-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
A cheerful mind.
It is useless today to even refute the claim circulated. At the last century’s end, of a “joyful antiquity” and a sad Christianity. The early success of Christianity, the religion of the poor and uneducated, in the cultural world of the Roman Empire, can also be explained by the fact that it promised victory over everything against which man felt powerless: fate, death, pain.
We are not worried about his future. On the contrary, if we see someone permanently sad, we rightly fear that he will not last on the path he has started, especially if there are major difficulties. The joyful performance of religious duties is an effective way of apostolate. It does not attract the company of sad people and discontented; on the contrary, all would like to go where they see, that there is happiness and joy. St. Leo exhorts the religious to their “modesty to be holy and not sad”. St. Francis wished to see a joyful countenance on his brothers, a desire to do more than they have been doing, and not weariness and weariness. That is how they are to go out into the streets. Christian morality teaches that a virtuous life is a life according to God and according to a happy and innocent nature, as it came from the hands of the Creator. Whoever strives for virtue and is in doing so joyless, denies the truth he wants to believe. At least, the impression he gives to others.
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment
To grow in the likeness of God about men.
Through Baptism, we received participation in the life of God. But how does God live? What does his life consist of? Jesus Christ told us something about this when he revealed that God is one but triune. Jesus made visible the goodness and love of the heavenly Father. He lived to the extreme for the fulfillment of the will of his Father, even to the cross. He also spoke about the Spirit who comes from the Father, who receives everything from Christ and proclaims it to us. God’s Spirit guided Jesus in fulfilling his mission, and Jesus rejoiced in the Holy Spirit.
From these few indications, we can guess that the life of God is the life of individual persons, one for the other. Their relationship is so strong and deep that he is also a living person, the Holy Spirit. From this brief indication of what creates the life of God, we can guess that we, too, as baptized people, are called to cooperate in the growth and development of God’s life in us. This practically means that we develop our relationship with the triune God and our relationships with people and human persons.
We heard about these relationships with people and convenient situations in today’s reading from the Old Testament. These are challenging requests. They require overcoming our egoism, an effort to respect others and do good to them. God challenges us as a motive for such an effort: “Be holy, as I, your God, am holy!” Holiness is God’s perfection. Practically, it means a challenge to grow in likeness with God. We are to express this similarity in our relationships with people.
In the Gospel, Jesus gives us yet another motive for such an effort: The other person, a person in need and suffering in various ways, a person who requires our service and overcoming our egoism, is a person with whom Jesus Christ himself identifies: “What have you done – or they didn’t – to one of these least of mine, you did it to me – or you didn’t.” There can be no stronger motive for doing good to one’s neighbors, for showing love to people. And in his caring love for us, Jesus reveals that these deeds will judge us. Jesus will reward us for manifestations of serving love in our neighbors by accepting us to direct and full participation in the life of the triune God – or, God forbid, exclude us from this participation if we were oblivious to the misery and suffering with people and closed ourselves in our egoism. When we think a little about these words of the Gospel about the last judgment, we realize how little we cooperate with the development of God’s life in us and how, in our daily circumstances, we must increase our efforts for concrete and practical love towards our neighbors – following the example of Christ himself, who loved us to the extreme, to complete self-sacrifice. But this complete self-giving for our salvation out of love for the Father led Jesus, even as a man, to full participation in God’s life at the moment of his resurrection.
Practical instruction: Manifestations of serving, attentive love towards neighbors, motivated by the belief that I am serving Christ himself in them.
Prayer: Merciful God and our Savior, turn our hearts to you and teach our minds with the heavenly doctrine so that we may improve in the Christian life through fasting and repentance. Through our Lord Jesus Christ, your Son, who is God, lives and reigns with you in unity with the Holy Spirit forever and ever.
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment
Feast of the Baptism of the Lord, Mark 1,1-7
Dear friends, brothers, and sisters! There are two mutually complementary concepts – opposites – “pair of siblings.” Some mysterious guides to the human being. One introduces us to being and accompanies us through it, and the other separates us from it. It is about the concept of life and the concept of death. Death has always been and will be the secret of every age. Science is speechless before it; it is unable to explain it. Philosophy turns into poetry, encountering it, and man’s archenemy. Theology has always stuck to general theses when trying to clarify them. Death, that bloodthirsty enemy, began its work at the cradle of the human race and continues through the centuries until the present. However, in the eyes of the original Creator’s plan, it was not a part of human life but became a direct consequence of committing original sin. For this reason, every human being entering existence in this world is marked by the so-called original sin. In the case of original sin, as Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI says. , we must understand that all of us – people of all times, carry in us a drop of the poison of thinking described or approached through the images of the book of Genesis. (Gn 3-4)
The consequence of sin is death. (Romans 6, 23). And so only “death” can reverse the effect of original sin. Lord Jesus told Nicodemus in a night conversation that “Unless one is born from above, he cannot see the kingdom of God” (John 3:3). Such death of the “old man” and the simultaneous “birth from above” is represented by Holy Baptism, which, as the Catechism of the Catholic Church says, is the entrance to life in the Holy Spirit (vitae spiritualis iguana) and the gate that opens access to other sacraments. Thus, the consequence of sin is also the fantastic solidarity of God, who sends us Jesus Christ as a friend and savior. That is why original sin is also called felix culpa – happy guilt. “Oh, happy guilt, for which such a noble Redeemer came to us!” (we sing during the liturgy of the Easter Vigil).
