-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Lula Sparks on IS THERE A GOD?
- XRumerTest on St. Athanasius
- Mario Williams on IS THERE A GOD?
- Ella White on IS THERE A GOD?
- JamesScier on St. Athanasius
Archives
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
22 Sunday in ordinary Time ,Year B Luke 4,16-30
Criticism – an expression of love. We all dislike criticism, as it often targets areas we think we’re handling well or consider off-limits to others.. After all, who is comfortable when someone tells them: you are a bad husband, you are a bad mother, you raise your children badly, you are lazy, you are dishonest and various other criticisms. Criticism of religious life is also a sensitive area. Even then, we usually get upset when someone has reservations about the style of our religious life. Jesus Christ shows us that criticism is sometimes necessary. In the Gospels, he is typically presented to us as a critic of the religious life of some Jewish elite groups, especially the Pharisees and scribes.
A central point of tension between Jesus and his opponents was the fundamental nature of religion. The Pharisees and scribes saw the essence in the observance of external religious regulations. Evangelist Mark reminds us of some of them today. They are regulations regarding ritual purity. Washing hands up to the wrist. Swimming. Washing cups, jugs, basins, and beds. They saw in this a connection with the tradition of their ancestors and the most appropriate expression of their relationship with God. That is why they boast to Jesus about the apostles that they do not do the same and despise the old traditions, ceremonies, regulations, and customs. Jesus’ idea of what is important in religion is different. He does not consider the preservation of the tradition of the fathers to be the main thing, but the preservation of God’s commands. And it especially emphasizes the quality of the human heart. All things are good. Only man can be evil and impure. The heart decides what is pure and what is impure. As the heart is, so is the whole person, his life and the whole world. Everything around us is colored by the color of our heart. Everything that happens in the world was born in the heart of man. Man and the world are the image of the human heart.
Jesus doesn’t reject Jewish regulations and traditions, but rather subordinates them to a greater priority: a transformed heart.. What does Jesus’ criticism of the Pharisees and scribes tell us at this moment? Does it concern us too, or is it just an old problem of Jesus and the Jews? Is our religion a religion of the heart, or just the outward manifestations that we too have inherited? In the history of the Church, we see the human effort to enrich individual religious acts. What Jesus gave in a simple way and expression, man tried to enrich with his abilities. Jesus laid the foundation and man strives to build on it. We know, for example, that the essence of the Last Supper and today’s Holy Mass is the same. But if the ceremony of the Last Supper was very simple, the Church has enriched this ceremony in the course of history. Churches began to be built, mass prayers and songs were created. Each era has created such a liturgy to suit the conditions of the environment and time. And that concerns the administration of all the sacraments.
Or Jesus didn’t tell us what body position we should have when praying. People figured out that it’s good for a person to kneel, or stand, or sit on their heels, or have their arms folded or crossed. Jesus did not tell us how, for example, he imagines Marian devotion. Church, people, saints, created Marian prayers, litanies, rosary, statues, chapels and pilgrimages. We have inherited all this and many other things, and we are also enriching them. But we certainly have to ask: what is the relationship of Jesus to this magnificent work that man and the Church have created throughout history and will continue to create in order to enrich their religious life? It is certainly sympathetic to Jesus. After all, everything that helps a better religion, Jesus also blesses. However, even at this moment he is saying to us: It is nice what you have done, but show me your heart.
Jesus is interested in how the sacraments, prayers, pilgrimages and other religious manifestations helped us to improve our heart. If he sees in our heart evil thoughts, fornication, theft, adultery, greed, sensuality, unchastity, envy, slander, pride and stupidity, so do we. he must say: “This people honors me with their lips, but their heart is far from me. You forsake the commandments of God and hold to the traditions of men.” Although we do not like criticism, yet in one case we accept it more easily. It is when we feel that he who criticizes us also likes us. Jesus likes us and he cares about the quality of our religious life. If we are touched by his criticism, let us humbly accept it and obey his advice.
Posted in sermons
Leave a comment
The Parable of the Ten Girls.
