Relationship of Christians to their body

Many people do not take him seriously, only problems take them over

Even though the world is dominated by the cult of the flesh, many Christians have rather the opposite problem in this area. They do not consider their body important and do not take care of it as they should.

Many people do not take him seriously, only problems take them over

Illustration photo: Shutterstock

On a day when the minister of the large Saddleback Protestant congregation in Southern California was baptizing hundreds of people, a thought that was not very pious swirled in his head: “They’re all fat!”

Baptism in this church takes place by immersion in water and then lifting the baptized person, and as pastor Rick Warren says, he physically felt the severity of this problem that day. At the same time, he had to admit that he was no exception.

“At that moment it dawned on me and I realized what a terrible example I was setting for others in the field of health. How can I expect my church congregation to take better care of their bodies when I set such a bad example for them?” he writes in his book The Daniel Program.

The next Sunday, he stood behind the pulpit and asked people for forgiveness. “Friends, I have been a poor steward of my health and set a terrible example for you. Today, I publicly repent of this and ask for your forgiveness,” he declared. He then added that the church was helping the poor and sick around the world, but was ignoring the growing problem within its ranks.

More than 15,000 people signed up for the challenge of who is joining the lifestyle change. So Pastor Warren enlisted three respected doctors and they created the 40-day Daniel Program based on biblical principles and the five fundamentals: diet, exercise, mindset, faith, and friends.

It was not supposed to be a one-time diet, but to acquire lifelong habits and skills. The book The Daniel Program, which was first published ten years ago, even became number one on the New York Times bestseller list.

Every seventh person in the world is addicted to junk food

Is obesity a diagnosis that people cannot be responsible for? The latest study presents new findings.

In his book, Rick Warren writes about the role food played in his family. Although no one smoked or drank alcohol, no food, no matter how unhealthy, was off-limits. “Every memory, whether good or bad, is associated with food. When we were happy, we celebrated with food. When we were sad, we consoled ourselves with food. If I had a hard day as a child, my cure was cookies with milk or a piece of freshly baked cake.’

Although he has heard thousands of sermons in church since he was a child about what God says about our souls, mind, or emotions, he has never once heard about how God looks at our bodies. “Our society is obsessed with physical beauty and a sexy body, but many believers ignore their bodies as if they don’t matter at all. But the body matters,” emphasizes the pastor.

With quotations from the Holy Scriptures, he proves what approach to the body God, who did not make us owners but stewards of our bodies, asks of us. “Do you not know that you do not belong to yourself, but that your body is the temple of the Holy Spirit who dwells in you and whom you have from God?” quotes the pastor from Paul’s letter to the Corinthians. “If you saw someone desecrating a temple dedicated to God, would you not consider it a crime? But you abuse and ravage the temple of God, your body, when you rob it of rest and sleep, overeat, put too much stress on it, and do not take care of it,” Pastor Warren calls the “diagnoses” of many Christians.

He also adds as an argument that Jesus paid too much for us to “cough” on each other. “If you bought a racehorse that was worth a million dollars, would you feed it junk food and keep it up all night? Of course not. The fact is that even Jesus has invested in you,” Warren compares.

We tolerate gluttony

Although the American context seems distant to us and we do not consider ourselves a country of hamburgers and fries, the number of overweight people, including children, is still growing in Slovakia, and we are not too far from the USA in terms of sugar consumption.

“It angers me that even though we are a Christian country, we do not see gluttony as a sin. On the contrary, I would say that it is our most tolerated sin,” said obesity researcher from the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SAV) Adela Penesová in an interview with Postoj newspaper.

We are a Christian country, but we do not see gluttony as a sin

Interview with doctor Adela Penesová about the obesity epidemic, overweight children, movement, healthy eating, and extreme transformations.

The doctor’s words are also confirmed by popular missionary Michal Zamkovský. In the book I Confessed, Slovakia identifies overeating as our biggest problem, along with alcoholism. According to both Zamkovský and Penesová, the sin of excessive eating and unhealthy eating is related to times of prosperity and the constant availability of processed foods. Our great-grandparents had a much more modest diet from household supplies, they consumed a minimum of sugar, they ate meat only on holidays, and physical work provided them with plenty of exercise in the fresh air.

“In the last twenty years, observe the change. When we used to go on missions, people were thinner. It was made in the field, in the garden, and it was not as plentiful as it is today. People eat a lot. They probably compensate for the lack of love, understanding, and acceptance,” thinks the priest, but admits that there may be other, medical reasons behind obesity.

Junk food is a new object of addiction for many people. Many processed foods are manufactured to induce it, and it works on a similar principle to alcohol or nicotine addiction.

Father Zamkovsky perceives the lack of moderation as a problem. “We need to learn moderation, the virtue of moderation. I’m afraid that even us priests miss it. Drinking coffee, internet, food…” he evaluates.

The obesitologist from SAS also thinks that many priests are not a good example to their believers in this regard. “Last year, my patient, a Catholic priest, came for a check-up during the fast before Easter and gained two kilos. I asked him: how can you gain weight even during fasting?” she recalls in the interview.

Points of negativity

Pope John Paul II highlighted the dignity of the body and its unity with the soul. in his famous Theology of the Body. He bid farewell to all the ancient theories that despised the body as a prison for the soul and condemned it to mortification. The fifth commandment of God also orders Christians to lead a good life.

Already in the third grade, while preparing for the first Holy Communion, they learned that we should take good care of the body. So why do we Christians still not take the physical side seriously enough and in the church do we not emphasize the need for movement, exercise, healthy diet, and moderation?

Kristína, who is in her thirties, only started looking for a way to a healthy lifestyle as an adult. In retrospect, she realizes that in the environment of the Christian community, where she worked as a teenager, the spiritual side was often developed at the expense of the physical one.

Nowadays, there is talk about the phenomenon of body positivity, which emphasizes acceptance of one’s body, no matter how it looks. “The environment I come from, however, followed a different path – as it were, the path of ‘points of negativity’. We were supposed to take care of our mental or spiritual side, which is also nice, but the body was like a burdensome element that had to be guarded so that it wouldn’t be sinful,” describes Kristína.

The spiritual weekends were accompanied by an unhealthy and high-calorie diet with a minimum of exercise, which did not have room for an intensive intellectual program. Since diet was not addressed even in Kristina’s family, the lifestyle was also reflected in her weight.

Catholic health blogger Emily Stimpson Chapman names the difference between controlling your body and taking care of it. “Some people emphasize control over their body because it can be a source of sin. But the body needs care. It’s a wonderful gift and we need to give it what it needs to do what God created it to do.”