Today, we continue with the epiphany, originating in the appearance of the Lord to the wise men from the East, representing the pagan nations of the world. The service presents us with its second aspect, namely, the baptism of Jesus in the Jordan River. The Jordan River is the largest of all Israeli rivers, measuring 251 kilometers, and its catchment area covers up to 18,300 km. It is formed by the confluence of three small rivers in the Chula Valley. During its course, it flows through Lake Tiberias until it finally flows into the Dead Sea, which is geographically the lowest place in terms of the Jordan region and the whole world.
Jesus descends into these ancient waters – to be baptized by John, although he did not have to because he was without sin; as St. Gregory of Nazianzus says in the texts of the sacred reading, he did it so that he could later come out of the Jordan and receive the “baptism of the cross” for which he came to this world. Exegetes say that the very act of Jesus’ baptism can be safely called a kind of ceremonial inauguration – the inauguration of the Messiah through the voice, the open sky, and the presence of the Holy Spirit.
Today, however, we also remember our baptism, even more so the sacrament of reconciliation, which, like holy baptism, washes away all committed sins, light and grave. The words captured by St. Mark the Evangelist, sounding like an echo from heaven, are also addressed to us: “You are my beloved Son, I am in love with you” (Mk 1, 11). Thus, we can legitimately say that our Lord constantly enters the deepest bowels of our interior and sanctifies it with grace. After all, we have acquired God’s sonship through baptism, which is enormous! To be God’s son and daughter is the highest rank and privilege we could ever receive! No title, rank, or any other earthly merit equaling or even surpassing this mysterious seal of God impressed by baptism on the soul of man.
The author of the letter to the Hebrews, citing Psalm 2:7, asks himself: “When did he say to any of the angels: ‘You are my Son, today I have begotten you’ and again: ‘I will be his father, and he will be my son’?” (Heb. 1,5) So these words, beloved brothers and sisters, are analogously intended for all of us who have the honor of being called God’s children!
Saint Paul, the apostle of the nations, declares this even more clearly when he writes: “All who the Spirit of God leads are sons of God. You have not received the spirit of slavery to be afraid again, but you have received the Spirit of adopted sonship in which we cry ‘ABBA FATHER’! The Spirit Himself and our spirit testifies that we are God’s children.” So we are rightly called God’s children because we are them too! It is always good to be reminded of this fact again and again.
Brothers and sisters, baptism is immersion in the death of Jesus. Breaking the bonds of sin, he frees man, changes the human paradigm, and revitalizes the soul marked by sin! Let us give thanks today, tomorrow, and throughout our lives for the gift of God’s sonship! Jesus’ baptism was a symbolic act of the beginning of his public activity! Even our baptism should be the beginning – not the end of the life of faith. So let us step on the path of life in the spirit of God’s beloved children, let us not be ashamed of the fact that God is our Father, and let us not forget our mother, the Church, whose mystical body we form and to whom Christ entrusted the depository with the treasure of faith and appointed her as its steward!
Posted in sermons
Leave a comment
Solemnity of the Epiphany of the Lord, Matthew 2,1-12
Jesus, as a rising star (cf. Num 24:17), comes to enlighten all nations and illuminate the nights of humanity. With the wise men who look to heaven, we too ask today: “Where is the newborn?” (Matthew 2:2). So which is where we can find and meet our Lord? From the experience of the sages, we understand that the first “place” where love allows itself to be found is in the turmoil of questions.
The fascinating adventure of these wise men from the East teaches us that faith is not born from our merits or theoretical considerations but is a gift from God. His grace helps us wake up from apathy and make room for the essential questions of life that take us out of the presumption that we are okay and open us to what is beyond us. In the sages at the beginning is this: the restlessness of the questioner. Driven by their longing for the infinite, they explore the sky. They are dazzled by the star’s brightness, representing the tension toward the transcendent that animates the journey of civilizations and the constant search of our hearts. That star leaves a question in their hearts: Where is the newborn?
Brothers and sisters, the journey of faith begins when, with God’s grace, we create space for the restlessness that keeps us awake; when we allow ourselves to be addressed, when we are not satisfied with our habits but resolutely face the challenges of each day; when we stop locking ourselves in a neutral space and decide to inhabit the uncomfortable spaces of life that makeup relationships with others, surprises, unforeseen events, projects that need to be carried out, dreams that need to be realized, fears that need to be faced, suffering that breaks into the body. In these moments, irrepressible questions arise in our hearts that open us to the search for God – where is happiness for me? Where is the whole life I long for? Where is the love that will not pass away, disappear, break, or face frailties, failures, and betrayals? What opportunities are hidden in my crises and sufferings?
It so happens that the air we breathe offers us “soul tranquilizers” every day, substitutes to calm our restlessness and banish these questions – from the products of consumption to the lures of pleasure, from grand debates to the idolatry of prosperity; everything seems to be telling us: don’t overthink, let it be, enjoy life! We often try to store our hearts in the vault of comfort, but if the wise did that, they would never meet the Lord. To calm your heart, to calm your soul, so that there is no more restlessness: that is the danger. But God dwells in our troubling questions; in them, we “look for him as the night looks for the dawn… He is in the silence that worries us before death and the end of all human greatness; it is in the need for justice and love that we carry within us; it is a holy mystery that meets the nostalgia for the Other, the nostalgia for perfect and complete justice, for reconciliation and peace” (CMMARTINI, Incontro al Signore Risorto. Il cuore dello spirito cristiano, Cinisello Balsamo 2012, 66). So this is the first place: a riot of questions. Don’t be afraid to enter this turmoil of questions: these paths lead us to Jesus.
