A stage in which our ancestor was aware of himself but not of God.
A stage in which our ancestor was aware of himself but not of God.
As we mentioned earlier, there were many ancestors of man, but only a few lineages passed through God’s sieve and continued to evolve. This was happening in East Africa, Europe, and Asia simultaneously because the Dryopithecov could successfully migrate. In the geological period, the ancestors of the hominoids reached a stage when their spirit was awakening. They could pierce the veil of routine action, according to the instinct inherent in the animal kingdom, and move into a sphere of action that indicates a thought process. Animals, apes, and great apes act according to the God-given program encoded in the DNA of the cell nucleus and transmitted from offspring to offspring. The main goal of action is to feed oneself and to establish new offspring. If we observe animals’ kind coexistence and help each other, it is always about helping each other acquire the necessities of life. Animals will not invent anything by themselves unless you teach them. Otherwise, their life would change rapidly. Thinking fosters creativity, and creativity is the mother of change. Only God and man can actively change things. The change in the minds of the Dryopithecus was divinely initiated. One day, our ancestor saw scattered pieces of wood and thought he could store them somewhere to serve him later. No animal can do that on its own. Marxists claimed that this ability separated man from nature, and based on these qualities, the animal became man. Wrong.
There is something more than work that separates man from nature. This stage of evolution has its special period and place in the line of ancestors, and it is impossible to speak of their representatives as men. The creative divine purpose only continues. The actual birth of man took place mainly in Southern Africa. Professor Raymond Dart discovered a skull in a limestone quarry in Southern Africa, just over 10 centimeters in size. He concluded that the skull did not belong to any ape or chimpanzee, leaving only the possibility of an ancestor of man. The dentition in the skull was milky, suggesting that it was a dead juvenile. Professor Dart described the find, saying it was a member of the evolutionary line of man and called it Australopithecus Africans, which was indeed a descendant of the genus Dryopithecus.
Visitors counter: 71
This entry was posted in
Nezaradené. Bookmark the
permalink.