do we have ambitions in acquiring spiritual virtues? Are we truly drawn to go to the desert to change our hearts? Do we want to see it again or ever in our lives?

These are essential questions when we want to live the time of our journey—the pilgrimage—to the desert, because we are to go there to see something beyond our expectations. Jesus said that the least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than John (cf. Mt 11:11). This phrase should serve as the standard for our spiritual ambitions. John was someone more than a prophet. His greatness consisted in the fact that he preceded the Messiah; he was utterly devoted to serving Him, although before that, he did not even know who He was. John was excellent in what he did, and he remained faithful to his mission until death. How enormous, then, must be our spiritual desire to serve Jesus so that we may be greater than John in the Kingdom of Heaven. However, if John the Baptist chose the desert as the place of his expectation of the Messiah, then surely for us the desert, also (and perhaps especially) the different one, blooming and joyful after reconciliation with God, is the responsible place for our Advent expectation of the birth of Jesus.

Posted in sermons | Leave a comment

St. Damas

December 11, reminder
Position: Pope
Death: 384
Attributes: Pope, cross, book with Vulgate inscription, church model

CURRICULUM VITAE

He became a deacon and a guide to Pope Liberius. In 366, a significant portion of the clergy and faithful elected him as pope at the age of 61. He was the first to have authority over the whole church, and the term “Apostolic See” was coined then. He resolved doctrinal disputes with the Arians, and the rebellious Pope Ursinus was also a problem. Damasus introduced Latin into the liturgy and commissioned Jerome to prepare a Latin translation of the Scriptures, known as the Vulgate. He renovated the old Roman burial grounds in the catacombs, revived the cult of martyrs, and marked about 60 of their graves with poetic inscriptions. He died after 18 years and two months of pontification.

CV FOR MEDITATION

PURITY OF LIFE AND THE STRIVE FOR PEACE

He was born in Rome around 305 to the family of Laurentius and Anthony, who held the spiritual office of exceptor and lector at St. Lawrence. He later became a priest. Damas had a sister, Irene, and soon followed his father in altar service. He became an ostiary in the church of St. Lawrence and later rose to the rank of deacon. He strove for a virtuous, ascetic life and higher education, for which he had a marked talent. In 355, as a deacon, he accompanied Pope Liberius into exile to Berea in Thrace. According to some accounts, he received priestly ordination from the pope there, and they soon returned together.

After Liberius’ death (+ 26. 9. 366), a new pope was immediately elected, and Damasus I was legitimately elected by the majority of the clergy and the faithful. However, he was not the only one recognized. At that time, seven priests and three deacons, dissatisfied with Liberius’ direction, gathered in Transnistria, along with a part of the laity, and elected the unworthy deacon Ursinus as bishop by acclamation. Damasus’ friends were angered by the result and rushed to Transnistria, where the first severe skirmish broke out, lasting three days and leaving some dead.

Thus began the pontificate of Damasus in Rome with a sad schism, which Damasus I, consecrated to office by the Bishop of Ostia on Wednesday, October 1st, in the Lateran, certainly did not want, could not be responsible for, and bore very painfully. As a duly elected Pope, however, he was not allowed to yield to Ursinus in the interest of the Church.

The Roman prefect Viventius, fearing further unrest, first expelled Ursinus and his deacons from Rome as the instigators and, a little later, also the seven priests who had constantly incited their people against Damasus. Ursinus’ followers, however, rebelled, forcibly freed the arrested priests, and led them triumphantly to the Marian Basilica of Liberius, where they fortified themselves.

The siege of the basilica, with the outbreak of bloody fighting, took place on October 26, and 137 people reportedly died. The basilica remained in the hands of the schismatics. Ursinus’ followers also settled in the suburbs, where they occupied the church of St. Agnes on the Nomentana road. Fierce battles continued here until the prefect’s decisive intervention, after which the arrested Ursinus was sent to Gaul, but later suffered again in northern Italy, from where he plotted against Damasus and in Milan against Bishop Ambrose. Around 374, Ursinus, with the help of the false testimony of the Jewish-Christian Isaac, even brought Damasus to trial on charges that, according to legend, concerned the almost 70-year-old man committing adultery. Indeed, the Roman prefect threatened to condemn him unless the emperor Gratian intervened. He freed Damasus, exiled Ursinus to Cologne and Isaac to Spain. Damas then presented the matter to the church council so that everyone could be convinced of his innocence.

In Rome, however, his life was made miserable by many different sects, including the Valentinians, Marcionites, Montanists, and Sabellians; the Novatians had a bishop in Rome, and the Donatists had their own community. Apart from the sectarian groups, the Roman prefect Vettius Agorius Praetextatus attempted to revitalize the dwindling pagan religion. Outside Rome, there were also quite a few government-appointed Arian bishops in the Church, whose removal was problematic. The situation was attributed to the previously reigning Julian the Apostate, who, by declaring to the sectarians that there would be no religious freedom in his empire and that everyone could freely profess their faith, hoped that the freedom given to the sects would kill Christianity. At that time, God was calling strong personalities to Christianity, including Ambrose, who was celebrated four days ago and proclaimed, “Where Peter is, there is the Church, and where the Church is, there is life.” The Pope also had some support from Jerome (d. 30 9), who wrote to him from Antioch, where at that time there were three bishops of different schools: Paulinus, Vitalis, and Meletius. He confirmed Damasus’s loyalty, saying that all who are with the See of Peter are with him, as Peter is the rock of Christ’s promise. He wrote: “I do not know Vitalis, I despise Meletius, and I have nothing with Paulinus; whoever does not gather with you scatters, that is, whoever is not of Christ is of the antichrist.” Damasus later entrusted him with revising the Old Latin translation of the Bible and preparing the text under the name Vulgate.