The second place where we can meet the Lord is the risk of the road. Questions, even spiritual ones, can cause frustration and desolation if they do not lead us on the path or direct our inner movement toward God’s face and the beauty of his word. The journey of the Wise Men, “Their outward journey,” said Benedict XVI, “was an expression of their inner journey, the inner journey of their heart” (Homily for Epiphany, January 6, 2013). The sages do not stop to look at the sky and contemplate the light of the stars but embark on a risky journey that does not guarantee safety in advance with an accurate map in hand. They want to find out who the King of the Jews is, where he was born, and where they can find him. They ask Herod for it, who in turn calls the leaders of the people and the scribes who question the Scriptures. The sages are on their way. Most of the verbs describing their activity are verbs of motion.
It is the same with our faith: without a constant journey and constant dialogue with the Lord, without listening to the Word, and without perseverance, it cannot grow. It is not enough to think about God and pray to calm the conscience; we must become disciples of following Jesus and his gospel, talk to him about everything in prayer, and look for him in everyday situations and the faces of our brothers and sisters. From Abraham, who set out on a journey to an unknown land, to the wise men who set out to follow the star, faith is a journey, a journey, a story of departures and more departures. Let us always remember: faith is a journey, a journey, a story of departures and further departures. Let us remember that faith does not grow if it remains static; we cannot enclose it in some personal piety or within the church’s walls, but we must take it outside and live it on a constant journey to God and our brothers and sisters. Let’s ask ourselves today: am I walking towards the Lord of life so that he becomes the Lord of my life? Jesus, who are you to me? Where do you call me to go? What do you ask of my life? What decisions are you inviting me to make for others?
Finally, after the confusion of questions and the risk of the journey, the third place of encounter with the Lord is the wonder of adoration. At the end of the long journey and arduous search, the wise men entered the house, “they saw the child with Mary, his mother, and they fell to the ground and worshiped him” (v. 11). This is the crucial point: our restlessness, our questions, spiritual journeys and practices of faith are to be united in the adoration of the Lord. They find their source center there because everything is born from there. After all, the Lord arouses feelings, actions, and deeds in us. Everything is born there, and everything culminates there because the goal of everything is not to achieve a personal goal and gain glory but to meet God and be embraced by his love, which gives the basis of our hope, which frees us from evil, which opens us to love others, which makes us people capable of building a fairer and more fraternal world. It makes no sense to be passed orally active if we do not put Jesus in the center and do not worship him—the wonder of bowing. There, we learn to stand before God, not to beg him for something or to do something, but to remain silent and surrender to his love, to let ourselves be captured and reborn by his mercy.
We often pray, ask, and think, but we usually miss the prayer of adoration. We have lost the sense of adoration because we have lost the restlessness of questions and the courage to go forward at the risk of the journey. Today, the Lord invites us to do as the wise men did: let us fall on the ground before God and surrender to him in awe and adoration. Let us worship God and not our ego; let us worship God and not false idols, which seduce us with the allure of prestige and power; fascinated by false news, let us worship God that we do not bow down to things that pass away and to the alluring but empty logic of evil.
Brothers and sisters, let us open our hearts to restlessness, ask for the courage to advance on the path, and end in adoration! Fear not; it is the way of the sages; it is the way of all the saints in history: to accept the restlessness, to set out on the journey, and to bow down. Brothers and sisters, let us not let the restlessness of questions die out in us; let us not stop our journey by succumbing to apathy or complacency; and when meeting the Lord, let us surrender to the wonder of adoration. Then we discover that the light illuminates even the darkest nights: Jesus, the bright morning star, the sun of justice, the merciful brightness of God who loves every person and every nation on earth.
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment
Voluntarism, sentimentalism.
Voluntarism. The human will is a tremendous force. It can do a lot. Without it, we would not save ourselves. “He who created you without you…,” writes St. Augustine, “will not save you without you.”But even this power must not be overestimated as if it alone is sufficient for everything (so-called Pelagianism) or if Christian perfection should be judged only by performance, especially external performance. At the end of the last century, some said that the time had come to replace passive virtues with active ones. We should worry less about humility, contemplation, adoration, and denial but instead put all our strength into doing something properly for the Church, social justice, and the law. These counsels were often well-intentioned, and there was a piece of truth. However, their one-sidedness quickly leads to consequences contrary to Christ’s life and the teaching of the Gospel. Related to voluntarism is so-called moralism. He who loves God keeps the commandments (Jn 14:21). People with a valid will are better able to keep the laws of morality and the rules of the Church and are faithful in their duties. Can it be said that they are genuinely holier, better than others? We are sure that keeping God’s laws sanctifies a man. The life struggle of Christ against the Pharisees shows how easily
it is to go astray here, too, and how outward integrity can become a mask that covers the fundamental deficiencies of many actual values.
Sentimentalism. The presence of the Holy Spirit purifies all our faculties, hence our affections. The ear of the trained musician becomes sensitive to the harmony of tones and the flow of melody. Religious life awakens sense and feeling for what is, as St. Paul says above (Col 3:1), for the world of God, for holiness. There is an inner joy, a consolation, a peace that the world cannot give. In the words of the Apostle, such is the fruit of the Spirit (Gal 5:22).
Spiritual writers have always wondered whether such inner states are inevitable, whether they are infallible signs of grace and the presence of the Spirit. What if someone completely lacks and feels comfortless, full of contradictions, temptations, and disgust? The “consciousness of grace” question is being addressed again in theology today, even though it is aware of the difficulties. Certainly, the long-convicted need to avoid errors, e.g., Messalianism (4th century), which claimed that we have grace only when we feel it. Temptation and restlessness are said to be symptoms of sin. Even in the early modern period, there are some profound statements from the Church. Feeling and believing in our justification to be saved is not enough. Again, it was emphasized (against Baius) that “the evil lust, though it has its origin in sin, leads to it, but is not itself a sin.” Spiritual writers to this day say of consolations and consolations that often alternate.