The kingdom of heaven can be likened to ten virgins who went out to meet the bridegroom. Five were foolish, while five were wise. This parable reflects our earthly journey towards the kingdom of God. On this path, we are called to behave wisely, not unwisely. All ten virgins represent Christians who know their destination and possess the grace of baptism and a Christian lifestyle. However, they differ in their ability to sustain this lifestyle, symbolized by the length of time their lamps remain lit. Let’s remember our responsibility to behave wisely on this journey.
Some Christians’ light fades quickly, while others maintain it for extended periods. Wise Christians shine throughout their lives because they continually try to cooperate with God’s grace and multiply it within themselves. They nurture the strength and courage to serve as a good Christian witness, persevering in doing good and enduring evil.
According to the Gospel, being wise means consciously and persistently focusing one’s life on Jesus Christ. When the bridegroom didn’t come, all the virgins fell asleep due to natural fatigue. Falling asleep with a clear conscience is different from succumbing to sleep unprepared. Belief requires using the strength and values we have acquired in times of “light” to navigate life’s “darkness.”
The wise virgins refused to share their oil, seeming “unchristian.” However, specific values that require sacrifice, prayer, or sacraments unique to each person cannot be shared. When the virgins went to buy more oil, they missed their opportunity as the door closed.
Seizing the present moment is essential to our spiritual growth. A future-oriented mindset should motivate us to make the most of the present, while reflecting on experiences should inform and enhance our current reality. May we be inspired to live our Christian lives to the fullest, utilizing the graces available in each moment.
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment
Herod and John the Baptist.
The king was saddened, but for the sake of the oath and for the sake of his fellow-constables, he did not want to disappoint her. Immediately, he sent an executioner and ordered John’s head to be brought. He went away, beheaded him in prison, brought his head on a platter, gave it to the girl, and the girl gave it to her mother” (Mk 6:17-29).
John did not accuse Herod of rejecting his first wife or of being polygamous, as these were situations permitted in the Bible, but of taking his brother’s wife, which is condemned in the Book of Leviticus (Lev. 18:16). Herodias was the daughter of Aristobulus, the brother/half-brother of Philip and Herod Antipas. Thus, the tetrarch has a concubine as his wife who is also his sister-in-law and niece: he could not have done worse. The very ambitious woman then brings about the ruin of Herod Antipas, and together with him, Caligula kills her.
According to Josephus Flavius, the death of the Baptist had a political motive; Herod feared that the popularity the Baptist had among the people would cause a revolt that would threaten his position. The evangelist wants to make a point about the Baptist’s actions: it is not a moralistic condemnation, but a connection between power and religion that keeps people in subjection. It is unlikely that the daughter of Herodias, the princess, would dance in public. Prostitute dancers were called in for these occasions. This expresses a humiliating flattery of power. In a story where everyone has a name, only the daughter is nameless. We know from Josephus Flavius that her name is “Salome,” but the Gospels are silent on this because she is a representative figure. She is a characterless figure, without personality, she has no will of her own and has to ask her mother what she wants. Through the anonymity of the daughter, the Evangelist presents us with the situation of a people who are ready to prostitute themselves just to remain attached to the representatives of power. The author of the text thus recalls the theme of prostitution of the people of God through the dance, a typical role of prostitutes.
From a certain point on, the plot of the story shifts to a representational plane. Proper names disappear: the daughter will remain nameless, Herod will be ‘king’, Herodias ‘mother’. The evangelist brings a figurative sense to the story. The title “king” makes Herod the enemy of God, the true king of Israel. Herod is presented as the bearer of a power that, in order to maintain itself, feeds on death and violence. Between his own prestige and the life of an innocent, he chooses the former. A foreign king who is not of David’s line represents an illegitimate power that is contrary to God’s promises. In order to retain power, Herodias allies himself with an illegitimate king at the expense of the people. He thus represents a Jewish ruling class that is unfaithful to God. The Jewish aristocracy is more ruthless than the ruling political power, has less reverence for God, and does not hesitate to prostitute the people it cares about just so it can take advantage of them. The nameless daughter without personality and will represents the people, subjugated and manipulated by the ruling class. The image of the daughter represents a people whose efforts are aimed at supporting the powerful, even at the cost of renouncing their own dignity.
