Australopithecus.

He was indeed a descendant of Dryopithecus and belongs to the evolutionary line of man. He weighed about 50 kilograms. Likewise, he could move equally well on trees and the ground. Furthermore, he ate mainly plant food, and perhaps larvae and eggs of animals or forest honey appeared on the menu.
But even Australopithecus was not destined for human perfection. They deviated from the main evolutionary line sometime at the beginning of the Levant period in the upper Pliocene and formed their blind evolutionary line. God’s sieve about 2.8 million years ago, a genus that walked on. Many signs distinguish Australopithecus from apes, but it is not so essential. However, it is enough for scientific materialism. Why was walking on two goods when it is significantly disadvantageous? Why hunt with the help of a club when agile muscles, strength of limbs, and powerful teeth are better? Can you imagine a bear brandishing a club to get something to eat? What chances would it have of survival? Australopithecus did not survive. Apes did.

I ask why nature, according to Marxists, so perfect and admirable, suddenly does something against itself. It creates an animal that will eventually perish. The second question concerns the mechanism of evolution. Nothing in nature prefers unigenesis – the independent development of a single genus, but polygenesis – several related genera simultaneously. This applies to the entire universe. A star does not arise alone but in a stellar association. If nature did not prefer polygenesis to unigenesis, we would have a sea of ​​​​individuals worldwide—for example, a cat and nothing more. Or a wolf, but its relatives, dogs, jackals, and skunks, would not be. Why did nature suddenly change its mind and support the development of someone who has no equal? Perhaps it occurred to Darwin himself that many other creatures better adapted to survival in nature than the human ancestor had become extinct during the Quaternary period. The machairodus (saber-toothed tiger), with its 50 cm long fangs, did not survive, but a slow creature walking on two legs, brandishing a club, did. It was as if someone was holding a protective hand over it. Yes, that’s true.