Thus, one cannot infallibly measure life by good and bad feelings in God’s grace. Nevertheless, the presence of the Holy Spirit usually gives a person peace and tranquility, an inner contentment. They have, therefore, also right those who testify that they have found happiness and joy, such as the world cannot give in the spiritual life. This, however, every Christian gratefully receives. But he will never substitute for it the search for sentimental “sweet.” devotions, artificially induced enthusiasm, or exaltation.
Exaggerated spiritualism. We believe that Jesus Christ is the true God. But He is a God who became incarnate, was born, lived as a man died, and sanctified human activity and values. Spiritual life is in the Holy Spirit. He, however, “spiritualizes” the whole human person. He is thus given a true sense of what exaggerated spiritualism despises: daily life, its concerns, interests, feelings, and relationships. In contrast, however, compared to God, the world is nothing, not even worthy of attention. The world in God and with God, however, is the beginning of the heavenly Jerusalem, towards which the development of history is directed. Exaggerated spiritualism manifests itself in many ways. Some overestimate miracles, expect extraordinary interventions of God’s power and do not make sufficient use of the means at hand to accomplish good. It is good to think of eternal bliss, but it must be remembered that it is the reward of love. Nothing is more holy to a Christian than prayer, but to it also belongs work, as symbolically the two sisters in the Gospel, Mary and Martha (Luke 10,
38 ). Save the soul, for the rest does not matter! Nevertheless, we cannot throw up our hands in condescension over the misery and needs of our neighbor, over social injustice, over oppression. So-called Quietism (from the Latin word quies – peace) longs for God’s grace to permeate man’s heart. It forgets, however, that God is action, so God’s life promotes activity. Spiritual experiences are not for that, to be drunk with them, as it were, and to fall into passivity, inactivity.
One-sided Christian sociologist. Love for God, however, is realized through the love of neighbor. The latter, then, is to meet the needs of modern life and be organized. Christians as a whole cannot be alienated from public life, neither from politics nor from culture. And yet, even in the heat of enthusiasm for a good cause, they must remember Christ’s words: My kingdom is not of this world (Jn 18,36). The Gospel is not just a social program.
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment
We have found the Messiah.
Andrew joyfully announces to his brother. In the Gospel, we hear how Andrew and John were interested in Jesus and how they came to know him. We who gather around the altar also want to know Jesus, for through him, we know the mysteries of life. Without Christ, we do not understand what life and death are. We are still determining who we are and what our destiny is. Someone has said that knowledge of God gives birth to pride, and knowledge of man gives birth to despair. The prideful are those who claim to know the ways of God and supposedly know what to expect from God. And those who know man’s misery and what he can do fall into despair. Jesus Christ came into the world to reveal God’s love and show us man’s greatness. For man’s salvation, God consented to the death of His Son. Happy are the first disciples who came to know Christ, but we see that the knowledge of Christ is not the goal but the starting point for them. They bring to Christ, other disciples, and then whole nations. Thus, our task is also to bring religiously indifferent people to Christ and open their eyes to heaven. It is a sad fact that the Messiah has already been born and is in our midst, and many have not yet come to know Him.
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment
Six tips for spending time with God
You know that feeling when you’re trying to steal a little time to devote to God, but your responsibilities won’t let you? And you fall asleep feeling guilty that you didn’t do enough for it every night. You struggle with remorse until you reach an impasse… What wins? Your pride, your fear, or your humility? In your pride, you say: “God will wait, but duty will not,” in fear you mumble to Our Father, “For what if…” and in humility, you say: “God, forgive me, for you are the Lord of time – here I am, I am listening.”
You are not alone in experiencing the struggle with time, but it is a little different. Our busy, duty-laden lives are not the only reason we don’t have time for God…
Why do we forget God?
We are used to giving out of our surplus. If we give something to people experiencing poverty, we provide not the most beautiful and precious things we have but what we no longer need. Piles of clothes that are no longer fashionable occupy the closet. Or the money we donate to people in need only at the end of the month because it has increased to us. So, we are used to giving God the leftovers of our time.
It is not an art to give in excess but to go out on a limb and trust God implicitly. To be frugal, to sacrifice a little of our comfort and give it to those who need it most. Those who love to sacrifice for others sacrifice most of their time for God. Don’t give him your leftovers – the time you have left before bedtime. If you never want to forget God again, start with Him when you wake up first thing in the morning.
Time with God is like a meal you must eat several times daily to fill you up. It is said that appetite grows with food, so why not speak to Him in the morning, at lunch, and at night before bed, but every time you have a moment – in the doctor’s waiting room, on the way to work, or while cooking? Make every opportunity to spend time with God your number one priority.
How can you spend time with God every day? Here are six tips
Start as soon as you wake up. Not all of us are early birds to get up, but what about sacrificing a few minutes of your sleep to God? Pray, give thanks, praise the Lord, or read a few scriptures. If you start talking to God, He will bless your day, fill you with the Holy Spirit, and multiply your time. Sacrifice your discomfort for the souls in purgatory or for your own sake.
Listen to God’s Word while you work.
Sitting down during the day and reading the Holy Scriptures or other spiritual literature is often challenging. However, audio versions can be downloaded to your cell phone and listened to anytime. You can download free Holy Scripture, Christian audiobooks, praise or sermons, and lectures by inspirational people. Listen to them on your way to and from work or home while doing chores that don’t need your full attention. Make the most of every moment and fill your mind with the Word – you will have a wonderful time with God, whom you will never forget.
Read the Holy Scriptures while you wait.