At the feast, the only course, the only food, is the decapitated head of John the Baptist; a ghostly menu. Power serves as a dish, on a “platter,” to the girl and her mother, the head of a dead man. In the world of the dead, they feed on corpses. The condemnation of the illegitimate union of Herod and Herodias serves as a backdrop that shows the unfaithfulness to God on the part of the Jewish leaders; John condemned not only Herod’s personal immorality, but also the connection between the Jewish leaders and Roman power. The death of the Baptist was the result of the incitement of Jewish, It has nothing to offer. The only instrument it wielded was political power. The connection between political power and religious power does not allow the people to have an intimate relationship with God, but manipulated by this connection, the people prostitute themselves. This is the charge that cost the Baptist his life, and the same fate would befall Jesus.
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment
The Passion of Saint John the Baptist, Mr 6,17-29
Each of us likes news that informs in detail about some event. Therefore, perhaps someone can blame the evangelists for not providing any details in the case of the actual execution of Saint John the Baptist. But this reproach is misplaced, for they could not record it, being absent. Nevertheless, the martyrdom of St. John the Baptist is a source of instruction for us that is worthy of following.
With Holy Baptism we became God’s children. If we follow the doctrine that our Savior brought us, we will meet the opposition of the world in which sin reigns. Jesus Christ says: “If they persecuted me, they will also persecute you” (Jn 15, 20). Sin is afraid of the truth, because it exposes it, tears off its mask. For a sinner who finds himself in the vicinity of a pious Christian, there are only two options: either he acknowledges his sin and repents, or he hardens his heart and begins to persecute this witness of the truth. You will surely agree with me that we often experience the second alternative. How should we behave in such moments? First of all, we must be sure that we are innocent. Because we often consider as wrong even what we have earned by our actions or by using the wrong words. If the offense was caused by our sin, let us accept the painful consequences as repentance. But if we are innocent, let’s not resist! Let us be guided by the words of Jesus Christ: “Love “Love your enemies, do good, lend, and expect nothing in return! Your reward will be great, and you will be sons of the Most High, for He is good to the ungrateful and the wicked” (Lk 6:35). Such an attitude towards wrongdoing testifies to the truth and promotes personal growth. In the biography of St. John Vianney, the parish priest of Ars, there is a story about an unmarried woman who gave birth to a child, with the father’s identity unknown. Living near the vicarage, she became the subject of malicious rumors that the parish priest was the father. John Vianney, knowing the truth, chose not to defend himself against this unjust slander, trusting fully in God’s justice. The rumors persisted for years. However, during a mission in Ars, the true father finally confessed to the priest, admitting his long-held shame over the impact on the priest’s honor. Afterward, he publicly acknowledged the truth, putting an end to the false accusations against Saint John Vianney. Through this ordeal, the priest achieved greater perfection and earned many merits in heaven.
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment
Works of St.Augustinus.
1. Autobiographical works:
Confessions, Tract revisions.
2. Philosophical works (Dialogues):
Against Academics, On a Happy Life, On Order, , Conversations with the Soul, Immortality of the Soul, Greatness of the Soul, Free Decision, Music, Master
3. Apologetic Works:
State of God, True Religion, Utility of Faith, Faith and Symbol, Faith in Invisible Things.
4. Dogmatic works:
The Trinity, Eighty-three different points of contention, Various problems for Simplician, Eight points of contention of Dulcitius, Manual of Faith Hope and Love, Magical Power of Demons, Faith and Works.
5. Moral – pastoral works:
Rule, Dignity of marriage, Dignity of widowhood, Holy virginity, Chastity, Marriage and lust, Lying, Against lying, Work of monks, Care of the dead, Christian struggle, Catechesis for beginners, Patience, Coexistence of adulterers.
6. Exegetical works (see also tracts, all of an exegetical nature):
Christian Doctrine, Questions on the Hexateuch, Commentary on the Letter to the Galatians, Genesis against the Manichaeans, Questions on the Gospels, Questions on the Letter to the Romans, Beginning of the Commentary on the Letter to the Romans, Notes on the Book of Job, 17 questions about the Gospel of St. Matthew, The Unfinished Book of Genesis, Genesis according to the letter, The Unity of the Evangelists, The Lord’s Speech on the Mount, Eight Questions to the Old Testament, The Mirror of Moral Commandments from St. Fonts.