Kneeling and adoring are not enough

Nutritional coach and structural therapist Tomáš Rusňák says that some Christians still perceive the body as something mundane or inferior or at least unimportant. “An overloaded body often speaks to us through pain. In addition to lay people, I have a lot of patients from among priests and religious sisters, who only when something brutally hurts them discover that they also have a body and it is not enough to just kneel and worship, but they need to seek professional help,” Rusňák told Postoj.

“I ask my patients many open questions, for example: Where do you experience your spiritual life? Where do you contemplate God? In the body or out of the body?” he adds.

With one of the priests, who initially sought out Rusňák because of great pain, and with a psychologist, they started doing Z2S2 seminars focused on the soul, spirit, and body. In addition to spiritual lectures and prayers, the participants are also educated on topics from the field of psychology, movement, and lifestyle, but also exercise and eat a nutritionally balanced diet as part of the program.

“When the body receives a balanced diet and exercise, it also affects the spiritual and mental life. On the contrary, when, for example, I sit at the computer all day. My digestion is broken, I have no energy either for prayer or playing with the children, so I lie down on the couch,” says the therapist, who calls today’s generation of people working at computers “homo status”.

Psychosomatics is not quackery.  Sometimes our relationships and our bodies hurt

Interview with health and nutrition coach Tomáš Rusňák, who integrates the scientific procedures of physiology and Christian theology.

Many Christians welcome the possibility of seminars focusing not only on the soul but also on the body. “A lot of believers who want to do something with themselves, when they search the Internet, they come across everything and they are afraid of it. The presence of a priest is a guarantee for them that it will not drift towards esotericism,” said priest Marek Kunder, who collaborates in the creation of Z2S2 seminars, in the U Nikodéma

Therapist Tomáš Rusňák, who also studied in the United States, tries to look at his patients as a whole. According to him, ignoring the needs of the body often stems from an unhealthy perception of one’s self-worth, overlooking one’s uniqueness, perfection, and the body as a temple of the Holy Spirit.

Overeating can be related to emotional problems, relationship or personal injuries, sin, stress, or ignorance. “I always ask the patient about his medical history, I ask him many questions about his lifestyle and then I try to guide him. In addition to healthy nutrition and exercise, sleep, daily routine, the ability to relax, build personality, relationships, or consciously prepare for eternity with every activity are very important.”

Verbist Ján Štefanec completed a course for priests in Canada based on a holistic approach to people. When developing a person, he takes into account his physical, spiritual, and mental needs. “It was a valuable experience for me that greatly influenced me. A spiritual life without a healthy lifestyle cannot function to its full potential, as well as a performance-oriented life without the necessary rest and fulfillment of spiritual needs. That’s also why I balance spiritual activity with physical work and sports whenever possible,” says the priest about his experience.

According to him, in addition to a balanced life, it is important to take care of the body. “I don’t gamble with my health, I go for preventive check-ups and keep fit. This is the basis for healthy self-development and awareness of one’s place and mission here on earth,” emphasizes Štefanec.

A good example of how clearly defined rules of life within a church community can affect the health of its members is the American town of Loma Linda in California. Shockingly, the city near Los Angeles in the bustling part of the United States has been designated as one of the five blue zones, along with the Greek island of Ikaria, Italian Sardinia, Japanese Okinawa, and Costa Rica’s Nicoya Peninsula. These are areas where a large number of people live to the full strength of old age, several or even hundreds.

In Loma Linda, people live about a decade longer than the American average. In the reports that were filmed there, you can see a century-old heart surgeon who says that he would have no problem standing behind the operating table with a scalpel. Despite his age, his head and body worked as a unit.

What is the secret of this small town’s health? “A third of the population of Loma Linda is a Seventh-day Adventist community. Their faith leads them to treat their bodies like temples: no or little meat or fish, no smoking, no alcohol, lots of exercise, and a life of purpose,” the Los Angeles Times reported.

Life in Loma Linda can be glimpsed in the Netflix series Live to 100: Secrets of the Blue Zones (Live to 100: Secrets of the Blue Zones). National Geographic reporter Dan Buettner shows the lives of old people in full force, who pray together, cook colorful vegetable meals, serve as volunteers, and move a lot in big sports fields. At the same time, all these activities prevent life in isolation, which is another prerequisite for a healthy life even in old age.

We have in common with this Protestant denomination the perception of the body as a temple of the Holy Spirit. The difference is that Adventists put a lot of emphasis on health, exercise, and diet and take it as part of their faith. In other words, they take it seriously.

While moderation, plenty of exercise, and modest food were the necessary standard two generations ago, in today’s age of sedentary jobs and stores full of processed foods, a healthy lifestyle is the result of a conscious choice. This topic is more relevant today than ever before.

Christianity offers us many arguments about why the body matters. Maybe it wouldn’t hurt if we were sometimes reminded of them from the pulpit.

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

Fourth Sunday of Lent, Year B John 3,14-21

Today’s Sunday’s Gospel (Jn 3, 14-21) began in the middle of the action – in the middle of Jesus’ conversation with Nicodemus. Nicodemus was a Pharisee, a member of the Great Council, and a person with a high social and religious position. It is mentioned three times in Scripture. The first time is in today’s Gospel when Nicodemus came to Jesus. He came to him at night. Most commentators believe that Nicodemus did not want anyone to see him. It’s pretty likely, but it doesn’t have to be. Jesus had a rather demanding dialogue with Nicodemus. Nicodemus had to ask some things because he did not understand them repeatedly. And we need to help understand everything, too.

The second time Nicodemus is mentioned is when Jesus is about to be tried. The Synod decided to get rid of Jesus and looked for ways to do it. Then, Nicodemus tried to defend Jesus. He turned to the members of the Great Council with the question of what they were doing if their law could condemn someone whom they had not heard. Nicodemus’s colleagues silenced him, laughed at him, told him that he was from the countryside and did not understand anything. Even though he was silenced, he still came forward. It was no longer hiding.

Nicodemus is mentioned for the third time in the Scriptures when Jesus was perfected on the cross. Then Nicodemus came with the ointment, which was intended to prepare the dead body for burial. He no longer hid; he no longer allowed himself to be discouraged. In this story, I want to remind you of a well-known truth: none of the people is perfect. Unfortunately, neither do I. And everyone can repeat it. We are not perfect, nor should we expect people to be. But as long as we do not lack Nicodemus’ willingness to seek the truth and desire to understand, there is still hope. It can still lead to more extraordinary courage and maturity.