We try to make the most of every spare moment while waiting. It is unthinkable to wait and do nothing at all. We pass the time by surfing the internet on our mobiles or tablets and don’t even realize that we could have spent it more meaningfully. We must remember about good old tried and tested manual work or reading. How many people have you seen today doodling or reading a book in a doctor’s waiting room or while driving to work?
Shorten your wait by reading spiritual literature or Holy Scripture. Why is it important to read God’s Word daily? Reading the Holy Scriptures should guide how we live our lives so we can be saved. It is a source we can draw at any time – in a state of joy, sorrow, fear, or pain. Holy Scripture is a constant reassurance from God of His love for us.
Speak to God with your words.
How many of us wander our minds thinking about ourselves, our actions, our problems, or how others treat us? Our thoughts have great power. They make us proud as we constantly remind ourselves how wonderful we are. Who can praise you more than your ego? Or who can give you more credit for the fact that your neighbor or colleague hasn’t been fair to you than yourself?
Instead of looking at yourself and your neighbors, turn your attention to God, and you will not lose your value. You can only gain. How about talking to God in your own words? Just like with your best friend. Just speak; your God is the best listener. Don’t be afraid to ask him for help because he responds with deeds – undeserved gifts and infinite mercy.
Be receptive to the gifts of the Holy Spirit all day long.
Being close to God also means being receptive to the gifts of the Holy Spirit. God speaks to us through the Holy Spirit, from whom we have received in the Sacrament of Confirmation the gift of wisdom, discernment, counsel, strength, knowledge, piety, and the fear of God to walk in the Light in this world. God’s love and the Holy Spirit guide us through the obstacles in our path. If you do not feel the blowing of the Holy Spirit in your life, there is a mistake somewhere.
The problem is that we often need to remember to thank the Holy Spirit for help, not realizing that the Holy Spirit lives within us. The Holy Spirit can help you make small daily decisions by whispering. If you listen to Him and discern the “feelings” that the Holy Spirit is giving you, you will have fewer problems. How to listen to the Holy Spirit? In the Holy Scriptures, it says: “By their fruits, you will know them…” (cf. Mt 7:16). The fruit of the Holy Spirit is “love, joy, peace, long-suffering, gentleness, goodness, faithfulness, meekness, temperance” (Gal 5:22-23).
Would you be able to sleep? Start praying
No, this is not meant to sound funny. Even if someone says it’s good to start counting sheep to get to sleep quickly, sometimes it doesn’t work. What to do at that time? Have you found yourself yawning while praying? It’s strange, but it works. Can you think of a better and more beautiful way to fall asleep than with a prayer on your lips?
Now, we don’t mean that you should save evening prayer for the late hour of the night when you fall asleep to it. It is intended to be one way of devoting the last minutes of nothingness to God. After all, it is possible to fight insomnia by prayer.
When you give God your time, He will multiply and bless it with graces. God uses a mysterious equation: He does not divide the time you give Him but multiplies it so you will have time for many other duties.
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment
We read Georg Gänswein’s book
The book begins by telling how Joseph Ratzinger chose him as his secretary, then goes on to write about the challenges that the later Pope dealt with as prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. It also touches on several dimensions of the pontificate, such as the choice of the secretary of state and the betrayal of those closest to them – the Vatileaks case. It also details Benedikt’s decision to resign and the days when it happened.
Subsequently, the Francis-Benedict relationship is analyzed in the eighth chapter, The Relationship of the Two Popes, and partly in the ninth chapter (Busy Silence in the Monastery). From the 330-page book, passages on this sensitive topic make up less than 20 percent of the content.
At the beginning of chapter 8, Gänswein recalls that Benedict publicly promised “respect and obedience to the new pope” even before the election of Francis.
He added that when celebrating Masses in retirement – in Italian during the week and in Latin on Sundays (Gänswein pointed out that according to Paul VI’s missal) – Benedict always mentioned “Pope Francis” in the Eucharistic prayer.
He also returned to the conclave in 2013; according to his own words, he didn’t even have time to congratulate the newly elected Pope from Argentina when he overtook him by saying he wanted to call Benedict to help him with this. Then, the German monsignor details the story with the phone call to Castel Gandolfo.
Joseph Ratzinger’s secretary is trying to clarify Benedict’s public words that he did not count on the election of Cardinal Bergoglio. According to Gänswein, the outgoing pope may have mistakenly believed that the Argentine cardinal had already passed 80.
In retrospect, it seems to Gänswein that Benedict tipped someone from the favored trio: Archbishop Angelo Scola of Milan, prefect of the Canadian Congregation for Bishops Marc Ouellet, and Archbishop Odilo Pedro Scherer of Sao Paulo, Brazil.
He knew Jorge Bergoglio, but there were few opportunities for them to meet each other, because “the Argentinian archbishop did not like to travel to the Vatican”.

Ratzinger’s secretary shattered the idyllic idea that there was harmony between Francis and Benedict right after the funeral.
Gänswein marks the episode of 2007 as a significant, albeit indirect, contact between Ratzinger and Bergoglio. It was at the time when the Superior General of the Jesuits, Peter Hans Kolvenbach, offered his resignation to the Pope and, at the same time, was preparing the election of his successor.
At that time, Benedict formulated a letter through State Secretary Bertone with reservations regarding the theological and ecclesial training of young Jesuits and the observance of the fourth religious vow, which consists of obedience to the Pope for Jesuits.
The State Secretariat proposed to Father Kolvenbach to involve the Jesuit Cardinal Bergoglio in the preparations for the new elections, which would provide an opinion on the state of the order and the hypothetical establishment of commission supervision over the Jesuits.