7. Polemical works:
The essence of goodness, Controversy with Fortunato, Customs of the Catholic Church and customs of the Manichaeans, Spirit and letter, Nature and grace, Christ’s grace and original sin, The soul and its origin, Grace and free distribution, The gift of perseverance, Correction and grace, The Predestination of the Saints, Polemic with Julian.
8. Tracts:
Commentary on the Gospel of John, Commentary on the letter of St. John, Commentary on the Psalms, Homilies (around 400).
9. Letters:
We have preserved more than 300 letters.
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment
St.Monica.
Mother’s upbringing and example
What is hidden behind the word mother?
The man says that she is his life guide, the one who takes care of his household children, cleans laundry, helps him raise children, and the like.
The children will say: She is the one who gave me life, who takes care of me both spiritually and materially, who loves me more than herself, and so on.
Society will say that the mother is the legal representative of the child and the first person close to the child.
The Church says about the mother that she is the one who gives not only physical life but also spiritual life. He takes care of both earthly and eternal education.
Today, on the feast of St. Monica, the mother of St. Augustine, we read about a widowed mother from the town of Naim whose only Son, who was already dead, was resurrected by Jesus.
What the Naima woman felt when she accompanied her dead Son, only a mother who has already experienced this pain from the death of a child knows best. When Jesus met her, his heart trembled and moved with compassion, and he said: “Don’t cry!” (Lk 7:13). This event is described by the evangelist Luke, who is the only one to explain things, and it is assumed that he got them from the Virgin Mary. Mary also knew pain as she stood under the cross at the death of her Son.
Don’t cry! These words are relevant many times, even today, not in the physical death of the mothers’ sons, but even more so in the mental death. Who will count the number of tears of mothers when their sons are physically healthy, but their souls are not healthy?! When sin made their soul’s dead souls. The mother sees her Son healthy, and his soul is dead for eternity. The mother who brought him into the world and wants him to be with her in eternity when she sees how her Son rejects eternal life is the most unhappy Catholic mother. This pain is much greater than the pain of a mother’s Son dying physically. She knows that he died reconciled to God and has hope of meeting him with God. But what about the death of the soul? We had the holiday of St. Ludovic. His mother, Saint Blanca, often told him: – I would rather see you physically dead than with one grave sin. – How sad it is to meet mothers indifferent to their sons’ souls. How painful it is when a mother still advises her child to sin when she encourages him to sin, when she defends his sin, and so on.
This does not match Saint Monica’s behavior. Someone will say that he knows everything about her:
-
How she endured wrongs from her mother-in-law.
-
She also talks about how she helped her husband find peace of mind.
-
How she prayed for her Son Augustín for sixteen years.
It’s a shame they know it but don’t follow her example. They would know what a wonderful feeling it is to wait for death. She died in Ostia, near Rome, far from her native Carthage. However, she died in the arms of her Son, no longer an errant Manichean, but the Son of a priest and a bishop.
Today’s world needs new Monicas. We need women, mothers, and brides who look not only with the eyes of the body at the people around them but also with the eyes of faith. It is beautiful when a woman, mother, and daughter-in-law knows how to take her place in the house, family, and society. It is valuable when such a woman knows how to defend her place even before the community of believers – the Church, especially before her conscience and God. St. Monica today teaches modern women an old but still modern Christian principle: Let us live so that none of us will be separated on the last day. Today, it is appropriate for women, mothers, and brides to pray to St. Monica for the virtues and graces with which she excelled. Today, sons, husbands, and parents-in-law should pray for their mothers, wives, and daughters-in-law that God bless them with the virtues that Saint Monica abounded in. And then today’s holiday will fulfill its role.
Saint Monica, mother, wife, and daughter-in-law, pray for us!
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment
The Victory of Virtue.