Emperor Theodosius, fed up with Christian abuses, issued an order from Thessalonica on February 27, 380, that all subjects in his empire should profess the faith as defined by the Council of Nicaea, as taught by the Roman bishop Damasus. The following year, a church council was convened in Constantinople, at which this confession of faith was reaffirmed and is still recited in the Holy Mass today as the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed.

The Council of Constantinople also approved several laws concerning church discipline, which Pope Damasus did not approve. Among them was the bishop of Constantinople, who sought precedence as the “bishop of New Rome.”

Another significant step of Damasus concerns the synod of 382, ​​which the learned Saint Jerome also attended. It defined Catholic teaching on the Holy Spirit and his gifts and declared which books of the Bible should be recognized as canonical. This is because much religious literature was circulated that had to be labeled as unreliable: forged gospels, false apostolic letters, and religious novels that spread heresies. Gnostics were especially active in this area, and therefore a precise definition and naming of the books of Holy Scripture was needed from the very beginning.

From the council, Pope Damasus kept Jerome as his secretary, in addition to the work he had given him in preparing the Bible, because Jerome, among other things, was fluent in several languages and knew essential figures in the world. Jerome became very popular at first, but then many resented his more direct nature and saw him as a harsh ascetic, protected by Damasus.

This pope had another friend in the letter engraver Dionysius Philokalus, whom he also employed frequently. Damas, as a worshiper of the holy martyrs, discovered and lovingly restored their graves, composed verses on them, which Philokalus engraved on marble slabs. In this way, he contributed to the reliable preservation of more than 50 names. He had the corridors in the catacombs widened and stairs built. If necessary, he also had the Vatican cemetery drained to prevent water from destroying the graves. Christian archaeologists are especially grateful to him for all this.

He built a new church of St. Lawrence and, next to it, established the first rooms for the church archive. Another basilica he built was on the Adreatina road, where his 92-year-old mother and sister Irene were buried, and finally Pope Damasus himself, who died at about 80 years of age on 11 December 384. Although he lived in such storms, he was called the Pope of Peace because he sought peace with God by avoiding sin and striving for holiness. His heart was full of love, with which he sought peace with his neighbors, and he also sought peace within himself by exercising patience and tempering his nature. Jerome called him a virgin teacher in a virgin church.

In 1880, his grave was discovered, and his remains were later transferred to the Basilica of St. Lawrence.

RESOLUTION, PRAYER

The purity of life and the pursuit of peace should also belong in my life. In meditation, I will strive to understand the meaning of purity and peace, and I will make a necessary decision that will serve as my resolution, to which I will pay special attention.

Through the intercession of the holy Pope Damasus, powerful generator of the martyrs and promoter of their glory, teach us, O God, to esteem and follow those who bear effective witness to their faith. We ask this through your Son, Jesus Christ, our Lord, who lives and reigns with you in the unity of the Holy Spirit, world without end.

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

Come to me, all you who labor and are heavily burdened… Math 11, 11,28

Jesus’ words ring familiar and close today. We are aware that contemporary men and women suffer from considerable psychological pressure. The world is constantly changing, making it impossible for us to keep up, and we lack the time and inner peace to adapt. Too often, we distance ourselves from the simplicity of the Gospel by burdening ourselves with rules, commitments, planning, and goals. We feel overwhelmed and tired of the constant struggle without meaningful efforts. Recent surveys confirm that the number of people who have nervous breakdowns is still on the rise. What do we lack to feel truly well?

Today, in the light of the Gospel, we can revise our concept of God. How do I live and feel God in my heart? What feelings reveal his presence in my life? Jesus offers us his understanding when we feel tired and want to rest: “Come to me, all you who labor and are heavy laden, and I will provide you rest.” (Matthew 11:28). We may have been striving for perfection when deep down we only wanted to feel loved. In Jesus’ words, we discover the answer to our crisis of meaning. Our ego deceives us when it hinders us from reaching our desired level of excellence.

Sometimes we may not see the light. Saint Julian of Norwich, a 14th-century English mystic, had a vision, heard Jesus’ message, and wrote, “All will be well, all will be well.” Jesus’ suggestion—“Take my yoke upon you and learn from me…” (Matthew 11:29)—presupposes following his kind lifestyle (wishing everyone well) and his humility of heart (a virtue that refers to keeping our feet on the ground, for only God’s grace can make us rise).

Being a disciple requires us to take on the yoke of Jesus, remembering that his yoke is “kind” and his burden “light.” However, I do not know if we are convinced that this is truly the case. Living as a Christian in our current context is not so easy, because we have to choose values ​​that go against the grain. Not being carried away by money, prestige, or power requires significant effort. If we want to achieve it on our own, it can become an impossible task. But with Jesus, all things are possible and reasonable.

Posted in Nezaradené | 1 Comment