According to Gänswein, the new Superior General, Father Adolfo Nicolás, after meeting with Pope Francis on March 17, 2013, heard from the new pontiff words of trust that were in opposition to the idea of supervision over the religious order, while the father was supposed to report to Benedict on the pope’s behalf “the inappropriateness of this problematic course and received a promise that it won’t happen.”
Gänswein does not comment further on the episode. He wanted to point out that Benedikt’s reservations were not taken into account by his successor, or instead, he stood up for “his.”
But what follows is a more positive passage about how Benedict was personally affected by the words of Pope Francis on March 15, 2013, when he praised Benedict in front of the cardinals, saying that “he lit a flame in our hearts that will continue to burn thanks to his prayer that will support the Church on his spiritual missionary journey.”
There is no difference in housing.
In the book, Monsignor Gänswein also returns to the subject of Benedict’s successor’s residence. He recalls how he showed Francis the rooms in the Apostolic Palace and how the pontiff told him some time later that “he normally sleeps like a log, but after seeing the room where he should stay, he slept badly.” And he asked Gänswein to find him smaller accommodation in the Vatican.
Let’s remind you that even after the resignation of Benedict, Francis kept Gänswein in the position of Prefect of the Papal House, which is a function connected, for example, to planning and accompanying foreign delegations to private audiences with the Pope or assisting in general audiences.
Benedict’s secretary was looking for solutions but interpreted to the new pontiff that they would need fixing with service and security. At the same time, he reminded Francis that many people passing by St. Peter’s Square in the evening looked up to the light in the windows of the Pope’s room in the Apostolic Palace as a point of reference. If the current Pope moved, people would perceive it with nostalgia.
Gänswein felt that the distance of thousands of kilometers from Rome made Francis insensitive to this dimension, and he described how he thought about this decision regarding his predecessor’s residence. “Even Benedikt was surprised by this, but his wise conclusion was that he can’t be forced if he doesn’t want to.”
In the next part, he writes that he must question the claims of critics who created a contradiction between the popes on the issue of housing. According to him, the personal quarters of the last popes were equivalent to the suite of Pope Francis in the House of Saint Martha; at the same time, the other spaces – from the kitchen and dining room to the chapel – are equally accessible, albeit as part of the hotel part of the house.
“Indeed, I can testify based on how we found the papal suit in 2005, John Paul II. certainly did not live in the comfort of a prince, and even the subsequent adjustments were not too lavish for the Holy See,” says Gänswein, adding that many non-Catholics also respect the office of the Pope.
According to Gänswein, this contrasting position between an incumbent and an emeritus pope always made Benedict sad, especially when it came from within the Vatican.
Msgr. Gänswein signed a document in Latin the day before the funeral, which was placed in Benedict’s coffin.
In the book, we also find moments where Archbishop Gänswein does not hide Benedict’s gratitude to his successor.
For example, when in June 2016, Benedict XVI. celebrated the 65th anniversary of his priestly ordination, he gave a kind of eulogy for Pope Francis when he also said that his “goodness is the place where I live, I feel protected.”
The publication also contains passages about the visits of Francis to the Mater Ecclesiae monastery, we read that the incumbent pope always brought wine and an Argentinean cream dessert to the visit. Benedict retaliated with limoncello made from lemons from the monastery garden and traditional Bavarian sweets.
However, we find less sweetness in the next part of the book.
After comments from Benedikt, Francis no longer asked for feedback
Half a year after his election, Pope Francis gave an extensive interview to the Jesuit magazine La Civiltà Cattolica, which was conducted by the editor-in-chief Antonio Spadaro.
The Italian publicist Massimo Franco later wrote in the book The Monastery that Pope Francis sent Benedict a printed interview with two blank pages, which meant a request for possible critical comments.
According to Gänswein, however, it was different. The Acting Pope handed him an envelope with a copy of the Jesuit Quarterly only after the interview was published on September 19, 2013, and asked him if Benedict could look at it and possibly comment on it. Benedict took it seriously, carefully read the 30 pages, and summarized the comments in a letter Gänswein handed to Pope Francis.
In the introduction, Benedikt said he read the text with pleasure and “with complete approval.” However, he needed to comment on two points. One was about abortion and contraception, and the other was about homosexuality.
In the letter, Benedict alluded to Francis’ words that he “did not talk much” about these topics and that “the pastoral mission is not obsessed with the disparate transmission of several doctrines.” In his own words, Benedict agrees with this. Still, he needs to add something to it. He recalls his 23 years during the pontificate of John Paul II, who, according to him, led the “fight for life” not as moralizing but as a fight for the Creator. Since the mentioned practices go directly against the Creator, they express “no” to God’s presence in human life.
According to Benedict, this perspective is often missing in pro-life movements. Hence, rebalancing is necessary, “but the public struggle against this concrete and practical negation of the living God certainly remains a necessity.”
Even on the topic of homosexuality, Benedict appreciates that in Francis’ words, he finds a balance that is also present in the catechism in the sense that, on the one hand, there is respect for the person, pastoral love, and then the doctrine of faith.
Nevertheless, Pope Emeritus wanted to add one aspect: a consequence of public propaganda in this area.
According to him, propaganda is not at all interested in the good of homosexual persons but only in the manipulation of being and the radical negation of the Creator. “I know that many gay people disagree with this manipulation and feel that their life issue is being used in an ideological war. Therefore, a strong and public resistance to this pressure is inevitable. We must realize this resistance without losing the balance in pastoral care between the shepherd’s love and the truth of the faith,” he wrote to Francis.
Gänswein did not stop teasing when he stated that he took the letter to Francis, who asked him to convey his thanks to Benedict, “but I do not know whether and how he adopted these considerations.”