Traditional moralists, who believe in the wisdom of nothingness, appear to their opponents as dull, monotonous, stern, and cursing damners. Well, believe them, they are not. They are rebels because it remains in the age of relativism orthodoxy as the only possible form of rebellion; these rebels also sing during the fight. They constantly keep hope in themselves until the end, even when they condemn our civilization. All the prophetsoffer hope. The patient has not died yet.
Patient, Western Civilization, maybe really soon he will die, perhaps a little later, but once for sure, because everything human is mortal. However, it is not necessary that she died immediately. On the slippery slope, along which they plunge into the abyss, “someone” has carved handles, which, if we catch it in time, we can still go back. As long as our single will is not just some kind of illusion, we are free to return, regret, turn around, and turn back the hands of the clock, which shows the wrong time. Unless we are victims of ourselves and our tools, like Dr. Frankenstein, as long as we are not slaves to time and masters of moralizing, we can still go back. No one with a flaming sword will close the way to paradise, which has long been settled. The history of the Israeli nation, our ancient history of the archetype, are interwoven with countless examples of the nation’s repentance and its return to God’s favor despite many, almost irreversible failures.
And God, like the loving father of the prodigal son, constantly waiting for our return. For this reason, we traditional and old-fashioned seafarers can smile because we are rebels and we have hope. However, relativists have no reason to smile. In his work The Fall, Camus briefly summarized: “Sometimes I think about what future historians will say about us. A simple sentence will suffice: they were fornicators, and they read newspapers.” We traditionalists “do not read The Times; we read eternity”, as Thoreau advises. And it is in her that we read the most wonderful news for us: God decided that we will make his bride.
A prevailing opinion is slowly disappearing: that traditional Virtue is uninteresting. It’s the opposite but the truth. Virtue will prevail. Virtue conquers the world.
What God planned, we will not change, and therefore will never change human nature. A person will starve from ordinary food repeatedly, and the stones will never be replaced with bread. It is the same with food for our spirit. A skeptic has the same digestion as a believer, only he does a different diet. He is not consciously looking for the right food to feed him, and he may find her only by chance. It can, for example, despise Mother Teresa’s faith, but he can no longer despise her when he once met her in person. These people do not know what Virtue is. They think it is something like a dried plum: old, wrinkled, and disgusting. By doing so, they essentially contrast Virtue and happiness however, it contradicts the comparisons of the oldest and the wisest philosophers and the discovery of the great moralists Plato and Aristo of the body and, last but not least, the content of Scripture.
They do not see Virtue’s winning campaign. However, the defenders of the virtues, who let themselves go, also made mistakes in part involve in a false dispute of concepts between Virtue and happiness, between Virtue and joy, Virtue and vigor; and who, somewhere along the way, lost the key to the victory of Virtue – to the pursuit of Virtue.
Medieval people knew how to be passionate about Virtue.
Today, however, it only seems bizarre, eccentric, and idiosyncratic. In the sixteenth century, Spencer could still portray Virtue as a beautiful lady. However, in Milton’s time, in the seventeenth century, divine virtues already appear cold, unpleasant, and unsympathetic, while vices, which were offered by the devil, enjoy more and more popularity and interest. Nietzsche generalized this contrast to the contrast between “Apollonian” cold reasoning, reason and truth and “Dionysian” explosiveness, passion, evil – and attraction. Well, Hannah Arendt he is right when he writes about the “emptiness of evil” (in the work Eichmann in Jerusalem), and members of the literary discussion group at Oxford University (among others, Lewis, Tolkien and Williams) point out that goodness is much more burdensome than evil, although others write otherwise. Liberals have a hard time getting fired up for Virtue because they have always tended to identify with general things like social justice, which is correct, but very distant. Conservatives rather identify with loyalty to a smaller whole – family, neighbors, and marriage, in short, to what we feel an irrational passion for. For ages, we have been created equally for emotional passion and reasonableness. And since liberalism gives us no room for zeal in virtues, only in vices, and conservatism shows zeal for Virtue, it is clear. If the world became what it was twenty years ago, when heroic virtues fascinated it, we can say he won.
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment
St.Bartholomew Apostle.