In a conversation with Nicodemus, Jesus said a sentence that sums up the entire Gospel and all of Christianity: “God so loved the world that he gave him only begotten Son so that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.” But we say to ourselves that people could be better. Then what kind of world did God love? A perfect world? In ancient times, people believed that there was an ideal world. It was the cosmos above us. People imagined it as a beauty, a perfectly functioning system. If even down here, in the human sphere, everything does not work, and there is suffering and evil, the superhuman world is incomparably bigger. Our troubled world is a slight aberration but nothing compared to the excellent working cosmos. For us, even the universe no longer functions perfectly like this. We know that there are collisions between cosmic bodies, and we understand that the universe is cooling… This does not contribute to the idea of ​​its perfection. So, what kind of world did God love and love? The imperfect one? Yes. We heard that he did not come to condemn him but to save him. It is precisely for such a world – with its imperfection and especially with human weakness, malice, and suffering – that it is essential: God loves this world.

Sometimes, we need the arguments to prove it. It is a matter of faith. I say this because we – unlike God – usually react to evil in three ways. The first is that evil robs us of strength and leads to resignation. The second way is that we don’t want to see evil. We don’t want to see someone suffering next to us, etc. We have all had such periods in our lives. For example, a young person often does not want to see evil; he wants to see joy and the possibilities of life. The third way is that we blame the environment and people. Something like the belief that “I also have to change something about myself, but those around me should change much more.” None of these reactions are ideal.

Jesus told Nicodemus that God saved this world through the cross on which Jesus will die. The sight of the cross should shake us. A view of the cross of Jesus and the crosses of people. He should remind us that all is not well. But it should not lead us to resignation. The cross of Jesus reminds us of love – that someone loved us to the extreme. And by doing so, he reminds us of the way that saves the world. It should also give us peace and strength in the turmoil – despite all the preponderance of evil. I will try to say it is an example of the difference between the words “condemnation” and “desire.” In both, it is implied that they see evil; they know about it. But desire – unlike condemnation or anger – has something calmer about it. Wishing for a better world and doing something for it is more creative for real good. Let us trust that God also loves our imperfect world. And he doesn’t want to condemn him; he wants to save him. Let’s add to it as we can.

Posted in sermons | Tagged | Leave a comment

HOLINESS IS A WORK OF THE SPIRIT.

There is a general illusion that holiness is the work of man, that one must have a clear program to achieve perfection and then carry it out gradually with courage and patience, and that this is what it is all about. Unfortunately (or fortunately!), it does not consist of everything… That it takes both courage and patience, that’s for sure. But that holiness would be realizing a life program you set out to achieve, certainly not. For several reasons, we shall now give the two main ones.
1. The task is beyond our power.
To achieve holiness in our strength is impossible. Scripture teaches us that it can be only the fruit of God’s grace. Jesus tells us: “Without me, you can do nothing with me” (Jn 15:5). And St. Paul: “…for to will good is near to me, but to do I do not do good” (Rom 7:18). The saints themselves witness this. Grignion of Montfort, for example, is known to the saint’s holiness, which is God’s plan for our lives; puts it this way: “Oh, how admirable work: dust turned into light, dung into purity, sin into holiness, creation into Creator, and man into God! Oh, marvelous work! I repeat, however, that work in itself is difficult and by the very nature of its nature impossible. Only God, through abundant and extraordinary grace, can complete the work. The creation of the whole universe is not equal to this work.” Try as we may; we cannot change ourselves. Only God can remove our shortcomings and limitations in love; only he can make a deep enough impact on our hearts. We will save ourselves many unnecessary struggles and frustrations when we realize this. We are not to become saints in our strength; 2 but we must find how God can make us so. This requires excellent humility (we must give up the presumptuous pride of wanting to do it ourselves and accept our wretchedness), but at the same time, it is very encouraging.
Indeed, our strength is limited, but God’s power and love are not. We are guaranteed means of getting His power and love to come to the rescue of our weakness. All we have to do is acknowledge it calmly and place our trust and hope in only the Lord. It is simple in principle, but as with all simple things, it takes years to understand and, more importantly, to put it into practice. The secret of holiness lies, in a sense, in the knowledge that we can receive everything from God, provided we know how to do it. It is the secret of the way of St. Teresa’s spiritual childhood: God has a father’s heart, and we can indeed receive from him all that we need if we can take him by the heart.3 I believe we can receive everything from God, St. Teresa from St. John of the Cross, who was almost her only teacher. He wrote in his Spiritual Hymn: “The power and steadfastness of love is great, for it conquers and fetters God Himself. Happy the soul that loves because it holds captive God, who yields to its desires. God is such’ that if we approach him with love and from the right side, he will do for us what we want” (Spiritual Song B, stanza 32,1).
This bold phrase is about the power our love and trust have over God’s heart and contains a beautiful and profound truth. St. John of the Cross himself expresses it in other words in another place: “A firm hope strikes and overcomes the heart of God.” Further, “God values so much the hope of the soul that continually takes refuge in him and relies on him alone, that it may justly be said that the soul attains all in what it hopes for” (Maxima 119).
Holiness is not a life program but something that is acquired from God. There are even reliable means for it. The whole art consists of understanding, that is… We all have the power to become holy simply because God allows us to be overwhelmed by our trust in him. What we will say next is to lead us to the right path.

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

I did not come to abolish them, but to fulfill | Mt 5, 17.

Although we can still fall, our sins do not have to separate us from God: we can accept forgiveness and be reconciled to him. If we strive to keep God’s commandments, we can call upon the Holy Spirit to pour His power upon us. This is the kingdom that Jesus ushered us into, and we are blessed to be invited to enter it. What does life mean for us to live according to the Word on the Mount? It means not only that we should not commit adultery but also that when we lose the battle with lustful thoughts, we can repent and receive forgiveness and strength from the Lord.

Many Jewish religious leaders believed that Jesus was rejecting the Law of Moses. They accused him of healing on the Sabbath and not following the prescribed hand-washing rituals. However, in the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus speaks about the true meaning of the law. It is not just an outward compliance but an inward transformation of the heart. And Jesus showed this not only with his teaching but also with his way of life. But Jesus did much more. He fulfilled God’s plan for our salvation through his death and resurrection. He freed us from sin and death and strengthened us with His grace to overcome temptation.

Not only are we not to murder, but in the struggle with anger and hateful thoughts, we can ask the Lord for mercy and help. Not only are we not to take revenge on those who have wronged us, but we can forgive and bless them with God’s grace. Jesus wants us to live as God intended when He gave His people the law. As you strive to live by this law of love, remember that Jesus has already prepared the way for you. He gave you the Holy Spirit so that you could go through the letter of the law to its essence – and thus change your heart. You can repent, accept forgiveness, and start over when you fail. You can do all this thanks to Jesus’ loving sacrifice. So praise the Lord today for everything he has done for you!

I did not come to abolish them, but to fulfill | Mt 5, 17.

Many Jewish religious leaders believed that Jesus was rejecting the Law of Moses. They accused him of healing on the Sabbath and not following the prescribed hand-washing rituals. However, in the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus speaks about the true meaning of the law. It is not just an outward compliance but an inward transformation of the heart. And Jesus showed this not only with his teaching but also with his way of life. But Jesus did much more. He fulfilled God’s plan for our salvation through his death and resurrection. He freed us from sin and death and strengthened us with His grace to overcome temptation.

Although we can still fall, our sins do not have to separate us from God: we can accept forgiveness and be reconciled to him. If we strive to keep God’s commandments, we can call upon the Holy Spirit to pour His power upon us. This is the kingdom that Jesus ushered us into, and we are blessed to be invited to enter it. What does life mean for us to live according to the Word on the Mount? It means not only that we should not commit adultery but also that when we lose the battle with lustful thoughts, we can repent and receive forgiveness and strength from the Lord.

Not only are we not to murder, but in the struggle with anger and hateful thoughts, we can ask the Lord for mercy and help. Not only are we not to take revenge on those who have wronged us, but we can forgive and bless them with God’s grace. Jesus wants us to live as God intended when He gave His people the law. As you strive to live by this law of love, remember that Jesus has already prepared the way for you. He gave you the Holy Spirit so that you could go through the letter of the law to its essence – and thus change your heart. You can repent, accept forgiveness, and start over when you fail. You can do all this thanks to Jesus’ loving sacrifice. So praise the Lord today for everything he has done for you!

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

Conscience: An echo of God’s voice or a set of personal feelings?

“That person is characterized by honesty and conscientiousness.” “He behaved correctly and according to his conscience.” Society still values ​​courageous and conscientious people. Many people believe that doing good does not pay, and it is more profitable to behave according to the unwritten “laws of wolves.” But in no society, no one gets a medal for betraying the motherland or deceiving a group of people. 

Conscience: An echo of God's voice or a set of personal feelings?

But what is conscience and where did it come from?

Some believe that conscience is more biological in origin. It is said to be an instinct that has developed through evolution and serves to preserve the human species. It is more beneficial for people to behave altruistically. But if we reduce conscience only to instinct, then we have to ask what happens in the case of a conflict between these instincts. 

In this context, the example of a drowning person is often cited. One instinct tells me not to take any chances and the other to go and save a person in need. So there must be some objective rule that can judge the dilemma of conflicting instincts. 

Conscience does not only have some biological function. However, many people deny the existence of conscience, trivialize it, and consider it a religious creation that is supposed to oppress people psychologically and keep them in the “fetters of religion.” For example, Friedrich Nietzsche once described conscience as a “terrible disease.” 

Some may say about someone that the presence of conscience is absent. Robert O. Hare, an important expert on the issue of psychopathy, writes in his book Without a Conscience that “psychopaths are social predators who completely lack a conscience and the ability to empathize with others. They selfishly take what they want and violate social norms without the slightest sense of guilt or remorse.” 

On the other hand, Joe Heschmeyer disagrees with the idea that, for example, psychopaths completely lack a conscience. Rather, they lack remorse for their actions, empathy and remorse. 

Is conscience just an internal feeling?

A very common misunderstanding in the case of conscience is when we perceive conscience only as a set of feelings. Many people use the term conscience to represent what they subjectively feel is right and behave accordingly in specific situations. 

However, this idea is wrong and often affects religious people as well. Archbishop Samuel Aquila says “Catholics today have understood conscience as listening to one’s voice, and not listening to the voice of God as revealed in Scripture and Tradition.” This is probably also the answer to the question of why some believers have a problem with certain points (e.g. the issue of contraception) in Catholic moral teaching and live contrary to it.

Therefore, conscience cannot be reduced to just a kind of subjective “inner voice”. John Henry Newman already warned against the temptation of subjectivism and exaggeration of feelings in the 19th century. He pointed out that what seems subjectively good to a person may not be objectively correct and by God’s will. 

No one has his own moral standard. Newman says that “conscience is not even a sentiment, an opinion about a matter, a view, but a law and an authoritative voice that commands to do good and avoid evil.”

Saint Cardinal John Henry Newman, who in the Catholic Church is sometimes titled a “teacher of conscience”, adds: “When it comes to conscience, there are two ways in which people treat it. One is that they regard conscience as a feeling, and the other is that it is an echo of God’s voice. The first way is not the way of faith, the second is.” Newman calls conscience “the law of the mind,” it is “the messenger of God” and “the apostle of Christ.”

English Cardinal John Henry Newman (1801 – 1890) was canonized by the Catholic Church in 2019.

The American philosopher Peter Kreeft writes in connection with conscience that “if our feelings were voices from God, then we would have to be followers of several gods or God would be schizophrenic.”

Of course, feelings can be accompanied by conscience, but we cannot put an equal sign between conscience and feeling. Feelings are often volatile and irrational. Conscience can also bind to something that is far from pleasant feelings (for example, saving a drowning person). 

Conscience as a practical judgment of reason

So what is conscience? Holy Scripture often connects conscience with the innermost thing in a person, with the human heart. In the Book of Proverbs (3:1-3) we read: “My son, do not forget my teaching and let your heart adhere to my commands because they will prolong (your) days and years of life and bring you an abundance of peace.” May love and loyalty (never) leave you! Tie (my commandments) around your throat, write them on the tablet of your heart!’  

The Catechism of the Catholic  Church teaches that “moral conscience is the judgment of the mind by which a person recognizes the moral quality of a specific act that he intends to perform, whether he is currently acting, or has already performed. A man is obliged in all that he says and does to adhere faithfully to what he knows to be just and right. Man perceives and knows the commands of God’s law by the judgment of his conscience.

So we see that even the catechism does not speak of conscience as a personal feeling but as a judgment of reason. Conscience testifies that we did or did not do something, prompts or obliges when we judge that something should or should not be done, and excuses, troubles, and accuses when we judge that something is done well or badly. 

However, it is not quite enough to say that conscience tells us what is true and what is not, and what is good and what is bad. Karl Keating in What Do Catholics Believe? explains that “though conscience informs you that you are doing something bad, or that you are neglecting something good that should be done, it does not happen in a vacuum. First you have to learn what is good and what is bad, and that is work for your mind. If you study well, your conscience will guide you well. If you neglect learning, your conscience will not be very trustworthy.”

Keating further clarifies that “if you learn that stealing is not a sin, and if you really believe it, you won’t feel bad about robbing a bank.”

That is why the formation of conscience in the light of what the Bible teaches, the moral teaching of the Church and Tradition is important. With reason we know what is good and what is bad, we know God’s law revealed in the Scriptures and in the Tradition of the Church.

Conscience is the application of this knowledge to a specific situation, it is a practical judgment that evaluates the morality of a given act. The education of conscience is a lifelong task and is binding not only for Catholics and Christians, but for all people. 

If a person does not form his conscience, it can lead him to make wrong moral judgments. For example, if a person has a warped conscience, he can overlook certain things and mistake evil for good, or consider sin as something normal. 

Deformations of conscience

Today, it is statistically normal to have sex before marriage, and most people do not see it as something evil, quite the opposite. But in the light of the moral teaching of the church, it is not correct. In extreme cases, a person is no longer able to realize his guilt. 

Psychologist Albert Gorres (quoted by Benedict XVI in the book Praise for Conscience ) writes about these people that they are often “monsters who, like other beasts, have no sense of guilt. Perhaps Hitler, Himmler or Stalin completely missed it. Maybe the mafia leaders don’t have it at all, but maybe they hide its remnants well. All people need a sense of guilt.’ 

On the other hand, many people have a scrupulous or scrupulous conscience and can see sin where there is none. A crooked and scrupulous conscience is the result of an often incorrect upbringing of the conscience. Knowledge of the Gospel, church teachings, prayer and questioning of conscience protect against distortions of conscience.

A properly formed conscience also protects against various forms of totalitarianism. Pope Benedict XVI mentions how the Nazi party denied man’s conscience and this led to enormous devastation of man. A sad example of this is the statement of leading Nazi Herman Göring: “I have no conscience. My conscience is Adolf Hitler.’

In his Letter to the Duke of Norfolk, Cardinal Newman writes (apparently somewhat jokingly) that if he were to make a toast to religion, he would first toast to his conscience and then to the Pope. This means that it is not possible to separate the authority of conscience from papal authority. Neither the pope nor any ecclesiastical (and not only ecclesiastical) authority can order something that would go against conscience. So our obedience to them cannot be blind. 

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

We have a responsibility to make sure people know Jesus personally. Not whether they have only heard of him.

God does not give us grace for our prayers or our works. It is his selfless gift of love, says priest Branislav Kozuch about the sixth central truth of the faith. We have a responsibility to make sure people know Jesus personally. Not whether they have only heard of him. Following our series on the Ten Commandments and the Seven Sacraments, we have prepared a series of interviews in which we take a closer look at Catholic teaching summarized in the six cardinal truths. In the previous parts, you could read: 

Archbishop Cyril Vasil on the six cardinal truths. He is obliged to respect it and to bear witness to it.

Joseph Gallovich on the first truth: Man’s relationship to God should be balanced. Neither excessive fear nor belittling

Cyril Shestak on the second truth: God reveals Himself to us as an inseparable relationship of three persons. Stephen Palocko on the third truth: To call some actions sin is nowadays regarded as a sign of disrespect, even hatred

Milan Lach on the fourth truth: Man forgets that God loves him

Paweł Stefan Wojnowski on the fifth truth: Thanks to the soul, we can rise beyond matter to look “into the eyes of God.”

“In our Christian understanding and perception, it is unfortunate that we have fallen into a very wrong business-mindedness. It is against the biblical and correct Christian attitude,” said Branislav Kozuch, a priest of the Spiš diocese, in an interview, explaining further:

“Many people think that if they go on pilgrimage, they will receive something from God in return. When they pray a novena, they receive something else from him. When they pray the rosary, they think God will reward them. God does not give us grace for our prayers, works, or acts of penance. It is his selfless gift of love.”

He also noted that “the apostles needed to announce Christ when they went out into the world. They did not need to change the world and make it Christian. We do the opposite. We do everything according to Christianity and we want everyone to be Christian, but without proclaiming Christ. And this will never succeed.”

The doctrines of grace contain the truths of Revelation as they apply to the supernatural life of man. However, many people need to be made aware of their supernatural life. What essential information should we know about God’s grace in this context?

Many people do not understand the word “grace” alone and do not grasp it. Yes, it connects us to something difficult for worldly people to perceive, namely, the supernatural life. We Christians believe that in addition to body and spirit, we have an immortal soul that makes us different from all other creatures. And grace is a supernatural gift from God that empowers us to live a supernatural life through our souls.

Our supernatural life does not begin until after death. It started at the moment of conception when God gave us a soul. As believers, we confess that human life transcends death; it is immortal. After death, we do not end up in the grave but continue with life. And this is the mystery of the eternal human soul, whose immortality is given precisely by God’s grace.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church, in paragraph 2000, points out that a distinction must be made between sanctifying grace and assisting grace. What is the difference between them?

The helping grace of God is God’s concrete help for any situation. For a particular moment, when we are dealing with something, for example, struggling with temptations, we seek to be faithful to our marriage vows. Such grace is God’s gift of helping us to do some good supernaturally. If we cooperate with this grace, every good deed of ours can become a supernatural deed, for by it, we gain merit for heaven and eternity.

We receive sanctifying grace in baptism. It is a permanent state in which we partake of the life of God. We lose it by sin. Only the baptized have sanctifying grace. Yes, in the strict sense of the word, only baptized people have sanctifying grace. Can we obtain the helping grace of God by our own doing – prayer, merit, as it were, “quid pro quo”? We are called to ask for these gifts – graces from God. The Gospel teaches us that the Father gives before we ask him. Because he knows what we need, our loving Father loves to provide us with gifts. His character is not that of a merchant, a judge, or a policeman we want to please or from whom we wish to bargain things somehow away. Grace is a gift. That means that we can only get it if we earn it.

But by our actions and life, we contribute to the fruit of that grace. The initiative, however, comes from God’s side. It is not because we have promised God something or because we have earned something.

How helpful are prayers, novenas, and rosaries in helping us to ask for God’s graces?

In our Christian understanding and perception, it is unfortunate that we have fallen into a state of business-mindedness that is very wrong. It is against the biblical and proper Christian attitude. Many people think they will get something from God in return if they go on a pilgrimage. When they pray a novena, they get something else from Him. When they pray the rosary, they think God will reward them.

God does not give us grace for our prayers, works, or acts of penance. It is his selfless gift of love. We cannot earn God’s grace in any way, but we are to cooperate with it so that its fruit will be as great as possible. And this is the crucial moment: our cooperation with grace.

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

The lost son.

Mária Delejová - 7.D - Náboženská výchova | Základná škola, Komenského 23,  Bardejov

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

The Lost Son Lk 15,11.32

Since the Father’s love for his son is highly significant, he can forgive him when he shows the will to correct everything he has messed up by his actions. It is precisely the same a million times over in the relationship between God and man, who loves him immensely, which he has already proven countless times. It is a pity that man is blind, deaf, and inattentive to the perfect God, and even in this case, Christ’s statement applies: So even in heaven there will be greater joy over one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine righteous people who do not need repentance ( Luke 15:7).

God is a benevolent Father, which is the main lesson of the parable. We first see how the Father in the parable respects human freedom, even if the son abuses it, and then waits for his return. When he returns, he restores his filial dignity, gives him a ring, the best clothes and shoes, and seems to like him even more. A cold silence or a word that would humiliate and punish the son does not come from the Father. He does not set any time for the test, as the son probably expected when he tells him: Take me as one of your day laborers. That’s how God is to convert sinners! Let’s turn away from sin and return to the Father. The essential element of conversion is God’s goodness, and only then does man’s cooperation consist of recognizing one’s guilt and the willingness to return.

God also wants to use a parable to say that even a Christian must be merciful. He wants a person to understand his merciful action, accept it as his own, rejoice in the conversion of the wandering ones, and be willing to behave in a friendly manner towards them. A person is instead a harsh and ruthless judge of the faults of others, which is pointed out by the second part of the parable. Although the older son was his Father’s devoted and diligent helper, he was more distant from God’s mindset than his prodigal brother. The older son was a person “without a heart”; for him, the younger brother was “paid,” and he was not worth addressing or forgiving (Lk 15:1-2; Mk 2:15-17). The Gospel does not want to influence a person’s free decision and, therefore, leaves the question of whether the older brother obeyed his Father’s warning unanswered. But no one can doubt that the elder son, in the case of stubbornness, was more profligate than the younger. Public opinion can make it very difficult for people who have slipped into guilt or suspicion of guilt to return to society, not to mention released prisoners.

How do I treat people with a sinister past? I say unchristian: Let’s look at him?! He did not want to know about God for years, and now he has come to the cross. When they go to communion, I have nothing to look for in front of the altar! Our presumption can very quickly exclude us from the kingdom of God because if the Spirit says that we are all sinners (Romans 3:23), then we should not presumptuously claim with the elder son that we have never transgressed the Father’s commandments (Luke 15:29). God wants to forgive. Still, we often want to block the flow of God’s love by playing the guardians of morality. We prefer to thunder or condemn sinners, the ungodly, and the evil world rather than do good. For a person to be able to follow the path of God’s order again, he needs, in addition to God’s forgiveness, human understanding, and acceptance into brotherhood. In the “elder brothers” community, a weaker and wounded Christian should know God’s benevolent love, which opens the door to a better future. The words: All that is mine is yours… refer not only to material possessions but also to participation in a benevolent fatherly relationship with others.

God patiently waits for man’s conversion, and at the same time, he does not prevent him from going astray, where he quickly learns what an ungodly life tastes like and what perspectives of hopelessness open up for him. Individuals, but also entire nations, testify to this in history. Returnees from a sinful world are usually more faithful than those who have never seriously left God’s ways. The path of sin is often the path to tremendous gratitude for God’s sonship, and wandering is often the felix culpa – the happy fault of the path to God. However, this fact is not an excuse for sin but a celebration of God’s grace. The presumptuous justification of the older son was primarily the Lord’s warning to Israel, who believed they were guaranteed salvation and thus ignored his message. At the same time, it is also a condemnation of our similar attitudes because none of us has a reason to consider ourselves better than others, to curse the ungodly and the immoral, and to call down God’s punishments on them.

Sin always leads to a dead end, as the younger son must have seen. The only way out of it is conversion, the sacrament of reconciliation with all five parts as we see them in the prodigal son: examination of conscience, remorse and good resolution (Lk 15:17-19), confession and the will to satisfaction (Lk 15:21). We also see in history that abandoning God’s ways and leaning towards power, mammon, and sexuality led to a dead end of wars, selfishness, and the destruction of health. In any place we open the Scriptures, we will encounter joy in every description of the return of prodigal sons and daughters, which Jesus himself testifies to when he talks about the joy that God’s angels have over one sinner who repents (Lk, 15, 10).

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

To bless or not to bless?

Priest Anton Ziolkovsky explained in the introduction what blessing means according to the Catholic Church and who can receive it.

“A blessing is understood as a sacrament, that is, it is the invocation of God’s favor on a person or a situation, and it must be said that anyone can receive it,” Ziolkovsky said, adding that what is required of a person for a blessing is a basic openness to what we call the transcendent, i.e., to God.

A person is always in some moral situation, but this is not completely decisive in whether or not he can receive the blessing, added the parish priest in the subtropical village of Nová Lesná.

Ziolkovsky also pointed out that just as in the case of prayer we say that it should lead to the sacramental life, so “the sacraments should also lead to the sacramental life.”

Many people do not perceive the validity of the controversy surrounding the document Fiducia supplicans, since after each Mass all those present in the church receive a blessing.

“The point and the idea of the blessing is that what is blessed should be by God’s plan and God’s will, and then there is no problem,” responded philosopher and president of the Ladislav Hanus Society, Juraj Šúst.

According to him, the Church is pleased and willing to bless sinners who, however, have the goodwill to purify themselves and direct themselves on the path of the Gospel.

Anton Ziolkovsky noted that the document Fiducia supplicans is specific in that it speaks of the non-liturgical blessing of couples who are in irreligious situations, or same-sex couples.

“With blessings in general, if I go to a rally in the square and I would give a blessing to everybody, of course, the effect of that blessing depends on how internally disposed and open people are to it,” Priest Ziolkovsky said.

The problem with blessing couples of persons with homosexual tendencies, according to Juraj Šúst, is that it is assumed that the relationship of two people is being blessed, but they do not live a pure sexual life, which, according to the Church’s teaching and natural reason, is only possible in a marriage between a man and a woman.

A case of such blessings would not be likened to some corrupt businessman, but rather to a situation where, for example, a cartel would be blessed.

“We probably shouldn’t do that, but, of course, individual sinners have always been blessed and can be blessed by the Church; it presupposes an openness to reform, to repent,” Shust stressed.

Priest Karol Moravcik sees the origin of the uproar over Fiducia supplicans in the Vatican dicastery’s intention, with the Pope’s signature, to bless these couples who, according to the norms of the Church, do not live a regular way of life. “Although some would say that only the Lord God knows,” Moravcik said.

Moravcik, a parish priest in Borinka near Bratislava, pointed out that in the past people married in different ways, for example, by parental agreement or for property. “There was a lot of sin and pain, even in these regular marriages, but culture and society have changed,” he concluded.

“Many people today live in couples and are not married, plus homosexual couples are mentioned more and more often, and a mood has developed in society that pities them and sympathizes with them, tries to understand them – all this has some reflection in the Church as well,” Karol Moravcik continued, adding that he does not consider the blessing of couples to be a complete novelty.

He pointed out that in Cardinal Victor Fernández’s response to the so-called dubia of the five cardinals of last September, signed by Pope Francis, “everything was said in a nutshell that is in the Fiducia, that is, that the Church has a clear understanding of marriage, that we should avoid holding rituals that would imitate the celebration of marriage where marriage is not the issue, but it is written that we must not lose pastoral charity in our relationship with people.”

Karol Moravcik emphasized the sentence that “the defense of objective truth is not to be the only expression of this pastoral love, because it is also to consist of charity, patience, understanding, kindness, and encouragement; we cannot be judges who only deny, reject and exclude…”

“When someone asks for a blessing, he is expressing a request for help from God, a request to be able to live a better life of trust in the Father,” he added.

For such people to come and ask for a blessing at all, presupposes some relationships, friendships, helpfulness, and understanding, Fr. Moravcik thought.

As an example, he cited the situation when in such a context, for example, a priest is invited to visit, something is celebrated, children and grandchildren are introduced to him, and among them, there are those who, despite their life situation, have remained in some type of relationship with the Church and ask for a blessing. “These are not some brash, eyeless people who would brag about their sins and ask for approval. I’ve never experienced that in my long life,” Moravcik said.

According to Anton Ziolkovsky, the question is not whether we agree or disagree with the blessing of irreligious couples, because we must understand the nature of the document Fiducia supplicans, which is, from a purely formal point of view, a document of the ordinary magisterium.

“It is a manifestation of the teaching office which is binding – not infallible, but binding. This means that in this sense there must be a normal respect for the document,” Ziolkovsky said.

He went on to say that the statements of the popes or the offices of the Roman Curia seem to be in a process of “verification,” or in theological terminology, reception. “This means that the life of the Church subsequently verifies whether or not what has been produced is accepted within the Church,” the former secretary of the CCC added.

According to Ziolkovsky, there is no need to create panic or hysteria from this document, although it is a solution that “is new for us, we must respect that it is a decision of the dicastery with the approval of the Pope, so it has a certain gravity, and it makes us think whether the arguments that are used are relevant or not, and then, of course, the future will show to what extent it is right,” he said.

Priest Ziolkovsky sees in Pope Francis a long-standing effort to give signals of openness and welcome to all people on the ecclesial community’s peripheries. “In my opinion, he is not concerned with anything other than simple expressions of humanity and acceptance,” Ziolkovsky mused.

Although we can, in his opinion, argue about whether the instruments the Pope chooses are appropriate or not, we have to admit that we have reserves in this area. “We owe these people a lot – in the human sense and the question of acceptance,” he added.

Ziolkovsky sees as a second, subsequent motive that this document is meant to be a kind of barrier that the Pope has erected to the Church in Germany. “The Church there is much more progressive in this, mentally they have been elsewhere for a long time, but this document has set a boundary for them that we can still imagine this and this again we can’t,” he added.

Blessing as approval?
Juraj Šúst agrees that it is necessary to maintain respect and reverence and to have the will to accept the magisterium, even if it is sometimes difficult, according to him, “but at the same time this quality must be complemented, as it were, by an effort of honest reasoning and justification”.

“It seems to me that if we compare the document of the dicastery of 2021 – that is the so-called note or response, which answers ‘no’ to the question of whether it is possible to bless couples of persons with homosexual inclinations – with this declaration of Fiducia supplicants, we must see a certain tension, even contradiction,” Šúst said.

According to him, the contradiction lies in the fact that when blessing same-sex couples, it is almost impossible to avoid the impression that by blessing them we are endorsing this lifestyle.

“The document explicitly says that this is not the purpose of the blessing, that it does not change the teaching on marriage, but the symbols have their language regardless of the intentions we have when we offer those symbols,” Juraj Šúst recounted, giving an example:

“If I gave a red rose to a colleague with whom I had, say, spent some interesting conversations over coffee before, I might have the intention that it was just a thank you for good cooperation, but in our culture, this symbol has certain romantic connotations,” he said.

Similarly, he said, it’s true of blessing, which involves calling something good to the object of the blessing itself. “But if it’s a relationship that’s unestablished, then there’s confusion. And that is why there is so much resistance in the church to this latest document,” he said.

Juraj Šúst went on to talk about how it is good pastorally to show that we accept people who are not living in a sacramental marriage, that we take the time to go and talk to them, or that we work with them on many good projects. “But part of that approach has to be that we don’t abandon the truth of how we are to live,” he opined.

“If in a situation like that we were to say to those people, but it’s okay that you’re not married, but otherwise you’re good people, you’re against corruption, you pay your taxes, in some ways that would not be a demonstration of pastoral love from my point of view, but perhaps even in some ways a certain indifference, because in this way we can reassure people that times have changed and that along with the secularization of culture and society, the Church must also necessarily secularize,” said the president of the Ladislav Hanus Community.

Karol Moravcik responded that the Church is learning and that when under the previous Prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Cardinal Ladaria, they rejected blessings, they meant ritual blessings, i.e. quasi-gay marriages. “Now there is a differentiation of blessings, it is not a contradiction, there is a shift,” said the priest of the Archdiocese of Bratislava.

Discussants also commented on whether the talk is about blessing individuals or couples in the sense of the couple as such. In other words, in this context, whether there are two blessings or one blessing and how they perceive the pastoral guidelines of the Slovak Bishops’ Conference.

“It is clear from the position of the KBS that when two persons who form a couple come and ask for a blessing, the meaning of the blessing is to be explained to them; if they do not accept the explanation, the blessing is to be refused,” said Anton Ziolkovsky, saying that in the case of a blessing, a sign of blessing is to be made over the individuals. “It is not the couple as a whole that is blessed, but the individuals,” he concluded.

“I would not worry about such theorizing, rather about the fact that it is not so common for people to come and ask for blessings in these situations,” responded Karol Moravcik to a question.

He went on to talk about his experience when people who seemed to be completely on the periphery of the Church, after years, stood on their feet and began to live according to the Church’s norms as well. However, according to him, this will not happen if an atmosphere of acceptance is not created for these people if they do not feel that something important is happening in the Church.

Priest Ziolkovsky admitted that the Fiducia Supplicans document, by the terminology it adopts and how it explains it, “comes across as relatively vague.”

“It has to be said that even the non-liturgical blessing of couples looks de facto like a simulation of the blessing that happens at the celebration of marriage, this is the root of the whole problem, which is why all the consternation has arisen,” he noted.

“I even think that this document is in a sense a prefiguration of Francis’ pontificate,” he said, adding that he doesn’t know if we have any similar document, apart from Humanae Vitae from the 1960s, that has been so massively disapproved internally by the Church.

Ziolkovsky pointed out that Cardinal Fernández had issued an interpretative note as early as January and, amid much opposition, had to interpret the document and narrow the rules. Then Africa stepped in when the President of the African Bishops’ Conferences declared that they would not accept the Fiducia Supplicans and, together with Cardinal Fernández, drew up a letter that meant that Africa would not apply it at all.

According to Ziolkovsky, the mistake may have been that the document did not go through an internal comment process. “Because if they had asked the bishops’ conferences beforehand what they thought about it, it might have turned out very differently. Or if they had applied the principle of synodality, which is now in circulation, but this thing seems to have gone its way, and you can see that a lot of people were left in a quandary about it,” he concluded.

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment

Third Sunday of Lent, Year B John 2,13-25

You all know the old saying: “The mouth speaks out of the heart.” Indeed, each of us reveals what his insides are filled with – his heart – with his gestures, spoken words, or actions. And so the heart can be a sanctuary from which the actual value of words, thoughts, and deeds radiates. But it can also be a market source of anger, dislike, and disorder about oneself and one’s neighbor. Dear brothers and sisters! So what should our heart be, the inside? The Lord Jesus shows us this in today’s Gospel when he very clearly and emphatically reprimands the salesmen for their actions: “Do not make my Father’s house a marketplace” (Jn 2:16)!

Jesus enters the temple. The temple is supposed to be a meeting place between God and man. Jesus first cleaned the temple and threw out the unclean idols; he remained and taught in their place. Those who listen to him become living stones of the new temple. Jesus was not only interested in making order in the temple. It was a prophetic act by which Jesus manifested himself as the Messiah, who took over the temple according to the prophecies. This practical external cleansing also requires internal cleansing. Jesus cleaned the temple and gave it a whole new meaning. It should not serve sacrifices but prayer, not external ceremonies, but a personal relationship with God. For us, the temple is Jesus himself. Faith in him makes us the temple of his Spirit, the abode of the Father and the Son. The New Testament people of God discover the need for a temple, a sacred place because there is a shrine. He requires a place that helps him listen to God’s word, concentrate on prayer, and establish and nourish the connection with the Lord through the sacraments. For all the people of the New Testament, the temple is Christ himself. The holiness of the temple depends on the holiness of the God who dwells in it. So, for all of us, the temple is Christ himself.

Lent is a challenge for us to clean the temple of our soul. Only after purification can our soul be a worthy temple of God. Even for the new temple, the danger remains that it will turn into a den of Lothians. Even in this case, it does not depend on the temple, but on how we enter it and what fills our hearts. Let’s try it through the nearest St., notice the mass, and spotless inside. Let’s follow where our memories or plans fly to “catch” what moves our feelings. Whether we listen to God here or negotiate and buy with him, watch how human considerations affect us.
We are fearless in answering. Ask ourselves why we came here first, what we want to be thankful for, and what to ask for. It is essential to clarify and sort it out in our soul sometimes or let Jesus come in to clean it up for us. We are in the temple where the living Jesus Christ is present. Are we also willing to prepare our hearts so that the living Jesus is present in them? Let us cleanse our temple in the Sacrament of Reconciliation. Let’s gather strength so that when we leave, the temple of our soul is not threatened. Let’s take God’s word for ourselves and talk about it with others. Do we also understand these words of Jesus: “Do not make my Father’s house a marketplace”? It is where the most beautiful and sincere conversations with God take place with us who love him. The sanctuary is the house of God, the place of our actual encounters with God. Let’s protect those places. Let’s be grateful to him for that. Let’s keep them clean. We live in the belief that this place is truly a link between heaven and earth.
Pollution reigns in our souls when we carry heavy sin. Who among us would be happy with such a state of affairs? When we realize the misery of such a state, do we not desire to purify ourselves? The soul is purified by repentance. We will make this inner return through perfect repentance and the determination to confess the regretted sin in holy confession. After such an inner return, our soul is perfectly purified and becomes a worthy temple of God. This joy, that we are in the arms of the Heavenly Father, that there is a warm personal relationship with God in our soul, surpasses all worldly joys and all the pleasures of sinful life. It is the greatest happiness of human life.

The belief that the Christian soul is the temple of the Holy Spirit was self-evident to the first Christians. After all, St. Paul emphasizes to the Corinthians: “And do you not know that you are the temple of God and that the Holy Spirit dwells in you?”

The Alexandrian Christian Leonidas, when he learned that he was denounced for Christianity and that he would be judged, the night before his imprisonment, goes to the cell of his beloved child Origin and kisses the sleeping child on the breast because there, in his soul, resides the Holy Spirit. In his thoughts, he begged for the light of true faith and persistence in it for his son. And Leonidas did not beg in vain. His son became the greatest theologian of the Eastern Church.

The Holy Spirit caused it because only He gives the light of higher knowledge; a person enlightened by him lives a whole life in God, and without him, the spiritual life cannot be led at all. What the soul is to the human body, what the eternal light in Christian temples is, the Holy Spirit is to us and to our body, which St. the Apostle called the temple of the Holy Spirit.

Lord, you said: “Do not make my father’s house a marketplace” (John 2:16)! You address these words to each of us: “Do not make your interior a home of disorder, sin, blasphemy. Disrupt us with your Holy Spirit so we never feel comfortable in sin. So that we are never left with a broken relationship towards you and our neighbor for a long time and carelessly, help us to understand that we will achieve true peace of heart when we are a living tabernacle. We want to be the bearers of your love, peace, and joy. Lord, with your help, let us remain beautiful on the inside for as long as possible.

 

Posted in Nezaradené | Leave a comment