Subsequently, Benedict’s secretary tells how Francis sent a copy of the apostolic exhortation Evangelii Gaudium to the Pope Emeritus in November of the same year, while he did the same for his other encyclicals and exhortations and always signed himself with the words “filially and brotherly Francis.”
“However, specific requests for comments on these texts no longer came,” comments Monsignor Gänswein.
In addition, he notes that some of Francis’ statements in the Evangelii Gaudium text sounded “foreign” to the emeritus pope, given Benedict’s theological sensibility. He enumerates three specific points, for example, 41: “For it happens that believers – accustomed to their speech, which they understand – when they listen to the flawless orthodox language, they take away something that does not correspond to the true gospel of Jesus Christ.”
To balance this, Gänswein adds that Benedict has also publicly expressed that Pope Francis governs the church with the best effort for the good of the current church with the responsibility of Peter’s successor.
According to Gänswein, a “misunderstanding” caused Pope Emeritus to be listed as a co-author of Sarah’s book, which he then asked the African cardinal to correct. The German monsignor quotes the entire letter in which Benedict explains everything to his successor (he said he did not reply, only confirmed the acceptance).
The African cardinal does not fare well at all in the description of the incident in Gänswein’s book; its author is very critical of him, which can also be explained by the fact that he associates his dismissal from the post of Prefect of the Papal House with this scandal.
Don Georg and František did not sit down.
We come to a passage that is more about Gänswein’s relationship with the incumbent pope than memories of Benedict.
The author openly writes that only a few months after the election of the Argentine pope, it appeared to him that an appropriate atmosphere of trust had not been created between them, while Francis had been leaving more and more responsibilities to the vice-prefect Leonardo Sapienza from the beginning.
He mentions an example from 2014 when he and Pope Francis were supposed to visit the Community of St. Aegis in the Roman quarter of Trastevere, but the Pope told him the day before – in front of the others – that he didn’t have to go with him, let him take time off.
The next day, the community’s founder, Andrea Riccardi, called Gänswein to ask what problem he or Benedikt had with them. Archbishop Gänswein then complained to Francis that it had humiliated him, to which the pontiff told him that he did not realize the problem and apologized, “but then added that humility is beneficial.”
According to Gänswein, this was repeated several times, especially when visiting Roman parishes.

Archbishop Georg Gänswein and Pope Francis accompanied by Mons. Leonardo Sapienza is separated after the funeral of Benedict XVI.
Then, Gänswein deals with his accommodation in the Vatican and describes how Francis forbade him to move into the Apostolic Palace, the original apartment of the prefect of the Papal House, which was undergoing renovation. Therefore, Gänswein lived temporarily in the monastery with Benedict.
When he came to Francis personally in January 2020 to explain the case with Sarah’s book, the Pope allegedly told him to stay in the monastery, where Benedict needs his care, and to make him a shield ( fascia scudo ).
“You will remain perfect, but from tomorrow, you will not return to work,” said the acting pope, according to Gänswein. “I was shocked and speechless,” he describes the decision to take away his executive powers as prefect of the Papal House.
When Gänswein reported this to Benedict, he is said to have remarked ironically: “It seems that Pope Francis no longer trusts me and wants you to be my guardian.” And Gänswein immediately asked the question with a laugh: “Should I be a guardian or a supervisor?” According to it was a protest against the case with Sarah’s book.
Benedict was said to be sorry for how this case developed, and at the end of his letter to Pope Francis dated February 13, 2020, he also dedicated a paragraph to his secretary, when he defended him by saying that he did the right thing in the Sarah case and that now he “feels under attack from of all parties and needs the father’s word.”
A few days later, the acting Pope confirmed to Gänswein that nothing would change, and he did not even respond to Benedict’s second appeal in a letter dated February 17.
When Gänswein returned from the hospital in September of that year, where he was diagnosed with renal syndrome, he met František, who told him that the de facto removal from the post of prefect was not a punishment. To Gänswein’s objection that everyone sees it that way, he is said to have said: “Many write against me or you and are not worth mentioning.”
Gänswein claims that, according to the doctor’s statement, his health problems may also have a psychosomatic origin.
Amoris laetitia and the pre-conciliar liturgy
How did Benedict perceive the apostolic exhortation of Pope Francis Amoris Laetitia, which includes in a footnote the possibility of access to the sacraments even for divorced and remarried people?
According to Gänswein’s account, after reading the text, the pontiff emeritus “became perplexed, and although he appreciated many passages, he wondered about the meaning of some which would ordinarily amount to a mere citation of a source, but in this case represented significant content.”
It is said that even in the following months, Benedikt still needed to understand the motive of why a certain ambiguity was left in the document. According to Gänswein, he did not agree with the strategy of keeping several interpretations in circulation and then cutting out one (meaning Francis’ letter to the Argentine bishops).
The Pope Emeritus was said to have been surprised by the absence of any hint of an answer to the four cardinals who wrote a letter (so-called Dubai) to Francis asking for an explanation of some doubts. The cardinals also demanded an audience with Francis, which did not happen. According to Gänswein, František was usually willing to meet and talk.
However, for completeness, he also noted in his memoirs that even Benedict did not personally receive any of the four critical cardinals.
The most direct criticism of Benedict towards Francis recorded in this book concerns the decision to tighten the rules for serving the pre-conciliar liturgy.
Benedict XVI is said to have carefully read Francis’ motu proprio Traditions custodes in L’Osservatore Romano, and when asked by Gänswein for his opinion, the pontiff emeritus noted that a sitting pontiff has responsibility for decisions like this and must do what he thinks is best for the church. “But from a personal point of view, he saw the decisive change of course and considered it a mistake because it jeopardized the attempt at peace that had been established fourteen years before.”