Patron: farmers, tailors, shepherds, vintners, tanners, bookbinders, butchers, miners, bakers, shoemakers, dealers in oil, cheese, and salt; Maastricht, Frankfurt and Pilsen; invoked against skin and nervous diseases
Attributes: head, baptism, skin, knife
CURRICULUM VITAE
He was born in Cana of Galilee and identified by Jesus as a true and guileless Israelite. He became an apostle and, after the sending of the Holy Spirit, preached the gospel in several places. The last was Armenia, where he was flayed and executed.
A TRUE ISRAEL IN WHICH IS NO DECEPTION
He came from Cana and was a friend of Philip, who brought him to Christ. The apostle John gives him the name Nathanael. Bar-Tolmai is a surname that translates as “son of Tolmai,” while Natanael means “God gave.”
Bartholomew and Philip lived in anticipation of the coming of the Messiah, therefore, after meeting Jesus, Philip looked for Bartholomew and said to him: “We have found the one about whom Moses in the Law and the prophets wrote, Jesus, the son of Joseph of Nazareth.” Nathanael objected to him: “From Nazareth? What good can come from there?” Filip answers him: “Come and see for yourself!” Jesus saw Nathanael coming to him and said of him: “Behold, a true Israelite in whom there is no guile.” Nathanael said to him: “How do you know me?” Jesus answered him, “Before Philip called you, I saw you under the fig tree.” (John 1:45-48)
At those words, Bartholomew recognized Jesus as the Son of God and the King of Israel, to which he also immediately confessed. Jesus confirmed his faith with the promise of more excellent proofs than the fact that he saw him under the fig tree.
Bartholomew became one of the twelve apostles, a witness and follower of Christ. After sending the Holy Spirit, he preached the gospel in several places. Historian Eusebius mentions his activities in India. Experts argue that this could mean Ethiopia and Arabia, often mentioned in connection with his gospel preaching. Indeed, India was referred to as “Happy Arabia.” According to tradition, he left an Aramaic copy of the Gospel of Matthew there.
St. Johannes Chrysostomus proves that ap. Bartholomew preached about Christ with great success on his apostolic journeys, and the heathen were astonished at the rapid change in the manners of those who believed. Purity, temperance, and other virtues are emphasized.
Somewhere it is stated that Bartholomew passed from Arabia to Phrygia, where he met ap. Philip and further visited Lycaonia. The oldest biographies agree on the place of his martyrdom, which became Armenia.
The legend tells of the miracle of Bartholomew’s prayer, which recovered the daughter of the Armenian king Polymers from possession. Bartholomew’s words convinced the king, his court, and his subjects to accept Christianity. However, the king’s obstinate brother Astyages had this apostle imprisoned and tortured, allegedly in Derbent, later Shirvan, on the shores of the Caspian Sea.
The skin was flayed from his body while he was alive, so the knife is his main attribute. Somewhere, there is talk of flying, and then he is said to have been crucified. His beheading is also mentioned somewhere, but cutting off the head of the crucified was not a custom.
His remains were transferred to Dura in Mesopotamia and then to Phrygia in Asia Minor in the 5th century. At the end of the next century, they were transported to the island of Lipari near Sicily and, in 809, to Benevento in southern Italy. In the end, they were the German emperor Otto III. They were transferred to Rome, where he had a church dedicated to St., built for them in 983 on the Tiber island. Bartholomew.
There was also some doubt whether the relics handed over to the emperor in Benevento were all genuine. Allegedly, the honest Bartholomew’s skull appeared in the 13th century. in Frankfurt am Main. Under Emperor Charles IV, the cathedral in Prague also acquired part of his remains.
RESOLUTION, PRAYER
Bartholomew’s confession followed a conversation in which he recognized that Jesus had loved him long before that. I can experience the same knowledge during inner prayer, ending with a confession like Bartholomew. However, I will also try so that Jesus can be satisfied with my life, which should be a testimony to others.
God, strengthen our faith so that we may be sincerely devoted to Your Son like St. Bartholomew, and through the intercession of this apostle, grant that Your Church may become a sign and instrument of salvation for all nations. Through Your Son Jesus Christ, our Lord, for He lives and reigns with You in the unity of the Holy Spirit forever and eve.
Posted in Nezaradené
Leave a comment