Benedict also considered it wrong to forbid the celebration of Mass in the old rite in parish churches “because it is always dangerous to drive a group of believers into a corner, to make them feel persecuted and to make them feel the need to protect their identity at all costs in the face of the enemy.”.
As Gänswein claims, this seemed inconsistent with Benedict’s intentions to allow an extraordinary form of the Mass. He also “remained a mystery” why the survey results among bishops, which Francis referred to and conducted by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, were not published.
Likewise, the German secretary notes that Benedict was also surprised why there was a transfer and dismemberment of competencies in this matter from the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith to the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments and also the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life.

Benedict’s secretary during the general audience of Pope Francis on February 27, 2013.
The rest of the final chapter is devoted to Gänswein’s attitude to Benedict’s sexual abuse cases, returning to the events when the retired pope had to respond to allegations of insufficient handling of sex scandals while he was archbishop of Munich.
In this context, he recalls that Francis expressed personal closeness, full support, and prayer to Benedict at the beginning of 2022 and thanked him for the letter that Pope Emeritus published.
At the end of the book, he quotes Benedict’s homilies and describes life in the Vatican monastery as a daily regimen or diet. We learn, for example, that Sunday dinner was Bavarian-style with black bread, sausages, and beer. However, Benedict “continued to drink his usual lemonade, to which he added a little beer.”
Neither attack nor kindness
The book Nichlen Pravda does not attack Pope Francis but contains references that can unnecessarily inflame passions.
Archbishop Gänswein writes in one place how the contrast between the popes always saddened Benedict, but he contributes to this with some words in the book.
The inconsistency can also be seen in the passage when he mentions the writer Vittorio Messori, who publicly described how the communication with Gänswein and the meeting with Pope Emeritus occurred. In the book, Benedict’s secretary complains that Messori exaggerated some things and said Pope Ratzinger called him a friend through Gänswein.
At the same time, he published things that we cannot independently verify, for example, the words and gestures of Benedict, with which he allegedly reacted to the actions of his successor.
In the book, Monsignor Gänswein also analyzes the tensions caused by the coexistence of the two popes. According to him, it is more correct to say that the problem does not lie in the fact that there were an incumbent and an emeritus pope next to each other but that two camps of fans arose because, over time, it became clear that “there are two visions of the church. And these two camps caused tension, which then reflected on those who do not know church processes well”.
It’s a shame that Gänswein is contributing to the tension, if only by saying in an interview with the German weekly Die Tagespost that Francis’ decision to limit the Trident Mass broke Benedict’s heart. At the same time, this phrase is not found in the book at all.
Georg Gänswein’s book does not present Francis and Benedict as two rival figures, but it is also not a work of peace and unity.
Perhaps this book is like Benedict’s “radler” in some ways. It is not “hard alcohol” full of gossip and slander, but also innocent, non-alcoholic, refreshing lemonade of memories and memories. It is something in between, thanks to Fr. Georg also “poured” a certain amount of controversy and discretion between the two popes into the book.
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment
The Cathars.
The Cathars, a heretical movement of the Middle Ages, had one more feature besides its gnosticism: it divided people into the perfect and the imperfect. The perfect lived an impossible life, or at least very difficult, for an average person. Thus, so that even a normal, ordinary person might have some hope of salvation, there was a belief that if such a perfect one, a psychic, as they were called in Gnosticism (or a good person, as the Cathars called them), gave an average and therefore still human person, a special absolution, the so-called consolamentum to the dying, before death, then that person would also be saved as a result of it. The perfect one was saved because he was perfect, the others because they received this absolution from them, and based on it, God took pleasure in them and accepted them, even though they were still sinful and carnal.
Does that remind you of anything? It certainly does. Today, we call it clericalism, and this delusion is rampant among Catholics.
It, too, believes that there are men, clerics, or “parish priests and nuns,” as it is popularly called, whom God has chosen for a life of holiness and perfection. In this understanding, holiness and perfection mean that they only pray, read the Bible and the holy books, and do nothing but deal with the Lord God. Therefore, they have neither family nor any other occupation and live in a rectory or monastery, separated from the rest of the world. They are called to holiness, and they save themselves for their holiness.
And then there are the laity who live in the world, have families and jobs, and cannot live anything like that; it is not in their power or ability, and no one expects them to. They are weak and sinful, but they will save themselves because of God’s mercy when God has mercy on them, and despite their sins of worldliness, they will still receive into Heaven. And He will do this if they will at least somehow “support the institutions of the Church,” and if they will at least confess and receive absolution from the priest before they die so that, cleansed of all guilt, they may pass clean before the Judge. And, of course, it is best if such purification occurs regularly, say once a month, and if church attendance is added as insurance, ideally every Sunday, or at least occasionally, on major feasts. Then it should be a sure thing!
It’s similar, very similar.
There are a lot of misunderstandings and misconceptions in the background, from the idea of holiness as basically a superhuman burden or “just praying all the time” to the concept of Heaven as a place where God will let us in or out at will – and whether He will do so is up for debate, will be determined by whether He is still angry with us for our faults and sins and will pursue us with punishments for them, or whether we have managed to “wash” and cleanse ourselves of everything in confession beforehand and come before Him already clean. He is satisfied and graciously lets you go to Heaven. ..
Oh, it’s all been here before. As Ecclesiastes says, “What has been is what will be again. And what has already happened will happen again. Nothing is new under the sun. If there is anything that man would say: “See, this is something new!”, it was already there in the times that were before us.” (Eccl 1:9-10).
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment

